Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Bosonic vs. Fermionic Matter in Quantum Simulations of $2+1$D Gauge Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that hardcore bosons can replace fermionic matter in quantum simulations of 2+1D U(1) quantum link models because the two phase diagrams coincide in the confined regime.

desk verdict Useful phase-diagram comparison, but the string-breaking recommendation overreaches the static data. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17000 v1 pith:5BXX65BS submitted 2025-04-23 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gashep-latquant-ph

N. S. Srivatsa , Jesse J. Osborne , Debasish Banerjee , Jad C. Halimeh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.quant-gashep-latquant-ph
keywords quantumlinkmodellatticegaugetheoryhardcorebosonsfermionicmatterphasediagramconfinementresonatingvalencebondsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether fermionic statistics are essential in 2+1D lattice gauge theory, or whether the simpler hardcore boson can reproduce the same physics. It studies the U(1) quantum link model, where gauge fields live on spin-1/2 links and matter lives on sites, and maps out the ground-state phase diagram for both statistics. The central finding is that the bosonic phase diagram closely mirrors the fermionic one: both show a transition from a columnar phase to a resonating-valence-bond phase as the matter mass is varied. The differences are confined to the small-mass region where hopping dominates, where bosons develop a narrow phase of alternating plaquette orientations and a possible thin liquid-like window. Because the confined regime, where string breaking and confinement are studied, is insensitive to the matter statistics, the paper concludes that hardcore bosons can replace fermions in digital and analog quantum simulations.

What carries the argument

The central objects are hardcore bosonic matter (bosons limited to at most one particle per site) and fermionic matter coupled to the same U(1) quantum link gauge field, a lattice gauge theory in which the gauge field on each link is a finite-dimensional spin operator rather than an unbounded continuous link variable. The comparison is carried by three order parameters: the chiral condensate $\langle \hat{C} \rangle$ (a staggered matter-density order parameter), the flippable-plaquette order $\langle \hat{O}_F \rangle$ (which counts plaquettes whose spin orientations can flip), and the staggered plaquette-orientation order $\langle \hat{Q}_A \rangle$ that distinguishes columnar from alternating ordering. The numerical evidence comes from tensor-network ground states (infinite-DMRG) on cylinders of circumference $L_y=4$ with infinite axial length, with entanglement entropy as the diagnostic that exposes the sharper bosonic transition. Particle statistics enters through the commutation algebra of the matter operators, and the paper shows that this matters only when the kinetic term makes matter mobile near $m/t\approx 0$.

What would settle it

Repeat the same infinite-DMRG calculation on cylinders of circumference $L_y=6$ and $L_y=8$; if the alternating-plaquette-ordered region and the liquid-like window around $m/t\approx 0.2$ shrink or disappear with increasing width, those phases are finite-width artifacts rather than genuine 2D phases.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, for the 2+1D U(1) quantum link model with spin-1/2 gauge links, the ground-state phase diagram with hardcore bosonic matter is essentially the same as with fermionic matter. Both feature a chiral condensate that vanishes near $m/t=0$ (where $m$ is the bare mass and $t$ the hopping amplitude) and gauge-field ordering that moves from a columnar dimer configuration to a resonating-valence-bond phase. Around $m/t=0$, where the matter kinetic term is largest, the two statistics diverge: bosons show a sharper transition, a pronounced dip in entanglement entropy, and a peak in the staggered plaquette-order parameter $\langle \hat{Q}_A \rangle$, indicating a phase of alternating plaquette orientations, followed by a thinner liquid-like region. Deep in the confined phase, however, connected plaquette correlations and order-parameter profiles for bosons and fermions are closely aligned, and it is this regime that matters for string-breaking experiments. The conclusion is that fermionic matter is not crucial for simulating confinement in 2+1D, so hardcore bosons are viable substitutes in both digital and analog platforms.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that a cylinder of circumference $L_y=4$ and infinite length is wide enough to represent the two-dimensional physics; if the alternating-plaquette phase is an artifact of that narrow width, the claimed bosonic phase diagram is a quasi-one-dimensional effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Confinement and string-breaking simulations in 2+1D can be run with hardcore bosons, removing the need for nonlocal fermion encodings and avoiding the fermionic sign problem.
  • The qualitative columnar-to-RVB structure of the phase diagram is robust to particle statistics, so earlier fermionic results carry over to bosonic implementations.
  • Observables matter: the staggered plaquette order parameter $\langle \hat{Q}_A \rangle$ and entanglement entropy, not the chiral condensate, reveal the statistics-driven differences near $m/t=0$.
  • The narrow alternating-plaquette phase and the thin liquid-like window provide specific targets for near-term bosonic quantum simulators to test.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $L_y=4$ result persists at larger circumference, the alternating-plaquette phase could be a genuine 2D phase stabilized by boson-enhanced mobility, and the boundary of the regime where statistics matters would be sharpened.
  • A direct experimental test would be to measure $\langle \hat{Q}_A \rangle$ in a cold-atom or Rydberg implementation of the bosonic model; a peak that sharpens with system size would validate the transition, while a vanishing peak would favor the finite-width explanation.
  • The supplemental finite-entanglement scaling hint of roughly $(1/6)\log\chi$ near $m/t=0.2$ is not conclusive; larger bond dimensions could shift the classification of the bosonic transition between first- and second-order, changing which experimental signatures to look for.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the 2+1D U(1) quantum link model with spin-1/2 gauge links coupled to hardcore-bosonic matter, and compares it with the previously studied fermionic case. Using iDMRG on infinite cylinders with circumference Ly=4 (and Ly=2 in the supplement), with bond dimensions up to chi=800, it computes the chiral condensate, plaquette order parameters, entanglement entropy, and plaquette correlation functions. It reports that the bosonic phase diagram largely mirrors the fermionic one, with a columnar-to-RVB transition, but that near m/t approximately 0 bosons exhibit a narrow alternating-plaquette ordered phase and possibly a thin liquid-like regime before entering the confined phase. The authors conclude that hardcore bosons can effectively replace fermionic matter in quantum simulations, particularly for string-breaking experiments in the confined regime.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would be practically valuable: it would justify using hardcore bosons (or qubit mappings without Jordan-Wigner strings) in analog and digital simulations of 2+1D U(1) quantum link models, avoiding fermionic overhead. The numerical work is substantial for a Letter: direct iDMRG scans at chi=800, a bond-dimension scaling check in the supplement, and a benchmark against the fermionic results of Ref. [45]. The comparison is not circular: the bosonic phase diagram is produced by direct Hamiltonian simulation, not by fitting model output. The main risk is not internal inconsistency but the gap between the static ground-state evidence and the dynamical conclusion about string breaking.

major comments (3)
  1. [Conclusions / Fig. 4] The statement that fermionic matter 'may not be crucial' in string-breaking experiments is load-bearing for the paper's practical recommendation, but it is supported only by ground-state order parameters and static correlation functions. String breaking is a real-time, non-equilibrium process involving pair creation and flux-tube rupture; equivalence of static correlation functions in a gapped confined phase does not by itself imply dynamical equivalence, because the local Hilbert space and matrix elements differ between hardcore bosons and fermions in two dimensions. No time-evolution, spectral, or transport data are presented, and no argument (e.g., an effective low-energy mapping) is given to close the gap. Please either add dynamical simulations of string breaking in the confined regime (e.g., iTEBD or iMPS quench data) or restrict the conclusion to static/equilibrium properties and mark the dynamical extrapolation as a conjecture.
  2. [Phase diagram / Fig. 2] The new alternating-plaquette phase and the adjacent liquid-like window are narrow features detected on Ly=4 cylinders, with only Ly=2 checked in the supplement; no error bars or truncation-error estimates are provided for the order parameters. The assertion that Ly=4 approaches the thermodynamic limit for spin models is documented for other models, but the narrowness of the new bosonic features makes them exactly the quantities most vulnerable to finite-width effects. Please provide convergence in Ly (at least one larger circumference, e.g., Ly=6, where feasible) or explicit truncation-error estimates, and mark the phase boundaries as tentative if such checks are not available.
  3. [Bosons vs. fermions / SM S2] The order of the bosonic transition is reported inconsistently. The main text describes the entropy drop near m/t=0.3 as 'indicative of a potential first-order transition, although the possibility of a second-order transition cannot be definitively excluded,' while the supplement reports Smax approximately (1/6) log(chi) at m/t=0.2 and states that this is 'hinting towards a possibility of a second-order transition.' These statements are in direct tension, and the phase-diagram interpretation in Fig. 1(c) depends on the transition order. Please reconcile the two statements or state explicitly that the transition order is undetermined and not part of the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figs. 2 and 3] The data would be easier to assess with truncation-error estimates or error bars; consider adding these to the captions or presenting a supplemental convergence table.
  2. [Simulation and experiments] The statement that fermionic quantum link model simulations are hindered by the 'notorious sign problem' is made without a model-specific sign-problem analysis; consider softening to 'may be hindered' or citing a specific result for this Hamiltonian.
  3. [SM S2] In Eq. (S1) the scaling coefficient is denoted c, and the text then writes Smax approximately (1/6) log(chi); please state explicitly that c=1/6 for the presented data and clarify whether this is a central charge or an effective coefficient.
  4. [Abstract / Conclusions] The abstract and Conclusions state that 'bosons can effectively replace fermions' without the hedges ('probable', 'possibly', 'may') used in the main text; aligning these statements with the caveats would better reflect the evidence presented.
  5. [Eq. (6)] The parity label p(r) in Eq. (6) is not defined unambiguously; please specify that p(r)=+1 for even r and p(r)=-1 for odd r, or give the corresponding definition in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: the bosonic phase diagram is produced by direct iDMRG calculations, and self-citations are used only as benchmarks and methodological precedents.

full rationale

All quantitative claims are generated by direct iDMRG ground-state calculations of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1), with the Gauss-law constraint enforced by a penalty term, and the order parameters C, O_F, Q_A, and the plaquette correlation function C_box(r) are evaluated from the resulting matrix-product states. No parameter is fitted to the quantity that is later reported as a prediction; the phase labels are read off from computed expectation values. The fermionic comparison is informed by Ref. [45], which shares authors with this paper, but the fermionic curves shown in Figs. 2-4 are computed in the present work with the same numerical method, so the boson-fermion comparison is not imported from that citation as an unverified input. Refs. [45,106,107] are cited for the Ly=4 cylinder approaching the two-dimensional thermodynamic limit; this is a methodological precedent rather than a derivation of the bosonic phase diagram, and the new alternating-plaquette and liquid-like regimes are identified from the computed data in Figs. 2-4. The conclusion that hardcore bosons may suffice for string-breaking experiments goes beyond the static ground-state evidence presented here, but that is an evidence gap or correctness risk, not a circular reduction. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated. The model parameters t, m, and J are scanned, not fitted. The only hand-chosen numerical input is the Gauss-law penalty coefficient, which is not stated. The main assumptions are the cylinder-width approximation and the penalty-based projection into the physical sector.

free parameters (1)
  • Gauss-law penalty coefficient
    The authors enforce the physical sector by "adding a large energy penalty proportional to sum_j G_j^2" but do not state the coefficient. It is a hand-chosen numerical parameter; if too small, the Gauss-law sector is contaminated.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A cylinder of circumference Ly=4 is representative of the 2D thermodynamic limit for the phases studied.
    Invoked in the Phase diagram section with citations [45,106,107]; all main phase-diagram claims rely on this width.
  • domain assumption The hardcore-boson Hilbert space with spin-1/2 links and the Gauss-law constraint define the model of interest.
    The Hamiltonian and Gauss law in Eqs. (1)-(2) specify a particular truncated gauge theory; it is a modeling choice, not derived.
  • domain assumption The large penalty term isolates the no-background-charge gauge-invariant sector without altering ground-state physics.
    Section Phase diagram; the penalty enforces Eq. (2), but the final state is assumed independent of penalty strength.
  • standard math Kogut-Susskind staggering assigns charge signs by sublattice, and chiral symmetry protects the order parameter C.
    Used to define Eq. (3); standard construction in the cited fermionic QLM literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bosonic vs. Fermionic Matter in Quantum Simulations of $2+1$D Gauge Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BXX65BS

@misc{pith2026250417000,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bosonic vs. Fermionic Matter in Quantum Simulations of $2+1$D Gauge Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BXX65BS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17000}
}
abstract

Quantum link models extend lattice gauge theories beyond the traditional Wilson formulation and present promising candidates for both digital and analog quantum simulations. Fermionic matter coupled to $U(1)$ quantum link gauge fields has been extensively studied, revealing a phase diagram that includes transitions from the columnar phase in the quantum dimer model to the resonating valence bond phase in the quantum link model, potentially passing through a disordered liquid-like phase. In this study, we investigate the model coupled to hardcore bosons and identify a similar phase structure, though with a more intricate mixture of phases around the transition. Our analysis reveals that near the transition region, a narrow and distinct ordered phase emerges, characterized by gauge fields forming plaquette configurations with alternating orientations, which is then followed by a thinner, liquid-like regime. This complexity primarily stems from the differences in particle statistics, which manifest prominently when the matter degrees of freedom become dynamic. Notably, our findings suggest that bosons can effectively replace fermions in lattice gauge theory simulations, offering solutions to the challenges posed by fermions in both digital and analog quantum simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.17000 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Lattice structure for the 2 + 1D U(1) quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Physical observables for fermions (top panel) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) The entanglement entropy and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The behavior of connected plaquette correlation function Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Universal framework with exponential speedup for the quantum simulation of quantum field theories including QCD

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Fermion extensions of the orbifold-lattice simulation framework achieve O(L^d) gates per Trotter step for QCD-like theories without oracles.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [109]

    Supplemental Material

  2. [45]

    Hashizume, J

    T. Hashizume, J. C. Halimeh, P. Hauke, and D. Baner- jee, Ground-state phase diagram of quantum link elec- trodynamics in (2 + 1)-d, SciPost Phys. 13, 017 (2022)

    2022

  3. [1]

    Berges, M

    J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venu- gopalan, Qcd thermalization: Ab initio approaches and interdisciplinary connections, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035003 (2021)

    2021

  4. [2]

    Gross, E

    F. Gross, E. Klempt, S. J. Brodsky, A. J. Buras, V. D. Burkert, G. Heinrich, K. Jakobs, C. A. Meyer, K. Orginos, M. Strickland, J. Stachel, G. Zanderighi, N. Brambilla, P. Braun-Munzinger, D. Britzger, S. Cap- stick, T. Cohen, V. Crede, M. Constantinou, C. Davies, L. Del Debbio, A. Denig, C. DeTar, A. Deur, Y. Dok- shitzer, H. G. Dosch, J. Dudek, M. Dunfo...

    2023

  5. [3]

    Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , Vol

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields , Vol. 2: Modern Applications (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  6. [4]

    Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction , EBSCO ebook academic collection (World Scientific, 2005)

    H. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction , EBSCO ebook academic collection (World Scientific, 2005)

    2005

  7. [5]

    Z. Fodor, Selected results in lattice quan- tum chromodynamics, Progress of Theoreti- cal and Experimental Physics 2012, 01A108 (2012), https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2012/1/01A108/4469747/pts033.pdf

    2012

  8. [6]

    Ding, New developments in lattice QCD on equi- librium physics and phase diagram, Nucl

    H.-T. Ding, New developments in lattice QCD on equi- librium physics and phase diagram, Nucl. Phys. A1005, 121940 (2021), arXiv:2002.11957 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 118 references
  1. [7]

    DeGrand and C

    T. DeGrand and C. E. Detar, Lattice methods for quan- tum chromodynamics (2006)

    2006

  2. [8]

    A. S. Kronfeld et al. (USQCD), Lattice QCD and Par- ticle Physics, (2022), arXiv:2207.07641 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Knechtli, M

    F. Knechtli, M. G¨ unther, and M. Peardon, Lat- tice Quantum Chromodynamics: Practical Essentials , SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, 2017)

    2017

  4. [10]

    Nielsen and I

    M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information , Cambridge Series on Informa- tion and the Natural Sciences (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    2000

  5. [11]

    Alexeev, D

    Y. Alexeev, D. Bacon, K. R. Brown, R. Calderbank, L. D. Carr, F. T. Chong, B. DeMarco, D. Englund, E. Farhi, B. Fefferman, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Houck, J. Kim, S. Kimmel, M. Lange, S. Lloyd, M. D. Lukin, D. Maslov, P. Maunz, C. Monroe, J. Preskill, M. Roet- teler, M. J. Savage, a...

    2021

  6. [12]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum sim- ulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014)

    2014

  7. [13]

    Horn, Finite Matrix Models With Continuous Local Gauge Invariance, Phys

    D. Horn, Finite Matrix Models With Continuous Local Gauge Invariance, Phys. Lett. B 100, 149 (1981)

    1981

  8. [14]

    Orland and D

    P. Orland and D. Rohrlich, Lattice Gauge Magnets: Lo- cal Isospin From Spin, Nucl. Phys. B 338, 647 (1990)

    1990

  9. [15]

    Chandrasekharan and U.-J

    S. Chandrasekharan and U.-J. Wiese, Quantum link models: A discrete approach to gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B. 492, 455 (1997)

    1997

  10. [16]

    Wiese, Ultracold quantum gases and lattice sys- tems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories, An- nalen der Physik 525, 777 (2013)

    U.-J. Wiese, Ultracold quantum gases and lattice sys- tems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories, An- nalen der Physik 525, 777 (2013)

    2013

  11. [17]

    Dalmonte and S

    M. Dalmonte and S. Montangero, Lattice gauge theory simulations in the quantum informa- tion era, Contemporary Physics 57, 388 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2016.1151199

    2016

  12. [18]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, R. Blatt, J. Catani, A. Celi, J. I. Cirac, M. Dalmonte, L. Fallani, K. Jansen, M. Lewenstein, S. Montangero, C. A. Muschik, B. Reznik, E. Rico, L. Tagliacozzo, K. Van Acoleyen, F. Verstraete, U.-J. Wiese, M. Wingate, J. Zakrzewski, and P. Zoller, Sim- ulating l...

    2020

  13. [19]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Quantum simula- tions of lattice gauge theories using ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 014401 (2015)

    2015

  14. [20]

    Aidelsburger, L

    M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, A. Dauphin, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, P. R. Grzy- bowski, S. Hands, F. Jendrzejewski, J. J¨ unemann, G. Juzeli¯ unas, V. Kasper, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Rizzi, G. Sierra, L. Tagliacozzo, E. Tirrito, T. V. Zache, J. Za- krzewski,...

    2022

  15. [21]

    Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Philos

    E. Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 380, 20210069 (2022), arXiv:2106.04609 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [22]

    N. Klco, A. Roggero, and M. J. Savage, Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 064301 (2022)

    2022

  17. [23]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, A. B. Balantekin, T. Bhat- tacharya, M. Carena, W. A. de Jong, P. Draper, A. El-Khadra, N. Gemelke, M. Hanada, D. Kharzeev, H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Liu, M. Lukin, Y. Meurice, C. Monroe, B. Nachman, G. Pagano, J. Preskill, E. Ri- naldi, A. Roggero, D. I. ...

    2023

  18. [24]

    Di Meglio, K

    A. Di Meglio, K. Jansen, I. Tavernelli, C. Alexandrou, S. Arunachalam, C. W. Bauer, K. Borras, S. Carrazza, A. Crippa, V. Croft, R. de Putter, A. Delgado, V. Dun- jko, D. J. Egger, E. Fern´ andez-Combarro, E. Fuchs, L. Funcke, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Grossi, J. C. Hal- imeh, ...

    2024

  19. [25]

    Cheng and H

    Y. Cheng and H. Zhai, Emergent u(1) lattice gauge the- ory in rydberg atom arrays, Nature Reviews Physics 6, 566 (2024)

    2024

  20. [26]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Cold-atom quantum simulators of gauge theories, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-024-02721-8 (2025)

    2025 doi

  21. [27]

    T. D. Cohen, H. Lamm, S. Lawrence, and Y. Yamauchi (NuQS), Quantum algorithms for transport coefficients in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094514 (2021), arXiv:2104.02024 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [28]

    K. Lee, F. Turro, and X. Yao, Quantum Computing for Energy Correlators, (2024), arXiv:2409.13830 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Turro, A

    F. Turro, A. Ciavarella, and X. Yao, Classical and quantum computing of shear viscosity for (2+1)D SU(2) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114511 (2024), arXiv:2402.04221 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Buyens, S

    B. Buyens, S. Montangero, J. Haegeman, F. Verstraete, and K. Van Acoleyen, Finite-representation approxima- tion of lattice gauge theories at the continuum limit with tensor networks, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094509 (2017)

    2017

  25. [31]

    T. V. Zache, M. Van Damme, J. C. Halimeh, P. Hauke, and D. Banerjee, Toward the continuum limit of a (1 + 1)D quantum link schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D 106, L091502 (2022)

    2022

  26. [32]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. V. Damme, T. V. Zache, D. Banerjee, and P. Hauke, Achieving the quantum field theory limit in far-from-equilibrium quantum link models, Quantum 6, 878 (2022)

    2022

  27. [33]

    Banerjee, F

    D. Banerjee, F. J. Jiang, P. Widmer, and U. J. Wiese, The (2 + 1)-d U(1) quantum link model masquerading as deconfined criticality, J. Stat. Mech. 1312, P12010 (2013), arXiv:1303.6858 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Banerjee, M

    D. Banerjee, M. B¨ ogli, C. P. Hofmann, F. J. Jiang, P. Widmer, and U. J. Wiese, Interfaces, Strings, and a Soft Mode in the Square Lattice Quantum Dimer Model, Phys. Rev. B 90, 245143 (2014), arXiv:1406.2077 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Banerjee, M

    D. Banerjee, M. B¨ ogli, C. P. Hofmann, F. J. Jiang, P. Widmer, and U. J. Wiese, Finite-Volume Energy Spectrum, Fractionalized Strings, and Low-Energy Ef- fective Field Theory for the Quantum Dimer Model on the Square Lattice, Phys. Rev. B 94, 115120 (2016), arXiv:1511.00881 [...

    2016 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Banerjee, F

    D. Banerjee, F. J. Jiang, T. Z. Olesen, P. Orland, and U. J. Wiese, From the SU (2) quantum link model on the honeycomb lattice to the quantum dimer model on the kagom´ e lattice: Phase transition and fraction- alized flux strings, Phys. Rev. B 97, 205108 (2018), arXiv:1712.08...

    2018 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Banerjee, S

    D. Banerjee, S. Caspar, F. J. Jiang, J. H. Peng, and U. J. Wiese, Nematic confined phases in the U(1) quantum link model on a triangular lattice: Near-term quantum computations of string dynamics on a chip, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023176 (2022), arXiv:2107.01283 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [38]

    E. Rico, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller, D. Banerjee, M. B¨ ogli, P. Stebler, and U. J. Wiese, SO(3) ”Nuclear Physics” with ultracold Gases, Annals Phys. 393, 466 (2018), arXiv:1802.00022 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. 7

    2018 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Brenes, M

    M. Brenes, M. Dalmonte, M. Heyl, and A. Scardic- chio, Many-body localization dynamics from gauge in- variance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030601 (2018)

    2018

  34. [40]

    F. M. Surace, P. P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi, and M. Dalmonte, Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simula- tors, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  35. [41]

    Papaefstathiou, A

    I. Papaefstathiou, A. Smith, and J. Knolle, Disorder- free localization in a simple U(1) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. B 102, 165132 (2020)

    2020

  36. [42]

    I. Sau, A. Sen, and D. Banerjee, Weak Universality In- duced by Q=±2e Charges at the Deconfinement Transi- tion of a (2+1)-Dimensional U(1) Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071901 (2023), arXiv:2209.14606 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Banerjee and A

    D. Banerjee and A. Sen, Quantum scars from zero modes in an abelian lattice gauge theory on ladders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220601 (2021)

    2021

  38. [44]

    Biswas, D

    S. Biswas, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Scars from pro- tected zero modes and beyond inU(1) quantum link and quantum dimer models, SciPost Phys. 12, 148 (2022)

    2022

  39. [46]

    Van Damme, T

    M. Van Damme, T. V. Zache, D. Banerjee, P. Hauke, and J. C. Halimeh, Dynamical quantum phase transi- tions in spin-su(1) quantum link models, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245110 (2022)

    2022

  40. [47]

    Desaules, D

    J.-Y. Desaules, D. Banerjee, A. Hudomal, Z. Papi´ c, A. Sen, and J. C. Halimeh, Weak ergodicity breaking in the schwinger model, Phys. Rev. B107, L201105 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    Desaules, A

    J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hudomal, D. Banerjee, A. Sen, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Prominent quantum many- body scars in a truncated schwinger model (2023)

    2023

  42. [49]

    J. C. Halimeh, L. Barbiero, P. Hauke, F. Grusdt, and A. Bohrdt, Robust quantum many-body scars in lattice gauge theories, Quantum 7, 1004 (2023)

    2023

  43. [50]

    Desaules, G.-X

    J.-Y. Desaules, G.-X. Su, I. P. McCulloch, B. Yang, Z. Papi´ c, and J. C. Halimeh, Ergodicity Breaking Un- der Confinement in Cold-Atom Quantum Simulators, Quantum 8, 1274 (2024)

    2024

  44. [51]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Disorder-free localization in 2 + 1d lattice gauge the- ories with dynamical matter, (2023), arXiv:2301.07720 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [52]

    I. Sau, P. Stornati, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Sublattice scars and beyond in two-dimensional U(1) quantum link lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D109, 034519 (2024), arXiv:2311.06773 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Quan- tum many-body scarring in 2 + 1d gauge theories with dynamical matter, (2024), arXiv:2403.08858 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [54]

    I. Sau, D. Banerjee, and A. Sen, Fate of many-body localization in an Abelian lattice gauge theory, (2024), arXiv:2405.20379 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    2024

  48. [55]

    G.-X. Su, J. J. Osborne, and J. C. Halimeh, Cold-atom particle collider, PRX Quantum 5, 040310 (2024)

    2024

  49. [56]

    Tan and Y.-P

    T.-L. Tan and Y.-P. Huang, Interference-caged quantum many-body scars: the fock space topological localization and interference zeros (2025), arXiv:2504.07780 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Jeyaretnam, T

    J. Jeyaretnam, T. Bhore, J. J. Osborne, J. C. Halimeh, and Z. Papi´ c, Hilbert space fragmentation at the ori- gin of disorder-free localization in the lattice schwinger model, Communications Physics 8, 172 (2025)

    2025

  51. [58]

    E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, and R. Blatt, Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Na- ture 534, 516 (2016)

    2016

  52. [59]

    N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Mor- ris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331 (2018)

    2018

  53. [60]

    G¨ org, K

    F. G¨ org, K. Sandholzer, J. Minguzzi, R. Desbuquois, M. Messer, and T. Esslinger, Realization of density- dependent Peierls phases to engineer quantized gauge fields coupled to ultracold matter, Nat. Phys. 15, 1161 (2019)

    2019

  54. [61]

    Schweizer, F

    C. Schweizer, F. Grusdt, M. Berngruber, L. Barbiero, E. Demler, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Floquet approach to Z2 lattice gauge theories with ul- tracold atoms in optical lattices, Nat. Phys. 15, 1168 (2019)

    2019

  55. [62]

    A. Mil, T. V. Zache, A. Hegde, A. Xia, R. P. Bhatt, M. K. Oberthaler, P. Hauke, J. Berges, and F. Jen- drzejewski, A scalable realization of local U(1) gauge invariance in cold atomic mixtures, Science 367, 1128 (2020)

    2020

  56. [63]

    B. Yang, H. Sun, R. Ott, H.-Y. Wang, T. V. Zache, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, P. Hauke, and J.-W. Pan, Obser- vation of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose–Hubbard quantum simulator, Nature 587, 392 (2020)

    2020

  57. [64]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    Z. Wang, Z.-Y. Ge, Z. Xiang, X. Song, R.-Z. Huang, P. Song, X.-Y. Guo, L. Su, K. Xu, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of emergent z2 gauge invariance in a su- perconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L022060 (2022)

    2022

  58. [65]

    Zhou, G.-X

    Z.-Y. Zhou, G.-X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, R. Ott, H. Sun, P. Hauke, B. Yang, Z.-S. Yuan, J. Berges, and J.-W. Pan, Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator, Science 377, 311 (2022)

    2022

  59. [66]

    Wang, W.-Y

    H.-Y. Wang, W.-Y. Zhang, Z. Yao, Y. Liu, Z.-H. Zhu, Y.-G. Zheng, X.-K. Wang, H. Zhai, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.- W. Pan, Interrelated thermalization and quantum criti- cality in a lattice gauge simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 050401 (2023)

    2023

  60. [67]

    Zhang, Y

    W.-Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Cheng, M.-G. He, H.-Y. Wang, T.-Y. Wang, Z.-H. Zhu, G.-X. Su, Z.-Y. Zhou, Y.-G. Zheng, H. Sun, B. Yang, P. Hauke, W. Zheng, J. C. Hal- imeh, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of micro- scopic confinement dynamics by a tunable topological theta-angl...

    2024 doi

  61. [68]

    G.-X. Su, H. Sun, A. Hudomal, J.-Y. Desaules, Z.-Y. Zhou, B. Yang, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, Z. Papi´ c, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of many-body scarring in a bose-hubbard quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023010 (2023)

    2023

  62. [69]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum simula- tion of su(3) lattice yang-mills theory at leading order in large-Nc expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111901 (2024)

    2024

  63. [70]

    A. N. Ciavarella, String Breaking in the Heavy Quark Limit with Scalable Circuits, (2024), arXiv:2411.05915 [quant-ph]. 8

    2024 arXiv

  64. [71]

    A. De, A. Lerose, D. Luo, F. M. Surace, A. Schuckert, E. R. Bennewitz, B. Ware, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, Z. Davoudi, A. V. Gorshkov, O. Katz, and C. Monroe, Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator (2024), arXiv:2410.13815 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Liu, W.-Y

    Y. Liu, W.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, M.-G. He, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, String breaking mechanism in a lattice schwinger model simulator (2024), arXiv:2411.15443 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [73]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Savage, Scalable Circuits for Preparing Ground States on Dig- ital Quantum Computers: The Schwinger Model Vac- uum on 100 Qubits, PRX Quantum 5, 020315 (2024), arXiv:2308.04481 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [74]

    R. C. Farrell, M. Illa, A. N. Ciavarella, and M. J. Sav- age, Quantum simulations of hadron dynamics in the Schwinger model using 112 qubits, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114510 (2024), arXiv:2401.08044 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Z.-H. Zhu, Y. Liu, G. Lagnese, F. M. Surace, W.-Y. Zhang, M.-G. He, J. C. Halimeh, M. Dalmonte, S. C. Morampudi, F. Wilczek, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Probing false vacuum decay on a cold-atom gauge- theory quantum simulator (2024), arXiv:2411.12565 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Ciavarella, N

    A. Ciavarella, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094501 (2021), arXiv:2101.10227 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [77]

    A. N. Ciavarella, Quantum simulation of lattice QCD with improved Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094513 (2023), arXiv:2307.05593 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [78]

    A. N. Ciavarella and I. A. Chernyshev, Preparation of the SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills vacuum with variational quantum methods, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074504 (2022), arXiv:2112.09083 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [79]

    E. J. Gustafson, H. Lamm, and F. Lovelace, Prim- itive quantum gates for an SU(2) discrete subgroup: Binary octahedral, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054503 (2024), arXiv:2312.10285 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [80]

    E. J. Gustafson, Y. Ji, H. Lamm, E. M. Murairi, S. O. Perez, and S. Zhu, Primitive quantum gates for an SU(3) discrete subgroup: Σ(36 ×3), Phys. Rev. D 110, 034515 (2024), arXiv:2405.05973 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Lamm, Y.-Y

    H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, J. Shu, Y.-L. Wang, and B. Xu, Block encodings of discrete subgroups on a quan- tum computer, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054505 (2024), arXiv:2405.12890 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [82]

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054512 (2023), arXiv:2207.01731 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  76. [83]

    R. C. Farrell, I. A. Chernyshev, S. J. M. Powell, N. A. Zemlevskiy, M. Illa, and M. J. Savage, Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. II. Single-baryon β-decay in real time, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054513 (2023), arXiv:2209.10781 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Z. Li, D. M. Grabowska, and M. J. Savage, Sequency Hi- erarchy Truncation (SeqHT) for Adiabatic State Prepa- ration and Time Evolution in Quantum Simulations, (2024), arXiv:2407.13835 [quant-ph]

    2024

  78. [85]

    N. A. Zemlevskiy, Scalable Quantum Simulations of Scattering in Scalar Field Theory on 120 Qubits, (2024), arXiv:2411.02486 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Lewis and R

    R. Lewis and R. M. Woloshyn, A qubit model for U(1) lattice gauge theory (2019) arXiv:1905.09789 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Y. Y. Atas, J. Zhang, R. Lewis, A. Jahanpour, J. F. Haase, and C. A. Muschik, SU(2) hadrons on a quantum computer via a variational approach, Nature Commun. 12, 6499 (2021), arXiv:2102.08920 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [88]

    A Rahman, R

    S. A Rahman, R. Lewis, E. Mendicelli, and S. Powell, Self-mitigating Trotter circuits for SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074502 (2022), arXiv:2205.09247 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Y. Y. Atas, J. F. Haase, J. Zhang, V. Wei, S. M. L. Pfaendler, R. Lewis, and C. A. Muschik, Simulat- ing one-dimensional quantum chromodynamics on a quantum computer: Real-time evolutions of tetra- and pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033184 (2023), arXiv:2207.03473 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Mendicelli, R

    E. Mendicelli, R. Lewis, S. A. Rahman, and S. Powell, Real time evolution and a traveling excitation in SU(2) pure gauge theory on a quantum computer., PoS LA T- TICE2022, 025 (2023), arXiv:2210.11606 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [91]

    A. H. Z. Kavaki and R. Lewis, From square plaquettes to triamond lattices for SU(2) gauge theory, Commun. Phys. 7, 208 (2024), arXiv:2401.14570 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [92]

    A. T. Than et al., The phase diagram of quantum chro- modynamics in one dimension on a quantum computer, (2024), arXiv:2501.00579 [quant-ph]

    2024

  86. [93]

    Angelides, P

    T. Angelides, P. Naredi, A. Crippa, K. Jansen, S. K¨ uhn, I. Tavernelli, and D. S. Wang, First-order phase transi- tion of the schwinger model with a quantum computer, npj Quantum Information 11, 6 (2025)

    2025

  87. [94]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Blekos, G. Polykratis, and S. K¨ uhn, Realizing string breaking dynamics in a z2 lattice gauge theory on quantum hardware, (2025), arXiv:2504.13760 [hep-lat]

    2025 arXiv

  88. [95]

    T. A. Cochran, B. Jobst, E. Rosenberg, Y. D. Lensky, G. Gyawali, N. Eassa, M. Will, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. A. Beni, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, M...

    2024 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Gyawali, T

    G. Gyawali, T. Cochran, Y. Lensky, E. Rosenberg, A. H. Karamlou, K. Kechedzhi, J. Berndtsson, T. Westerhout, A. Asfaw, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. A. Beni, T. I. An- dersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, N. Astrakhant- sev, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, B. Ballard, J. C. Bardin, A. B...

    2024 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Gonzalez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cantu, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string break- ing on a (2 + 1)d rydberg quantum simulator (2024), arXiv:2410.16558 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Crippa, K

    A. Crippa, K. Jansen, and E. Rinaldi, Analysis of the confinement string in (2 + 1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics with a trapped-ion quantum computer (2024), arXiv:2411.05628 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Osborne, I

    J. Osborne, I. P. McCulloch, B. Yang, P. Hauke, and J. C. Halimeh, Large-scale 2+1d U(1) gauge theory with dynamical matter in a cold-atom quantum simulator, (2022), arXiv:2211.01380 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2022 arXiv

  93. [100]

    F. M. Surace, P. Fromholz, N. D. Oppong, M. Dal- monte, and M. Aidelsburger, abinitio derivation of lat- tice gauge theory dynamics for cold gases in optical lat- tices, PRX Quantum 4, 020330 (2023)

    2023

  94. [101]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quan- tum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  95. [102]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993)

    1993

  96. [103]

    I. P. McCulloch, Infinite size density matrix renormal- ization group, revisited (2008), arXiv:0804.2509 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2008 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  98. [105]

    For spin models, this system size is known to approach the thermodynamic limit in two spatial dimensions in and out of equilib- rium [45, 106, 107]

    on cylinders of circumference Ly = 4, with in- finite axial length ( Lx → ∞). For spin models, this system size is known to approach the thermodynamic limit in two spatial dimensions in and out of equilib- rium [45, 106, 107]. We enforce Gauss’s law condition by adding a large...

  99. [106]

    I. P. McCulloch and J. J. Osborne, Matrix product toolkit, https://github.com/mptoolkit

  100. [107]

    Hashizume, I

    T. Hashizume, I. P. McCulloch, and J. C. Halimeh, Dynamical phase transitions in the two-dimensional transverse-field ising model, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013250 (2022)

    2022

  101. [108]

    Hashizume, J

    T. Hashizume, J. C. Halimeh, and I. P. McCulloch, Hy- brid infinite time-evolving block decimation algorithm for long-range multidimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035115 (2020)

    2020

  102. [110]

    Banerjee, E

    D. Banerjee, E. Huffman, and L. Rammelm¨ uller, Exploring bosonic and fermionic link models on (3+1)D tubes, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033174 (2022), arXiv:2201.07171 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Troyer and U.-J

    M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Computational complex- ity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005)

    2005

  104. [112]

    J. C. Halimeh, H. Lang, J. Mildenberger, Z. Jiang, and P. Hauke, Gauge-symmetry protection using single- body terms, PRX Quantum 2, 040311 (2021)

    2021

  105. [113]

    Osborne, B

    J. Osborne, B. Yang, I. P. McCulloch, P. Hauke, and J. C. Halimeh, Spin- s U(1) quantum link models with dynamical matter on a quantum simulator, (2023), arXiv:2305.06368 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. 10

    2023 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Jafarizadeh, F

    A. Jafarizadeh, F. Pollmann, and A. Gammon-Smith, A recipe for local simulation of strongly-correlated fermionic matter on quantum computers: the 2d fermi- hubbard model, (2024), arXiv:2408.14543 [quant-ph]

    2024

  107. [115]

    Derby, J

    C. Derby, J. Klassen, J. Bausch, and T. Cubitt, Com- pact fermion to qubit mappings, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035118 (2021)

    2021

  108. [116]

    Nigmatullin, K

    R. Nigmatullin, K. Hemery, K. Ghanem, S. Moses, D. Gresh, P. Siegfried, M. Mills, T. Gatterman, N. He- witt, E. Granet, and H. Dreyer, Experimental demon- stration of break-even for the compact fermionic encod- ing, (2024), arXiv:2409.06789 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Tagliacozzo, T

    L. Tagliacozzo, T. R. de Oliveira, S. Iblisdir, and J. I. Latorre, Scaling of entanglement support for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 78, 024410 (2008)

    2008

  110. [118]

    Nagy, Exploring phase transitions by finite- entanglement scaling of mps in the 1d annni model, New Journal of Physics 13, 023015 (2011)

    A. Nagy, Exploring phase transitions by finite- entanglement scaling of mps in the 1d annni model, New Journal of Physics 13, 023015 (2011). 1 Supplemental Material for ‘Bosonic vs. Fermionic Matter in Quantum Simulations of 2 + 1D Gauge Theories’ Appendix S1: Physical observa...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.