Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Large Language Models as Evolutionary Optimizers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19046 v3 pith:4ZSZ5KGL submitted 2023-10-29 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords evolutionarylmeacombinatorialsolutionsllm-drivenoptimizationoptimizersproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have achieved remarkable success in tackling complex combinatorial optimization problems. However, EAs often demand carefully-designed operators with the aid of domain expertise to achieve satisfactory performance. In this work, we present the first study on large language models (LLMs) as evolutionary combinatorial optimizers. The main advantage is that it requires minimal domain knowledge and human efforts, as well as no additional training of the model. This approach is referred to as LLM-driven EA (LMEA). Specifically, in each generation of the evolutionary search, LMEA instructs the LLM to select parent solutions from current population, and perform crossover and mutation to generate offspring solutions. Then, LMEA evaluates these new solutions and include them into the population for the next generation. LMEA is equipped with a self-adaptation mechanism that controls the temperature of the LLM. This enables it to balance between exploration and exploitation and prevents the search from getting stuck in local optima. We investigate the power of LMEA on the classical traveling salesman problems (TSPs) widely used in combinatorial optimization research. Notably, the results show that LMEA performs competitively to traditional heuristics in finding high-quality solutions on TSP instances with up to 20 nodes. Additionally, we also study the effectiveness of LLM-driven crossover/mutation and the self-adaptation mechanism in evolutionary search. In summary, our results reveal the great potentials of LLMs as evolutionary optimizers for solving combinatorial problems. We hope our research shall inspire future explorations on LLM-driven EAs for complex optimization challenges.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ACCORD: Autoregressive Constraint-satisfying Generation for COmbinatorial Optimization with Routing and Dynamic attention

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ACCORD rewrites combinatorial optimization solutions as step-by-step state updates that keep constraints visible, and this representation raises solution feasibility and lowers optimality gap versus list-of-list and p...

  2. REMoH: A Reflective Evolution of Multi-objective Heuristics approach via Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    REMoH evolves LLM-written heuristics with NSGA-II and a reflection mechanism, reporting competitive FJSSP results that are weakened by test-set selection.

  3. LLM-Based Instance-Driven Heuristic Bias In the Context of a Biased Random Key Genetic Algorithm

    cs.NE 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-generated, per-instance bias vector improves a BRKGA on the NP-hard Longest Run Subsequence problem, with statistically significant gains on 15 of 35 instance groups, concentrated on complex instances.

  4. On the Convergence of Large Language Model Optimizer for Black-Box Network Management

    cs.IT 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims a first convergence proof for LLM-based black-box optimizers, but the key lemma is proven by assertion rather than derivation.

Pith tools