REVIEW 2 cited by
Variational preparation of entangled states on quantum computers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose a variational approach for preparing entangled quantum states on quantum computers. The methodology involves training a unitary operation to match with a target unitary using the Fubini-Study distance as a cost function. We employ various gradient-based optimization techniques to enhance performance, including Adam and quantum natural gradient. Our investigation showcases the versatility of different ansatzes featuring a hypergraph structure, enabling the preparation of diverse entanglement target states such as GHZ, W, and absolutely maximally entangled states. Remarkably, the circuit depth scales efficiently with the number of layers and does not depend on the number of qubits. Moreover, we explore the impacts of barren plateaus, readout noise, and error mitigation techniques on the proposed approach. Through our analysis, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the variational algorithm in maximizing the efficiency of quantum state preparation, leveraging low-depth quantum circuits.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Variational optical phase learning on a continuous-variable quantum compiler
An experimental continuous-variable quantum compiler learns an optical phase with two-mode squeezed light, and increasing the squeezing sharpens the cost landscape, improving precision and training speed.
-
Approximate Quantum State Preparation Through Proximal Policy Optimization
An RL agent using PPO constructs approximate quantum state preparation circuits with 10^-14 error and near-optimal gate counts on 2-3 qubit systems, with performance degrading at larger sizes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.