Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 61 references

LID-1166 hosts two physically distinct, actively accreting supermassive black holes at a projected separation of ~1.5 kpc, making it the first confirmed close-separation dual AGN beyond the local Universe.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

LID-1166 is the first confirmed close-separation (<3 kpc) dual AGN beyond the local Universe, hosting two accreting supermassive black holes in a gas-rich merger at z~4.5.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection A plausible first close-separation dual AGN at z~4.5, but the companion's AGN signature rests on one PSF-subtracted broad line; worth refereeing carefully. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19491 v1 pith:5IZC34VB submitted 2026-07-21 astro-ph.GA

Rapid growth in a dual AGN during a gas-rich merger at z~4.5

Hyewon Suh , Roberto Decarli , Emanuele Paolo Farina , Julia Scharw\"achter , Mar Mezcua , Giorgio Lanzuisi , Federica Loiacono , Brian C. Lemaux
show 10 more authors
Sukyoung K. Yi Stefano Marchesi Marta Volonteri G\"unther Hasinger Francesca Civano Anniek Gloudemans Ena Choi Yeonwoo Nam Adi Foord Silvia Onorato
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dual AGNsupermassive black holesgalaxy mergershigh-redshift galaxiesJWST NIRSpec IFUALMA [CII]super-Eddington accretionobscured AGN
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the discovery of LID-1166, a system at z≈4.5 in which JWST/NIRSpec integral-field spectroscopy resolves two nuclei separated by 0.23 arcsec (~1.5 kpc), showing two kinematically distinct narrow-line components and an off-nuclear broad Hα component. ALMA [CII] 158 μm maps independently reveal two spatially and kinematically distinct cold-gas components at the same positions and velocities, confirming a gas-rich, late-stage merger. The authors conclude that both nuclei are actively accreting supermassive black holes, making this the first confirmed close-separation (<3 kpc) dual AGN beyond the local Universe. They further argue that the system is undergoing super-Eddington accretion while already lying on the local black hole–host mass relation, suggesting that rapid, obscured growth can establish this relation early in cosmic history. The discovery points to a hidden population of heavily obscured dual AGNs missed by broad-band surveys.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that LID-1166 hosts two physically distinct, actively accreting supermassive black holes at a projected separation of ~1.5 kpc at z≈4.5, making it the first confirmed close-separation dual AGN beyond the local Universe. The evidence combines two spatially and kinematically distinct narrow-line Hα components (velocity offset −164 km/s), a compact off-nuclear broad Hα component from the companion, and ALMA [CII] maps showing two cold-gas components at the same positions and velocities. Lensing is ruled out by the differing redshifts, line ratios, broad-line profiles, and reversed [CII] brightness. The black holes have masses log M_BH/M_sun ≈ 7.8 and 7.2 and are acc

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by spatially resolved emission-line spectroscopy: JWST/NIRSpec integral-field unit (IFU) observations, with a WebbPSF model of the primary AGN subtracted to isolate a faint second nucleus, and ALMA [CII] 158 μm line maps that provide independent, dust-unbiased kinematics. The PSF-subtracted cube reveals the companion's broad Hα line — the key AGN signature — while the [CII] velocity field and position–velocity diagram show two kinematically distinct gas components aligned with the two nuclei. Together these tracers connect an obscured, rapidly accreting active nucleus to a distinct cold-gas component and rule out a single lensed source.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that LID-1166 is a dual AGN depends on the companion's broad Hα emission being real and not a residual artifact of subtracting the primary AGN's PSF; if that residual is an artifact, the second nucleus is not confirmed as an AGN, although the independent ALMA [CII] kinematic component cushions this risk.

What would settle it

A sub-arcsecond observation that resolves the two nuclei without PSF modeling — for example, very long baseline interferometry at radio wavelengths or a mid-infrared map — that reveals only a single compact active nucleus, or a PSF-subtraction test using an independent PSF library that removes the companion's broad Hα signal, would falsify the dual-AGN claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Close-separation dual AGNs existed at z≈4.5 and can be discovered through resolved emission-line spectroscopy even when host galaxies are invisible in rest-frame UV/optical imaging.
  • Heavily obscured, gas-rich mergers can host super-Eddington accretion while the black holes already obey the local black hole–host mass relation, implying that relation can be established early and preserved during rapid growth.
  • The large cold-gas reservoir (M_H2 ≈ 8×10^10 M_sun) and inferred star formation rate (~68 M_sun/yr) indicate that such systems can sustain gas supply for continued growth over roughly a gigayear.
  • Current censuses of dual AGNs at high redshift are likely incomplete because selection based on broad-band imaging misses heavily obscured systems like LID-1166.
  • If LID-1166 is representative, the progenitors of low-frequency gravitational-wave sources may be more abundant in the early Universe than previously inferred.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The PSF-subtraction approach used here could be applied systematically to other X-ray-selected, optically faint AGNs; if even a few percent of such sources hide a second nucleus, the dual-AGN fraction at z>3 would be much higher than current estimates.
  • A natural testable extension is to search for the companion's X-ray or radio emission at sub-arcsecond resolution; a detection of a second compact core would independently confirm the dual-AGN interpretation beyond line-emission evidence.
  • If super-Eddington phases are short and episodic, systems like LID-1166 are rare snapshots; the implied duty cycle could be constrained by counting how many similarly obscured mergers show dual broad-line components in large JWST IFU surveys.
  • The consistency with the local scaling relation may depend on how dynamical mass is estimated; a stellar-mass measurement from deeper NIRCam imaging would test whether the relation holds when host mass is measured directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports JWST/NIRSpec IFU and ALMA [CII] 158 μm observations of LID-1166, an X-ray-selected, optically invisible AGN at z~4.5. Two compact Hα emission components separated by 0.23″ (~1.5 kpc) are identified after PSF subtraction. The two components show a line-of-sight velocity offset of ~164 km/s, distinct narrow-line ratios, and, in the companion, a broad Hα component detected in the PSF-subtracted cube. Independent ALMA data reveal two spatially and kinematically distinct [CII] components at the same positions and velocities. The paper interprets this as a genuine dual AGN in a gas-rich, late-stage merger, estimates black hole masses from broad Hα (log M_BH/M_sun ~7.8 and ~7.2), a system-integrated Eddington ratio of ~3.7 from MYtorus-based X-ray modeling, and a dynamical mass from [CII] kinematics, arguing that the system is consistent with the local black hole–host mass relation while undergoing super-Eddington accretion.

Significance. If the dual-AGN interpretation holds, this would be the first confirmed <3 kpc dual AGN beyond the local Universe and a direct probe of obscured, merger-driven SMBH growth at high redshift. The paper's strengths are its use of two independent instruments (JWST and ALMA), the resolved kinematics in both tracers, the explicit lensing rejection based on redshift difference and brightness reversal, and the transparent discussion of systematic uncertainties (X-ray model dependence, [CII]-to-H2 conversion, non-virialized dynamics). The central claim, however, depends on the identification of a broad Hα component in the PSF-subtracted residual of the companion, which is the only accretion diagnostic for that nucleus; the ALMA [CII] data confirm a second gas component but not a second accreting black hole.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'JWST NIRSpec/IFU PSF subtraction'; Extended Data Fig. 1] The second black hole's AGN nature is supported only by broad Hα in the PSF-subtracted residual. The text acknowledges that 'spatially extended outflow emission from the primary nucleus may contribute' to the emission around the secondary nucleus, but counters only that the residual is 'morphologically distinct.' This distinction is not quantified. Please provide (i) a radial/azimuthal profile or image-plane fit of the residual Hα at the companion position compared with the WebbPSF model, (ii) an explicit decomposition of the residual into a compact point-source component and an extended component, with significances, and (iii) a demonstration that the broad Hα profile at the companion is not reproduced by the primary's broad-line profile scaled and shifted at 0.23". Because the companion's [NII]/Hα ratio (0.13±0.08) is consistent with star formation, the broad line is the sole accretion
  2. [Methods, 'AGN Bolometric luminosity'; main text 'Eddington ratio' paragraph] The super-Eddington ratio (λ_Edd=3.7) is presented as a headline result, but it depends on the MYtorus CT model with fixed Γ=1.9. The improvement over a simple absorbed power-law fit is only ΔC=3.38 for one additional free parameter, which is not statistically significant, and the authors themselves state that non-CT models yield log L_bol~45.3–45.7 and λ_Edd=0.2–0.5, i.e., sub-Eddington. The abstract and main text should therefore present the super-Eddington phase as model-dependent, or provide a stronger statistical or physical justification for the CT model. This does not affect the dual-AGN detection, but it weakens the 'rapid/super-Eddington growth' claim in the title and abstract.
  3. [Dynamical mass estimates; Fig. 3] The comparison with the local M_BH–bulge mass relation uses M_dyn from [CII] as a proxy for bulge mass, with M_dyn explicitly acknowledged to include gas, stars, and dark matter and hence to be an upper bound on the bulge mass. If the true bulge mass is lower, the point moves left in Fig. 3. The statement that this shift would 'further reinforce consistency' needs a quantitative check: with the Kormendy–Ho relation's slope, a leftward shift of ~0.3–0.5 dex may move LID-1166 off the relation. Please show the allowed range of M_bulge (e.g., from the gas fraction and a reasonable stellar-to-dynamical mass ratio) and the resulting offset, or soften the claim accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Data availability; Methods ALMA] The ALMA program ID appears as 2024.1.01025.S in Methods but as 2014.1.01025.S in Data availability. Please correct.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The local M_BH–bulge relation is attributed to ref. 47 in the caption but to ref. 49 in the text; the local AGN relation from ref. 50 is cited as ref. 48. Please align the citation numbers.
  3. [Extended Data Fig. numbering] Extended Data Fig. 2 is used both for the X-ray spectral model and for the ALMA [CII] velocity/dispersion maps, while the PV diagram is in Extended Data Fig. 3; the numbering is inconsistent.
  4. [Text near 'gas depletion timescale'] Typo: 'could plausibly the sustained' should be 'could plausibly be sustained.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found: independent observables and external calibrations support the dual-AGN claim.

full rationale

We walked the paper's derivation chain. The dual-AGN claim rests on (i) two spatially and kinematically distinct narrow-line H-alpha components in JWST/NIRSpec data, (ii) a compact off-nuclear broad-H-alpha component in the PSF-subtracted residual cube, and (iii) independent ALMA [CII] components with velocity centroids from a free two-Gaussian fit. None of these is computed from the others by construction: the ALMA redshifts are fitted independently and then compared with the H-alpha redshifts, while the companion H-alpha spectrum is an observed residual, not a refit of the PSF model. Black-hole masses use the external Greene & Ho (2005) single-epoch virial calibration; bolometric luminosity uses the MYtorus X-ray fit and the Duras et al. (2020) bolometric correction; dynamical mass uses Equation (14) of Neeleman et al. (2021); molecular gas mass uses the Zanella et al. (2018) [CII]-to-H2 conversion. These are external calibrations applied to independent measurements, not parameters fitted to reproduce the target relation. The PSF-subtraction assumption is a potential systematic data-quality risk for the companion detection, and the Methods explicitly discuss the alternative that extended outflow emission from the primary contributes around the secondary; but a data-analysis risk is not a circular derivation. The evolutionary trajectories are explicitly labelled as illustrative upper limits, not predictive tracks. Self-citations (Suh et al. 2020, 2025; Loiacono et al.; Decarli et al.) are contextual or procedural and are not load-bearing for the central claim. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physics entities are postulated. The central dual-AGN claim uses standard observables; the super-Eddington and gas-mass claims carry several fitted or assumed model parameters.

free parameters (5)
  • Hydrogen column density N_H (MYtorus) = 1.0e24 cm^-2 (90% range -0.8/+3.0)
    Fitted to Chandra X-ray spectrum; drives absorption-corrected L_2-10 and hence L_bol and Eddington ratio.
  • Photon index Γ (MYtorus) = 1.9 (fixed)
    Fixed to canonical AGN value; a free fit gives Γ=1.07, which would change the bolometric luminosity.
  • Torus inclination angle = 75° (fixed)
    Chosen to ensure line-of-sight intercepts obscuring material; affects reflected/scattered contribution.
  • [CII]-to-H2 conversion factor α_CII = 30 M_sun/L_sun (ref 61)
    External calibration chosen; authors note range ~10-1000, so M_H2=8.2e10 has factor-several systematic uncertainty.
  • Bolometric correction k_bol = luminosity-dependent (ref 59)
    External correction applied to L_2-10; alternative non-CT model lowers L_bol by ~1 dex.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Broad-line region is virialized and Hα FWHM traces MBH via single-epoch virial calibration
    Used to derive MBH=6.9e7 and 1.7e7 M_sun; single-epoch virial masses carry ~0.4 dex systematic scatter.
  • domain assumption WebbPSF accurately models the JWST NIRSpec PSF and PSF-template scaling is valid at 0.23″ offset
    Companion detection rests on PSF subtraction; authors test with shifted centroids and calibration-star PSF but the assumption remains load-bearing.
  • domain assumption [CII] emission traces galaxy ISM kinematics and is not dominated by AGN outflows
    Used to interpret two [CII] velocity components as two merging gas-rich components; authors concede outflow contribution cannot be fully excluded.
  • domain assumption Dynamical mass formula (Eq. 14 of ref 44) approximates total enclosed mass in a non-virialized merger
    Gives M_dyn=5.1e10 M_sun used in the BH-host scaling comparison; acknowledged as order-of-magnitude only.
  • standard math Gravitational lensing preserves redshift and line ratios so Δz rules out lensing
    Standard physics; used to exclude lensed-image interpretation.
  • domain assumption MYtorus CT reprocessing model with covering factor 0.5 and uniform column correctly represents the X-ray source
    Underpins the super-Eddington ratio; alternative non-CT model changes Eddington ratio from 3.7 to 0.2-0.5.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rapid growth in a dual AGN during a gas-rich merger at z~4.5." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5IZC34VB

@misc{pith2026260719491,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rapid growth in a dual AGN during a gas-rich merger at z~4.5},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5IZC34VB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19491}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The late stages of galaxy mergers - when two supermassive black holes (SMBHs) reach kiloparsec-scale separations - represent a critical phase for understanding SMBH growth, galaxy co-evolution, and the progenitors of low-frequency gravitational waves. Yet confirmed close-separation (<3 kpc) dual active galactic nuclei (AGNs) remain confined to the local Universe, despite predictions that such systems should be common in the merger-rich early Universe. Here we report the discovery of LID-1166, a dual AGN with a projected separation of ~1.5 kpc at z~4.5, representing the first such system known beyond the local Universe. Spatially resolved JWST/NIRSpec integral-field spectroscopy reveals two spatially and kinematically distinct narrow-line emission components with a line-of-sight velocity offset of ~ -164 km/s. Both components additionally exhibit broad Ha emission, including a compact off-nuclei broad Ha component associated with the companion source, confirming two actively accreting SMBHs. Independent ALMA [CII] 158 um observations reveal corresponding spatially and kinematically distinct cold gas components associated with the same nuclei, demonstrating that the system is a gas-rich merger. While undergoing super-Eddington accretion during a late-stage merger, the SMBHs already lie on the local black hole-host mass relation for massive elliptical galaxies within the uncertainties, suggesting that rapid, obscured growth may help establish this relation early in cosmic history. LID-1166 reveals a previously hidden phase of SMBH growth and points to a missing population of heavily obscured, merger-driven dual AGNs at high redshift.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [2]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Kereš, D. A Cosmological framework for the Co-evolution of Quasars, Supermassive black holes, and Elliptical galaxies. I. Galaxy mergers and Quasar activity. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 175 , 356 (2008)

    2008

  2. [3]

    Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies

    Di Matteo, T., Volker, S., Lars, H. Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies. Natur. 433 , 604 (2005)

    2005

  3. [4]

    Park, J., Smith, R., Yi, S. K. Star formation of merging disk galaxies with AGN feedback effects. Astrophys. J. 845 , 128 (2017)

    2017

  4. [5]

    Episodic super-Eddington accretion as a clue to overmassive black holes in the early universe

    Trinca, A., et al. Episodic super-Eddington accretion as a clue to overmassive black holes in the early universe. arXiv:2412.14248 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [6]

    Connecting low-redshift LISA massive black hole mergers to the nHz stochastic gravitational wave background

    Izquierdo-Villalba, D., et al. Connecting low-redshift LISA massive black hole mergers to the nHz stochastic gravitational wave background. Astron. Astrophys. 686 , 183 (2024)

    2024

  6. [7]

    Maiolino, R., et al., JADES: The diverse population of infant black holes at 4<z<11: Merging, tiny, poor, but mighty. Astron. Astrophys. 691 , 145 (2024)

    2024

  7. [8]

    Little Red Dots: an abundant population of faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z~5 revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST surveys

    Matthee J., et al. Little Red Dots: an abundant population of faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z~5 revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST surveys. Astrophys. J. 963 , 129 (2024)

    2024

  8. [9]

    J., et al

    Green, P. J., et al. SDSS J1254+0846: A binary quasar caught in the act of merging. Astrophys. J. 710 , 1578 (2010)

    2010

  9. [10]

    D., et al

    Silverman, J. D., et al. The impact of galaxy interactions on Active Galactic Nucleus activity in zCOSMOS. Astrophys. J. 743 , 2 (2011)

    2011

  10. [11]

    L., Trevor, M

    Ellison, S. L., Trevor, M. J., Patton, D. R., Scudder, J. M. Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - VIII. The observational properties of post-merger galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 435 , 3627 (2013)

    2013

  11. [12]

    M., et al

    Comerford, J. M., et al. Merger-driven fueling of Active Galactic Nuclei: Six dual and offset AGNs discovered with Chandra and Hubble Space Telescope Observations. Astrophys. J. 806 , 219 (2015)

    2015

  12. [13]

    A trio of massive black holes caught in the act of merging

    Liu, X., et al. A trio of massive black holes caught in the act of merging. Astrophys. J. 887 , 90 (2019)

    2019

  13. [14]

    Double-peaked narrow-line signatures of dual supermassive black holes in galaxy merger simulations

    Blecha, L., Loeb, A., Narayan, R. Double-peaked narrow-line signatures of dual supermassive black holes in galaxy merger simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 429 , 2594 (2013)

    2013

  14. [15]

    C., Blandford, R

    Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R. D., Rees, M. J. Natur. 287 , 307 (1980) 16. Agazie, G., et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave background. Astrophys. J. 951 , 8 (2023)

    1980

  15. [17]

    J., et al

    Koss, M. J., et al. NuSTAR resolves the first dual AGN above 10 keV in SWIFT J2028.5+2543. Astrophys. J. 824 , 4 (2016)

    2016

  16. [18]

    J., et al

    Koss, M. J., et al. A population of luminous accreting black holes with hidden mergers. Natur. 563 , 214 (2018)

    2018

  17. [19]

    A hard X-ray view of luminous and ultra-luminous infrared galaxies in GOALS - I

    Ricci, C., et al. A hard X-ray view of luminous and ultra-luminous infrared galaxies in GOALS - I. AGN obscuration along the merger sequence. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506 , 5935 (2021)

    2021

  18. [20]

    The quest for dual and binary supermassive black holes: A multi-messenger view

    De Rosa, A., et al. The quest for dual and binary supermassive black holes: A multi-messenger view. New Astron. Rev. 86 , 101525 (2019)

    2019

  19. [21]

    W., Weaver, K

    Pfeifle, R. W., Weaver, K. A., Secrest, N. J., Rothberg, B., Patton, D. R. Super-size Me: The Big Multi-AGN Catalog (The Big MAC) Data Release 1: The source catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 281 , 25 (2025)

    2025

  20. [22]

    and Oguri, M

    Kayo, I. and Oguri, M. Very small scale clustering of quasars from a complete quasar lens survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424 , 1363 (2012)

    2012

  21. [23]

    D., et al

    Silverman, J. D., et al. Dual supermassive black holes at close separation revealed by the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program. Astrophys. J. 899 , 154 (2020)

    2020

  22. [24]

    A candidate dual QSO at Cosmic Noon

    Glikman, E., et al. A candidate dual QSO at Cosmic Noon. Astrophys. J. 951 , 18 (2023) 25. Chen, Y-C., et al. A close quasar pair in a disk-disk galaxy merger at z=2.17. Natur. 616 , 45 (2023)

    2023

  23. [26]

    GMP-selected dual and lensed AGNs: Selection function and classification based on near-IR colors and resolved spectra from VLT/ERIS, Keck/OSIRIS, and LBT/LUCI

    Mannucci, F., et al. GMP-selected dual and lensed AGNs: Selection function and classification based on near-IR colors and resolved spectra from VLT/ERIS, Keck/OSIRIS, and LBT/LUCI. Astron. Astrophys. 680 , A53 (2023)

    2023

  24. [27]

    A hidden population of high-redshift double quasars unveiled by astrometry

    Shen, Y., et al. A hidden population of high-redshift double quasars unveiled by astrometry. Nat. Astron. 5 , 569 (2021)

    2021

  25. [28]

    Statistics of Galactic-scale Quasar pairs at Cosmic Noon

    Shen, Y., et al. Statistics of Galactic-scale Quasar pairs at Cosmic Noon. Astrophys. J. 943 , 38 (2023)

    2023

  26. [29]

    A quasar-galaxy merger at z~6.2: Rapid host growth via the accretion of two massive satellite galaxies

    Decarli, R., et al. A quasar-galaxy merger at z~6.2: Rapid host growth via the accretion of two massive satellite galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 689 , A219 (2024)

    2024

  27. [30]

    Active Galactic Nuclei and Host galaxies in COSMOS-Web

    Li, J., et al. Active Galactic Nuclei and Host galaxies in COSMOS-Web. II. First look at the kiloparsec-scale dual and offset AGN population. Astrophys. J. 986 , 101 (2025)

    2025

  28. [31]

    GA-NIFS: High number of dual active galactic nuclei at z~3

    Perna, M., et al. GA-NIFS: High number of dual active galactic nuclei at z~3. Astron. Astrophys. 696 , A59 (2025)

    2025

  29. [32]

    Discovery of Merging Twin Quasars at z=6.05

    Matsuoka, Y., et al. Discovery of Merging Twin Quasars at z=6.05. Astrophys. J. Letters 965 , L4 (2024)

    2024

  30. [33]

    Merging gas-rich galaxies that harbor low-luminosity twin quasars at z=6.05: A promising progenitor of the most luminous quasars

    Izumi, T., et al. Merging gas-rich galaxies that harbor low-luminosity twin quasars at z=6.05: A promising progenitor of the most luminous quasars. Astrophys. J. 972 , 116 (2024)

    2024

  31. [34]

    BlackTHUNDER: evidence for three massive black holes in a z~5 galaxy

    Übler, H., et al. BlackTHUNDER: evidence for three massive black holes in a z~5 galaxy. arXiv.2509.21575

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [35]

    Dual AGN in the Horizon-AGN simulation and their link to galaxy and massive black hole mergers, with an excursus on multiple AGN

    Volonteri, M., et al. Dual AGN in the Horizon-AGN simulation and their link to galaxy and massive black hole mergers, with an excursus on multiple AGN. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 514 , 640 (2022)

    2022

  33. [36]

    The Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: Overview and Point source catalog

    Civano, F., et al. The Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: Overview and Point source catalog. Astrophys. J. 819 , 62 (2016)

    2016

  34. [37]

    A super-Eddington-accreting black hole ~1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang observed with JWST

    Suh, H., et al. A super-Eddington-accreting black hole ~1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang observed with JWST. Nat. Astron. 9 , 271 (2025)

    2025

  35. [38]

    Microlensing of the broad line region in 17 lensed quasars

    Sluse, D., et al. Microlensing of the broad line region in 17 lensed quasars. Astron. Astrophys. 544 , 62 (2012)

    2012

  36. [39]

    & Marshall, P

    Treu, T. & Marshall, P. J. Time delay cosmography. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 24 , 11 (2016) 40. Comerford, J., et al. Inspiralling supermassive black holes: A new signpost for galaxy mergers. Astrophys. J. 698 , 956 (2009)

    2016

  37. [41]

    Carilli, C. L. & Walter, F. Cool gas in high-redshift galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51 , 105 (2013)

    2013

  38. [42]

    An ALMA [CII] survey of 27 Quasars at z>5.94

    Decarli, R., et al. An ALMA [CII] survey of 27 Quasars at z>5.94. Astrophys. J. 854 , 97 (2018)

    2018

  39. [43]

    & Tanio, D.-S

    Decarli, R. & Tanio, D.-S. Infrared fine-structure lines at high redshift. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 33 , 4 (2025)

    2025

  40. [44]

    The kinematics of z>6 Quasar host galaxies

    Neeleman, M., et al. The kinematics of z>6 Quasar host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 911 , 141 (2021)

    2021

  41. [45]

    Evidence of strong quasar feedback in the early Universe

    Maiolino, R., et al. Evidence of strong quasar feedback in the early Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425 , L66 (2012)

    2012

  42. [46]

    Very extended cold gas, star formation and outflows in the halo of a bright quasar at z>6

    Cicone, c., et al. Very extended cold gas, star formation and outflows in the halo of a bright quasar at z>6. Astron. Astrophys. 574 , A14 (2015)

    2015

  43. [47]

    A spatially resolved [CII] survey of 31 z~7 massive galaxies hosting luminous quasars

    Wang, F., et al. A spatially resolved [CII] survey of 31 z~7 massive galaxies hosting luminous quasars. Astrophys. J. 968 , 9 (2024)

    2024

  44. [48]

    Dual Active Galactic nuclei: Precursors of binary supermassive black hole formation and mergers

    Saeedzadeh, V., et al. Dual Active Galactic nuclei: Precursors of binary supermassive black hole formation and mergers. Astrophys. J. 975 , 265 (2024)

    2024

  45. [49]

    Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51 , 511 (2013)

    2013

  46. [50]

    E., Volonteri

    Reines, A. E., Volonteri. M. Relations between central black hole mass and total galaxy stellar mass in the local universe. Astrophys. J. 813 , 82 (2015)

    2015

  47. [51]

    [CII] 158 μ m emission as a star formation tracer

    Herrera-Camus, R., et al. [CII] 158 μ m emission as a star formation tracer. Astrophys. J. 800 , 1 (2015)

    2015

  48. [52]

    P., et al

    Farina, E. P., et al. The X-shooter/ALMA Sample of Quasars in the Epoch of Reionization. II. Black Hole Masses, Eddington Ratios, and the formation of the First Quasars. Astrophys. J. 941 , 106 (2022)

    2022

  49. [53]

    No significant evolution of relations between black hole mass and galaxy total stellar mass up to z~2.5

    Suh, H., et al. No significant evolution of relations between black hole mass and galaxy total stellar mass up to z~2.5. Astrophys. J. 889 , 32 (2020)

    2020

  50. [54]

    A quasar-galaxy merger at z~6.2: black hole mass and quasar properties from the NIRSpec spectrum

    Loiacono, F., et al. A quasar-galaxy merger at z~6.2: black hole mass and quasar properties from the NIRSpec spectrum. Astron. Astrophys. 685 , 121 (2024)

    2024

  51. [55]

    Impact of resonance, Roman, and Thomson scattering on hydrogen line formation in Little Red Dots

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., Mason, C. Impact of resonance, Roman, and Thomson scattering on hydrogen line formation in Little Red Dots. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 545 , 1 (2026)

    2026

  52. [56]

    E., Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., Ho, L. C. Estimating black hole masses in Active Galaxies using the H 𝛼 emission line. Astrophys. J. 630 , 122 (2005)

    2005

  53. [57]

    D., Yaqoob, T

    Murphy, K. D., Yaqoob, T. An X-ray spectral model for Compton-thick toroidal reprocessors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 397 , 1549 (2009)

    2009

  54. [58]

    The Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: Compton-thick AGN at high redshift

    Lanzuisi, G., et al. The Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: Compton-thick AGN at high redshift. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480 , 2578 (2018)

    2018

  55. [59]

    Universal bolometric corrections for active galactic nuclei over seven luminosity decades

    Duras, F., et al. Universal bolometric corrections for active galactic nuclei over seven luminosity decades. Astron. Astrophys. 636 , 73 (2020)

    2020

  56. [60]

    P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., Golap, K

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., Golap, K. CASA Architecture and Applications. Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser. 376 , 127 (2007)

    2007

  57. [61]

    The [CII] emission as a molecular gas mass tracer in galaxies at low and high redshifts

    Zanella, A., et al. The [CII] emission as a molecular gas mass tracer in galaxies at low and high redshifts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481 , 1976 (2018)

    1976

  58. [62]

    C., et al

    Madden, S. C., et al. Tracing the total molecular gas in galaxies: [CII] and the CO-dark gas. Astron. Astrophys. 643 , 141 (2020)

    2020

  59. [63]

    Molecular gas in z~6 quasar host galaxies

    Decarli, R., et al. Molecular gas in z~6 quasar host galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 662 , A60 (2022)

    2022

  60. [64]

    Dust temperature in ALMA [CII]-detected high-z galaxies

    Sommovigo, L., et al. Dust temperature in ALMA [CII]-detected high-z galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503 , 4878 (2021)

    2021

  61. [65]

    L., Langer, W

    Pineda, J. L., Langer, W. D., Velusamy, T., Goldsmith, P. F. A Herschel [CII] Galactic plane survey. I. The global distribution of ISM gas components. Astron. Astrophys. 554 , 103 (2013) Data availability The data for ALMA and JWST used in this study are publicly available through their respective data archives. These observations are associated with the ...

    2013

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.