REVIEW 2 cited by
BTS: Bridging Text and Sound Modalities for Metadata-Aided Respiratory Sound Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Respiratory sound classification (RSC) is challenging due to varied acoustic signatures, primarily influenced by patient demographics and recording environments. To address this issue, we introduce a text-audio multimodal model that utilizes metadata of respiratory sounds, which provides useful complementary information for RSC. Specifically, we fine-tune a pretrained text-audio multimodal model using free-text descriptions derived from the sound samples' metadata which includes the gender and age of patients, type of recording devices, and recording location on the patient's body. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ICBHI dataset, surpassing the previous best result by a notable margin of 1.17%. This result validates the effectiveness of leveraging metadata and respiratory sound samples in enhancing RSC performance. Additionally, we investigate the model performance in the case where metadata is partially unavailable, which may occur in real-world clinical setting.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Disentangling Dual-Encoder Masked Autoencoder for Respiratory Sound Classification
A dual-encoder masked autoencoder with time-shuffle Siamese and vCLUB mutual-information losses reaches an ICBHI average score of 61.50 and the highest sensitivity among compared respiratory sound classifiers.
-
Lungmix: A Mixup-Based Strategy for Generalization in Respiratory Sound Classification
Lungmix, a mixup variant with loudness masks and semantic OR label interpolation, improves some cross-dataset respiratory sound classification scores by up to 3.55 points.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.