Exploring the Kleinian horizons

Bryan Malpartida; Gaston Giribet; Juan Laurnagaray; Pedro Schmied

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Exploring the Kleinian horizons

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Near the horizons of self-dual black holes in Klein space, the geometry admits an infinite-dimensional symmetry generated by supertranslations and superrotations.

desk verdict The paper is honest and checkable, but the headline algebra is conditional on a state-independence assumption that the authors state rather than prove. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.11686 v1 pith:5FSRMZK3 submitted 2025-05-16 hep-th

Gaston Giribet , Juan Laurnagaray , Bryan Malpartida , Pedro Schmied This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th MSC 83C5783C4083C3081T40

keywords Kleinspaceself-dualblackholesTaub-NUTnear-horizonsymmetriessupertranslationssuperrotationsNoetherchargescelestialholography

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the near-horizon region of self-dual Schwarzschild–Taub–NUT solutions in Klein space, i.e., in a spacetime with (2,2) signature. It establishes that, despite the unusual signature, the geometry near the Kleinian horizon exhibits an infinite-dimensional symmetry algebra similar to the Bondi–van der Burg–Metzner–Sachs algebra: supertranslations and superrotations. The result is obtained by generalizing earlier near-horizon fall-off conditions and solving the asymptotic Killing equations. The associated Noether charges are shown to be integrable. This matters because Klein-space black holes are a testing ground for celestial holography, and horizon symmetries provide a concrete handle on their microscopic structure.

What carries the argument

The central object is the relaxed set of near-horizon boundary conditions (3.2)–(3.3), where the metric components are expanded as g_ρρ = αρ + O($ρ^{2}$), g_ρA = β_A ρ + O($ρ^{2}$), g_vρ = 1 + γρ + O($ρ^{2}$), and the transverse metric is Ω_AB + ω_AB ρ + O($ρ^{2}$). These generalize the stricter fall-offs of earlier null-surface analyses (the case α = β_A = γ = 0). The argument then imposes state independence, forcing Z = 0 and ∂_v Y^A = 0 in the asymptotic Killing expansion, which simplifies the symmetry generators and yields the closed algebra. The modified Lie bracket (3.14), {ξ_1, ξ_2} = L_{ξ_1}ξ_2 − δ_{ξ_1}ξ_2 + δ_{ξ_2}ξ_1, is the device that makes the algebra close despite the relaxed fall-offs.

What would settle it

Impose the stricter fall-off conditions of earlier null-surface analyses, namely α = β_A = γ = 0 in (3.2), and re-solve the asymptotic Killing equations for the self-dual Kleinian metric (3.18); if the only solutions are the four Killing vectors of the exact metric, then the infinite-dimensional symmetry is an artifact of the relaxed boundary conditions rather than a robust feature of the horizon geometry.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper proves that the near-horizon geometry of the self-dual Kleinian Schwarzschild–Taub-NUT metric (with mass equal to the NUT charge) admits a local infinite-dimensional symmetry. In coordinates where the horizon sits at ρ = 0, the asymptotic Killing vectors take the form ξ^v = f + O($ρ^{2}$), ξ^A = Y^A − $Ω^{{AB}}$ ∂_B f ρ + O($ρ^{2}$), and ξ^ρ = −∂_v f ρ + O($ρ^{2}$), with f and Y^A arbitrary functions of the horizon coordinates. With the modified Lie bracket (3.14), these close into the algebra (3.15)–(3.16): a semi-direct sum of the supertranslation algebra generated by f and two copies of the Witt algebra generated by Y^A. The paper also computes the Noether charge variations for supertranslations and finds them integrable, with charges expressible in terms of the exponential integral function; the charges are v-dependent because the horizon sections themselves depend on the null time.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes the near-horizon metric falls off with coefficients independent of ρ and that the asymptotic Killing vectors are state-independent, forcing Z = 0 and ∂_v Y^A = 0; if the physically appropriate boundary conditions instead fix g_vρ = 1 exactly or allow the Killing vectors to depend on the metric functions, the algebra could reduce to the trivial Killing isometries or fail to close.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The near-horizon region of self-dual Kleinian black holes carries the same type of BMS-like symmetry that appears for Lorentzian black-hole horizons, extended here to (2,2) signature.
The supertranslation Noether charges are integrable even though they depend on the null time v, so a well-defined charge can be assigned to each horizon section.
The static and stationary self-dual Kleinian solutions are related by a large diffeomorphism that does not belong to the near-horizon asymptotic symmetry group, since it changes the location of the horizon.
The relaxed boundary conditions used here are compatible with the presence of nontrivial O(ρ) terms in g_ρμ, which earlier treatments had set to zero, so the result extends the known horizon-symmetry analysis to a broader class of null surfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the v-dependence of the charges is interpreted as flux through the horizon sections, the Kleinian horizon could provide a (2,2)-signature analog of gravitational memory, where the supertranslation charges evolve as the null time advances.
The relaxed fall-offs might be the natural boundary conditions for any self-dual black hole in Klein space, suggesting that the same infinite-dimensional symmetry appears for the full self-dual Kerr–Taub-NUT family, not just the static configuration studied here.
A concrete testable extension would be to couple a scalar or graviton probe to the self-dual Kleinian black hole and compute the corresponding memory effect; a nonzero late-time displacement would give the charges a dynamical meaning beyond their formal integrability.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here is my read. The paper does a careful, honest job on a narrow but real extension: for the self-dual Schwarzschild-Taub-NUT solution in Klein space, it writes the horizon metric in coordinates that realize relaxed near-horizon fall-offs (3.2)-(3.3), derives the asymptotic Killing vectors in the state-independent sector, and shows they close into the familiar semi-direct sum of supertranslations and two Witt algebras. The algebra itself is not new—same bracket as in [17]—but the relaxed boundary conditions and the v-dependent horizon geometry are new, and the supertranslation charge is cross-checked through two independent formulas, (4.4) and (4.8), which match. That deserves credit. The paper also flags its own conceptual limitation around the meaning of the charges. This should go to peer review. The real soft spot is the one the stress-test note identifies. Equation (3.11) is not derived from (3.2)-(3.3); it is an extra state-independence assumption that kills Z and v-dependent Y. On this background, the first equation in (3.9) admits nonzero Z, and the second can then source v-dependent Y. The paper does not prove these modes are excluded by the boundary conditions, nor that they fail to preserve the fall-offs at the required order. So the claimed algebra is a closed subalgebra under an asserted truncation, not necessarily the full near-horizon symmetry. That does not invalidate the result, but the abstract's phrasing—'the infinite-dimensional algebra underlying the local symmetries'—overstates what is proven. A referee should ask the authors to either rule out the extra modes or present the result as 'a closed subalgebra.' Minor issues: the derivation of (3.5) from (3.4) is compressed; the charge analysis covers only supertranslations, not superrotations; and there is a duplicated reference [28,28,29]. Who gets value: people working on near-horizon symmetries, celestial holography, or Kleinian signature black holes. It is a subfield advance, not a breakthrough. Recommendation: send it to a serious referee. The caveat is fixable by proof or by a more modest claim.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the near-horizon geometry of the self-dual Schwarzschild–Taub-NUT solution in Kleinian (2,2) signature. After passing to coordinates adapted to the null horizon at ρ = 0, the authors propose relaxed fall-off conditions (3.2)–(3.3) that permit O(ρ) terms in g_ρμ. Solving the asymptotic Killing equations yields a general expansion for symmetry generators, and after imposing a state-independence condition, Eq. (3.11), the authors obtain a closed algebra of supertranslations and superrotations, Eqs. (3.14)–(3.16). They then compute the Noether charge variation for the supertranslation sector using two independent formulas, Eqs. (4.4) and (4.8), which match and are integrable, and they discuss the relation to the diffeomorphism mapping static and stationary self-dual Kleinian solutions. The central claim is that the Kleinian self-dual horizon exhibits a local infinite-dimensional BMS-like symmetry with integrable charges.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the paper offers a nontrivial extension of near-horizon asymptotic symmetry analysis to Kleinian signature, showing that relaxed fall-offs can still yield a BMS-type algebra. The explicit cross-check of the charge formula through two independent expressions is a genuine strength, as is the explicit construction of the asymptotic Killing algebra. The subject is timely for celestial holography and the recent program on Kleinian black holes. However, the symmetry claim is conditional on the state-independence truncation, and the displayed metric components contain inconsistencies that must be resolved before the charge results can be fully accepted.

major comments (2)

[Section 3, Eq. (3.11)] The state-independence condition that forces Z = 0 and ∂_vY^A = 0 is assumed, not derived. For the specific background considered (κ = 1/(4M), θ_A = 0), the first equation in (3.9) admits the family Z = Z_0(t,φ) e^{v/(4M)}, and the second equation then sources ∂_vY^B from ∂_AZ. These modes do not obviously violate the relaxed fall-offs (3.2)–(3.3), and the paper does not show that they yield vanishing charges or are pure gauge. Since the algebra (3.14)–(3.16) is obtained by projecting onto the Z = 0, ∂_vY^A = 0 sector, the claim that the geometry 'exhibits' this symmetry should be justified by an additional boundary condition (e.g., regularity in v, finiteness of charges, or a stricter fall-off) or explicitly stated as a property of a chosen subalgebra of the full asymptotic symmetry group. The abstract and conclusions should be adjusted accordingly.
[Sections 2 and 3, Eqs. (2.14), (2.15), (3.18)] The metric expansions in (2.14) and (3.18) are mutually inconsistent for the same coordinate system: (2.14) gives g_ρv = 1 + ρ/(2M) + O(ρ²) and g_tφ = -M e^{v/(2M)} + O(ρ), while (3.18) gives g_ρv = 2(1 + ρ/(2M)) + ... and g_tφ = -2M e^{v/(2M)} + O(ρ). Equation (2.13) does not cleanly reproduce either expansion. Since the boundary data (κ, θ_A, Ω_AB) in (2.15) and the charge integrals (4.4), (4.6), and (4.8) depend on these components, the authors need to correct the metric expansion and re-derive the boundary data and charges if necessary.

minor comments (6)

[Section 2, Eq. (2.13)] The coordinate definition v = 2Mθ + 2M logρ is dimensionally ambiguous because the logarithm contains a dimensionful argument; please specify the scale (e.g., log(ρ/(2M))) and use it consistently in (2.13), (2.14), and (3.18).
[Section 3, Eq. (3.5)] The resolution of the asymptotic Killing equations (3.4) leading to (3.5) is not shown; please add a short derivation or an explicit reference to the analogous computation in [17].
[Section 4] The integrability claim is demonstrated only for the supertranslation sector (Y^A = 0); the text should state explicitly that the superrotation charges are not analyzed.
[References] References [27] and [28] are identical and should be merged.
[Eq. (4.5)] The definition of the exponential integral should be written unambiguously, e.g., Ei(z) = ∫_{-∞}^{z} (e^τ/τ) dτ.
[Throughout] Minor typos such as 'from this conditions' should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the near-horizon symmetry algebra is obtained by solving the asymptotic Killing equations under explicitly stated boundary conditions, and the charge computation uses a standard published formula rather than a fitted parameter.

full rationale

The paper does not fit any parameter to data, nor does it rename a known result. The central derivation is a direct computation: relaxed near-horizon boundary conditions (3.2)-(3.3) are stated, the Killing equations (3.4) are solved to give the vector expansion (3.5), and the state-independence assumption (3.11) is applied to obtain the algebra (3.14)-(3.16). The metric (2.13), rewritten as (3.18), is explicitly checked to satisfy the boundary conditions, so the claim that this Kleinian geometry admits the infinite-dimensional symmetry is a verification, not an input. The main caveat is that Eq. (3.11) excludes branches of Eq. (3.9) with nonzero Z or v-dependent Y^A; the paper does not prove that those modes are incompatible with the boundary conditions. This is a correctness/completeness risk, not circularity: the reported algebra is conditional on an explicit assumption, but the derivation from that assumption is genuine. The charge calculation starts from expression (24) of the authors' earlier paper [17]; this is a self-citation, and it is load-bearing for the integrability claim. However, [17] is an independent published derivation of the covariant phase-space charge formula with stated assumptions that do not include the present result, and the present evaluation is a new explicit computation, so the self-citation does not make the argument circular. Overall the paper's derivation chain is self-contained and not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the boundary condition ansatz and the state-independence assumption, plus the standard charge formula from [17]. There are no fitted numerical parameters and no new entities. The main burden is whether the chosen boundary conditions are the physically appropriate ones for Kleinian horizons.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Null surface coordinates satisfy the gauge conditions g_ρρ = 0, g_ρA = 0, g_ρv = 1 on H (Eq. (3.1)).
The paper assumes such Gaussian null coordinates exist near the Kleinian horizon; if the horizon could not be put in this form, the entire expansion would fail.
ad hoc to paper The near-horizon metric admits the relaxed fall-offs (3.2)-(3.3), with coefficient functions independent of ρ.
These boundary conditions are chosen specifically because they include the Kleinian self-dual metric, which has γ = 1/(2M) ≠ 0. They generalize [17] and are not derived from an independent physical principle, but they are stated explicitly.
domain assumption State-independence of asymptotic Killing vectors (3.11): ξ does not depend on the metric functions, which forces Z = 0 and ∂_v Y^A = 0.
This is an explicit assumption in Section 3. It is needed to obtain the simplified algebra (3.14)-(3.16); without it, (3.9) admits more general solutions and the algebra could differ.
standard math The charge variation formulas (4.1) and (4.6) are taken from Eqs. (24) and (25) of Ref. [17].
The covariant phase space charge expression is an established result; the paper uses it without re-derivation. One of the present authors co-authored [17], so this carries a minor self-citation.
domain assumption The self-dual Kleinian metric (2.11) is a Ricci-flat solution with a single non-degenerate horizon at r = M (Section 2).
The solution is an input inherited from the prior literature via analytic continuation; the paper does not re-verify the Einstein equations.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the Kleinian horizons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5FSRMZK3

@misc{pith2026250511686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the Kleinian horizons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5FSRMZK3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.11686}
}

read the original abstract

Self-dual black holes in (2,2) signature spacetime -- Klein space -- have recently attracted interest in the context of celestial holography. Motivated by this development, we investigate the structure of spacetime near the horizons of these solutions. Focusing on the self-dual Schwarzschild-Taub-NUT solution, we demonstrate that, near the Kleinian horizons, the geometry exhibits a local infinite-dimensional symmetry generated by supertranslations and superrotations. Establishing this result requires refining and extending earlier analyses of asymptotic symmetries near null surfaces. We formulate the appropriate boundary conditions, derive the infinite-dimensional algebra underlying the local symmetries, and compute the associated Noether charges, finding them to be integrable. Finally, we discuss the connection of our findings to recent observations in the literature regarding self-dual black holes in Klein space, including the diffeomorphism relating static and stationary solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Celestial Chiral Algebras and Self-Dual Gravity
hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

This thesis derives deformations of celestial chiral algebras in self-dual gravity on curved backgrounds, obtaining W(infinity) on Eguchi-Hanson space, Ldiff_q(C) under Moyal deformation, and a two-parameter deformati...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[17]

Extended S ymmetries at the Black Hole Horizon,

L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonz´ alez and M. Pino, “Extended S ymmetries at the Black Hole Horizon,” JHEP 09, 100 (2016) [arXiv:1607.05703 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2016
[1]

Black holes in Klein space,

E. Crawley, A. Guevara, N. Miller and A. Strominger, “Black holes in Klein space,” JHEP 10, 135 (2022) [arXiv:2112.03954 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2022
[2]

Self-dua l black holes in celestial holography,

E. Crawley, A. Guevara, E. Himwich and A. Strominger, “Self-dua l black holes in celestial holography,” JHEP 09, 109 (2023) [arXiv:2302.06661 [hep-th]]. 13

arXiv 2023
[3]

Scattering on se lf-dual Taub-NUT,

T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason and A. Sharma, “Scattering on se lf-dual Taub-NUT,” Class. Quant. Grav. 41, no.1, 015030 (2024) [arXiv:2309.03834 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024
[4]

An Exact Black Hole Scattering Amplitude,

A. Guevara, U. Kol and H. Tran, “An Exact Black Hole Scattering Amplitude,” [arXiv:2412.19627 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[5]

Self Dual Black Holes as the Hydrogen Ato m,

A. Guevara and U. Kol, “Self Dual Black Holes as the Hydrogen Ato m,” [arXiv:2311.07933 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[6]

Kleinian black holes,

D. A. Easson and M. W. Pezzelle, “Kleinian black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.4, 044007 (2024) [arXiv:2312.00879 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024
[7]

Taub-NUT inst anton as the self-dual analog of Kerr,

J. Desai, G. Herczeg, D. McNutt and M. Pezzelle, “Taub-NUT inst anton as the self-dual analog of Kerr,” JHEP 12, 044 (2024) [arXiv:2405.15946 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024

Show all 32 references

[8]

A note on the area of event horizon of Kleinian black hole ,

T. Q. Do, “A note on the area of event horizon of Kleinian black hole ,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.9, 978 (2024) [arXiv:2405.16689 [gr-qc]]

2024 arXiv
[9]

Single Kerr-Schild metric for Taub-NUT instanton,

J. H. Kim, “Single Kerr-Schild metric for Taub-NUT instanton,” Phy s. Rev. D 111, no.2, L021703 (2025) [arXiv:2405.09518 [hep-th]]

2025 arXiv
[10]

Towards celestial chiral algebras o f self-dual black holes,

G. Bogna and S. Heuveline, “Towards celestial chiral algebras o f self-dual black holes,” [arXiv:2408.14324 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[11]

Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-NUT Instantons ,

J. H. Kim, “Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-NUT Instantons ,” [arXiv:2412.19611 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[12]

Properties of Dual Supertranslation C harges in Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,

U. Kol and M. Porrati, “Properties of Dual Supertranslation C harges in Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.4, 046019 (2019) [arXiv:1907.00990 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[13]

Gravitational Wu-Yang Monopoles,

U. Kol and M. Porrati, “Gravitational Wu-Yang Monopoles,” Phy s. Rev. D 101, no.12, 126009 (2020) [arXiv:2003.09054 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[14]

The Information Paradox for Black Holes,

S. W. Hawking, “The Information Paradox for Black Holes,” [arXiv :1509.01147 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[15]

Supertrans lations and Superrotations at the Black Hole Horizon,

L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonzalez and M. Pino, “Supertrans lations and Superrotations at the Black Hole Horizon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.9, 091101 (2016) [arXiv:1511.08687 [hep-th]]

2016 arXiv
[16]

Soft Hair on Blac k Holes,

S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Soft Hair on Blac k Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.23, 231301 (2016) [arXiv:1601.00921 [hep-th]]. 14

2016 arXiv
[18]

Black hole m emory eﬀect,

L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonz´ alez and A. Puhm, “Black hole m emory eﬀect,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.12, 124016 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.124016 [arXiv:1809 .07266 [hep- th]]

2018 doi
[19]

Zooming in on the horizon when in its Meissner state,

G. Giribet, J. La Madrid, L. Montecchio, E. R. de Celis and P. Schm ied, “Zooming in on the horizon when in its Meissner state,” JHEP 05, 207 (2023) [arXiv:2302.14140 [hep-th]]

2023 arXiv
[20]

Symmetries of magn etized horizons,

S. Brenner, G. Giribet and L. Montecchio, “Symmetries of magn etized horizons,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.12, 124006 (2021) [arXiv:2103.06983 [hep-th]]

2021 arXiv
[21]

Field response in the near-horizon limit of near-extremal ﬁve-dimensional black hole s,

G. Giribet, J. Laurnagaray, B. Malpartida, J. Oliva and O. Santill´ an, “Field response in the near-horizon limit of near-extremal ﬁve-dimensional black hole s,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.12, 124078 (2023) [arXiv:2310.07559 [hep-th]]

2023 arXiv
[22]

Close r look at black hole pair creation,

A. Anabal´ on, S. Brenner, G. Giribet and L. Montecchio, “Close r look at black hole pair creation,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.2, 024044 (2021) [arXiv:2103.05782 [hep-th]]

2021 arXiv
[23]

Horizon symmetries and hairy black holes in AdS,

L. Donnay, G. Giribet and J. Oliva, “Horizon symmetries and hairy black holes in AdS,” JHEP 09, 120 (2020) [arXiv:2007.08422 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[24]

Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair,

D. Grumiller, A. P´ erez, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Troncoso and C. Zwikel, “Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.4, 041601 (2020) [arXiv:1908.09833 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[25]

Cosmological horizons, Noether cha rges and entropy,

L. Donnay and G. Giribet, “Cosmological horizons, Noether cha rges and entropy,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36, no.16, 165005 (2019) [arXiv:1903.09271 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[26]

Near-Horizon Symmetries of L ocal Black Holes in General Relativity,

M. M. Akbar and S. M. Modumudi, “Near-Horizon Symmetries of L ocal Black Holes in General Relativity,” [arXiv:2503.09915 [gr-qc]]
[28]

Spin structures on Kleinian manifolds,

L. Alty and A. Chamblin, “Spin structures on Kleinian manifolds,” Cla ss. Quant. Grav. 11, 2411-2416 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9310175 [hep-th]]

1994 arXiv
[29]

Kleinian geometry and the N=2 superstring,

J. W. Barrett, G. W. Gibbons, M. J. Perry, C. N. Pope and P. Ru back, “Kleinian geometry and the N=2 superstring,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 1457-1494 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9302073 [hep-th]]. 15

1994 arXiv
[30]

Warped A dS(3) Black Holes,

D. Anninos, W. Li, M. Padi, W. Song and A. Strominger, “Warped A dS(3) Black Holes,” JHEP 03, 130 (2009) [arXiv:0807.3040 [hep-th]]

2009 arXiv
[31]

The Extreme Kerr throat g eometry: A Vacuum analog of AdS(2) × S(2),

J. M. Bardeen and G. T. Horowitz, “The Extreme Kerr throat g eometry: A Vacuum analog of AdS(2) × S(2),” Phys. Rev. D 60, 104030 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9905099 [hep-th]]

1999 arXiv
[32]

Anti de Sitter space, squashed and stretched,

I. Bengtsson and P. Sandin, “Anti de Sitter space, squashed and stretched,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 971-986 (2006) [arXiv:gr-qc/0509076 [gr-qc]]

2006 arXiv
[33]

The Kerr/C FT Correspondence,

M. Guica, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger, “The Kerr/C FT Correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 124008 (2009) [arXiv:0809.4266 [hep-th]]. 16

2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [17]

Extended S ymmetries at the Black Hole Horizon,

L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. A. Gonz´ alez and M. Pino, “Extended S ymmetries at the Black Hole Horizon,” JHEP 09, 100 (2016) [arXiv:1607.05703 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2016

[2] [1]

Black holes in Klein space,

E. Crawley, A. Guevara, N. Miller and A. Strominger, “Black holes in Klein space,” JHEP 10, 135 (2022) [arXiv:2112.03954 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2022

[3] [2]

Self-dua l black holes in celestial holography,

E. Crawley, A. Guevara, E. Himwich and A. Strominger, “Self-dua l black holes in celestial holography,” JHEP 09, 109 (2023) [arXiv:2302.06661 [hep-th]]. 13

arXiv 2023

[4] [3]

Scattering on se lf-dual Taub-NUT,

T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason and A. Sharma, “Scattering on se lf-dual Taub-NUT,” Class. Quant. Grav. 41, no.1, 015030 (2024) [arXiv:2309.03834 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024

[5] [4]

An Exact Black Hole Scattering Amplitude,

A. Guevara, U. Kol and H. Tran, “An Exact Black Hole Scattering Amplitude,” [arXiv:2412.19627 [hep-th]]

arXiv

[6] [5]

Self Dual Black Holes as the Hydrogen Ato m,

A. Guevara and U. Kol, “Self Dual Black Holes as the Hydrogen Ato m,” [arXiv:2311.07933 [hep-th]]

arXiv

[7] [6]

Kleinian black holes,

D. A. Easson and M. W. Pezzelle, “Kleinian black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.4, 044007 (2024) [arXiv:2312.00879 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024

[8] [7]

Taub-NUT inst anton as the self-dual analog of Kerr,

J. Desai, G. Herczeg, D. McNutt and M. Pezzelle, “Taub-NUT inst anton as the self-dual analog of Kerr,” JHEP 12, 044 (2024) [arXiv:2405.15946 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2024