REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Robust Federated Learning via Logits Calibration on Non-IID Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed management framework based on collaborative model training of distributed devices in edge networks. However, recent studies have shown that FL is vulnerable to adversarial examples (AEs), leading to a significant drop in its performance. Meanwhile, the non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) challenge of data distribution between edge devices can further degrade the performance of models. Consequently, both AEs and non-IID pose challenges to deploying robust learning models at the edge. In this work, we adopt the adversarial training (AT) framework to improve the robustness of FL models against adversarial example (AE) attacks, which can be termed as federated adversarial training (FAT). Moreover, we address the non-IID challenge by implementing a simple yet effective logits calibration strategy under the FAT framework, which can enhance the robustness of models when subjected to adversarial attacks. Specifically, we employ a direct strategy to adjust the logits output by assigning higher weights to classes with small samples during training. This approach effectively tackles the class imbalance in the training data, with the goal of mitigating biases between local and global models. Experimental results on three dataset benchmarks, MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10 show that our strategy achieves competitive results in natural and robust accuracy compared to several baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Non-IID data in Federated Learning: A Survey with Taxonomy, Metrics, Methods, Frameworks and Future Directions
A comprehensive survey that organizes non-IID data in federated learning into taxonomies of skew types, partition protocols, and metrics, with a meta-analysis of 235 selected papers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.