Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluation of Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Field Extrapolation Using PSP Solar Wind Observation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12124 v1 pith:526VH35D submitted 2023-05-20 astro-ph.SR physics.space-ph

classification astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords fieldmagneticextrapolationinterplanetarymathrmmethodobservationsimilar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Using solar wind observation near PSP perihelions as constraints, we have investigated the parameters in various PFSS model methods. It's found that the interplanetary magnetic field extrapolation with source surface height $R_\mathrm{SS} = 2\,Rs$ is better than that with $R_\mathrm{SS} = 2.5\,Rs$. HMI and GONG magnetograms show similar performance in the simulation of magnetic field variation, but the former appears to have a slight advantage in reconstruction of intensity while the latter is more adaptable to sparser grids. The finite-difference method of constructing eigenvalue problem for potential field can achieve similar accuracy as analytic method and greatly improve the computational efficiency. MHD modeling performs relatively less well in magnetic field prediction, but it is able to provide rich information about solar-terrestrial space.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AutoRAG-LoRA: Hallucination-Triggered Knowledge Retuning via Lightweight Adapters

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    AutoRAG-LoRA reports a 46.6% relative reduction in classifier-flagged hallucinations on TruthfulQA, but the evaluation uses the same classifier that triggers the corrective training.

Pith tools