Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exactly Tight Information-Theoretic Generalization Error Bound for the Quadratic Gaussian Problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.00876 v2 pith:5ANSXHVI submitted 2023-05-01 cs.IT math.ITstat.ML

classification cs.ITmath.ITstat.ML
keywords boundtightgeneralizationerrorproposedboundsexactlygaussian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We provide a new information-theoretic generalization error bound that is exactly tight (i.e., matching even the constant) for the canonical quadratic Gaussian (location) problem. Most existing bounds are order-wise loose in this setting, which has raised concerns about the fundamental capability of information-theoretic bounds in reasoning the generalization behavior for machine learning. The proposed new bound adopts the individual-sample-based approach proposed by Bu et al., but also has several key new ingredients. Firstly, instead of applying the change of measure inequality on the loss function, we apply it to the generalization error function itself; secondly, the bound is derived in a conditional manner; lastly, a reference distribution is introduced. The combination of these components produces a KL-divergence-based generalization error bound. We show that although the latter two new ingredients can help make the bound exactly tight, removing them does not significantly degrade the bound, leading to an asymptotically tight mutual-information-based bound. We further consider the vector Gaussian setting, where a direct application of the proposed bound again does not lead to tight bounds except in special cases. A refined bound is then proposed for decomposable loss functions, leading to a tight bound for the vector setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fairness Overfitting in Machine Learning: An Information-Theoretic Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Claims computable MI/CMI bounds on fairness generalization error, but the core derivation uses an invalid variance-based Hoeffding step.

Pith tools