REVIEW 2 cited by
RSD measurements from BOSS galaxy power spectrum using the halo perturbation theory model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
RSD measurements from BOSS galaxy power spectrum using the halo perturbation theory model
read the original abstract
We present growth of structure constraints from the cosmological analysis of the power spectrum multipoles of SDSS-III BOSS DR12 galaxies. We use the galaxy power spectrum model of Hand et al. (2017), which decomposes the galaxies into halo mass bins, each of which is modeled separately using the relations between halo biases and halo mass. The model combines Eulerian perturbation theory and halo model calibrated on $N$-body simulations to model the halo clustering. In this work, we also generate the covariance matrix by combining the analytic disconnected part with the empirical connected part: we smooth the connected component by selecting a few principal components and show that it achieves good agreement with the mock covariance. Our analysis differs from recent analyses in that we constrain a single parameter $f\sigma_8$ fixing everything else to Planck+BAO prior, thereby reducing the effects of prior volume and mismodeling. We find tight constraints on $f\sigma_8$: $f\sigma_8(z_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.38)=0.489 \pm 0.038$ and $f\sigma_8(z_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.61)=0.455 \pm 0.028$ at $k_{\mathrm{max}} = 0.2\ h$Mpc$^{-1}$, with an overall amplitude error of 5%, and in good agreement (within 0.3 sigma) of Planck amplitude. We discuss the sensitivity of cosmological parameter estimation to the choice of scale cuts, covariance matrix, and the inclusion of hexadecapole $P_4(k)$. We show that with $k_{\mathrm{max}} = 0.4\ h$Mpc$^{-1}$ the constraints improve considerably to an overall 3.2% amplitude error, but there is some evidence of model misspecification on MultiDark-PATCHY mocks. Choosing $k_{\mathrm{max}}$ consistently and reliably remains the main challenge of RSD analysis methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape Galaxy Clustering from Galaxies and Quasars
DESI DR1 full-shape galaxy clustering constrains Omega_m = 0.296 ± 0.010, H0 = 68.63 ± 0.79 km/s/Mpc, and sigma_8 = 0.841 ± 0.034, consistent with LambdaCDM and Planck.
-
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters
ACT DR6 CMB lensing map gives σ8 = 0.819 ± 0.015 and H0 = 68.3 ± 1.1 km/s/Mpc, consistent with Planck ΛCDM but 1.7-2.1σ higher in S8 than KiDS, DES, and HSC galaxy surveys.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.