Responsibility Gap and Diffusion in Sequential Decision-Making Mechanisms
read the original abstract
Responsibility has long been a subject of study in law and philosophy. More recently, it became a focus of AI literature. The article investigates the computational complexity of two important properties of responsibility in collective decision-making: diffusion and gap. It shows that the sets of diffusion-free and gap-free decision-making mechanisms are $\Pi_2$-complete and $\Pi_3$-complete, respectively. At the same time, the intersection of these classes is $\Pi_2$-complete.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI Friction
Analysis of 1,223 AI-HCI papers shows declining focus on human epistemic sovereignty and rising optimization of autonomous agents, leading to a proposal for scaffolded cognitive friction via multi-agent systems to pre...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.