REVIEW 2 cited by
Loss-Sensitive Generative Adversarial Networks on Lipschitz Densities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we present the Lipschitz regularization theory and algorithms for a novel Loss-Sensitive Generative Adversarial Network (LS-GAN). Specifically, it trains a loss function to distinguish between real and fake samples by designated margins, while learning a generator alternately to produce realistic samples by minimizing their losses. The LS-GAN further regularizes its loss function with a Lipschitz regularity condition on the density of real data, yielding a regularized model that can better generalize to produce new data from a reasonable number of training examples than the classic GAN. We will further present a Generalized LS-GAN (GLS-GAN) and show it contains a large family of regularized GAN models, including both LS-GAN and Wasserstein GAN, as its special cases. Compared with the other GAN models, we will conduct experiments to show both LS-GAN and GLS-GAN exhibit competitive ability in generating new images in terms of the Minimum Reconstruction Error (MRE) assessed on a separate test set. We further extend the LS-GAN to a conditional form for supervised and semi-supervised learning problems, and demonstrate its outstanding performance on image classification tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Spectral Regularization for Combating Mode Collapse in GANs
A spectral regularization penalty on the discriminator's singular value distribution prevents mode collapse in GANs and improves Inception Score and FID over spectral normalization in the tested settings.
-
Generalization in Generative Adversarial Networks: A Novel Perspective from Privacy Protection
Under differential privacy, a GAN's generalization gap is bounded, and experimentally, Lipschitz regularization reduces both train-test gap and membership attack success.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.