pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05576 · v1 · pith:562K3HRRnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 💻 cs.CV

UltraVR: A Diagnostic Ultra-Resolution Image-VQA Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Reasoning

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords reasoningevidenceultra-resolutionultravrvisualdiagnosticgroundingmodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) excel on visual question answering and multimodal reasoning benchmarks. Yet their capability on ultra-resolution images - where critical evidence is tiny, subtle, spatially distant, or distributed - remains unclear. Existing evaluations largely report final-answer accuracy, offering limited insight into whether models acquire and integrate the necessary visual evidence. We introduce UltraVR, a diagnostic benchmark for evidence-grounded visual reasoning over ultra-resolution images. UltraVR spans four high-value scenarios: CCTV surveillance, remote sensing (RS), whole-slide image (WSI) pathology, and industrial anomaly detection (AD). These domains pose complementary challenges: fine-grained object grounding in crowded CCTV scenes, long-range spatial comparison in RS, multi-scale evidence navigation in WSI, and subtle irregularity detection in repetitive industrial layouts. Beyond standard QA triples, each instance includes a structured ground-truth chain of thought with step-level questions, intermediate answers, and reasoning labels. These labels decompose reasoning into evidence grounding, local perception, quantification, evidence integration, and decision inference, enabling process-level diagnosis over black-box scoring. Using UltraVR, we evaluate frontier VLMs and show that current models remain far from reliable on ultra-resolution reasoning. Importantly, the structured annotations allow us to localize failures across the visual-to-decision pipeline: errors concentrate in evidence grounding and local perception, while downstream inference often recovers when intermediate visual facts are supplied. These findings demonstrate UltraVR as a diagnostic testbed for measuring not only whether VLMs answer correctly, but where their ultra-resolution reasoning process breaks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.