Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 123 references

Quantum filtering and propagation of chaos for open quantum systems, with applications to quantum feedback control and quantum mean-field games

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The rigorous theory of Belavkin quantum filtering for mixed states in infinite-dimensional systems is complete: the equations are well-posed, arise from sequential measurements, and propagate chaos to mean-field limits that underwrite quant

desk verdict Solid survey that closes the infinite-dimensional mixed-state Belavkin gap under bounded L, with clean well-posedness, sequential derivations, and propagation of chaos. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08507 v1 pith:55YOK3G7 submitted 2026-07-09 math-ph math.MP

Vassili N. Kolokoltsov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 60H1560K3581P1581Q9393E1193E20
keywords quantumfilteringBelavkinequationsstochasticmasterequationpropagationofchaosmean-fieldgamesopensystemsfeedbackcontroltrajectories
topics The Measurement Problem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey presents the full mathematical theory of quantum continuous-measurement filtering for mixed states when the Hilbert space is infinite-dimensional. The author proves that the Belavkin stochastic master equations are well-posed as singular SDEs in the space of self-adjoint Hilbert–Schmidt operators, derives them as scaling limits of successive indirect measurements, and establishes a law of large numbers (propagation of chaos) for continuously observed interacting quantum particles. The resulting infinite-dimensional mean-field filtering equations supply the forward dynamics for quantum feedback control and quantum mean-field games. A reader cares because continuous observation and feedback are central to quantum technologies, yet the mixed-state infinite-dimensional theory had remained open for decades after Belavkin’s original work.

What carries the argument

The Belavkin stochastic master (Lindblad) equation for density operators—linear and normalised forms, for both diffusive and counting observations—treated as singular SDEs in the Hilbert space of self-adjoint Hilbert–Schmidt operators and via their Markov generators on continuous functions on the set of density matrices.

What would settle it

Exhibit a concrete infinite-dimensional model with unbounded coupling (for example continuous position measurement of a free particle) for which the filtering SDE fails to have unique positive trace-class solutions, or for which the sequential-measurement approximation does not converge to that SDE.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The Belavkin quantum filtering equations for mixed states are well-posed in infinite dimensions, arise rigorously as continuous-measurement limits of discrete sequential observations, and satisfy propagation of chaos: large systems of continuously observed interacting particles converge to nonlinear mean-field Belavkin equations that define quantum mean-field games and feedback control.

Load-bearing premise

The coupling operators that connect the quantum system to the measuring device are assumed bounded in all the main well-posedness and derivation theorems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Infinite-dimensional continuous-variable models can now use filtering equations with rigorous well-posedness guarantees.
  • Propagation of chaos supplies tractable mean-field descriptions of large continuously observed quantum ensembles.
  • Quantum mean-field games become well-defined objects whose limiting dynamics yield approximate Nash equilibria for finite-agent quantum games.
  • Fractional (CTRW) approximations produce non-Markovian continuous-filtering equations for systems with heavy-tailed waiting times.
  • Continuous dependence on Hamiltonians and initial data enables rigorous analysis of feedback control loops.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bounded-coupling restriction leaves the most common laboratory continuous measurements (position, momentum) still partially open, so companion results for unbounded operators remain essential for applications.
  • The same framework naturally suggests a dynamic central-limit theorem for fluctuations around the mean-field limit, parallel to classical kinetic equations.
  • Experimental groups that already observe quantum trajectories could test the predicted rates at which discrete sequential measurements converge to the continuous filtering equations.
  • Extending the counting-observation mean-field limit beyond unitary coupling operators would cover a wider class of jump-type measurements used in practice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey that consolidates the author’s recent work on the rigorous theory of Belavkin quantum filtering for mixed states in infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Under the standing hypothesis that the coupling operator L is bounded, it establishes well-posedness of the linear and nonlinear stochastic master equations in the Hilbert space of self-adjoint Hilbert–Schmidt operators (Theorems 2.4–2.12), derives these equations as scaling limits of sequential indirect measurements with explicit rates (Theorems 3.1–3.2), and proves propagation of chaos for continuously observed N-particle systems toward infinite-dimensional mean-field Belavkin (McKean–Vlasov) equations under Hilbert–Schmidt or multiplication interactions (Theorems 4.1–4.5). Applications to fractional quantum filtering, feedback control and quantum mean-field games (Theorem 7.1) are sketched, together with classical examples (position/momentum observation) treated by explicit Green-function methods.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper closes a long-standing gap: the rigorous infinite-dimensional theory of Belavkin filtering for mixed states, previously available only in finite dimensions or for pure states. The well-posedness results in H^{2}_s, the sequential-measurement derivation with rates, and the propagation-of-chaos theorems for both Hilbert–Schmidt and multiplication interactions are substantial contributions. They supply the analytic foundation for quantum mean-field games and for fractional open-system dynamics. The explicit Lipschitz estimates (Lemmas 2.1–2.2), fixed-point constructions and Knowles–Pickl-type estimates are machine-checkable in principle and give concrete rates (e.g., N^{-1/2} or N^{-(q-1)/q}). The bounded-L restriction is stated openly and the companion paper [82] is cited for the unbounded case, so the core claims are correctly scoped.

major comments (2)
  1. The standing hypothesis that L is bounded (§1.1, §1.7) is load-bearing for Theorems 2.4–2.12, 3.1–3.2 and 4.1–4.5. Many standard continuous measurements (position, momentum) involve unbounded L; the classical examples of §6 are treated by separate Green-function methods rather than by the general theory. The manuscript should state more prominently (abstract or introduction) that the main theorems cover only the bounded-L regime and that the physically central unbounded cases remain outside the present scope (deferred to [82]).
  2. Theorem 7.1 asserts that the mean-field strategies form an ε-Nash equilibrium with ε of order N^{-1/4}, but existence and uniqueness of the limiting forward-backward MFG system are established only in finite dimensions (end of §7). For the infinite-dimensional setting that is the paper’s main focus, the result remains conditional. Either a self-contained existence argument under the same hypotheses as Theorem 4.3, or a clear restriction of Theorem 7.1 to finite-dimensional H, is needed.
minor comments (4)
  1. Heavy self-citation of the author’s recent papers [77]–[82] is natural for a survey of that program, but a short comparative paragraph situating the new results relative to independent concurrent work (e.g., de Bouard–Guo–Hérouard [32], Chalal–Amini–Guo [38]) would help the reader.
  2. Several typographical slips appear (e.g., “July 10, 2026”, “Pokrovksy”, “arXiv:2607.08507v1”). A careful proof-reading pass is recommended.
  3. The notation for the innovation process B versus the output process Y is introduced carefully in §1.3 but occasionally reused without reminder in later sections; a short notation table would improve readability.
  4. Open problems listed in §8 are valuable; adding a one-sentence pointer after each major theorem to the corresponding open question would make the survey more useful for subsequent work.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Survey of the author's own recent program on infinite-dimensional quantum filtering; self-citations are numerous but the well-posedness, sequential-measurement limits and propagation-of-chaos arguments are written out in full and do not reduce by construction to their inputs.

  1. self citation load bearing [§1.1 Objectives and brief content (opening paragraphs)]
    "However, the rigorous mathematical theory of the filtering equations for mixed states in basic infinite-dimensional quantum systems remained an open problem, which was resolved by the author recently. This survey paper presents in full the mathematical theory of quantum filtering equations, their rigorous derivation from basic principles, the corresponding law of large number limits (propagation of chaos) and related topics."

    The assertion that the open problem 'was resolved by the author recently' is justified solely by self-citation to [81,82]; the survey then re-presents those results. This is the only load-bearing self-reference, but because the paper supplies complete proofs (Theorems 2.4–2.12, 3.1–3.2, 4.1–4.5) rather than merely invoking the citations, the circularity is minor and non-forcing.

full rationale

The paper is a mathematical survey that re-derives and unifies results previously announced in the author's own works [81,82,77,78,79,80]. The core claims (well-posedness of Belavkin equations for mixed states in H^{2}_s, derivation as scaling limits of indirect measurements with rates, and LLN/propagation of chaos to mean-field Belavkin equations) are proved in place via explicit estimates (Lipschitz lemmas 2.1–2.2, fixed-point maps, generator convergence, Pickl-type eta_N estimates, Gronwall). There are no fitted parameters, no empirical predictions, no uniqueness theorems imported without proof, and no ansatz smuggled via citation. Self-citation is therefore ordinary for the genre and not load-bearing; the derivations stand independently of the cited papers. Bounded-L is an explicit standing hypothesis, not a hidden circularity. Score 2 reflects only the density of self-reference, not any reduction of a claimed result to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The theory rests on standard stochastic calculus and quantum measurement postulates, plus the standing technical restriction to bounded coupling operators and the choice of the Hilbert–Schmidt space H²_s (rather than trace-class) forced by the available Ito calculus in Banach spaces. No free parameters are fitted. Quantum mean-field games and fractional filtering SDEs are new objects introduced for applications, with independent mathematical content but limited external experimental handles so far.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Coupling operator L is bounded (or continuous and uniformly bounded if time-dependent); Hamiltonian H is self-adjoint.
    Stated as the standing assumption of the survey (§1.1, §1.7); unbounded L deferred to [82].
  • standard math Ito stochastic calculus is available in the real Hilbert space H²_s of self-adjoint Hilbert–Schmidt operators; H¹ is not a UMD/martingale-type-2 space, so the theory is developed in H²_s.
    Explicitly used to justify working in H²_s rather than the physically preferred trace-class space (§2.3).
  • domain assumption Basic quantum measurement postulate: measuring a discrete observable with spectral projections P_j yields outcome j with probability tr(γ P_j) and post-measurement state P_j γ P_j / tr(γ P_j).
    Used as the starting point for sequential indirect measurements in §3.1.
  • domain assumption Interaction kernels A satisfy either Hilbert–Schmidt integrability or multiplication by a continuous L^p potential, and solutions of the one-particle equation remain in the required L^{2q} spaces when needed.
    Assumptions of Theorems 4.3–4.5 for propagation of chaos.
  • standard math Existence of uniformly Gateaux-differentiable equivalent norms on separable Banach spaces (used to build cores for generators on S(H)).
    Invoked in Theorem 2.3 via [53], [109].
invented entities (3)
  • Mean-field Belavkin equations / infinite-dimensional operator-valued McKean–Vlasov diffusions for observed quantum particles
    purpose: Describe the law-of-large-numbers limit of continuously observed interacting quantum systems and serve as forward dynamics for quantum mean-field games.
    Introduced and analyzed in §4; mathematical objects with well-posedness theorems, not postulated particles or forces.
  • Fractional quantum filtering equations (Caputo–Djerbashian time derivative + Belavkin generator)
    purpose: Model continuous measurement when inter-measurement times lie in the domain of attraction of a stable law.
    Derived in §5 via CTRW scaling; mathematical extension of the Markovian theory.
  • Quantum mean-field games (N-player quantum games under continuous observation with mean-field interaction)
    purpose: Extend classical mean-field game theory to continuously observed quantum agents.
    Defined and partially analyzed in §7; existence of limiting MFG solutions proved only in finite dimensions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum filtering and propagation of chaos for open quantum systems, with applications to quantum feedback control and quantum mean-field games." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/55YOK3G7

@misc{pith2026260708507,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum filtering and propagation of chaos for open quantum systems, with applications to quantum feedback control and quantum mean-field games},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/55YOK3G7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08507}
}
read the original abstract

The theory of quantum filtering (of quantum continuous measurements) was developed by V.P. Belavkin about 40 years ago. Since then it attracted attention of numerous investigators including mathematicians, theoretical and experimental physicists. However, the rigorous mathematical theory of the filtering equations for mixed states in basic infinite-dimensional quantum systems remained an open problem, which was resolved by the author recently. This survey paper presents in full the mathematical theory of quantum filtering equations, their rigorous derivation from basic principles, the corresponding law of large number limits (propagation of chaos) and related topics. Applications to feedback control, quantum dynamic and mean-field games are discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages

  1. [82]

    Kolokoltsov

    Vassili N. Kolokoltsov. On quantum stochastic master equations. Electron. J. Probab. 30 (2025), PNO = 57, 1-21

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Accardi, A

    L. Accardi, A. Pechen, I. V. Volovich. A stochastic golden rule and quantum Langevin equation for the low density limit. Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. 6:3 (2003), 431–453

    work page 2003

  3. [2]

    N. U. Ahmed. Systems governed by mean-field stochastic evolution equations on Hilbert spaces and their optimal control. Dynam. Systems Appl. 25:1-2 (2016), 61 - 87

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    Albeverio, R.J

    S. Albeverio, R.J. Hoegh-Krohn. Mathematical Theory of Feynman Path Integrals. LNM 523, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1976

    work page 1976

  5. [4]

    Albeverio, V.N

    S. Albeverio, V.N. Kolokoltsov, O.G. Smolyanov. Repr´ esentation des solutions de l’´ equation de Belavkin pour la mesure quantique par une version rigoureuse de la formule d’int´ egration fonctionnelle de Menski. C.R.Acad. Sci.Paris, S´ er. 1, 323 (1996), 661-664

    work page 1996

  6. [5]

    Kolokoltsov, O.G

    S.Albeverio, V.N. Kolokoltsov, O.G. Smolyanov. Continuous quantum measurement: local and global approaches. Rev. Math. Phys. 9:8 (1997), 907-920

    work page 1997

  7. [6]

    Alicki and K

    R. Alicki and K. Lendi, Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications, Lect. Notes Phys. 717. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    M. A. Armen, J. K. Au, J. K. Stockton, A. C. Doherty and H. Mabuchi. Adaptive homodyne measurement of optical phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002), 133602

    work page 2002

Show all 123 references
  1. [8]

    S Attal and Y. Pautrat. From repeated to continuous quantum interactions. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 7 (2006), 59–104

    2006

  2. [9]

    von Bahr and C.-G

    B. von Bahr and C.-G. Essen. Inequalities for therth absolute moment of a sum of random variables, 1≤r≤2. Ann. Math. Statist., 36:6 (1965), 299-303

    1965

  3. [10]

    Bain and D

    A. Bain and D. Crisan.Fundamentals of stochastic filtering. Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability, 60. Springer, New York (2009). 74

    2009

  4. [11]

    Phys.Rev.Lett

    A.P.Balachandran, S.M.Roy A Quantum Anti-Zeno Paradox. Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000), 4019-4022

    2000

  5. [12]

    Baleanu, K

    D. Baleanu, K. Diethelm, E. Scalas and J. J. Trujillo.Fractional calculus. Models and numerical methods. Second edition. Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos,

  6. [13]

    World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    Ballesteros, N

    M. Ballesteros, N. Crawford, M. Fraas, J. Fr¨ ohlich, and B. Schubnel. Perturbation theory for weak measurements in quantum mechanics, systems with finitedimensional state space. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 20 (2019), 299–335

    2019

  8. [15]

    Barbu, M R¨ ockner and D

    V. Barbu, M R¨ ockner and D. Zhang. Stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Nonlinear Anal. 136 (2016), 168 - 194

    2016

  9. [16]

    Barchielli

    A. Barchielli. Markovian dynamics for a quantum/classical system and quantum trajectories. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 (2024), 315301

    2024

  10. [17]

    Barchielli and V.P

    A. Barchielli and V.P. Belavkin. Measurements contunuous in time and a posteriori states in quantum mechanics. J. Phys A: Math. Gen. 24 (1991), 1495-1514

    1991

  11. [18]

    Barchielli and A.S

    A. Barchielli and A.S. Holevo. Constructing quantum measurement processes via classical stochastic calculus. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 58 (1995) 293 - 317

    1995

  12. [19]

    Barchielli and M

    A. Barchielli and M. Gregoratti. Quantum Trajectories and Measurements in Con- tinuous Case. The Diffusive Case. Lecture Notes Physics, v. 782, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2009

    2009

  13. [20]

    Barchielli and A

    A. Barchielli and A. M. Paganoni. On the asymptotic behvior of some stochastic differential equations for quantum states. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics 6 (2003), 223-243

    2003

  14. [21]

    O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen and E. R. Loubenets. General framework for the behaviour of continuously observed open quantum systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 (2002) 565 - 588

    2002

  15. [22]

    Bauer, D

    M. Bauer, D. Bernard and A. Tilloy. Computing the Rates of Measurement- Induced Quantum Jumps. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 48(25):25FT02, 2015

    2015

  16. [23]

    V. P. Belavkin, Nondemolition measurement and control in quantum dynamical sys- tems. In: Information Complexity and Control in Quantum Physics. CISM Courses and Lectures 294, S. Diner and G. Lochak, eds., Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1987, pp. 331–336

    1987

  17. [24]

    Belavkin

    V.P. Belavkin. Nondemolition stochastic calculus in Fock space and nonlinear filter- ing and control in quantum systems. Proceedings XXIV Karpacz winter school (R. Guelerak and W. Karwowski, eds.), Stochastic methods in mathematics and physics. World Scientific, Singapore, 198...

    1988

  18. [25]

    Belavkin

    V.P. Belavkin. A new wave equation for a continuous nondemolition measurement. Phys. Lett. A 140 (1989), 355-358. 75

    1989

  19. [26]

    Belavkin

    V.P. Belavkin. Quantum stochastic calculus and quantum nonlinear filtering. J. Mul- tivar. Anal. 42 (1992), 171 - 201

    1992

  20. [27]

    Belavkin, V.N

    V.P. Belavkin, V.N. Kolokoltsov. Stochastic evolution as interaction representation of a boundary value problem for Dirac type equation. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Fields 5:1 (2002), 61-92

    2002

  21. [28]

    V. V. Belokurov, E. T. Shavgulidze. Polar decomposition of the Wiener measure: Schwarzian theory versus conformal quantum mechanics. Theoret. and Math. Phys., 200:3 (2019), 1324–1334

    2019

  22. [29]

    Benoist and C

    T. Benoist and C. Pellegrini. Large Time Behavior and Convergence Rate for Quan- tum Filters Under Standard Non Demolition Conditions. Commun. Math. Phys. 331, 703–723 (2014)

    2014

  23. [30]

    Benoist, C

    T. Benoist, C. Bernardin, R. Chetrite, R. Chhaibi, J. Najnudel and C. Pellegrini. Emergence of jumps in quantum trajectories via homogenization. Commun. Math. Phys. 387 (2021), 1821–1867

    2021

  24. [31]

    Bernardin, R

    C. Bernardin, R. Chhaibi, J. Najnudel, and C. Pellegrini. To spike or not to spike: the whims of the Wonham filter in the strong noise regime. Probability Theory and Related Fields (2025), 1-53

    2025

  25. [32]

    Bensoussan, J

    A. Bensoussan, J. Frehse, P. Yam. Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory. Springer, 2013

    2013

  26. [33]

    de Bouard, G

    A. de Bouard, G. Guo, Th. H´ erouard. Infinite Dimensional Mean-Field Belavkin Equation: Well-posedness and Derivation. Annales Henri Poincar´ e. In press (hal- 05185070)

  27. [34]

    Bouten, R

    L. Bouten, R. Van Handel and M. James. An introduction to quantum filtering. SIAM J. Control Optim. 46:6 (2007), 2199-2241

    2007

  28. [35]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione. The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2002

    2002

  29. [36]

    Bushev et al

    P. Bushev et al. Feedback cooling of a singe trapped ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006), 043003

    2006

  30. [37]

    Carmona and F

    R. Carmona and F. Delarue. Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Ap- plications, v. I, II. Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling v. 83, 84. Springer, 2018

    2018

  31. [38]

    Chebotarev and F

    A.M. Chebotarev and F. Fagnola. Sufficient conditions for conservativity of minimal quantum dynamical semigroups. J. Funct. Anal. 153 (1998), 382 - 404

    1998

  32. [39]

    Chalal, N

    S. Chalal, N. H. Amini1, G. Guo. On the mean-field Belavkin filtering equation (2023). arXiv:2303.09667

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Chebotarev, J

    A.M. Chebotarev, J. Garcia and R. Quezada. A priori estimates and existence theo- rems for the Lindblad equation with unbounded time-dependent coefficients. In Re- cent Trends in Infinite Dimensional Non-Commutative Analysis 1035 (1998), 44–65. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., Kok...

    1998

  34. [41]

    L. Diosi. Localised solution of a simple nonlinear quantum Langevin equation. Phys. Let. A 132 (1988), 233-236

    1988

  35. [42]

    L. Diosi. Hybrid completely positive Markovian quantum-classical dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 107 (2023), 062206

    2023

  36. [43]

    Eells, A setting for global analysis

    J. Eells, A setting for global analysis. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1966), 751–807

    1966

  37. [44]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Wilkens and M. Lewenstein. Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies. Phys Rev Lett 83:15 (1999), 3077 - 3080

    1999

  38. [45]

    Fagnola and C

    F. Fagnola and C. M. Mora. Stochastic Schr¨ odinger equation and applications to Ehrenfest-type theorems. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 10:1 (2013), 191 - 223

    2013

  39. [46]

    Fernengel, B

    B. Fernengel, B. Drossel. Bifurcations and chaos in nonlinear Lindblad equations. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 (2020), 385701

    2020

  40. [47]

    Gomes et al

    D. Gomes et al. Regularity theory for mean-field game systems. Springer 2016

    2016

  41. [48]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski and E. C. G. Sudarshan. Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N-Level Systems. J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976), 821

    1976

  42. [49]

    Guerlin, J

    Ch. Guerlin, J. Bernu, S. Del´ eglise, C. Sayrin, S. Gleyzes, S. Kuhr, M. Brune, J.- M. Raimond, and S. Haroche. Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non- demolition photon counting. Nature 448(7156) (2007), 889-893

    2007

  43. [50]

    A. J. Guirao, V. Montesinos and V. Zizler. Renormings in Banach Spaces. A Toolbox. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2022

    2022

  44. [51]

    H. Guo, J. Zhang and G. J. Koehler. A survey of quantum games. Decision Support Systems 46 (2008), 318-332

    2008

  45. [52]

    Grecksch and H

    W. Grecksch and H. Lisei. Stochastic nonlinear equations of Schr¨ odinger type. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 29:4 (2011), 631 - 653

    2011

  46. [53]

    S. Haroche. Nobel lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85:3 (2013), 1083

    2013

  47. [54]

    H´ ajek, V

    P. H´ ajek, V. Montesinos and V. Zizler. Geometry and Gˆateaux smoothness in sep- arable Banach spaces. Operators and Matrices 6:2 (2012), 201–232

    2012

  48. [55]

    A.S. Holevo. Statistical Inference for quantum processes. In: Quanum Aspects of Optical communications. Springer LNP 378 (1991), 127-137, Berlin, Springer

    1991

  49. [56]

    A.S. Holevo. On dissipative stochastic equations in a Hilbert space. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 104 (1996), 483 - 500

    1996

  50. [57]

    Huang, R

    M. Huang, R. Malham´ e, P. Caines. Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop Mckean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. Communications in information and systems 6 (2006), 221 – 252

    2006

  51. [58]

    Kallenberg

    O. Kallenberg. Foundations of Modern Probability. Second ed., Springer, 2002. 77

    2002

  52. [59]

    F. S. Khan, N. Solmeyer, R. Balu and T. Humble. Quantum games: a review of the history, current state, and interpretation. Quantum Information Processing (2018), 17:309

    2018

  53. [60]

    W. Klieman. Recurrence and invariant measures for degenerate diffusion. Ann. Prob. 15 (1987), 690-707

    1987

  54. [61]

    Knowles and P

    A. Knowles and P. Pickl. Mean-field dynamics: singular potentials and rate of con- vergence. Commun. Math. Phys. 298 (2010), 101–138

    2010

  55. [62]

    Kobayashi, Stochastic Calculus for a Time-Changed Semimartingale and the As- sociated Stochastic Differential Equations, Journal of Theoretical Probability 24:3 (2011), 789–820

    K. Kobayashi, Stochastic Calculus for a Time-Changed Semimartingale and the As- sociated Stochastic Differential Equations, Journal of Theoretical Probability 24:3 (2011), 789–820

    2011

  56. [63]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. The stochastic Bellman equation as a nonlinear equation in Maslov spaces. Perturbation theory. Dokl. Akad. Nauk 323:2 (1992), 223-228

    1992

  57. [64]

    Kolokoltsov

    V.N. Kolokoltsov. Scattering theory for the Belavkin equation describing a quantum particle with continuously observed coordinate. Journ. Math.Phys. 36:6 (1995), 2741- 2760

    1995

  58. [65]

    Kolokoltsov

    V.N. Kolokoltsov. Localization and analytic properties of the simplest quantum fil- tering equation. Rev. Math. Phys. 10: 6 (1998), 801-828

    1998

  59. [66]

    Kolokoltsov

    V.N. Kolokoltsov. Long time behavior of continuously observed and controlled quan- tum systems (a study of the Belavkin quantum filtering equation). In: Quantum Probability Communications, QP-PQ, V. 10, Ed. R.L. Hudson, J.M. Lindsay, World Scientific, Singapore (1998), 229-243

    1998

  60. [67]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Semiclassical Analysis for Diffusions and Stochastic Processes. Springer Lecture Notes Math., v. 1724, Springer 2000

    2000

  61. [68]

    Kolokoltsov

    V.N. Kolokoltsov. Mathematics of the Feynmann path integral. Proc. of the Inter- national Mathematical conference FILOMAT 2001, University of Nis, FILOMAT 15 (2001), 293-312

    2001

  62. [69]

    Kolokoltsov

    V. Kolokoltsov. A new path integral representation for the solutions of the Schr¨ odinger and stochastic Schr¨ odinger equation. Math. Proc. Cam. Phil.Soc. 132 (2002), 353-375

    2002

  63. [70]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. On the singular Schr¨ odinger equations with magnetic fields. Matem. Zbornik 194:6 (2003), 105-126

    2003

  64. [71]

    Kolokoltsov

    V. Kolokoltsov. Generalized Continuous-Time Random Walks (CTRW), Subordi- nation by Hitting Times and Fractional Dynamics. Theory of Probability and its Applications 53:4 (2009), 594-609

    2009

  65. [72]

    Kolokoltsov

    V. Kolokoltsov. The Central Limit Theorem for the Smoluchovski Coagulation Model. Probability Theory Related Fields 146: 1 (2010), 87-153

    2010

  66. [73]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Nonlinear Markov processes and kinetic equations. Cambridge Tracks in Mathematics 182, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010. 78

    2010

  67. [74]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Markov processes, semigroups and generators. DeGruyter Studies in Mathematics v. 38, DeGruyter, 2011

    2011

  68. [75]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Differential equations on measures and functional spaces. Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts, Birkh¨ auser, 2019

    2019

  69. [76]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Dynamic Quantum Games. Dynamic Games and Applications, 12 (2022), 552-573

    2022

  70. [77]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Quantum Mean-Field Games with the Observations of Counting Type. Games (2021), 12, 7

    2021

  71. [78]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. The law of large numbers for quantum stochastic filtering and control of many particle systems. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 208:1 (2021), 97-121

    2021

  72. [79]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Quantum Mean Field Games. Annals Applied Probability 32:3 (2022), 2254 - 2288

    2022

  73. [80]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. Continuous time random walks modeling of quantum measure- ment and fractional equations of quantum stochastic filtering and control. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis 25 (2022), 128 - 165

    2022

  74. [81]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov. The Rates of Convergence for Functional Limit Theorems with Stable Subordinators and for CTRW Approximations to Fractional Evolutions. Frac- tal Fract. 2023, 7, 335

    2023

  75. [83]

    Kolokoltsov

    Vassili N. Kolokoltsov. On the Mathematical Theory of Quantum Stochastic Filtering Equations for Mixed States. Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics (RJMP) 32:3 (2025), 510-529

    2025

  76. [84]

    Kolokoltsov, V

    V. Kolokoltsov, V. Korolev, V. Uchaikin. Fractional Stable Distributions. J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) 105:6 (2001), 2570-2577

    2001

  77. [85]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov and O.A. Malafeyev. Understanding Game theory. World scientific, Second Edition 2020

    2020

  78. [86]

    V. N. Kolokoltsov and O. A. Malafeyev. Many Agent Games in Socio-economic Systems: Corruption, Inspection, Coalition Building, Network Growth, Security. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Springer Nature, 2019

    2019

  79. [87]

    Lakshmikantham, R

    V. Lakshmikantham, R. Mutchell and R. W. Mitchell. Differential equations in closed subsets of a Banach space. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 220 (1976), 103–113

    1976

  80. [88]

    N. Laskin. Fractional Schr¨ odinger equation. Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002), 056108. 79

    2002

  81. [89]

    Lasry, P-L

    J-M. Lasry, P-L. Lions. Jeux ` a champ moyen, I. Le cas stationnaire. Comptes Rendus Mathematique Acad. Sci. Paris 343:9 (2006), 619 - 625

    2006

  82. [90]

    Liang, N

    W. Liang, N. H. Amini and P. Mason. Feedback Exponential Stabilization of GHZ States of Multiqubit Systems. IEEE Transctions on automatic control 67: 6 (2022), 2918-2929

    2022

  83. [91]

    Liang, N

    W. Liang, N. H. Amini, and P. Mason. On exponential stabilization of N-level quan- tum angular momentum systems. SIAM J. Control Optim., 57:6 (2019), 3939–3960

    2019

  84. [92]

    Lindblad

    G. Lindblad. On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys., 48 (1976), 119-130

    1976

  85. [93]

    E. R. Loubenets. Quantum Stochastic Approach to the Description of Quantum Measurements. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001), 7639

    2001

  86. [94]

    Marinatto and T

    L. Marinatto and T. Weber. A quantum approach to static games of complete infor- mation. Physics Letters A 272 (2000), 291-303

    2000

  87. [95]

    D. A. Meyer. Quantum strategies. Phys Rev Lett 82:5 (1999), 1052-1055

    1999

  88. [96]

    R. H. Martin, Jr. Differential Equations on Closed Subsets of a Banach Space.Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society.179(1973), 399–414

    1973

  89. [97]

    V.P. Maslov. Complex Markov Chains and Functional Feynman Integral. Moscow, Nauka, 1976 (in Russian)

    1976

  90. [98]

    Mazzucchi

    S. Mazzucchi. Mathematcal Feynman path integrals and their applications. World Scientific 2009

    2009

  91. [99]

    Meerschaert, H.-P

    M.M. Meerschaert, H.-P. Scheffler. Limit Theorems for Continuous-Time Random Walks with Infinite Mean Waiting Times. J. Appl. Prob. 41 (2004), 623-638

    2004

  92. [100]

    M.B. Menski. The difficulties in the mathematical definition of path integrals are overcome in the theory of continuous quantum measurements. Teoret. i Matem. Fizika 93:2 (1992), 264-272

    1992

  93. [101]

    Misra, E. C. G. Sudarshan. The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 18:4 (1977), 756–763

    1977

  94. [102]

    Montroll, G.H

    E.W. Montroll, G.H. Weiss. Random Walks on Lattices, II. J. Math. Phys. 6 (1965), 167-181

    1965

  95. [103]

    C. M. Mora. Regularity of solutions to quantum master equations: a stochastic approach. The Annals of Probability 41:3B (2013), 1978 - 2012

    2013

  96. [104]

    C. M. Mora and R. Rebolledo. Basic Properties of Nonlinear Stochastic Schr¨ odinger Equations Driven by Brownian Motions. The Annals of Applied Probability 18:2 (2008), 591 - 619

    2008

  97. [105]

    Murch, S

    K. Murch, S. Weber, C. Macklin, and I. Siddiqi. Observing single quantum trajec- tories of a superconducting quantum bit. Nature, 502(7470), 211-214, 2013. 80

    2013

  98. [106]

    Pechen, N

    A. Pechen, N. Il´ ın, F. Shuang and H. Rabitz. Quantum control by von Neumann measurements. Phys. Rev. A, 74 (2006), 052102

    2006

  99. [107]

    Pechen and H

    A. Pechen and H. Rabitz. Teaching the Environment to Control Quantum Systems Phys. Rev. A, 73 (2006), 062102

    2006

  100. [108]

    Pellegrini

    C. Pellegrini. Poisson and Diffusion Approximation of Stochastic Schr¨ odinger Equa- tions with Control. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 10:5 (2009), 995–1025

    2009

  101. [109]

    Pellegrini

    C. Pellegrini. Markov chains approximation of jump–diffusion stochastic master equations. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 46: 4 (2010), 924–948

    2010

  102. [110]

    R. R. Phelps. Convex Functions, Monotone Operators and Differentiability. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, v. 1364. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

    1993

  103. [111]

    P. Pickl. A simple derivation of mean-field limits for quantum systems. Lett. Math. Phys. 97 (2011), 151 - 164

    2011

  104. [112]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of modern mathematical physics. v .2. Academic Press, New York 1978

    1978

  105. [113]

    R. M. Redheffer. The Theorems of Bony and Prezis on Flow-Invariant Sets. Amer- ican Mathematical Monthly 79:7 (1972), 740–747

    1972

  106. [114]

    Russkikh, B

    I. Russkikh, B. Volkov, A. Pechen. Quantum channels, complex Stiefel manifolds, and optimization. Quantum Inf. Process., 24 (2025), 167, 26

    2025

  107. [115]

    Slavnov, L.D

    A.A. Slavnov, L.D. Faddeev. Gauge Fields, Introduction to Quantum Theory. Moscow, Nauka, 1988 (in Russian). Engl. transl. by Benjamin/Cumminge, Reading Mass., 1980

    1988

  108. [116]

    Smolyanov and E.T

    O.G. Smolyanov and E.T. Shavgulidze. Kontinualniye Integrali. Moscow Univ. Press, Moscow, 1990 (in Russian)

    1990

  109. [117]

    van Handel, J

    R. van Handel, J. K Stockton, and H. Mabuchi. Feedback control of quantum state reduction. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 50:6 (2005), 768–780

    2005

  110. [118]

    van Neerven, M

    J. van Neerven, M. Veraar and L. Weis (2015). Stochastic Integration in Banach Spaces – a Survey. In: Dalang, R., Dozzi, M., Flandoli, F., Russo, F. (eds) Stochastic Analysis: A Series of Lectures. Progress in Probability, vol 68. Birkh¨ auser, Basel

    2015

  111. [119]

    Weber, A

    S. Weber, A. Chantasri, J Dressel, A. Jordan, K. Murch, and I Siddiqi. Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states. Nature, 511(7511),570-573, 2014

    2014

  112. [120]

    Wineland

    D.J. Wineland. Nobel lecture: Superposition, entanglement, and raising Schr¨ odinger’s cat. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85:3 (2013), 1103

    2013

  113. [121]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn. Quantum measurement and control. Cambridge Univesity Press, 2010

    2010

  114. [122]

    K. Yajima. Existence of Solutions for Schrodinger Evolution Equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 110 (1987), 415-426. 81

    1987

  115. [123]

    Zhang, Yu

    J. Zhang, Yu. Liu, R. Wu, K. Jacobs, F. Nori. Quantum feedback: theory, experi- ments, and applications. Physics Reports 679 (2017), 1-60. 82

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.