Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a tetrahedron gluing sum over continuous conformal weights reproduces Virasoro TQFT amplitudes after a modular Fourier transform, once the triangulation is 'large'.

desk verdict The continuous-spectrum Turaev-Viro construction is new and the two examples check out, but the general proof of (1.1) rests on an unverified distributional regularization that the paper does not close. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11652 v1 pith:54BHPRFB submitted 2025-07-15 hep-th

Thomas Hartman This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 57R5681T4083C45 PACS 04.60.Kz11.25.Hf
keywords ConformalTuraev-VirotheoryVirasoroTQFTtriangulated3-manifoldsCardydensityofstateschain-mailinvariantmodularS-matrixAdS3quantumgravity6j-symbol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces Conformal Turaev-Viro (CTV) theory, a triangulation-based dual of Virasoro TQFT in which tetrahedron edges carry continuous conformal weights and the gluing measure is the Cardy density of states. Its central claim is that the CTV partition function equals the modular S-transform of the squared Virasoro TQFT amplitude, $Z_{\rm CTV}(M_E,\Gamma(P')) = \int dP\,(\prod_i S_{P'_iP_i})\,|Z_{\rm Vir}(M_E,\Gamma(P))|^2$. The identity is checked in two examples and derived in general through a Virasoro adaptation of the chain-mail invariant. If correct, it turns squared Virasoro conformal-block amplitudes into a geometry-friendly state sum, and through the companion gravity interpretation it provides a triangulation route to exact AdS$_3$ quantum-gravity path integrals on fixed topology. The main caveat is a conjecture: the CTV sum is finite and triangulation-independent only for a restricted class of 'large' triangulations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the CTV state sum (2.3), a tetrahedron gluing sum with continuous edge weights and Cardy-density measure, together with its conjectured domain of 'large triangulations' characterized by $H_2(M_E - V_{\rm int})=0$. The load-bearing identity is (1.1), the modular Fourier relation between CTV and $|Z_{\rm Vir}|^2$; the Virasoro modular S-matrix $S_{P'P}=2\sqrt{2}\cos(4\pi P'P)$ is the Fourier kernel. The proof machinery is the Virasoro chain-mail invariant: starting from a graph $\Gamma(P)$, one attaches $\Omega$-loops (weights integrated with the Cardy density), deletes the outer perimeter loop, and evaluates the result as a Virasoro TQFT amplitude. Handleslide and vertex-join identities let the same diagram produce the CTV partition function on one side and the S-transform of $|Z_{\rm Vir}|^2$ on the other, after a shadow-formalism evaluation that removes relative phases.

What would settle it

Compute the CTV partition function (2.3) for the tetrahedron graph using a large triangulation with an interior edge and compare with the squared Virasoro $6j$-symbol: if the Cardy-measure integral diverges, or if two large triangulations connected by a 2-3 Pachner move give different values, identity (1.1) fails. A direct numerical test of (1.5) at a generic weight sextuple would settle the central example.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper defines the CTV partition function $Z_{\rm CTV}(M_E,\Gamma(P))$ by triangulating a closed 3-manifold $(M_E,\Gamma)$ with tetrahedra, assigning a Virasoro $6j$-symbol to each tetrahedron, labeling external edges by fixed conformal weights $P\in\mathbb{R}_+^n$, and integrating internal edge weights against the Cardy density $\rho_0(P)=4\sqrt{2}\sinh(2\pi bP)\sinh(2\pi b^{-1}P)$. Its central discovery is equation (1.1): $Z_{\rm CTV}(M_E,\Gamma(P')) = \int_{\mathbb{R}_+^n} dP\,\bigl(\prod_{i=1}^n S_{P'_iP_i}\bigr)\,|Z_{\rm Vir}(M_E,\Gamma(P))|^2$, where $S_{P'P}=2\sqrt{2}\cos(4\pi P'P)$ is the Virasoro modular S-matrix. This is a continuum analogue of the discrete Turaev–Viro relation and is established by evaluating a Virasoro chain-mail invariant in two ways: once as the CTV triangulation sum and once as the S-transform of the squared Virasoro amplitude. Two explicit checks are given: the squared Virasoro $6j$-symbol is self-dual under the S-transform, and the squared modular S-matrix for the knotted handcuff graph transforms into a $6j$-symbol.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction depends on the unproven claim that the state-sum integral over internal edge weights is finite and independent of the chosen triangulation (for the 'large' triangulations the paper allows); the paper verifies this only in examples.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CTV provides a triangulation-based definition of Virasoro TQFT observables: any squared Virasoro amplitude can be reconstructed from a tetrahedron state sum by a modular Fourier transform.
  • The squared Virasoro $6j$-symbol is self-dual under the S-transform, and the squared modular S-matrix transforms into a $6j$-symbol, giving new identities for Virasoro crossing kernels.
  • The Virasoro chain-mail invariant equals the CTV partition function, so the chain-mail link is a practical diagrammatic tool for evaluating these state sums.
  • The restriction to large triangulations means CTV captures macroscopic triangulations sliced along geodesics but not arbitrary fine-graining, a structural difference from discrete spin-network gravity.
  • Together with the companion paper, CTV is the exact gravitational path integral on a fixed-topology compact region of AdS$_3$ with fixed dihedral angles, giving a topological foundation for exact gravity path integrals by triangulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the Fourier duality should extend to graphs with vertices of degree greater than three by integrating some weights with the Cardy measure, producing the relativistic invariants obtained from $|Z_{\rm Vir}|^2$; the paper mentions this generalization but does not prove it.
  • Editorial inference: the 'large triangulation' condition is likely the state-sum avatar of the restricted Hilbert spaces of Virasoro and Teichmüller TQFT; a concrete check would be whether a regulated version of 1-4 Pachner moves preserves (1.1).
  • Editorial inference: in the gravity dictionary, the S-transform converts fixed-length to fixed-angle boundary conditions, so a single-tetrahedron CTV amplitude should reproduce a Regge-type action for a tetrahedron in AdS$_3$; this semiclassical check is not carried out in the paper.
  • Editorial inference: the chain-mail equality gives an efficient way to compute Fourier transforms of squared Virasoro crossing kernels, which may be useful in statistical models with Virasoro symmetry beyond the gravity application.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper defines Conformal Turaev-Viro (CTV) theory, a state-sum over triangulations of a closed 3-manifold with an embedded trivalent graph, with continuous edge labels and the Cardy density of states. The central claim is Eq. (1.1): the CTV partition function equals the modular S-transform of the squared Virasoro TQFT amplitude, |Z_Vir|^2. After reviewing the diagrammatic rules of Virasoro TQFT, the paper derives a Virasoro adaptation of Roberts' chain-mail invariant and uses it to argue for (1.1). Two nontrivial examples are worked out in closed form: the squared 6j-symbol (Section 4.1, Eq. (4.8)) and the squared modular S-matrix (Section 4.2, Eq. (4.21)). The paper explicitly states that well-definedness rests on a conjecture about 'large triangulations' (Section 2) and that several delta-function identities are meaningful only as distributions integrated against Virasoro characters (Section 3.2). The connection to AdS3 gravity is deferred to a separate paper [13].

Significance. If Eq. (1.1) holds, it gives a triangulation-based dual formulation of Virasoro TQFT, with a clear interpretation as a fixed-length to fixed-angle transform in AdS3 gravity. The two explicit identities (4.8) and (4.21) are nontrivial and are checked by direct evaluation, and the paper contains no free parameters or circularity: Z_CTV is defined independently of Z_Vir, and the main relation is derived rather than assumed. At the same time, the central definition is conditional on an unproved conjecture, and the general derivation relies on unverified distributional manipulations and on an asserted rather than demonstrated adaptation of the discrete chain-mail proof. The paper is therefore best read as a well-motivated conjecture with strong supporting evidence, not as a proof of (1.1) in full generality.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 7.1, Eq. (7.9)] The general derivation of Eq. (7.9) applies the replacement rules (7.4)-(7.5) and then uses identities such as (3.15), (3.19), (3.30)-(3.34) on integrands that are products of 6j-symbols and phases multiplied by the Cardy density, e.g., (7.10)-(7.12). In Section 3.2, however, these identities are introduced with the explicit caveat that they are meaningful only when integrated against Virasoro characters (see the discussion after (3.15)-(3.19)). The paper provides no estimate of the large-P growth of the 6j products or phases appearing in Section 7, and no argument that the contour rotations implicit in (3.16) are valid for such products. The two explicit examples in Section 4 are special cases where the integrals can be evaluated in closed form, but they do not establish the general analytic continuation. Consequently, the central identity (1.1) is currently justified only modulo an unverified distributional regularization.
  2. [Section 2, Conjecture (around Eq. (2.3))] The CTV partition function (2.3) is defined only under the conjecture that, for large triangulations and graphs finite in Virasoro TQFT, the integrals converge and the result is triangulation-independent. This conjecture is load-bearing: all applications and the derivation of (1.1) assume that the state sum is well defined. The paper gives two examples and invariance under 2-3 Pachner moves, but it does not prove that the condition H_2(M_E - V_int)=0 suffices, nor does it characterize the allowed class of manifolds and graphs beyond examples. The main identity should be stated with this conditionality made explicit, or the conjecture should be proven in a useful class of cases.
  3. [Sections 5.3 and 5.4] The equality between the chain-mail invariant and the CTV partition function, Eq. (5.11), and the triangulation independence of the chain-mail invariant rest on the assertion that the proofs of [20, 22] 'carry over verbatim to the Virasoro case' (Section 5.3, after Eq. (5.7)). This is not a trivial carry-over, since the discrete proofs rely on finite quantum dimensions and on graphs that are disallowed in Virasoro TQFT; the paper notes this issue at the start of Section 5.1 but does not show the general adaptation. Section 7.2 likewise states that extension to general embedding manifolds is 'straightforward' but leaves the characterization of admissible (M_E, Gamma) to future work. These points should be either proved or clearly delimited as assumptions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.2] The text uses 'marked Heegard splitting' and 'marked Heegard diagram'; the standard spelling is 'Heegaard'.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.31)] In Eq. (3.31), the numerator '1' denotes the identity representation, but it is easily misread as the number one; a short explanatory note or a different notation would improve clarity.
  3. [Throughout] Section headings such as 'F ourier transforms' and the title line 'Conformal T uraev-Viro Theory' contain spurious spaces, apparently from LaTeX line breaking; these should be fixed in the final version.
  4. [Section 6, around Eq. (6.8)] The statement that 'it is straightforward to check' the shadow evaluation reproduces bS_{P1 P2}[P3] could benefit from a few more intermediate steps, given that this check is one of the main consistency examples for the shadow formalism.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the CTV state sum and the VTQFT amplitude-squared are independently defined, and the S-transform relation is derived via chain-mail and external identities rather than assumed or fitted.

full rationale

The central identity (1.1) is derived, not assumed. The CTV partition function is defined independently in (2.3) as a triangulation state sum over Virasoro 6j-symbols weighted by the Cardy density, while the VTQFT amplitudes |Z_Vir|^2 are defined by the separate diagrammatic rules of Section 3.1. The paper then proves their relation in two independent ways: by direct example calculations (Sections 4.1 and 4.2, where the CTV sums (4.12) and (4.24) are matched to explicit S-transforms of (6j)^2 and |S|^2) and by the general chain-mail argument (Sections 5-7), which shows Z_CTV = Z_Vir(chain-mail) and then that the S-transform of the chain-mail invariant is |Z_Vir|^2. No parameter is fitted and no side of (1.1) is defined in terms of the other. The proof invokes external results such as the Post-Tsiares formula [36] and the shadow formalism [41], and the approach follows the discrete spin-network literature [20,22]; these are independent supports, not self-citations. The only self-references, [13] and [16], are forward pointers to companion papers on gravity applications and do not enter the derivation of (1.1). The paper explicitly flags as conjectural the well-definedness of (2.3) for large triangulations and the distributional interpretation of the S-matrix identities in Section 3.2, but these are mathematical gaps or regularization assumptions, not circular reductions of the claimed result to its own inputs. The finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The paper postulates the large-triangulation conjecture and relies on the Virasoro TQFT framework and standard crossing-kernel identities from prior literature.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Virasoro TQFT diagrammatic rules (Section 3.1) are consistent and correctly compute Z_Vir.
    The paper takes VTQFT from [4,5] as given, without proof, and uses its graphical calculus throughout.
  • domain assumption The Virasoro crossing kernels satisfy orthogonality, the pentagon identity, and the (ST)^3 relations (Appendix A).
    These identities from [36,47] underpin the chain-mail and shadow derivations.
  • domain assumption Delta-function identities such as (3.15)-(3.19) are well-defined as distributions against Virasoro characters.
    The paper states that expressions are interpreted as distributions, a regularization needed for the unbounded spectrum.
  • ad hoc to paper The CTV partition function is finite and triangulation-independent on large triangulations.
    This is the paper's Conjecture in Section 2, not proven; it is introduced specifically to make the state sum well-defined.
  • ad hoc to paper Roberts' chain-mail proof carries over verbatim to the Virasoro case.
    Asserted in Section 5.3 without a complete re-derivation for the continuous spectrum.
  • domain assumption The shadow formalism rules apply to Virasoro TQFT with the stated modifications.
    Section 6 extends Turaev's shadow theory to the continuous-spectrum case; the derivation is cited to [41].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/54BHPRFB

@misc{pith2026250711652,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/54BHPRFB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11652}
}
abstract

We define and study Conformal Turaev-Viro (CTV) theory, a dual formulation of Virasoro TQFT based on triangulating 3-manifolds with tetrahedra. Edges of the triangulation are labeled by continuous conformal weights, and tetrahedra are glued together weighted by the Cardy density of states. We demonstrate that the CTV partition function is equal to the modular S-transform of the Virasoro TQFT amplitude-squared, $|Z_{Vir}|^2$. This is analogous to a known result for discrete spin networks. The derivation uses a variant of the chain-mail formalism, adapted to the Virasoro context. As a CFT application, we derive formulae for the S-transforms of the squared Virasoro crossing kernels. These results lay the topological foundation to study the exact path integral of pure AdS$_3$ quantum gravity by triangulations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Virasoro Crossing Kernels at Rational Central Charge

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    At rational central charge, the Virasoro crossing kernels decompose into two admissible square-root-branched kernels; the physical c≤1 kernels are derived for the first time.

  2. Symmetry TFTs for Continuous Spacetime Symmetries

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Continuous spacetime symmetries can be encoded in a (d+1)-dimensional BF/Chern-Simons topological field theory, whose boundary reproduces symmetry generators, symmetry breaking, and anomalies.

  3. A Holographic Map from AdS$_3$ to CFT$_2$

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Semiclassical pure AdS3 gravity states, labelled by fixed-area geodesic networks, are mapped to CFT2 primary states whose wavefunctions are networks of OPE coefficients.

  4. The many facets of a hyperbolic tetrahedron: open and closed triangulations of 3d gravity

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Open Virasoro TQFT equals fixed-length/angle 3d gravity path integrals on compact regions and yields the CTV–scalar Virasoro relation via open-closed duality.

  5. Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS$_3$

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The fixed-angle gravitational path integral in AdS3 equals a Conformal Turaev-Viro partition function, the fixed-length path integral equals a Virasoro TQFT amplitude squared, and the semiclassical geometries are buil...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [13]

    Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS 3

    T. Hartman, “Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS 3”, to appear

    work page

  2. [1]

    A Chern-Simons Action for Three-Dimensional anti-De Sitter Supergravity Theories,

    A. Achucarro and P. K. Townsend, “A Chern-Simons Action for Three-Dimensional anti-De Sitter Supergravity Theories,” Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 89

    work page 1986

  3. [2]

    (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,

    E. Witten, “(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,” Nucl. Phys. B 311 (1988) 46

    work page 1988

  4. [3]

    Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited,

    E. Witten, “Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited,” arXiv:0706.3359 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Solving 3d gravity with Virasoro TQFT,

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, and M. Zhang, “Solving 3d gravity with Virasoro TQFT,” SciPost Phys. 15 no. 4, (2023) 151, arXiv:2304.13650 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    3d gravity from Virasoro TQFT: Holography, wormholes and knots,

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, and M. Zhang, “3d gravity from Virasoro TQFT: Holography, wormholes and knots,” SciPost Phys. 17 no. 5, (2024) 134, arXiv:2401.13900 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    A TQFT from Quantum Teichm¨ uller Theory,

    J. Ellegaard Andersen and R. Kashaev, “A TQFT from Quantum Teichm¨ uller Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 330 (2014) 887–934, arXiv:1109.6295 [math.QA]

    arXiv 2014

  8. [7]

    Conformal Field Theory, 2- D Quantum Gravity and Quantization of Teichmuller Space,

    H. L. Verlinde, “Conformal Field Theory, 2- D Quantum Gravity and Quantization of Teichmuller Space,” Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 652–680

    work page 1990

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Liouville theory revisited,

    J. Teschner, “Liouville theory revisited,” Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) R153–R222, arXiv:hep-th/0104158

    2001 arXiv

  2. [9]

    On the relation between quantum Liouville theory and the quantized Teichmuller spaces,

    J. Teschner, “On the relation between quantum Liouville theory and the quantized Teichmuller spaces,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S2 (2004) 459–477, arXiv:hep-th/0303149

    2004 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Supersymmetric gauge theories, quantization of Mflat, and conformal field theory,

    J. Teschner and G. S. Vartanov, “Supersymmetric gauge theories, quantization of Mflat, and conformal field theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 19 (2015) 1–135, arXiv:1302.3778 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Quantization of moduli spaces of flat connections and Liouville theory,

    J. Teschner, “Quantization of moduli spaces of flat connections and Liouville theory,” in International Congress of Mathematicians . 5, 2014. arXiv:1405.0359 [math-ph]. 34

    2014 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Supersymmetric gauge theories, quantisation of moduli spaces of flat connections, and Liouville theory,

    J. Teschner, “Supersymmetric gauge theories, quantisation of moduli spaces of flat connections, and Liouville theory,” arXiv:1412.7140 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    AdS 3 gravity and random CFT,

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen, “AdS 3 gravity and random CFT,” JHEP 04 (2021) 033, arXiv:2006.08648 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman, and A. Maloney, “Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,” JHEP 12 (2022) 069, arXiv:2203.06511 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Thermal probes of hyperbolic knots,

    T. Hartman, “Thermal probes of hyperbolic knots,” talk at SCGP, June 2, 2025. Paper to appear

    2025

  9. [17]

    Topological invariants of graphs in 3-space,

    Y. Yokota, “Topological invariants of graphs in 3-space,” Topology 35 no. 1, (1996) 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(95)00002-X

    1996 doi

  10. [18]

    Generalized Barrett-Crane vertices and invariants of embedded graphs,

    D. N. Yetter, “Generalized Barrett-Crane vertices and invariants of embedded graphs,” J. Knot Theory Ramifications 8 no. 6, (1999) 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216599000511

    1999 doi

  11. [19]

    The classical evaluation of relativistic spin networks,

    J. W. Barrett, “The classical evaluation of relativistic spin networks,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 no. 3, (1998) 593–600. https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n3.a7

    1998 doi

  12. [20]

    Observables in the Turaev-Viro and Crane-Yetter models,

    J. W. Barrett, J. M. Garcia-Islas, and J. F. Martins, “Observables in the Turaev-Viro and Crane-Yetter models,” J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 093508, arXiv:math/0411281

    2007 arXiv

  13. [21]

    State sum invariants of 3 manifolds and quantum 6j symbols,

    V. G. Turaev and O. Y. Viro, “State sum invariants of 3 manifolds and quantum 6j symbols,” Topology 31 (1992) 865–902

    1992

  14. [22]

    Skein theory and turaev-viro invariants,

    J. Roberts, “Skein theory and turaev-viro invariants,” Topology 34 no. 4, (1995) 771–787

    1995

  15. [23]

    Geometrical measurements in three-dimensional quantum gravity,

    J. W. Barrett, “Geometrical measurements in three-dimensional quantum gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18S2 (2003) 97–113, arXiv:gr-qc/0203018

    2003 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Observables in three-dimensional quantum gravity and topological invariants,

    J. M. Garcia-Islas, “Observables in three-dimensional quantum gravity and topological invariants,” Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 3933–3952, arXiv:gr-qc/0401093

    2004 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A TQFT of Turaev–Viro Type on Shaped Triangulations,

    R. Kashaev, F. Luo, and G. Vartanov, “A TQFT of Turaev–Viro Type on Shaped Triangulations,” Annales Henri Poincare 17 no. 5, (2016) 1109–1143, arXiv:1210.8393 [math.QA]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Quantum 2D Liouville Path-Integral Is a Sum over Geometries in AdS 3 Einstein Gravity,

    L. Chen, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang, and B.-X. Lao, “Quantum 2D Liouville Path-Integral Is a Sum over Geometries in AdS 3 Einstein Gravity,” arXiv:2403.03179 [hep-th]

  19. [27]

    Building up quantum spacetimes with BCFT Legos,

    L.-Y. Hung and Y. Jiang, “Building up quantum spacetimes with BCFT Legos,” arXiv:2404.00877 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    QG from SymQRG: AdS 3/CFT2 Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow,

    N. Bao, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang, and Z. Liu, “QG from SymQRG: AdS 3/CFT2 Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow,” arXiv:2412.12045 [hep-th]. 35

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Universal Structures and Emergent Geometry from Large-c BCFT Ensemble,

    L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang, and B.-X. Lao, “Universal Structures and Emergent Geometry from Large-c BCFT Ensemble,” arXiv:2504.21660 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-c BCFT Ensemble,

    H. Geng, L.-Y. Hung, and Y. Jiang, “It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-c BCFT Ensemble,” arXiv:2505.20385 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Quantization of Chern-Simons Gauge Theory With Complex Gauge Group,

    E. Witten, “Quantization of Chern-Simons Gauge Theory With Complex Gauge Group,” Commun. Math. Phys. 137 (1991) 29–66

    1991

  24. [32]

    Quantization of Teichmueller spaces and the quantum dilogarithm,

    R. M. Kashaev, “Quantization of Teichmueller spaces and the quantum dilogarithm,” Lett. Math. Phys. 43 (1998) 105–115

    1998

  25. [33]

    Quantum Teichmuller space,

    L. Chekhov and V. V. Fock, “Quantum Teichmuller space,” Theor. Math. Phys. 120 (1999) 1245–1259, arXiv:math/9908165

    1999 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Exact Results for Perturbative Chern-Simons Theory with Complex Gauge Group,

    T. Dimofte, S. Gukov, J. Lenells, and D. Zagier, “Exact Results for Perturbative Chern-Simons Theory with Complex Gauge Group,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 3 (2009) 363–443, arXiv:0903.2472 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    A new formulation of the teichm \

    J. E. Andersen and R. Kashaev, “A new formulation of the teichm \” uller tqft,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.4291 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    A non-rational Verlinde formula from Virasoro TQFT,

    B. Post and I. Tsiares, “A non-rational Verlinde formula from Virasoro TQFT,” arXiv:2411.07285 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Multiboundary wormholes and OPE statistics,

    J. de Boer, D. Liska, and B. Post, “Multiboundary wormholes and OPE statistics,” JHEP 10 (2024) 207, arXiv:2405.13111 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    V. G. Turaev, Quantum invariants of knots and three manifolds , vol. 18. 1994

    1994

  31. [39]

    Heegaard splittings of compact 3-manifolds,

    M. Scharlemann, “Heegaard splittings of compact 3-manifolds,” arXiv preprint math/0007144 (2000)

    2000 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Representations of the algebra Uq(sl(2)), q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links,

    A. N. Kirillov and N. Y. Reshetikhin, “Representations of the algebra Uq(sl(2)), q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links,” in Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and groups (Luminy-Marseille, 1988) , vol. 7 of Adv. Ser. Math. Phys. , pp. 285–339. World Sci. Publ., Teane...

    1988

  33. [41]

    L. H. Kauffman and S. L. Lins, Temperley-Lieb recoupling theory and invariants of 3-manifolds, vol. 134 of Annals of Mathematics Studies . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882533

    1994 doi

  34. [42]

    Modifications and cobounding manifolds,

    A. H. Wallace, “Modifications and cobounding manifolds,” Canadian J. Math. 12 (1960) 503–528. https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1960-045-7

    1960 doi

  35. [43]

    A representation of orientable combinatorial 3-manifolds,

    W. B. R. Lickorish, “A representation of orientable combinatorial 3-manifolds,” Ann. of Math. (2) 76 (1962) 531–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/1970373. 36

    1962 doi

  36. [44]

    3d gravity as a random ensemble,

    D. L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg, and G. Wong, “3d gravity as a random ensemble,” JHEP 02 (2025) 208, arXiv:2407.02649 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Clebsch-Gordan and Racah-Wigner coefficients for a continuous series of representations of U(q)(sl(2,R)),

    B. Ponsot and J. Teschner, “Clebsch-Gordan and Racah-Wigner coefficients for a continuous series of representations of U(q)(sl(2,R)),” Commun. Math. Phys. 224 (2001) 613–655, arXiv:math/0007097

    2001 arXiv

  38. [46]

    6j symbols for the modular double, quantum hyperbolic geometry, and supersymmetric gauge theories,

    J. Teschner and G. Vartanov, “6j symbols for the modular double, quantum hyperbolic geometry, and supersymmetric gauge theories,” Lett. Math. Phys. 104 (2014) 527–551, arXiv:1202.4698 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks,

    L. Eberhardt, “Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks,” arXiv:2309.11540 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT2,

    S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield, and I. Tsiares, “Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT2,” JHEP 07 (2020) 074, arXiv:1912.00222 [hep-th]. 37

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.