Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 60 references

Non-linear density scaling of spin noise reveals atomic correlations in warm vapors

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin noise variance in warm atomic vapors scales quadratically with density due to dipole-dipole cross-correlations.

desk verdict The paper reports a quadratic density scaling in spin noise from warm Rb vapor that vanishes under a DDI-quenching protocol, extending SNS to interacting regimes. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.31262 v1 pith:5CXTYAS4 submitted 2026-05-29 quant-ph

Joseph Delpy , Elwyn Cardoz , Adwaith KV , Nikos Fayard , Nadia Belabas , Fabien bretenaker , Fabienne Goldfarb This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords spinnoisespectroscopydipole-dipoleinteractionatomiccorrelationswarmvaporsrubidiumdensityscalingmany-bodyeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates that spin noise variance in a warm rubidium vapor follows the expected linear density scaling at low densities but acquires an additional quadratic term at high densities. This non-linear contribution arises from atomic cross-correlations induced by resonant dipole-dipole interactions and requires residual optical excitation by the probe beam. Introducing a protocol that quenches the dipole-dipole interaction eliminates both the quadratic scaling and the associated distortions in the spin noise spectrum. The work positions spin noise spectroscopy as a tool for characterizing many-body correlations in dense atomic ensembles.

What carries the argument

High-bandwidth spin noise spectroscopy near the rubidium D2 transition, combined with an experimental protocol that quenches resonant dipole-dipole interactions.

What would settle it

Applying the quenching protocol and still observing a persistent quadratic density term in the spin noise variance would falsify the claim that dipole-dipole interactions are the source.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In warm alkali vapors, the spin noise variance exhibits a non-linear dependence on atomic density, developing a quadratic contribution at high densities that stems from atomic cross-correlations due to resonant dipole-dipole interaction; this term depends on residual optical excitation by the probe and is suppressed when an additional protocol quenches the interaction, thereby extending spin noise spectroscopy to many-body correlation measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The observed quadratic scaling of spin noise variance and the spectral distortions are produced by resonant dipole-dipole interactions rather than by other density-dependent processes such as collisions or light-induced effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spin noise spectroscopy can now access many-body correlations in interacting atomic ensembles.
  • The quadratic term and spectral distortions both disappear when the dipole-dipole interaction is quenched.
  • The effect requires residual optical excitation, linking the correlations to probe-induced population in the excited state.
  • The linear scaling regime remains valid only when interactions can be neglected.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar quadratic contributions might appear in other fluctuation measurements such as fluorescence noise when dipole-dipole effects are present.
  • Varying probe intensity could provide a controllable way to tune the strength of the observed correlations.
  • The approach may extend to other dense quantum gases where interaction-induced noise scaling could be measured.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration, using high-bandwidth spin noise spectroscopy near the Rb D2 line, that spin-noise variance exhibits a quadratic density dependence at high atomic densities in a warm vapor, in contrast to the linear scaling expected for non-interacting atoms. The authors attribute the quadratic term to atomic cross-correlations induced by resonant dipole-dipole interactions and show that it requires residual optical excitation by the probe; an auxiliary quenching protocol is introduced that suppresses both the quadratic scaling and the associated spectral distortions.

Significance. If the central experimental claim is substantiated by the full dataset and controls, the result would be significant for extending spin-noise spectroscopy from single-particle to interaction-driven many-body regimes in thermal atomic ensembles. The quenching protocol provides a direct experimental handle on the proposed mechanism, which is a methodological strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the quadratic contribution 'crucially depend[s] on the residual optical excitation' and is suppressed by the quenching protocol is load-bearing for the DDI interpretation, yet the abstract supplies neither a description of the protocol, quantitative suppression factors, nor any mention of error bars, fitting procedures, or statistical tests on the quadratic coefficient. Without these, alternative density-dependent mechanisms cannot be assessed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater clarity in the abstract regarding the quenching protocol and supporting statistical details. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the quadratic contribution 'crucially depend[s] on the residual optical excitation' and is suppressed by the quenching protocol is load-bearing for the DDI interpretation, yet the abstract supplies neither a description of the protocol, quantitative suppression factors, nor any mention of error bars, fitting procedures, or statistical tests on the quadratic coefficient. Without these, alternative density-dependent mechanisms cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is concise and does not include a description of the quenching protocol or quantitative details on suppression factors, error bars, or the fitting procedures used to extract the quadratic coefficient. The main text provides these elements (protocol in the methods section, quantitative results and error analysis in the results and supplementary figures). To strengthen the abstract and allow readers to better evaluate the DDI interpretation against alternatives, we will revise it to incorporate a brief description of the quenching protocol, the observed suppression of the quadratic term, and a reference to the statistical fitting and error bars. This revision will be made in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a purely experimental study demonstrating non-linear spin noise scaling via high-bandwidth SNS on Rb vapor and a quenching protocol that suppresses the quadratic term. No derivation chain, fitted parameters presented as predictions, self-citations as load-bearing premises, or ansatz smuggling exists. The central claim rests on direct experimental controls and observations rather than any reduction to inputs by construction, rendering the result self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental attribution of quadratic scaling to DDI; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract, only standard atomic-physics background assumptions.

assumptions (2)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and atomic structure govern spin noise and resonant dipole-dipole interactions in alkali vapors
    Invoked implicitly to interpret the quadratic term as arising from DDI
  • domain assumption The probe beam produces residual optical excitation that enables the DDI effect
    Stated as crucial for the non-linear scaling to appear

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-linear density scaling of spin noise reveals atomic correlations in warm vapors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5CXTYAS4

@misc{pith2026260531262,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-linear density scaling of spin noise reveals atomic correlations in warm vapors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5CXTYAS4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.31262}
}
read the original abstract

We experimentally demonstrate a non-linear dependence of the spin noise variance on atomic density in a warm alkali vapor. Implementing high-bandwidth spin noise spectroscopy (SNS) near the D2 transition of rubidium, a quadratic spin noise contribution is shown to arise at high densities, in contrast with the linear dependence valid in non-interacting ensembles. This non-linear scaling is shown to crucially depend on the residual optical excitation of the vapor by the probe beam, suggesting it stems from atomic cross-correlations due to resonant dipole-dipole interaction (DDI) in the vapor. We support this claim by introducing an additional experimental protocol to quench the ddi, resulting in a suppression of both the quadratic scaling of the spin variance and the distortions of the spin noise spectrum induced by the interaction. These results extend the applications of SNS to the characterization of many-body correlations in complex quantum systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31262 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. shows typical spin-noise spectra at dif￾ferent atomic number densities obtained for a de￾tuning ∆/2π = +1.5 GHz and an input probe power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows results of total spin noise vari￾ance integrated from power spectra similar to the ones in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (b) in green squares and orange dots respectively. These values correspond to a probe beam being re￾spectively far red and blue-detuned from all hyperfine transitions of both rubidium 85 and 87. In this case, a linear fit to the spin noise variance for densities lower or (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the measured spin noise on the input probe power. Detected spin noise variance as a function of input probe power for different vapor densities. The detected power is fixed to 160 µW for all points, and the detuning is ∆/2π = +1.5 GHz. ∆/2π = +1.5 GHz as a…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Impact of the auxiliary beam on the de￾tected spin noise variance. (a) Density dependence of the residuals from the low-density linear trend with (blue dots) and without (orange squares) auxiliary beam. Param￾eters are Pp = 2 mW, Pd = 0.4 mW and ∆/2π = +1.5 GHz. (b) Bl…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Impact of the auxiliary beam power on the lineshapes. (a) Modification of the spin noise lineshapes with increasing auxiliary beam power depopulating the ex￾cited state. (b) Reduction of 85Rb spin linewidth (blue dots) and broadband low-frequency noise measured at 60 M…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of residual PSD levels after back￾ground subtraction, from which uncertainties in the esti￾mated spin noise variance are derived. measurement, by getting rid of the vapor cell on the beam path [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Characterization of the photon shot noise power spectrum. (a) PSD of the detected shot noise for different optical powers, after normalization by this power. (b) Linearity of the shot noise PSD evaluated at a fixed 10 MHz frequency with input optical power. rience a p…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We describe here the procedure for extracting and analyzing the spin-noise signal obtained from the digital oscilloscope

    Background subtraction. We describe here the procedure for extracting and analyzing the spin-noise signal obtained from the digital oscilloscope. We restrict ourselves to a frequency range of 0.2 MHz to 250 MHz. Below 0.2 MHz, flicker(1/f) noise dominates the spectrum. The upper frequency is chosen appropriately based on the 350 MHz bandwidth of the balan...

  2. [2]

    This in- cludes the technical background noise of the whole detection chain

    We first acquire the dark electronic background noiseS elec (ν), with the laser turned off. This in- cludes the technical background noise of the whole detection chain

  3. [3]

    Background noise

    We then acquire the backgroundSbg with the laser on but no vapor cell. This contains both the laser shot-noiseS laser (ν), and the dark electronic background:S bg (ν) =S elec (ν) +S laser (ν). The laser shot-noise can be thus accessed by performing the subtractionS laser =S bg −S elec. The orange curve labeled "Background noise" in Fig.8 shows a typical b...

  4. [4]

    In order to obtain the spin-noise variance,S SN is then integrated by manually choosing an appropriate frequency domain

    PSD integration procedure. In order to obtain the spin-noise variance,S SN is then integrated by manually choosing an appropriate frequency domain. The total spin-noise variance is com- posed of contributions from the resonance peaks of85Rb and 87Rb as well as the broadband noise component appearing at higher densities. Hence, the integration domain shoul...

  5. [5]

    Arnold L. Bloom. Principles of Operation of the Rubid- ium Vapor Magnetometer.Applied Optics, 1(1):61–68, January 1962

    1962

  6. [6]

    Optical mag- netometry.Nature Physics, 3(4):227–234, April 2007

    Dmitry Budker and Michael Romalis. Optical mag- netometry.Nature Physics, 3(4):227–234, April 2007. Number: 4 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2007

  7. [7]

    Schmittberger and David R

    Bonnie L. Schmittberger and David R. Scherer. A review of contemporary atomic frequency standards, 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Caesium atomic clocks: function, per- formance and applications.Measurement Science and Technology, 14(8):1159, 2003

    Andreas Bauch. Caesium atomic clocks: function, per- formance and applications.Measurement Science and Technology, 14(8):1159, 2003

    2003

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Gorshkov, David F

    Irina Novikova, Alexey V. Gorshkov, David F. Phillips, Anders S. Sørensen, Mikhail D. Lukin, and Ronald L. Walsworth. Optimal control of light pulse storage and retrieval.Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:243602, Jun 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Tittel, M

    W. Tittel, M. Afzelius, T. Chanelière, R.L. Cone, S. Kröll, S.A. Moiseev, and M. Sellars. Photon-echo quantum memory in solid state systems.Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews, 4(2):244–267, 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics.Rev

    Nicolas Sangouard, Christoph Simon, Hugues de Ried- matten, and Nicolas Gisin. Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics.Rev. Mod. Phys., 83:33–80, Mar 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    Ivan H. Deutsch. Harnessing the power of the second quantum revolution.PRX Quantum, 1:020101, Nov 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    The security of practical quantum key distribution.Reviews of modern physics, 81(3):1301– 1350, 2009

    Valerio Scarani, Helle Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Nico- las J Cerf, Miloslav Dušek, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Momtchil Peev. The security of practical quantum key distribution.Reviews of modern physics, 81(3):1301– 1350, 2009

    2009

  6. [14]

    Secure quantum key distribu- tion with realistic devices.Reviews of modern physics, 92(2):025002, 2020

    Feihu Xu, Xiongfeng Ma, Qiang Zhang, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Jian-Wei Pan. Secure quantum key distribu- tion with realistic devices.Reviews of modern physics, 92(2):025002, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Magnetic reso- nance in the Faraday-rotation noise spectrum.JETP, 54, 1981

    E B Aleksandrov and VS Zapasskii. Magnetic reso- nance in the Faraday-rotation noise spectrum.JETP, 54, 1981

    1981

  8. [16]

    S. A. Crooker, D. G. Rickel, A. V. Balatsky, and D. L. Smith. Spectroscopy of spontaneous spin noise as a probe of spin dynamics and magnetic resonance.Na- ture, 431(7004):49–52, September 2004. Number: 7004 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2004

  9. [17]

    Crooker, Dwight G

    Bogdan Mihaila, Scott A. Crooker, Dwight G. Rickel, Krastan B. Blagoev, Peter B. Littlewood, and Darryl L. Smith. Quantitative study of spin noise spectroscopy in a classical gas of K 41 atoms.Physical Review A, 74(4):043819, October 2006

    2006

  10. [18]

    G. E. Katsoprinakis, A. T. Dellis, and I. K. Kominis. Measurement of transverse spin-relaxation rates in a ru- bidium vapor by use of spin-noise spectroscopy.Physical Review A, 75(4):042502, April 2007

    2007

  11. [19]

    Birefringence and dichroismeffectsinthespinnoisespectraofaspin-1sys- tem.New Journal of Physics, 24(11):113047, November 2022

    S Liu, P Neveu, J Delpy, L Hemmen, E Brion, E Wu, F Bretenaker, and F Goldfarb. Birefringence and dichroismeffectsinthespinnoisespectraofaspin-1sys- tem.New Journal of Physics, 24(11):113047, November 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Oestreich, M

    M. Oestreich, M. Römer, R. J. Haug, and D. Hägele. Spin Noise Spectroscopy in GaAs.Physical Review Let- ters, 95(21):216603, November 2005

    2005

  13. [21]

    The rise of spin noise spectroscopy in semiconductors: From acoustic to GHz frequencies

    Jens Hübner, Fabian Berski, Ramin Dahbashi, and Michael Oestreich. The rise of spin noise spectroscopy in semiconductors: From acoustic to GHz frequencies. physica status solidi (b), 251(9):1824–1838, 2014

    2014

  14. [22]

    S. V. Poltavtsev, I. I. Ryzhov, M. M. Glazov, G. G. Ko- zlov, V. S. Zapasskii, A. V. Kavokin, P. G. Lagoudakis, D. S. Smirnov, and E. L. Ivchenko. Spin noise spec- troscopy of a single quantum well microcavity.Physical Review B, 89(8):081304, February 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Glasenapp, D

    Ph. Glasenapp, D. S. Smirnov, A. Greilich, J. Hack- mann, M. M. Glazov, F. B. Anders, and M. Bayer. Spin noise of electrons and holes in (In,Ga)As quan- tum dots: Experiment and theory.Physical Review B, 93(20):205429, May 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    V. O. Kozlov, N. S. Kuznetsov, A. N. Kamenskii, A. Greilich, I. I. Ryzhov, G. G. Kozlov, and V. S. Za- passkii. Spin noise of magnetically anisotropic centers. Physical Review B, 107(6):064427, February 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    V. O. Kozlov, I. A. Smirnov, M. S. Kuznetsova, E. V. Kolobkova, G. G. Kozlov, V. S. Zapasskii, D. S. Smirnov, and I. I. Ryzhov. Spin noise reveals spin dynamics and recharging of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals.Applied Materials Today, 45:102820, Au- gust 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Glasenapp, N.A

    P. Glasenapp, N.A. Sinitsyn, Luyi Yang, D.G. Rickel, D. Roy, A. Greilich, M. Bayer, and S.A. Crooker. Spin Noise Spectroscopy Beyond Thermal Equilib- rium and Linear Response.Physical Review Letters, 113(15):156601, October 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Measurements of spin properties of atomic sys- tems in and out of equilibrium via noise spectroscopy

    Maheswar Swar, Dibyendu Roy, Dhanalakshmi D, Sap- tarishi Chaudhuri, Sanjukta Roy, and Hema Ramachan- dran. Measurements of spin properties of atomic sys- tems in and out of equilibrium via noise spectroscopy. Optics Express, 26(24):32168, November 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Sterin, L

    Tian-Jiao Sun, P. Sterin, L. Lengert, C. Nawrath, M. Jetter, P. Michler, Yang Ji, J. Hübner, and M. Oestreich. Non-equilibrium spin noise spectroscopy of a single quantum dot operating at fiber telecom- munication wavelengths.Journal of Applied Physics, 131(6):065703, February 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Delpy, S

    J. Delpy, S. Liu, P. Neveu, E Wu, F. Bretenaker, and F. Goldfarb. Spin-noise spectroscopy of optical light shifts.Physical Review A, 107(1):L011701, January

  22. [30]

    Publisher: American Physical Society

  23. [31]

    Fluctuations in Spin Dynamics Excited by Pulsed Light.Physical Review Letters, 134(10):106702, March 2025

    TetsuyaSato, ShinichiWatanabe, MamoruMatsuo, and Takeo Kato. Fluctuations in Spin Dynamics Excited by Pulsed Light.Physical Review Letters, 134(10):106702, March 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    V. Shah, G. Vasilakis, and M. V. Romalis. High Band- width Atomic Magnetometery with Continuous Quan- tum Nondemolition Measurements.Physical Review Letters, 104(1):013601, January 2010

    2010

  25. [33]

    Mouloudakis, V

    K. Mouloudakis, V. Koutrouli, I. K. Kominis, M. W. Mitchell, andG.Vasilakis. Spinprojectionnoiseandthe magnetic sensitivity of optically pumped magnetome- 12 ters, February 2024. arXiv:2402.10746 [quant-ph]

    2024

  26. [34]

    Spin dynamics and noise spectrum for alkali- metal atoms of arbitrary polarization in the spin- exchange-relaxation-free regime.Physical Review A, 111(3):033703, March 2025

    Yang Li, Xiangyu Li, Tingxuan Guo, and Kaifeng Zhao. Spin dynamics and noise spectrum for alkali- metal atoms of arbitrary polarization in the spin- exchange-relaxation-free regime.Physical Review A, 111(3):033703, March 2025

    2025

  27. [35]

    Mitchell

    Vito Giovanni Lucivero, Ricardo Jiménez-Martínez, Jia Kong, and Morgan W. Mitchell. Squeezed-light spin noise spectroscopy.Physical Review A, 93(5):053802, May 2016

    2016

  28. [36]

    Troullinou, R

    C. Troullinou, R. Jiménez-Martínez, J. Kong, V.G. Lu- civero, and M.W. Mitchell. Squeezed-Light Enhance- ment and Backaction Evasion in a High Sensitivity Op- tically Pumped Magnetometer.Physical Review Letters, 127(19):193601, November 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Guarrera, R

    V. Guarrera, R. Gartman, G. Bevilacqua, and W. Chalupczak. Spin-noise spectroscopy of a noise- squeezed atomic state.Physical Review Research, 3(3):L032015, July 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Interferometric measurement of local spin fluctuations in a quantum gas.Nature Physics, 8(6):454–458, June

    Jakob Meineke, Jean-Philippe Brantut, David Stadler, Torben Müller, Henning Moritz, and Tilman Esslinger. Interferometric measurement of local spin fluctuations in a quantum gas.Nature Physics, 8(6):454–458, June

  31. [39]

    Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

  32. [40]

    Detection of spin coherence in cold atoms via Faraday rotation fluctua- tions.Physical Review Research, 3(4):043171, December 2021

    Maheswar Swar, Dibyendu Roy, Subhajit Bhar, San- jukta Roy, and Saptarishi Chaudhuri. Detection of spin coherence in cold atoms via Faraday rotation fluctua- tions.Physical Review Research, 3(4):043171, December 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Mouloudakis, G

    K. Mouloudakis, G. Vasilakis, V. G. Lucivero, J. Kong, I. K. Kominis, and M. W. Mitchell. Effects of spin- exchange collisions on the fluctuation spectra of hot alkali-metal vapors.Physical Review A, 106(2):023112, August 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Mouloudakis, V

    K.Mouloudakis, F.Vouzinas, A.Margaritakis, A.Kout- simpela, G. Mouloudakis, V. Koutrouli, M. Skotiniotis, G. P. Tsironis, M. Loulakis, M. W. Mitchell, G. Vasi- lakis, and I. K. Kominis. Interspecies spin-noise cor- relations in hot atomic vapors.Physical Review A, 108(5):05282...

    2023

  35. [43]

    Crooker, and Niko- lai A

    Dibyendu Roy, Luyi Yang, Scott A. Crooker, and Niko- lai A. Sinitsyn. Cross-correlation spin noise spec- troscopy of heterogeneous interacting spin systems.Sci- entific Reports, 5(1):9573, April 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    V. N. Gorshkov, M. O. Stretovych, N. A. Sinitsyn, and D. Mozyrsky. Phase transition in the noise power spec- trum of interacting-spin fluctuations at infinite temper- ature.Physical Review B, 109(9):094402, March 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Spin- noise spectroscopy as a tool for probing magnetic order, November 2024

    Julius Schlegel, Martin Evers, and Ulrich Nowak. Spin- noise spectroscopy as a tool for probing magnetic order, November 2024. arXiv:2411.18342 [cond-mat]

    2024

  38. [46]

    Probing many-body localization by spin noise spec- troscopy.Physical Review B, 92(18):180205, November 2015

    Dibyendu Roy, Rajeev Singh, and Roderich Moessner. Probing many-body localization by spin noise spec- troscopy.Physical Review B, 92(18):180205, November 2015

    2015

  39. [47]

    Delpy, N

    J. Delpy, N. Fayard, F. Bretenaker, and F. Gold- farb. Anomalous high-density spin noise in a strongly interacting atomic vapor.Physical Review Research, 7(1):013298, March 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    Rubidium 85 D line data, 2001

    Daniel A Steck. Rubidium 85 D line data, 2001. Pub- lished: Available online at https://steck.us/alkalidata/

    2001

  41. [49]

    PhD thesis, December 2011

    Georgios Vasilakis.Precision measurements of spin in- teractions with high density atomic vapors. PhD thesis, December 2011. Publication Title: Ph.D. Thesis ADS Bibcode: 2011PhDT........41V

    2011

  42. [50]

    Koschorreck, M

    M. Koschorreck, M. Napolitano, B. Dubost, and M. W. Mitchell. Quantum Nondemolition Measurement of Large-Spin Ensembles by Dynamical Decoupling.Phys- ical Review Letters, 105(9):093602, August 2010

    2010

  43. [51]

    Koschorreck, M

    M. Koschorreck, M. Napolitano, B. Dubost, and M. W. Mitchell. Sub-Projection-Noise Sensitivity in Broad- band Atomic Magnetometry.Physical Review Letters, 104(9):093602, March 2010

    2010

  44. [52]

    Dispersive measurement of spin shot noise in a Bose-Einstein condensate.Physical Review Research, 7(4):043040, October 2025

    KosukeShibata, NaotaSekiguchi, JunnosukeTakai, and Takuya Hirano. Dispersive measurement of spin shot noise in a Bose-Einstein condensate.Physical Review Research, 7(4):043040, October 2025

    2025

  45. [53]

    Happer and B

    W. Happer and B. S. Mathur. Effective Opera- tor Formalism in Optical Pumping.Physical Review, 163(1):12–25, November 1967

    1967

  46. [54]

    W. Happer. Light propagation and light shifts in optical pumping experiments.Progress in Quantum Electron- ics, 1:51–103, January 1970

    1970

  47. [55]

    Cambridge University Press, 2010

    Gilbert Grynberg, Alain Aspect, and Claude Fabre.In- troduction to Quantum Optics: From the Semi-classical Approach to Quantized Light. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  48. [56]

    Egusquiza, and Géza Tóth

    Giuseppe Vitagliano, Iagoba Apellaniz, Iñigo L. Egusquiza, and Géza Tóth. Spin squeezing and entan- glement for an arbitrary spin.Phys. Rev. A, 89:032307, Mar 2014

    2014

  49. [57]

    Mitchell

    Jia Kong, Ricardo Jiménez-Martínez, Charikleia Troullinou, Vito Giovanni Lucivero, Géza Tóth, and Morgan W. Mitchell. Measurement-induced, spatially- extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system.Nature Communications, 11(1):2415, May 2020. Number: 1 Publi...

    2020

  50. [58]

    The theory of spin noise spectroscopy: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(10):106501, October 2016

    Nikolai A Sinitsyn and Yuriy V Pershin. The theory of spin noise spectroscopy: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(10):106501, October 2016

    2016

  51. [59]

    Higher-orderspinnoisestatistics.New Journal of Physics, 15(11):113038, November 2013

    Fuxiang Li, Avadh Saxena, Darryl Smith, and Nikolai A Sinitsyn. Higher-orderspinnoisestatistics.New Journal of Physics, 15(11):113038, November 2013

    2013

  52. [60]

    Sinitsyn

    Fuxiang Li and N.A. Sinitsyn. Universality in higher order spin noise spectroscopy.Physical Review Letters, 116(2):026601, January 2016

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.