pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.07245 · v1 · pith:5BSEC2OJnew · submitted 2019-07-09 · 💻 cs.CY

A Survey of Automatic Methods for Nutritional Assessment

Lars Brenna , H{\aa}vard D. Johansen , Dag Johansen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords nutritional assessmentautomatic methodswearable devicesquantified selfunder-reportingsurveycomputer science technologiesbiometric logging
0
0 comments X

The pith

Emerging computer science technologies are set to heavily impact nutritional assessment by enabling more objective data collection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that nutritional assessment, the process of collecting and interpreting nutrition information to address health issues, can benefit from new technologies even though traditional methods have not changed much. It highlights that current data collection approaches suffer from under-reporting and points to wearable biometric devices and the Quantified Self movement as sources of objective alternatives. The survey reviews and categorizes both academic and commercial systems to map out these promising approaches. A reader would care because better nutritional data supports improved decisions about diet-related health problems.

Core claim

Nutritional assessment is about to be heavily impacted by emerging computer science technologies, and this survey provides an overview of promising technology approaches supporting nutritional assessment by reviewing and categorizing both academic and commercial systems.

What carries the argument

Categorization of academic and commercial systems that use wearable biometric logging devices and related technologies for objective nutritional data collection.

Load-bearing premise

Traditional data collection methods have remained largely unchanged for two decades and suffer from under-reporting issues that new technologies can address.

What would settle it

Evidence from a follow-up study or updated review showing that traditional nutritional assessment methods have changed substantially in the last twenty years or exhibit little under-reporting.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.07245 by Dag Johansen, H{\aa}vard D. Johansen, Lars Brenna.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A sample pen-and-paper FFQ (Source: The European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC), h‚p://www.srl.cam.ac.uk/epic/) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A web-based FFQ (Source: [44]). spans. Œe method is still considered to collect an acceptably detailed insight into the nutritional intake of an individual over a longer period of time. 24-Hour Recall (24HR). Œe 24HR method is based on structured interviews where subjects are asked about their intake of food and beverages over the previous 24 hours, or from morning to midnight on the previous day. Œe inter… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A sample pen-and-paper 7 day food record form (Source: The European Prospective Investigation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Kitrics digital food scale with food packaging label showing macro nutrients and sodium. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fitbit API JSON data format for food record entries, as of April 2018. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Screenshot from a mobile food record prototype using images to record meals. The pictures are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The Wellnavi hand-held personal assistant for nutritional assessment (Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Nutritional assessment is key in order to make decisions about the nature and cause of nutrition related health issues that affect an individual. The systematic process of collecting and interpreting relevant nutrition information, however, is still in its technological infancy. Despite technological advances in storage and analysis of nutritional data, methods for collecting data are largely unchanged over the past two decades. It is well documented that these methods have issues that cause under-reporting. Meanwhile, new developments in wearable biometric logging devices have seen increased traction among individuals. This is sometimes referred to as the Quantified Self movement. One part of this movement is the development of technological means for objectively collecting nutritional data. Nutritional assessment, however, is about to be heavily impacted by emerging computer science technologies, and this survey provides an overview of promising technology approaches supporting nutritional assessment. Both academic and commercial systems are reviewed and categorized.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey reviewing and categorizing both academic and commercial systems for automatic nutritional assessment. It is motivated by the claim that traditional data collection methods have remained largely unchanged for two decades and suffer from under-reporting, while new technologies associated with the Quantified Self movement are poised to heavily impact the field.

Significance. If the categorization is systematic and the coverage of systems is representative, the survey could provide a useful reference point for researchers working at the intersection of nutrition and computer science. The paper does not introduce new methods, data, or predictions, so its contribution rests entirely on the quality and completeness of the literature overview.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The claims that 'methods for collecting data are largely unchanged over the past two decades' and that these methods 'have issues that cause under-reporting' are presented as established facts without any supporting citations or data. These statements form the primary motivation for the survey and therefore require explicit references.
  2. The manuscript provides no description of the search strategy, databases queried, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or time frame used to select the academic and commercial systems that are reviewed and categorized. For a survey paper, the absence of a methods section undermines the ability to assess whether the overview is comprehensive or biased toward particular approaches.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the survey.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The claims that 'methods for collecting data are largely unchanged over the past two decades' and that these methods 'have issues that cause under-reporting' are presented as established facts without any supporting citations or data. These statements form the primary motivation for the survey and therefore require explicit references.

    Authors: We agree that these motivational claims require supporting citations to be presented as established facts. In the revised manuscript, we will add explicit references to prior work documenting the stability of traditional dietary assessment methods over the past two decades and the well-known issues of under-reporting associated with self-report techniques such as food frequency questionnaires and 24-hour recalls. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript provides no description of the search strategy, databases queried, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or time frame used to select the academic and commercial systems that are reviewed and categorized. For a survey paper, the absence of a methods section undermines the ability to assess whether the overview is comprehensive or biased toward particular approaches.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a clear description of the literature search process is important for a survey paper to allow readers to evaluate coverage and potential bias. We will add a new 'Methods' section that details the databases queried (including academic repositories and commercial product searches), search keywords and terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria for both academic publications and commercial systems, and the time period covered by the review. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; survey paper with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a literature review surveying academic and commercial systems for nutritional assessment. It advances no novel empirical claims, mathematical derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems. Background statements on traditional methods serve as motivation only and are not load-bearing for any core result. No self-citation chains or ansatzes are invoked to justify new findings. The paper is self-contained as a categorization of existing work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a survey paper with no new scientific claims, derivations, or models; the abstract introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5672 in / 955 out tokens · 17761 ms · 2026-05-24T23:47:26.603149+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aristotelis Agianniotis, Marios Anthimopoulos, Elena Daskalaki, Aur ´elie Drapela, Christoph Ste/t_tler, Peter Diem, and Stavroula Mougiakakou. 2015. GoCARB in the Context of an Arti/f_icial Pancreas.Journal of diabetes science and technology 9, 3 (2015), 549–555

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Kiyoharu Aizawa, Kazuki Maeda, Makoto Ogawa, Yohei Sato, Mayumi Kasamatsu, Kayo Waki, and Hidemi Takimoto

    work page

  3. [3]

    Journal of diabetes science and technology 8, 2 (2014), 203–208

    Comparative study of the routine daily usability of foodlog a smartphone-based food recording tool assisted by image retrieval. Journal of diabetes science and technology 8, 2 (2014), 203–208

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Oliver Am/f_t. 2010. A wearable earpad sensor for chewing monitoring. InSensors, 2010 IEEE. IEEE, 222–227

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Oliver Am/f_t, Mathias St¨ager, Paul Lukowicz, and Gerhard Tr ¨oster. 2005. Analysis of chewing sounds for dietary monitoring. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing . Springer, 56–72

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Oliver Am/f_t and Gerhard Troster. 2006. Methods for detection and classi/f_ication of normal swallowing from muscle activation and sound. In 2006 Pervasive Health Conference and Workshops . IEEE, 1–10

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Oliver Am/f_t and Gerhard Tr¨oster. 2009. On-body sensing solutions for automatic dietary monitoring. IEEE pervasive computing 8, 2 (2009), 62–70

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Marios Anthimopoulos, Joachim Dehais, Sergey Shevchik, Botwey H Ransford, David Duke, Peter Diem, and Stavroula Mougiakakou. 2015. Computer vision-based carbohydrate estimation for type 1 patients with diabetes using smart- phones. Journal of diabetes science and technology 9, 3 (2015), 507–515

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Marios M Anthimopoulos, Lauro Gianola, Luca Scarnato, Peter Diem, and Stavroula G Mougiakakou. 2014. A food recognition system for diabetic patients based on an optimized bag-of-features model. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 18, 4 (2014), 1261–1271

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Lenore Arab, Deborah Estrin, Donnie H Kim, Jeff Burke, and Jeff Goldman. 2011. Feasibility testing of an automated image-capture method to aid dietary recall. European journal of clinical nutrition 65, 10 (2011), 1156–1162

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Lenore Arab and Ashley Winter. 2010. Automated camera-phone experience with the frequency of imaging necessary to capture diet. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 110, 8 (2010), 1238–1241

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Edward Archer, Gregory A Hand, and Steven N Blair. 2013. Validity of US nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey caloric energy intake data, 1971–2010. PloS one 8, 10 (2013), e76632

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Eirik ˚Arsand, Miroslav Muzny, Meghan Bradway, Jan Muzik, and Gunnar Hartvigsen. 2015. Performance of the /f_irst combined smartwatch and smartphone diabetes diary application study. Journal of diabetes science and technology 9, 3 (2015), 556–563

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    BDA. 2012. Model and Process for Nutrition and Dietetic Practice. (2012). h/t_tps://www.bda.uk.com/publications/ professional/model and process for nutrition and dietetic practice

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Oscar Beijbom, Neel Joshi, Dan Morris, Sco/t_t Saponas, and Siddharth Khullar. 2015. Menu-match: restaurant-speci/f_ic food logging from images. In Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), 2015 IEEE Winter Conference on. IEEE, 844–851

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Vinay Be/t_tadapura, Edison /T_homaz, Aman Parnami, Gregory D Abowd, and Irfan Essa. 2015. Leveraging context to support automated food recognition in restaurants. In Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), 2015 IEEE Winter Conference on. IEEE, 580–587

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    S. A. Bingham, C. Gill, A. Welch, K. Day, A. Cassidy, K. T. Khaw, M. J. Sneyd, T. J. A. Key, L. Roe, and N. E. Day

    work page

  18. [18]

    24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records

    Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 4 (Oct 1994), 619–643. h/t_tps://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19940064

    work page doi:10.1079/bjn19940064 1994

  19. [19]

    CJ Boushey, M Spoden, FM Zhu, EJ Delp, and DA Kerr. 2016. New mobile methods for dietary assessment: review of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (2016), 1–12

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Andreas Budde and Florian Michahelles. 2010. Product Empire—Serious play with barcodes. In Internet of /T_hings (IOT),

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Keng-hao Chang, Shih-yen Liu, Hao-hua Chu, Jane Yung-jen Hsu, Cheryl Chen, Tung-yun Lin, Chieh-yu Chen, and Polly Huang. 2006. /T_he diet-aware dining table: Observing dietary behaviors over a tabletop surface. InInternational Conference on Pervasive Computing . Springer, 366–382. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article 1. Publication date: January 2016. 1:32 Lars Brenn...

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Hsinchun Chen, Roger HL Chiang, and Veda C Storey. 2012. Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS quarterly 36, 4 (2012), 1165–1188

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Hsin-Chen Chen, Wenyan Jia, Xin Sun, Zhaoxin Li, Yuecheng Li, John D Fernstrom, Lora E Burke, /T_homas Baranowski, and Mingui Sun. 2015. Saliency-aware food image segmentation for personal dietary assessment using a wearable computer. Measurement Science and Technology 26, 2 (2015), 025702

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Jacqueline Chen, Simon J Marshall, Lu Wang, Suneeta Godbole, Amanda Legge, Aiden Doherty, Paul Kelly, Melody Oliver, Ruth Pa/t_terson, Charlie Foster, et al. 2013. Using the SenseCam as an objective tool for evaluating eating pa/t_terns. InProceedings of the 4th International SenseCam & Pervasive Imaging Conference . ACM, 34–41

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Jingjing Chen and Chong-Wah Ngo. 2016. Deep-based ingredient recognition for cooking recipe retrieval. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference . ACM, 32–41

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Jen-Hao Chen, Peggy Pei-Yu Chi, Peggy Pei-Yu Hao-Hua Chu, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen, and Polly Huang. 2010. A smart kitchen for nutrition-aware cooking. (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Jennifer Coates, Winnie FL Bell, Brooke Colaiezzi, and Cathleen Cisse. 2016. Scaling up Dietary Data for Decision- Making in Africa and Asia: New Technological Frontiers. /T_he FASEB Journal30, 1 Supplement (2016), 669–15

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    ConsumerPhysics. 2017. SCiO. (May 2017). h/t_tps://www.consumerphysics.com

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Cron-O-Meter. 2016. (Nov 2016). h/t_tps://cronometer.com

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Karen Cullen, Tom Baranowski, Kathy Watson, /T_heresa Nicklas, Jennifer Fisher, Sharon O’Donnell, Janice Baranowski, Noemi Islam, and Mariam Missaghian. 2007. Food category purchases vary by household education and race/ethnicity: results from grocery receipts. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 107, 10 (2007), 1747–1752

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    WANG Da-Hong and Michiko Kogashiwa. 2002. Validity and reliability of a dietary assessment method: the application of a digital camera with a mobile phone card a/t_tachment.Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology 48, 6 (2002), 498–504

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Joachim Dehais, Sergey Shevchik, Peter Diem, and Stavroula G Mougiakakou. 2013. Food volume computation for self dietary assessment applications. In Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 1–4

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Yujie Dong, Adam Hoover, Jenna Scisco, and Eric Muth. 2012. A new method for measuring meal intake in humans via automated wrist motion tracking. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback 37, 3 (2012), 205–215

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Judy A Driskell and Ira Wolinsky. 2016. Nutritional assessment of athletes . CRC press

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Elizabeth Dunford, Helen Trevena, Chester Goodsell, Ka Hung Ng, Jacqui Webster, Audra Millis, Stan Goldstein, Orla Hugueniot, and Bruce Neal. 2014. FoodSwitch: a mobile phone app to enable consumers to make healthier food choices and crowdsourcing of national food composition data. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2, 3 (2014), e37

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    EatSmart. 2016. EatSmart Digital Nutrition Scale. (Nov 2016). h/t_tps://eatsmartproducts.com/products/ eatsmart-digital-nutrition-scale-professional-food-and-nutrient-calculator

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Deborah Estrin and Ida Sim. 2010. Open mHealth architecture: an engine for health care innovation. Science 330, 6005 (2010), 759–760

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Evernote. 2017. Evernote Scannable. (April 2017). h/t_tps://itunes.apple.com/us/app/evernote-scannable/id883338188

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Muhammad Farooq, Juan M Fontana, and Edward Sazonov. 2014. A novel approach for food intake detection using electroglo/t_tography.Physiological Measurement 35, 5 (2014), 739. h/t_tp://stacks.iop.org/0967-3334/35/i=5/a=739

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Muhammad Farooq and Edward Sazonov. 2016. A novel wearable device for food intake and physical activity recognition. Sensors 16, 7 (2016), 1067

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    FatSecret. 2016. (Nov 2016). h/t_tp://www.fatsecret.com

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Li Fei-Fei and Pietro Perona. 2005. A bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. In Computer Vision and Pa/t_tern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 524–531

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Fitbit. 2016. (Nov 2016). h/t_tps://www./f_itbit.com

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Katherine M Flegal, Brian K Kit, Heather Orpana, and Barry I Graubard. 2013. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama 309, 1 (2013), 71–82

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Juan M Fontana, Muhammad Farooq, and Edward Sazonov. 2014. Automatic ingestion monitor: A novel wearable device for monitoring of ingestive behavior. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 61, 6 (2014), 1772–1779

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Hannah Forster, Rosalind Fallaize, Caroline Gallagher, Clare B O’Donovan, Clara Woolhead, Marianne C Walsh, Anna L Macready, Julie A Lovegrove, John C Mathers, Michael J Gibney, et al. 2014. Online dietary intake estimation: the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire. Journal of medical Internet research 16, 6 (2014), e150

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Fraunhofer. 2017. HawkSpex ® Mobile. (February 2017). h/t_tp://www.iff.fraunhofer.de/en/business-units/ biosystems-engineering/research.html

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Simone A French, Sco/t_t T Shimotsu, Melanie Wall, and Anne Faricy Gerlach. 2008. Capturing the spectrum of household food and beverage purchasing behavior: a review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 108, 12 (2008), 2051–2058. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article 1. Publication date: January 2016. A Survey of Automatic Methods for Nutritional Assessment 1:33

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Jiang Gao, Alexander G Hauptmann, Ashok Bharucha, and Howard D Wactlar. 2004. Dining activity analysis using a hidden markov model. In Pa/t_tern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 915–918

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    L Gemming, A Doherty, P Kelly, J U/t_ter, and C Ni Mhurchu. 2013. Feasibility of a SenseCam-assisted 24-h recall to reduce under-reporting of energy intake. European journal of clinical nutrition 67, 10 (2013), 1095–1099

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Luke Gemming, Jennifer U/t_ter, and Cliona Ni Mhurchu. 2015. Image-assisted dietary assessment: a systematic review of the evidence. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 115, 1 (2015), 64–77

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Rosalind S Gibson. 2005. Principles of nutritional assessment . Oxford university press, USA

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Grocery Iq

    GroceryIq. Grocery Iq. (/question_question/question_question). h/t_tp://www.groceryiq.com

    work page

  54. [54]

    Hanshen Gu and Dong Wang. 2009. A content-aware fridge based on RFID in smart home for home-healthcare. In Advanced Communication Technology, 2009. ICACT 2009. 11th International Conference on , Vol. 2. IEEE, 987–990

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Cathal Gurrin, Alan F Smeaton, and Aiden R Doherty. 2014. Lifelogging: Personal big data. Foundations and trends in information retrieval 8, 1 (2014), 1–125

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Ross A Hammond and Ruth Levine. 2010. /T_he economic impact of obesity in the United States.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy 3 (2010), 285

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    HEALBE. 2017. HEALBE GoBe. (February 2017). h/t_tps://blog.healbe.com/blogs/news/ 15160021-how-does-healbe-gobe-automatically-track-calorie-intake

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    Airo Health. 2016. Automatic Calorie Tracker. (Nov 2016). h/t_tp://www.getairo.com

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    George Hripcsak, Jon D Duke, Nigam H Shah, Christian G Reich, Vojtech Huser, Martijn J Schuemie, Marc A Suchard, Rae Woong Park, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Peter R Rijnbeek, et al. 2015. Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): opportunities for observational researchers. Studies in health technology and informatics 216 (2015), 574

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Ibo/t_ta. 2017. Ibo/t_ta. (April 2017). h/t_tps://ibo/t_ta.com/

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    AK Illner, H Freisling, H Boeing, Inge Huybrechts, SP Crispim, and N Slimani. 2012. Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. International journal of epidemiology 41, 4 (2012), 1187–1203

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Johansen, Eleanor Birrell, Robbert van Renesse, Fred B

    H˚avard D. Johansen, Eleanor Birrell, Robbert van Renesse, Fred B. Schneider, Magnus Stenhaug, and Dag Johansen

    work page

  63. [63]

    In Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Paci/f_ic Workshop on Systems (APSys ’15)

    Enforcing Privacy Policies with Meta-Code. In Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Paci/f_ic Workshop on Systems (APSys ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 7 pages. h/t_tps://doi.org/10.1145/2797022.2797040

    work page doi:10.1145/2797022.2797040

  64. [64]

    Haik Kalantarian, Nabil Alshurafa, Tuan Le, and Majid Sarrafzadeh. 2015. Monitoring eating habits using a piezoelectric sensor-based necklace. Computers in biology and medicine 58 (2015), 46–55

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Akihiko Kandori, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, Yuko Sano, Mitsuru Oonuma, Tsuyoshi Miyashita, Miho Murata, and Saburo Sakoda. 2012. Simple magnetic swallowing detection system. IEEE Sensors Journal 12, 4 (2012), 805–811

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    Kawano and K

    Y. Kawano and K. Yanai. 2014. Automatic Expansion of a Food Image Dataset Leveraging Existing Categories with Domain Adaptation. In Proc. of ECCV Workshop on Transferring and Adapting Source Knowledge in Computer Vision (TASK-CV)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    Yoshiyuki Kawano and Keiji Yanai. 2015. Foodcam: A real-time food recognition system on a smartphone. Multimedia Tools and Applications 74, 14 (2015), 5263

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Shigeshi Kikunaga, TIN Tomoe, Genji Ishibashi, and WANG Da-Hong. 2007. /T_he application of a handheld personal digital assistant with camera and mobile phone card (Wellnavi) to the general population in a dietary survey. Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology 53, 2 (2007), 109–116

    work page 2007

  69. [69]

    Kitrics. 2016. Kitrics Digital Nutrition Scale. (Nov 2016). h/t_tps://www.amazon.com/ Kitrics-Digital-Nutrition-Scale-Silver/dp/B000U67EI0

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Takamichi Kojima, Takashi Ijiri, Jeremy White, Hidetomo Kataoka, and Akira Hirabayashi. 2016. CogKnife: Food recognition from their cu/t_ting sounds. InMultimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1–6

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    KostdataSE. 2016. (Nov 2016). h/t_tp://www.kostdata.se/en/dietitian-net

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Cl SC Lear, JB Flanagan, and CFA Moorrees. 1965. /T_he frequency of deglutition in man.Archives of Oral Biology 10, 1 (1965), 83IN13–99IN15

    work page 1965

  73. [73]

    Clement SC Lear and Coenraad FA Moorrees. 1966. Swallowing frequency: A detection system employing FM telemetry. Journal of dental research 45, 4 (1966), 1222–1222

    work page 1966

  74. [74]

    Seoho Lee, Dakota O’Dell, Jess Hohenstein, Susannah Colt, Saurabh Mehta, and David Erickson. 2016. NutriPhone: a mobile platform for low-cost point-of-care quanti/f_ication of vitamin B12 concentrations.Scienti/f_ic Reports6 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Seoho Lee, Balaji Srinivasan, Sasank Vemulapati, Saurabh Mehta, and David Erickson. 2016. Personalized nutrition diagnostics at the point-of-need. Lab on a Chip (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Gordon S Linoff and Michael JA Berry. 2011. Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer relationship management. John Wiley & Sons. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article 1. Publication date: January 2016. 1:34 Lars Brenna, H ˚avard D. Johansen, and Dag Johansen

    work page 2011

  77. [77]

    Chang Liu, Yu Cao, Yan Luo, Guanling Chen, Vinod Vokkarane, and Yunsheng Ma. 2016. Deepfood: Deep learning- based food image recognition for computer-aided dietary assessment. In International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics. Springer, 37–48

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    Suhuai Luo, Jesse Jin, and Jiaming Li. 2009. A smart fridge with an ability to enhance health and enable be/t_ter nutrition. Int. J. Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng 4, 2 (2009), 66–80

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    Oleksandr Makeyev, Paulo Lopez-Meyer, Stephanie Schuckers, Walter Besio, and Edward Sazonov. 2012. Automatic food intake detection based on swallowing sounds. Biomedical signal processing and control 7, 6 (2012), 649–656

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    Jennifer Mankoff, Gary Hsieh, Ho Chak Hung, Sharon Lee, and Elizabeth Nitao. 2002. Using low-cost sensing to support nutritional awareness. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing . Springer, 371–378

    work page 2002

Showing first 80 references.