Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 103 references

Empirical modeling and hybrid machine learning framework for nucleate pool boiling on microchannel structured surfaces

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A physics-seeded hybrid model predicts boiling heat transfer on microchannel surfaces with test-set $R^2 = 0.995$.

desk verdict A new microchannel boiling correlation with a real evaluation flaw: the hybrid framework's R²=0.995 is inflated because the baseline correlation was fit on the test data. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16867 v1 pith:5EM4UW4C submitted 2025-01-28 physics.app-ph cs.LG

Vijay Kuberan , Sateesh Gedupudi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcs.LG
keywords PoolboilingMicrochannelstructuredsurfacesHeattransfercoefficientEmpiricalcorrelationMachinelearningDeepneuralnetworkPhysics-informedSHAPanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that nucleate pool boiling heat transfer on microchannel-structured surfaces can be predicted far more accurately by combining a new empirical correlation with a deep neural network that learns the correlation's residuals than by either approach alone. Using a compiled database of 7,128 experimental points covering water, R-141b, R-123, and ethanol on copper and silicon microchannel surfaces, the proposed correlation alone reaches $R^2 = 0.936$, and the hybrid framework reaches $R^2 = 0.995$, $\mathrm{MAE} = 0.907$ kW/m$^2$K, and $\mathrm{RMSE} = 2.999$ kW/m$^2$K on the test set. A reliable model of this kind matters because boiling surfaces are central to cooling and energy systems, and existing correlations are accurate only over narrow operating ranges.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the PIMLAF hybrid: a prior physics-based model predicts $\hat{y}_p$, a deep neural network predicts the residual $\hat{\epsilon}_m$, and the final prediction is $\hat{y}_f = \hat{y}_p + \hat{\epsilon}_m$. The prior is the proposed correlation, a modified Stephan--Preusser equation whose nine dimensionless groups carry all surface-geometry and fluid-property effects through fitted exponents; the residual network (8 hidden layers, 90 neurons per layer, ELU activation, L1/L2 regularization) captures whatever systematic error remains. A feature-attribution analysis then ranks the inputs' contributions, identifying surface roughness, fin height, area augmentation factor, and groove width as the dominant parameters across datasets.

What would settle it

Retrain the correlation and PIMLAF on all but one of the source studies, then predict the withheld study's HTC; if the held-out $R^2$ falls far below the reported 0.995 and 0.936, the model is memorizing study-specific offsets rather than learning transferable boiling physics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that nine dimensionless groups -- the area augmentation factor $\lambda$, substrate-to-liquid conductivity ratio $k_w/k_l$, roughness-to-cavity-radius ratio $R_q/r_{\mathrm{cav}}$, normalized contact angle $\theta/90$, reduced pressure $P_r$, molecular-weight ratio $M_f/M_w$, fin aspect ratio $h_f/w_f$, groove-to-pitch ratio $w_g/p$, and hydraulic-diameter-to-pitch ratio $D_h/p$ -- can be multiplied into the Stephan--Preusser nucleate-boiling correlation with fitted exponents to describe the 7,128-point microchannel dataset with $R^2 = 0.936$ and MAE 4.94. Treating that correlation as a fixed prior and training a deep neural network to predict only the residual $\epsilon = y - \hat{y}_p$ gives the PIMLAF hybrid, which achieves $R^2 = 0.995$, MAE 0.907, and RMSE 2.999 on the test partition. These figures beat every one of the 19 individual ML models tested, the standalone DNN ($R^2 = 0.940$), and all 18 existing correlations evaluated, and the hybrid also reaches $R^2 = 0.992$ on a water-only subset and $R^2 = 0.997$ on other fluids.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the nine chosen dimensionless parameters, with exponents fitted on the same 7,128-point dataset used to judge the correlation, fully capture how surface geometry and fluid properties control the boiling heat-transfer coefficient; if those groups are redundant, omit a governing variable, or have unstable exponents, the correlation baseline and therefore the hybrid model will not generalize.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The proposed correlation alone gives a closed-form HTC predictor for microchannel structured surfaces, improving on the best existing correlation (Stephan--Preusser) from $R^2 = 0.55$ to $R^2 = 0.936$ over the full 7,128-point dataset.
  • PIMLAF's test-set accuracy ($R^2 = 0.995$, MAE 0.907) is higher than every conventional ML model and the standalone DNN, showing that a physics prior plus residual learning outperforms data-only modeling on this problem.
  • The hybrid retains the correlation as a baseline, so predictions stay anchored to boiling physics even when the residual network is uncertain, which supports the paper's claim of better generalization to unseen datasets.
  • The water-only and other-fluids splits both perform well ($R^2 = 0.992$ and 0.997), indicating the framework is not relying on one fluid's behavior.
  • The feature-attribution analysis converts the model into design guidance: surfaces with larger area augmentation factor, taller fins, and smaller groove/fin widths and pitch should give higher HTC.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural check the paper does not report is leave-one-study-out validation: if the residual network is absorbing calibration offsets specific to each source experiment, holding out an entire study should sharply reduce the hybrid's $R^2$.
  • The same correlation-plus-residual recipe could be carried over to other structured-surface families (pin fins, reentrant cavities, V-grooves) once datasets of comparable size exist, because the hybrid mechanism does not depend on the microchannel-specific form of the prior.
  • The identified dominant parameters could be turned into dimensionless design maps -- for example, HTC contours versus $h_f/w_f$ and $\lambda$ at fixed fluid conditions -- to guide fabrication choices, although the paper stops at feature rankings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper compiles 7,128 pool-boiling data points on microchannel-structured surfaces from the literature, proposes a new empirical correlation obtained by multiplying the Stephan-Preusser correlation with nine dimensionless groups (Eq. 2), compares 18 existing correlations, trains 19 machine-learning regressors plus a deep neural network, and introduces a physics-informed machine-learning-aided framework (PIMLAF) in which a DNN learns the residuals of the proposed correlation. The authors report R² = 0.936 for the proposed correlation, R² = 0.940 for the standalone DNN, and R² = 0.995 for PIMLAF, together with SHAP-based feature importance analysis for the overall, water, and other-fluids datasets.

Significance. If the reported predictive performance were validated on genuinely held-out data, the work would be practically useful: a reliable HTC model for microchannel-structured surfaces is of clear engineering value, and the compilation of 7,128 points from multiple studies is a substantial contribution. The paper also provides a broad comparison of existing correlations and ML methods, and the SHAP analysis gives a physically interpretable account of feature effects. The hybrid-framework concept (correlation as prior, DNN on residuals) is a reasonable approach. However, the current evaluation protocol does not establish the central generalization claim, because the proposed correlation is fitted on the full dataset and then reused inside a train/test split, so all headline metrics are in-sample or leakage-affected numbers.

major comments (4)
  1. [3.1.1 (Eq. (2))] The exponents of the nine dimensionless groups in Eq. (2) are fitted to the entire 7,128-point dataset, and the reported R² = 0.936, MAE = 4.94 are evaluated on the same data. This makes the comparison against the fixed-coefficient correlations in Table 6 an in-sample fitting comparison, not a predictive comparison. The exponents should be fitted on training folds only and evaluated on held-out data (or via leave-one-study-out cross-validation) before any claim of predictive superiority is made.
  2. [3.3 (PIMLAF)] Because the prior correlation in Eq. (2) was fitted on the full dataset, the residual ε = y - ŷ_p for any point in the 20% test split is an in-sample residual: each test point already contributed to the coefficient estimates. The DNN in PIMLAF therefore learns on residuals that are artificially small, and the reported R² = 0.995, MAE = 0.907, RMSE = 2.999 do not establish that PIMLAF generalizes better than the standalone DNN, which was trained only on 80% of the data. The prior must be refitted inside each training split, or trained only on the training-study portion, before computing residuals.
  3. [2.4 and 3.2 (train/test split)] The manuscript does not report how the 80/20 split is stratified or grouped by source study. Since the dataset is compiled from a small number of experimental studies, near-duplicate points from the same surface and same study are likely to appear in both training and test sets, which can inflate all model metrics, including the standalone DNN. A group-wise split (e.g., leave-one-study-out), or at least a report of the study distribution across folds, is needed to assess generalization.
  4. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract and the conclusions state that the hybrid framework 'is able to generalize well for different datasets,' but the only evidence is the overall 80/20 split and the water/other-fluid subsets of the same dataset. These are in-sample evaluations. An external dataset or a leave-one-study-out experiment is required to support the generalization claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [2.4] The statement 'The percentage of data imputed in this analysis is 20%' is vague: which features had missing values, and is the imputation model fitted before or after the split? If fitted before, it is a source of leakage for all downstream models.
  2. [Table 6] The R² values for Rohsenow (-32,809,514.6) and Pioro (-1,334,090.4) are extreme; these large negative values are likely dominated by a few outliers. Reporting MAE/RMSE on a log scale or with clipped R² would make the table more readable.
  3. [Nomenclature] Pr is listed as 'Reduced pressure (bar)' in the nomenclature, but in Eq. (2) and in several correlations Pr is also used for the Prandtl number. Please use distinct symbols (e.g., p_r and Pr).
  4. [General] There are typographical errors: 'Rosenhow' should be 'Rohsenow', 'alogrithms' in the Section 3.2 heading, and the German title in reference [42] should be 'Wärmeübergang und maximale Wärmestromdichte beim Behältersieden binärer und ternärer Flüssigkeitsgemische'.
  5. [3.2] Hyperparameters are reported only for the DNN; the hyperparameter settings for the tree-based models (e.g., Extra Trees, LightGBM) after random search are not given, which limits reproducibility.
  6. [2.1] The paper does not state how the 7,128 data points were digitized from figures, or whether the compiled dataset will be made publicly available. Please include this information or provide the data in a repository.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Correlation fit on the full dataset leaks the 20% test split into the PIMLAF prior, so the R²=0.995 hybrid 'prediction' is partly an in-sample fit rather than an independent generalization result.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.1.1, Eq. (2), Table 6]
    "Thus, this empirical correlation has been modified with the addition of the above dimensionless parameters, and appropriate coefficients have been determined. The proposed correlation in Eq.(2) is able to predict the microchannel structured surfaces dataset with a R2 value of 0.936 and MAE of 4.94. ... These metrics are evaluated based on the entire dataset of microchannel structured surfaces."

    The paper states the R²=0.936 'metrics are evaluated based on the entire dataset' after 'appropriate coefficients have been determined' for Eq. (2). Thus the exponents of the nine dimensionless groups were optimized on the same 7128 points that are then scored; there is no held-out split or leave-one-study-out validation. Reporting this as the correlation 'able to predict' the dataset presents an in-sample curve fit as if it were a predictive result, and Table 6's 0.55→0.936 improvement over Stephan-Preusser conflates fitted flexibility with generalization.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sections 3.2–3.3, Fig. 9, Table 10]
    "The new correlation proposed in this study is used to provide a good baseline prediction. Then, the DNN model with optimized hyperparameters as in Table 9 is developed to learn the correlation residual errors. Then, through backpropagation, the MSE loss function is minimized, yielding a highly accurate model for HTC prediction on microchannel structured surfaces with R2, MAE, and RMSE values as 0.995, 0.907, and 2.999, respectively. ... All the model performances are based on the test dataset."

    The ML pipeline withholds 20% as test, but the PIMLAF prior is Eq. (2), whose exponents were determined from the entire dataset including those withheld points. For a test point, y_p is produced by a regression fitted to that point's target y, so the residual epsilon = y − y_p is not an out-of-sample error; it is partially an in-sample residual. The DNN then fits these residuals and the final y_f = y_p + epsilon_m is scored on the same contaminated test targets. The R²=0.995 therefore reflects leakage from the prior fit, and the comparison with a standalone DNN trained only on the 80% split is unfair. Grouping by source study is also not reported, so same-experiment points may straddle the split.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular at the level of self-citation: PIMLAF's residual-learning idea is attributed to external works [65,85–88], and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior papers. The 19 ML baselines and the standalone DNN use an 80/20 split and their test metrics are honest. However, the central 'prediction' claim is compromised by the proposed correlation being fitted on the full 7128-point dataset before being used as the PIMLAF prior in a split evaluation. The paper's own statements make this explicit: Eq. (2)'s coefficients are determined and then its R² is evaluated on 'the entire dataset,' while Section 3.3 applies that same correlation as the baseline whose residuals the DNN learns. As a result, the test-residual target is in-sample with respect to the baseline; R²=0.995 and the claimed superiority over the standalone DNN (R²=0.940) are inflated by target leakage. The appropriate fix is to fit Eq. (2) on the training split only (or per study) and then evaluate PIMLAF on truly held-out data. This is a partial circularity in the main generalization claim, not a fully definitional collapse; hence score 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are the fitted exponents of the correlation and ML hyperparameters. The main implicit assumptions are the validity of the Stephan-Preusser functional form as a baseline and the consistency of the compiled literature dataset. The use of 20 percent imputed data is the most concerning unvalidated choice. The fitted exponents are the core of the claimed new correlation, and they are fit to the same data used for evaluation.

free parameters (3)
  • Exponents of the nine dimensionless groups in the proposed correlation = lambda^0.472, (kw/kl)^0.966, (Rq/rcav)^-0.197, (theta/90)^0.138, Pr^1.106, (Mf/Mw)^-2.175, (hf/wf)^-0.484…
    Nine exponents plus the prefactor are fitted to the 7,128-point microchannel dataset to maximize R². They are not derived from physics, and their values are the main content of the proposed correlation.
  • Data imputation model (LightGBM) = not specified
    Twenty percent of the data was imputed using a LightGBM model. The imputed values are model outputs and affect the fitted correlation exponents and the ML training data, but the imputation model is not described in detail.
  • DNN hyperparameters for PIMLAF = 8 hidden layers, 90 neurons/layer, ELU, lr=0.001, L1=L2=0.001, 10,000 epochs
    These hyperparameters were selected by random search on the same dataset. They are fitted choices that affect the reported performance.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Stephan-Preusser correlation is a valid baseline form for nucleate pool boiling on microchannel surfaces.
    The proposed correlation is constructed by multiplying the Stephan-Preusser correlation by additional dimensionless groups. If the baseline functional form is inappropriate for microchannel surfaces, the modified correlation inherits that limitation.
  • domain assumption Liquid thermophysical properties evaluated at the film temperature T_film = (T_w + T_sat)/2 accurately capture interface effects.
    The paper states this choice is made 'to accurately model the heat transfer at the liquid-vapor interface', citing their prior work. This is a modeling choice that enters all property calculations.
  • domain assumption The collected dataset from various studies is accurate and consistent with respect to surface geometry definitions and measurement conditions.
    The 7,128 data points are compiled from different experimental studies [8,9,23,25-30,66]. The paper assumes these studies use consistent definitions of parameters like groove width, fin width, pitch, and contact angle. Inconsistencies would propagate into the fitted correlation and ML models.
  • ad hoc to paper The 20 percent of data imputed by LightGBM is reliable enough to train models on.
    The paper imputes 20 percent of the dataset using a LightGBM model. The imputed values are treated as ground truth for fitting and evaluation. This is a significant modeling choice that is not independently validated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Empirical modeling and hybrid machine learning framework for nucleate pool boiling on microchannel structured surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5EM4UW4C

@misc{pith2026250116867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Empirical modeling and hybrid machine learning framework for nucleate pool boiling on microchannel structured surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5EM4UW4C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16867}
}
read the original abstract

Micro-structured surfaces influence nucleation characteristics and bubble dynamics besides increasing the heat transfer surface area, thus enabling efficient nucleate boiling heat transfer. Modeling the pool boiling heat transfer characteristics of these surfaces under varied conditions is essential in diverse applications. A new empirical correlation for nucleate boiling on microchannel structured surfaces has been proposed with the data collected from various experiments in previous studies since the existing correlations are limited by their accuracy and narrow operating ranges. This study also examines various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) on the microchannel structured surfaces dataset to predict the nucleate pool boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient (HTC). With the aim to integrate both the ML and domain knowledge, a Physics-Informed Machine Learning Aided Framework (PIMLAF) is proposed. The proposed correlation in this study is employed as the prior physics-based model for PIMLAF, and a DNN is employed to model the residuals of the prior model. This hybrid framework achieved the best performance in comparison to the other ML models and DNNs. This framework is able to generalize well for different datasets because the proposed correlation provides the baseline knowledge of the boiling behavior. Also, SHAP interpretation analysis identifies the critical parameters impacting the model predictions and their effect on HTC prediction. This analysis further makes the model more robust and reliable. Keywords: Pool boiling, Microchannels, Heat transfer coefficient, Correlation analysis, Machine learning, Deep neural network, Physics-informed machine learning aided framework, SHAP analysis

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16867 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Different structured surfaces (reproduced with permissions). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the overall methodology implemented in this analysis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Surface characteristics of a microchannel structured surface. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Data distribution of microchannel structured surfaces data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pearson correlation chart for microchannel structured surfaces data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spearman correlation chart for microchannel structured surfaces data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Deep Neural Networks. Deep neural network (DNN) is a powerful ML technique and has extensive applications in various sectors ranging from regression, Computer Vision (CV), and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to Generative AI (GenAI) [72, 73]. Their success lies in mo…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Conventional ML model framework. Input data Prior model - Empirical correlation Prior model prediction 𝒚ෝ𝑷 Machine learning Model Actual output 𝒚 Prior model residual (Actual output for the ML model) 𝜺 = 𝒚 - 𝒚ෝ𝑷 Predicted residual by the Machine learning model 𝜺ො𝒎 Back…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: PIMLAF framework. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Performance of (a) Stephan-Preusser correlation and (b) proposed correlation (modified Stephan-Preusser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Performance of (a) Extra tree regression model and (b) DNN model for microchannel structured surfaces. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Residual plot of PIMLAF model for microchannel structured surfaces data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Performance of PIMLAF model for microchannel structured surfaces. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Performance metric comparison: Proposed correlation, ML model, and hybrid framework. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: SHAP summary plot of microchannel structured surfaces for the overall dataset - Bar plot. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: SHAP summary plot of microchannel structured surfaces for the overall dataset - Beeswarm plot. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: SHAP summary bar plot of microchannel structured surfaces for (a) water (b) other fluids. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. E. Bergles, Enhancement of pool boiling, International Journal of Refrigeration 20 (1997) 545–551. doi:10.1016/S0140-7007(97)00063-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0140-7007(97)00063-7 1997

  2. [4]

    Mahmoud, T

    M. Mahmoud, T. Karayiannis, Pool boiling review: Part ii – heat transfer enhancement, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 25 (2021) 101023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tsep.2021.101023

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [5]

    Jaswal, A

    R. Jaswal, A. Sathyabhama, K. Singh, A. P. Yandapalli, Experimental and numerical investigation of pool boiling heat transfer from finned surfaces, Applied Thermal Engineering 233 (2023) 121167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121167

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [6]

    M. I. Hasan, Investigation of flow and heat transfer characteristics in micro pin fin heat sink with nanofluid, Applied Thermal Engineering 63 (2014) 598–607. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.11.059

    2014

  5. [7]

    K. Wang, H. Gong, L. Wang, N. Erkan, K. Okamoto, Effects of a porous honeycomb structure on critical heat flux in downward-facing saturated pool boiling, Applied Thermal Engineering 170 (2020) 115036. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115036

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [8]

    Walunj, A

    A. Walunj, A. Sathyabhama, Comparative study of pool boiling heat transfer from various microchannel geometries, Applied Thermal Engineering 128 (2018) 672–683. doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.157. 37

    work page doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.157 2018

  7. [9]

    Kaniowski, R

    R. Kaniowski, R. Pastuszko, Pool boiling of water on surfaces with open microchannels, Energies 14 (2021). doi: 10.3390/en14113062

    work page doi:10.3390/en14113062 2021

  8. [10]

    Ranjan, A

    A. Ranjan, A. Priy, I. Ahmad, M. Pathak, M. K. Khan, Pool boiling heat transfer characteristics of a stepped microchannel structured heating surface, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 160 (2023) 104351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow. 2022.104351

    work page arXiv 2023

Show all 103 references
  1. [11]

    Y. K. Prajapati, M. Pathak, M. K. Khan, A comparative study of flow boiling heat transfer in three different configurations of microchannels, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 85 (2015) 711–722. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.016

    2015 doi

  2. [12]

    B. Shah, K. Shah, P. Patel, V. J. Lakhera, Experimental investigations on nucleate pool boiling over micro-finned cylindrical surfaces, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 236 (2022) 6284–6296. doi: 10. 1177...

    2022

  3. [13]

    Kumar, B

    R. Kumar, B. Premachandran, Enhancement of pool boiling performance through an asymmetric dual v-groove microchannel structured surface, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 221 (2024) 125096. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer. 2023.125096

    2024

  4. [14]

    K. X. Cheng, Z. H. Foo, K. T. Ooi, Heat transfer enhancement through periodic flow area variations in microchannels, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 111 (2020) 104456. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104456

    2020

  5. [15]

    A. F. Al-Neama, N. Kapur, J. Summers, H. M. Thompson, An experimental and numerical investigation of the use of liquid flow in serpentine microchannels for microelectronics cooling, Applied Thermal Engineering 116 (2017) 709–723. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.applthermaleng....

    2017

  6. [17]

    A. Das, P. Das, P. Saha, Performance of different structured surfaces in nucleate pool boiling, Applied Thermal Engineering 29 (2009) 3643–3653. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.applthermaleng.2009.06.020. 38

    2009

  7. [18]

    G. Pi, D. Deng, L. Chen, X. Xu, C. Zhao, Pool boiling performance of 3d-printed reentrant microchannels structures, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 156 (2020) 119920. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119920

    2020

  8. [19]

    A. Das, P. Das, P. Saha, Some investigations on the enhancement of boiling heat transfer from planer surface embedded with continuous open tunnels, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 34 (2010) 1422–1431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.06. 017

    2010 doi

  9. [20]

    Jiang, X

    H. Jiang, X. Yu, N. Xu, D. Wang, J. Yang, H. Chu, Effect of t-shaped micro-fins on pool boiling heat transfer performance of surfaces, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 136 (2022) 110663. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2022.110663

    2022

  10. [21]

    A. R. Betz, J. Jenkins, C. J. Kim, D. Attinger, Boiling heat transfer on superhydrophilic, superhydrophobic, and superbiphilic surfaces, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 57 (2013) 733–741. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.10.080

    2013 doi

  11. [22]

    D. Y. Lim, I. C. Bang, Controlled bubble departure diameter on biphilic surfaces for enhanced pool boiling heat transfer performance, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 150 (2020) 119360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119360

    2020

  12. [23]

    M. M. Rahman, M. McCarthy, Effect of length scales on the boiling enhancement of structured copper surfaces, Journal of Heat Transfer 139 (2017) 111508. doi: 10.1115/1.4036693

    2017 doi

  13. [24]

    W. Li, R. Dai, M. Zeng, Q. Wang, Review of two types of surface modification on pool boiling enhancement: Passive and active, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 130 (2020) 109926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109926

    2020

  14. [25]

    L. J. Orman, N. Radek, J. Pietraszek, M. Szczepaniak, Analysis of enhanced pool boiling heat transfer on laser—textured surfaces, Energies 13 (2020). doi: 10.3390/en13112700

    2020 doi

  15. [26]

    Cooke, S

    D. Cooke, S. G. Kandlikar, Effect of open microchannel geometry on pool boiling enhancement, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (2012) 1004–1013. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.10.010

    2012 doi

  16. [27]

    Kalani, S

    A. Kalani, S. G. Kandlikar, Pool boiling of fc-87 over microchannel surfaces at atmospheric pressure, in: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, volume Volume 7: Fluids and Heat Transfer, Parts A, B, C, and D of ASME International Mechanical Enginee...

    2012 doi

  17. [28]

    Kalani, S

    A. Kalani, S. G. Kandlikar, Pool boiling heat transfer over microchannel surfaces with ethanol at atmospheric pressure, in: International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, volume ASME 2012 10th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels,...

    2012 doi

  18. [29]

    B. A. Shah, P. Patel, V. J. Lakhera, Evaluation of pressure, surface characteristics, and fluid properties effect on pool boiling heat transfer over plain and external micro-finned cylindrical surfaces, Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications 15 (2023) 111011. ...

    2023

  19. [30]

    H. J. Kwak, J. H. Kim, B.-S. Myung, M. H. Kim, D. E. Kim, Behavior of pool boiling heat transfer and critical heat flux on high aspect-ratio microchannels, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 125 (2018) 111–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci. 2017.11.025

    2018 doi

  20. [31]

    W. M. Rohsenow, A method of correlating heat-transfer data for surface boiling of liquids, Journal of Fluids Engineering 74 (1952) 969–975. doi: 10.1115/1.4015984

    1952 doi

  21. [32]

    Pioro, Experimental evaluation of constants for the rohsenow pool boiling correlation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 42 (1999) 2003–2013

    I. Pioro, Experimental evaluation of constants for the rohsenow pool boiling correlation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 42 (1999) 2003–2013. doi: 10.1016/ S0017-9310(98)00294-4

    1999

  22. [33]

    Stephan, M

    K. Stephan, M. Abdelsalam, Heat-transfer correlations for natural convection boiling, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 23 (1980) 73–87. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1016/0017-9310(80)90140-4

    1980

  23. [34]

    V. Borishanskii, Correlation of the effect of pressure on the critical heat flux and heat transfer rates using the theory of thermodynamic similarity, in: Problems of Heat Transfer and Hydraulics of Two-Phase Media, Elsevier, 1969, pp. 16–37

    1969

  24. [35]

    D. Jung, Y. Kim, Y. Ko, K. Song, Nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficients of pure halogenated refrigerants, International Journal of Refrigeration 26 (2003) 240–248. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-7007(02)00040-3

    2003 doi

  25. [36]

    Labuntsov, Heat transfer problems with nucleate boiling of liquids, Therm

    D. Labuntsov, Heat transfer problems with nucleate boiling of liquids, Therm. Eng.(USSR)(Engl. Transl.), v. 19, no. 9, pp. 21-28 (1973)

    1973

  26. [37]

    Gorenflo, D

    D. Gorenflo, D. Kenning, Vdi heat atlas, VDI-Verlag GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany, (1993). 40

    1993

  27. [38]

    Kruzhilin, Free-convection transfer of heat from a horizontal plate and boiling liquid, Doklady AN SSSR (reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences) 58 (1947) 1657–1660

    G. Kruzhilin, Free-convection transfer of heat from a horizontal plate and boiling liquid, Doklady AN SSSR (reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences) 58 (1947) 1657–1660

    1947

  28. [39]

    HussainTarrad, D

    A. HussainTarrad, D. S. Khudor, A correlation for the pool boiling enhancement factor from low finned tubes, Global Journal of Research In Engineering 14 (2014). URL: https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:102484960

    2014

  29. [40]

    Cornwell, S

    K. Cornwell, S. Houston, Nucleate pool boiling on horizontal tubes: A convection-based correlation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 37 (1994) 303–309. doi: 10.1016/ 0017-9310(94)90031-0

    1994

  30. [41]

    Cooper, Heat flow rates in saturated nucleate pool boiling-a wide-ranging examination using reduced properties, in: J

    M. Cooper, Heat flow rates in saturated nucleate pool boiling-a wide-ranging examination using reduced properties, in: J. P. Hartnett, T. F. Irvine (Eds.), Advances in Heat Transfer, volume 16, Elsevier, 1984, pp. 157–239. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2717(08)70205-3

    1984 doi

  31. [42]

    Stephan, P

    K. Stephan, P. Preußer, W¨ arme¨ ubergang und maximale w¨ armestromdichte beim beh¨ altersieden bin¨ arer und tern¨ arer fl¨ ussigkeitsgemische, Chemie Ingenieur Technik 51 (1979) 37–37

    1979

  32. [43]

    Ribatski, J

    G. Ribatski, J. M. Jabardo, Experimental study of nucleate boiling of halocarbon refrigerants on cylindrical surfaces, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 46 (2003) 4439–4451. doi:10.1016/S0017-9310(03)00252-7

    2003 doi

  33. [44]

    Kichigin, N

    M. Kichigin, N. Y. Tobilevich, Generalization of experimental data on heat transfer in boiling, Hydrodynamics and Heat Transfer in Boiling in High-Pressure Boilers (1955) 175–185

    1955

  34. [45]

    V. M. B. S. S. Kutateladze, A Concise Encyclopedia of Heat Transfer, Pergamon Press, 1966. URL: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=MmbDvwEACAAJ

    1966

  35. [46]

    S. S. Kutateladze, Heat transfer and hydrodynamic resistance: a reference guide, M.: Energoatomizdat (1990)

    1990

  36. [47]

    I. H. Sarker, Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions, SN Computer Science 2 (2021) 160. doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x

    2021 doi

  37. [48]

    Shanmugam, L

    M. Shanmugam, L. S. Maganti, Machine learning-based thermal performance study of microchannel heat sink under non-uniform heat load conditions, Applied Thermal Engineering 253 (2024) 123769. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123769

    2024

  38. [49]

    Shanmugam, L

    M. Shanmugam, L. S. Maganti, Predicting the nusselt number of parallel microchannel and oblique pin-fin heat sinks using a machine learning approach, in: Proceedings of the 27th National and 5th International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference December 41 14-17, 202...

    2023 doi

  39. [50]

    Y. Oh, Z. Guo, Prediction of nusselt number in microscale pin fin heat sinks using artificial neural networks, Heat transfer research 54 (2023). doi: 10.1615/HeatTransRes.2022044987

    2023 doi

  40. [51]

    Traverso, F

    T. Traverso, F. Coletti, L. Magri, T. Karayiannis, O. Matar, A machine learning approach to the prediction of heat transfer coefficients in microchannels, in: International Heat Transfer Conference Digital Library, 2023, p. 8. doi: 10.1615/IHTC17.490-170

    2023 doi

  41. [52]

    Loyola-Fuentes, S

    J. Loyola-Fuentes, S. Mancin, E. Diaz-Bejarano, F. Coletti, Application of machine learning algorithms to predict the condensation heat transfer coefficient inside microfin tubes, in: International Heat Transfer Conference Digital Library, Begel House Inc., 2023, p. 10. doi:10...

    2023 doi

  42. [53]

    Y. Sei, K. Enoki, S. Yamaguchi, K. Saito, Prediction of heat transfer coefficients for mini-channels, Multiphase Science and Technology (2022). doi: 10.1615/MultScienTechn. 2022039089

    2022 doi

  43. [54]

    Huang, J

    L. Huang, J. Zou, B. Liu, Z. Jin, J. Qian, Machine learning assisted microchannel geometric optimization—a case study of channel designs, Energies 17 (2024). doi: 10.3390/en17010044

    2024 doi

  44. [55]

    Y. Qiu, D. Garg, S. M. Kim, I. Mudawar, C. R. Kharangate, Machine learning algorithms to predict flow boiling pressure drop in mini/micro-channels based on universal consolidated data, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 178 (2021) 121607. doi: 10.1016/j. ijheatmas...

    2021

  45. [56]

    Khosravi, J

    A. Khosravi, J. Pabon, R. Koury, L. Machado, Using machine learning algorithms to predict the pressure drop during evaporation of R407C, Applied Thermal Engineering 133 (2018) 361–370. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.01.084

    2018 doi

  46. [57]

    Alizadehdakhel, M

    A. Alizadehdakhel, M. Rahimi, J. Sanjari, A. A. Alsairafi, Cfd and artificial neural network modeling of two-phase flow pressure drop, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 36 (2009) 850–856. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009. 05.005

    2009 doi

  47. [58]

    N. Bar, S. K. Das, M. N. Biswas, Prediction of frictional pressure drop using artificial neural network for air-water flow through u-bends, Procedia Technology 10 (2013) 813–821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.426, first International Conference on Computational ...

    2013 doi

  48. [59]

    Azizi, E

    S. Azizi, E. Ahmadloo, Prediction of heat transfer coefficient during condensation of r134a in inclined tubes using artificial neural network, Applied Thermal Engineering 106 (2016) 203–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.189

    2016 doi

  49. [60]

    Vijay, S

    K. Vijay, S. Gedupudi, Machine learning based modeling and identification of key influencing parameters for nucleate pool boiling on plain and roughened surfaces, in: ASTFE Digital Library, Begellhouse, 2024, pp. 1299–1314. doi: 10.1615/TFEC2024.ml.050781

    2024 doi

  50. [61]

    Kuberan, S

    V. Kuberan, S. Gedupudi, Modelling of nucleate pool boiling on coated substrates using machine learning and empirical approaches, 2024. doi: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07811. arXiv:2409.07811

    2024 arXiv

  51. [62]

    A. M. Aliyu, R. Choudhury, B. Sohani, J. Atanbori, J. X. Ribeiro, S. K. Ahmed, R. Mishra, An artificial neural network model for the prediction of entrained droplet fraction in annular gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical pipes, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 164 (2...

    2023

  52. [63]

    H. B. Arteaga-Arteaga, A. Mora-Rubio, F. Florez, N. Murcia-Orjuela, C. E. Diaz-Ortega, S. Orozco-Arias, M. A. Bravo-Ort ´ ız, M. Robinson, P. Guillen-Rondon, R. Tabares-Soto, et al., Machine learning applications to predict two-phase flow patterns, PeerJ Computer Science 7 (2021) e798

    2021

  53. [64]

    Jalili, Y

    D. Jalili, Y. Mahmoudi, Physics-informed neural networks for two-phase film boiling heat transfer, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 241 (2025) 126680. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2025.126680

    2025

  54. [65]

    K. M. Kim, P. Hurley, J. P. Duarte, Physics-informed machine learning-aided framework for prediction of minimum film boiling temperature, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 191 (2022) 122839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022. 122839

    2022 doi

  55. [66]

    Y. Chen, R. Fu, Y. Yan, Enhanced pool boiling heat transfer on grooved surfaces by wettability modification with nanoparticle coatings, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 137 (2022) 106298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022. 106298

    2022 doi

  56. [67]

    I. H. Bell, J. Wronski, S. Quoilin, V. Lemort, Pure and pseudo-pure fluid thermophysical property evaluation and the open-source thermophysical property library CoolProp, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53 (2014) 2498–2508. doi: 10.1021/ie4033999. 43

    2014 doi

  57. [68]

    E. W. Lemmon, I. H. Bell, M. L. Huber, M. O. McLinden, Thermophysical properties of fluid systems, NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, Linstrom, P.J. and Mallard, W.G., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, 202...

    2023 doi

  58. [69]

    Fritz, Berechnung des maximalvolumes von dampfblasen, Physik

    W. Fritz, Berechnung des maximalvolumes von dampfblasen, Physik. Zeitschr 36 (1935) 379–384

    1935

  59. [70]

    G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, T.-Y. Liu, LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  60. [71]

    Ahsan, M

    M. Ahsan, M. Mahmud, P. Saha, K. Gupta, Z. Siddique, Effect of data scaling methods on machine learning algorithms and model performance, Technologies 9 (2021) 52. doi: 10.3390/ technologies9030052

    2021

  61. [72]

    Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: An overview, Neural Networks 61 (2015) 85–117

    J. Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: An overview, Neural Networks 61 (2015) 85–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003

    2015 doi

  62. [73]

    Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, 2006

    C. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, 2006

    2006

  63. [74]

    Cybenko, Continuous valued neural networks with two hidden layers are sufficient, department of computer science, Trfts

    G. Cybenko, Continuous valued neural networks with two hidden layers are sufficient, department of computer science, Trfts. University 31 (1988)

    1988

  64. [75]

    Chen, Back-propagation neural networks for nonlinear self-tuning adaptive control, IEEE Control Systems Magazine 10 (1990) 44–48

    F.-C. Chen, Back-propagation neural networks for nonlinear self-tuning adaptive control, IEEE Control Systems Magazine 10 (1990) 44–48. doi: 10.1109/37.55123

    1990 doi

  65. [76]

    A. F. Agarap, Deep learning using rectified linear units (relu), 2019. URL: https://arxiv. org/abs/1803.08375. arXiv:1803.08375

    2019 arXiv

  66. [77]

    Maniatopoulos, N

    A. Maniatopoulos, N. Mitianoudis, Learnable leaky relu (lelelu): An alternative accuracy-optimized activation function, Information 12 (2021). URL: https://www.mdpi. com/2078-2489/12/12/513. doi:10.3390/info12120513

    2021 doi

  67. [78]

    Clevert, T

    D.-A. Clevert, T. Unterthiner, S. Hochreiter, Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus), 2016. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07289. arXiv:1511.07289

    2016 arXiv

  68. [79]

    Ruder, An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms, 2017

    S. Ruder, An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms, 2017. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/1609.04747. arXiv:1609.04747. 44

    2017 arXiv

  69. [80]

    Duchi, E

    J. Duchi, E. Hazan, Y. Singer, Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization, Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011) 2121–2159. URL:http://jmlr. org/papers/v12/duchi11a.html

    2011

  70. [81]

    M. D. Zeiler, Adadelta: An adaptive learning rate method, 2012. URL: https://arxiv.org/ abs/1212.5701. arXiv:1212.5701

    2012 arXiv

  71. [82]

    D. P. Kingma, J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 2017. URL: https:// arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. arXiv:1412.6980

    2017 arXiv

  72. [83]

    Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58 (2018) 267–288

    R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58 (2018) 267–288. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161. 1996.tb02080.x

    2018 doi

  73. [84]

    A. E. Hoerl, R. W. Kennard, Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems, Technometrics 12 (1970) 55–67. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634

    1970

  74. [86]

    H.-T. Su, N. Bhat, P. Minderman, T. McAvoy, Integrating neural networks with first principles models for dynamic modeling, IF AC Proceedings Volumes 25 (1992) 327–332. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)51013-7 , 3rd IF AC Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Chemical...

    1992 doi

  75. [87]

    M. L. Thompson, M. A. Kramer, Modeling chemical processes using prior knowledge and neural networks, AIChE Journal 40 (1994) 1328–1340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic. 690400806

    1994 doi

  76. [88]

    Acu˜ na, F

    G. Acu˜ na, F. Cubillos, J. Thibault, E. Latrille, Comparison of methods for training grey-box neural network models, Computers & Chemical Engineering 23 (1999) S561–S564. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(99)80138-0 , european Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering

    1999 doi

  77. [89]

    Fix, Discriminatory analysis: nonparametric discrimination, consistency properties, volume 1, USAF school of Aviation Medicine, 1985

    E. Fix, Discriminatory analysis: nonparametric discrimination, consistency properties, volume 1, USAF school of Aviation Medicine, 1985

    1985

  78. [90]

    Cover, P

    T. Cover, P. Hart, Nearest neighbor pattern classification, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 13 (1967) 21–27. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964. 45

    1967

  79. [91]

    Breiman, Random forests, Machine Learning 45 (2001) 5–32

    L. Breiman, Random forests, Machine Learning 45 (2001) 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A: 1010933404324

    2001 doi

  80. [92]

    Geurts, D

    P. Geurts, D. Ernst, L. Wehenkel, Extremely randomized trees, Machine Learning 63 (2006) 3–42. doi:10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1

    2006 doi

  81. [93]

    T. Chen, C. Guestrin, Xgboost, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, 2016, pp. 785–794. doi:10.1145/ 2939672.2939785

    2016

  82. [94]

    Bergstra, Y

    J. Bergstra, Y. Bengio, Random search for hyper-parameter optimization., Journal of machine learning research 13 (2012)

    2012

  83. [95]

    S. M. Lundberg, S.-I. Lee, A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  84. [96]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, ´Edouard Duchesnay, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, Journal of Machine Learni...

    2011

  85. [97]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. K¨ opf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, S. Chintala, Pytorch: An imperative style, high-perfo...

    2019 arXiv

  86. [98]

    J. P. McHale, S. V. Garimella, Bubble nucleation characteristics in pool boiling of a wetting liquid on smooth and rough surfaces, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 36 (2010) 249–260. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.12.004

    2010 doi

  87. [99]

    P. Goel, A. K. Nayak, P. P. Kulkarni, J. B. Joshi, Experimental study on bubble departure characteristics in subcooled nucleate pool boiling, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 89 (2017) 163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.10.012

    2017 doi

  88. [100]

    J. Kim, S. Jun, R. Laksnarain, S. M. You, Effect of surface roughness on pool boiling heat transfer at a heated surface having moderate wettability, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 101 (2016) 992–1002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer. 2016.05.067. 46

    2016 doi

  89. [101]

    H. T. Phan, N. Caney, P. Marty, S. Colasson, J. Gavillet, Surface wettability control by nanocoating: The effects on pool boiling heat transfer and nucleation mechanism, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 52 (2009) 5459–5471. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijheat...

    2009 doi

  90. [102]

    Moˇ ze, M

    M. Moˇ ze, M. Zupanˇ ciˇ c, I. Golobiˇ c, Pattern geometry optimization on superbiphilic aluminum surfaces for enhanced pool boiling heat transfer, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 161 (2020) 120265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020. 120265

    2020 doi

  91. [103]

    Jaikumar, S

    A. Jaikumar, S. G. Kandlikar, Ultra-high pool boiling performance and effect of channel width with selectively coated open microchannels, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 95 (2016) 795–805. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.12.061

    2016 doi

  92. [104]

    Yao, Y.-W

    Z. Yao, Y.-W. Lu, S. G. Kandlikar, Pool boiling heat transfer enhancement through nanostructures on silicon microchannels, Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine 3 (2013) 031002. doi: 10.1115/1.4007425

    2013 doi

  93. [105]

    A. M. Gheitaghy, A. Samimi, H. Saffari, Surface structuring with inclined minichannels for pool boiling improvement, Applied Thermal Engineering 126 (2017) 892–902. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.200

    2017 doi

  94. [106]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. K. Behura, D. K. Rajak, R. Kumar, M. H. Ahmadi, M. Sharifpur, O. Bamisile, Performance of heat transfer mechanism in nucleate pool boiling -a relative approach of contribution to various heat transfer components, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 24 (2021) 10082...

    2021

  95. [107]

    Y. An, C. Huang, X. Wang, Effects of thermal conductivity and wettability of porous materials on the boiling heat transfer, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 170 (2021) 107110. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107110. 47

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.