Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Taming Vision-Language Models for Medical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.18378 v1 pith:4XOWRDXH submitted 2025-06-23 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords medicalvlmsanalysisimagetaskschallengesclinicalcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) exhibit unprecedented capabilities in cross-modal semantic understanding between visual and textual modalities. Given the intrinsic need for multi-modal integration in clinical applications, VLMs have emerged as a promising solution for a wide range of medical image analysis tasks. However, adapting general-purpose VLMs to medical domain poses numerous challenges, such as large domain gaps, complicated pathological variations, and diversity and uniqueness of different tasks. The central purpose of this review is to systematically summarize recent advances in adapting VLMs for medical image analysis, analyzing current challenges, and recommending promising yet urgent directions for further investigations. We begin by introducing core learning strategies for medical VLMs, including pretraining, fine-tuning, and prompt learning. We then categorize five major VLM adaptation strategies for medical image analysis. These strategies are further analyzed across eleven medical imaging tasks to illustrate their current practical implementations. Furthermore, we analyze key challenges that impede the effective adaptation of VLMs to clinical applications and discuss potential directions for future research. We also provide an open-access repository of related literature to facilitate further research, available at https://github.com/haonenglin/Awesome-VLM-for-MIA. It is anticipated that this article can help researchers who are interested in harnessing VLMs in medical image analysis tasks have a better understanding on their capabilities and limitations, as well as current technical barriers, to promote their innovative, robust, and safe application in clinical practice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Multimodal Large Language Models Understand OCT?

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OCT-Bench, a 20-task benchmark across 10,076 questions, shows current MLLMs score up to 62% overall but only 43% on clinical reasoning over OCT images.

  2. 6 Fingers, 1 Kidney: Natural Adversarial Medical Images Reveal Critical Weaknesses of Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 22 vision-language models, accuracy on simple medical perception questions dropped from ~74% on typical anatomy to ~29% on rare anatomical variants, with errors aligning to textbook priors.

Pith tools