pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.10912 · v1 · pith:5KI4QXI3new · submitted 2019-07-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Forming Weakly Interacting Multi Layers of Graphene by using Atomic Force Microscope Tip Scanning and Evidence of Competition Between Inner and Outer Raman Scattering Processes Piloted by Structural Defects

C. Pardanaud (AMU) , A. Merlen (IEMN) , K Gratzer , O. Chuzel (SSOPN) , D Nikolaievskyi , L. Patrone (IM2NP) , S. Clair (IM2NP) , R Ramirez Jimenez
show 3 more authors
A de Andr\'es P. Roubin (PIIM) J.-L Parrain (ISM2)
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 16:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords graphene foldingRaman spectroscopyatomic force microscopymulti-layer graphenestructural defectsDirac cone scatteringweakly interacting layers
0
0 comments X

The pith

AFM tip scanning folds single-layer graphene into weakly interacting multi-layers while maintaining in-plane properties and linking defects to Raman scattering competition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a method to form weakly interacting multi-layer graphene from single-layer material using an atomic force microscope tip that cuts, pushes, and folds the sheet during zigzag scans. Raman microscopy analysis through several plots confirms that the single-layer in-plane properties persist even as tens of layers stack with only limited structural defects introduced. A blue shift of roughly 20 wavenumbers in the 2D band appears, and the intensities of the 2D- and 2D+ components are tied to defects, showing how these defects mediate inner and outer scattering processes around the Dirac cone.

Core claim

We report an alternative route based on nanomechanical folding induced by AFM tip to obtain weakly interacting multi-layer graphene from CVD grown single-layer graphene. The tip first cuts, then pushes and folds graphene during zigzag movements. We show that the SLG in plane properties are maintained under the folding process and that a few tens of graphene layers are stacked, with a limited amount of structural defects. A blue shift of about 20 cm-1 of the 2D band is observed. The relative intensity of the 2D- and 2D+ bands have been related to structural defects, giving evidence of their role in the inner and outer processes at play close to the Dirac cone.

What carries the argument

AFM tip nanomechanical folding that cuts and stacks graphene layers, analyzed through Raman plots including A_D/A_G × E_L^4 versus Γ_G and A_2D-/A_2D+ versus A_2D/A_G to connect defects to scattering processes.

Load-bearing premise

The Raman spectral changes result directly from the AFM-induced folding and the structural defects it creates rather than from substrate interactions or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

Measuring the Raman spectra on the folded graphene after transferring it to a different substrate and finding no blue shift or altered 2D- to 2D+ ratios would falsify the claim that defects from folding drive these changes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.10912 by A de Andr\'es, A. Merlen (IEMN), C. Pardanaud (AMU), D Nikolaievskyi, J.-L Parrain (ISM2), K Gratzer, L. Patrone (IM2NP), O. Chuzel (SSOPN), P. Roubin (PIIM), R Ramirez Jimenez, S. Clair (IM2NP).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Cut and pushed graphene after scanning probe nanolithography. (a, b) AFM image and corresponding height profile along the blue line. (c) Raman spectrum before (green) and after (red) the tip scan (in blue that of the substrate). (d) Raman map of the G band intensity. Numbers in the white squares are the tip forces applied in N. (e) 2D band of the top pushed graphene compared to N-layer graphene with N=1 (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Doping and strain characterization with a 2D vs G plot. Data from Bayle et al28 have been L-corrected using a 2D band dispersion of 100 cm-1 / eV. Straight lines correspond to the behavior under doping (blue) or strain (violet). 35-37 (b) Structural characterization with a 2D vs G plot. Consistently, the pristine graphene data point is close to the intersection of these two lines which corresponds… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 2D- and 2D+ sub bands of graphene pushed on top. (a) Fits with one (top) or two (bottom) Lorentzians for (1-2) pristine graphene, (3-4) the edge of the 8.1 N zone, (5-6) the edge and (7-8) the center of the 11 N zone. (b) 2D- (full square) and 2D+ (empty circle) width profile for tip forces of 1.5, 4.2, 8.1, 9.4, 10.3 and 11.1 N. (c) 2D+/- vs2D+/- plot for the same tip forces, restricted to data at t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report on an alternative route based on nanomechanical folding induced by AFM tip to obtain weakly interacting multi-layer graphene (wi-MLG) from a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) grown single-layer graphene (SLG). The tip first cuts, then pushes and folds graphene during zigzag movements. The pushed graphene has been analyzed using various Raman microscopy plots: $A_D /A_G \times E_L{}^4$ vs $\Gamma_G$, $\omega_{2D}$ vs $\Gamma_{2D}$, $\Gamma_{2D}$ vs $\Gamma_G$, $\omega_{2D+/-}$ vs $\Gamma_{2D+/-}$, and $A_{2D-}/A_{2D+}$ vs $A_{2D}/A_G$. We show that the SLG in plane properties are maintained under the folding process and that a few tens of graphene layers are stacked, with a limited amount of structural defects. A blue shift of about 20 cm-1 of the 2D band is observed. The relative intensity of the 2D$_-$ and 2D$_+$ bands have been related to structural defects, giving evidence of their role in the inner and outer processes at play close to the Dirac cone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an AFM tip-based nanomechanical folding method to convert CVD-grown single-layer graphene (SLG) into weakly interacting multi-layer graphene (wi-MLG). Analysis via multiple Raman correlation plots (A_D/A_G × E_L^4 vs Γ_G, ω_2D vs Γ_2D, Γ_2D vs Γ_G, ω_2D+/- vs Γ_2D+/-, and A_2D-/A_2D+ vs A_2D/A_G) leads to the claims that SLG in-plane properties are preserved, a few tens of layers are stacked with limited structural defects, a ~20 cm⁻¹ blue shift of the 2D band occurs, and the relative intensities of the 2D- and 2D+ bands demonstrate the role of defects in piloting inner and outer Raman scattering processes near the Dirac cone.

Significance. If the observed Raman shifts and intensity correlations can be isolated to the AFM folding and resulting defects, the work supplies an alternative fabrication route for wi-MLG and experimental evidence connecting structural defects to specific scattering channels in the Raman response of graphene. The use of several independent correlation plots constitutes a strength in the experimental design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central attribution of the ~20 cm⁻¹ 2D-band blue shift, the A_2D-/A_2D+ vs A_2D/A_G correlation, and the maintenance of SLG-like properties specifically to AFM-induced folding and limited defects lacks reported before/after spectra on the same flake, Raman data from scanned but unfolded regions, or independent layer-count verification (AFM step height or optical contrast). Without these controls the interpretation cannot exclude substrate interactions, doping, or strain as alternative sources.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No raw spectra, error bars, number of sampled locations, or explicit exclusion criteria are supplied for any of the five listed Raman correlation plots, so the statistical reliability of the claimed defect-mediated inner/outer process distinction cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the experimental controls and statistical presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central attribution of the ~20 cm⁻¹ 2D-band blue shift, the A_2D-/A_2D+ vs A_2D/A_G correlation, and the maintenance of SLG-like properties specifically to AFM-induced folding and limited defects lacks reported before/after spectra on the same flake, Raman data from scanned but unfolded regions, or independent layer-count verification (AFM step height or optical contrast). Without these controls the interpretation cannot exclude substrate interactions, doping, or strain as alternative sources.

    Authors: We agree that before/after spectra on the exact same flake location would be the strongest control but are not possible because the folding process irreversibly alters the flake. In the revised manuscript we have added Raman spectra from adjacent regions scanned by the AFM tip but left unfolded; these show SLG-like 2D-band position and width, supporting that the ~20 cm⁻¹ blue shift and intensity correlations arise from the folded wi-MLG rather than substrate, doping or strain. We have also included AFM step-height profiles confirming a few tens of layers. The existing multi-plot Raman correlations already discriminate against uniform doping/strain scenarios according to established literature. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No raw spectra, error bars, number of sampled locations, or explicit exclusion criteria are supplied for any of the five listed Raman correlation plots, so the statistical reliability of the claimed defect-mediated inner/outer process distinction cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We have revised the manuscript to include representative raw spectra for each correlation plot, error bars (standard deviation), the number of sampled locations (n = 12–18 per plot), and explicit exclusion criteria (spectra with SNR < 5 or obvious cosmic-ray artifacts were discarded). These additions allow direct assessment of the statistical robustness of the defect-piloted inner/outer scattering interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper reports AFM-induced folding of CVD graphene followed by Raman microscopy plots (A_D/A_G vs Γ_G, ω_2D vs Γ_2D, etc.) and direct band assignments. No equations, models, parameters fitted to subsets, or predictions are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. All claims rest on observed spectral shifts and intensity ratios interpreted via standard Raman literature; no self-citation chains or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps. This matches the default case of an experimental report with independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is purely experimental and draws on established domain knowledge of graphene Raman spectroscopy rather than introducing new free parameters, axioms, or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assignment of D, G, and 2D Raman bands in graphene and their established relations to defects, layer number, and electronic structure near the Dirac cone.
    Invoked throughout the Raman analysis to interpret shifts and intensity ratios.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5845 in / 1377 out tokens · 24700 ms · 2026-05-24T16:24:51.584886+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S.; Geim, A

    Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306 (5696), 666-669

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    H.; Wang, Y

    Xu, J. H.; Wang, Y. Z.; Hu, S. S., Nanocomposites of graphene and graphene oxides: Synthesis, molecular functionalization and application in electrochemical sensors and biosensors. A review. Microchimica Acta 2017, 184 (1), 1-44

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    G.; Barros, E

    Meunier, V.; Souza, A. G.; Barros, E. B.; Dresselhaus, M. S., Physical properties of low- dimensional sp(2)-based carbon nanostructures. Reviews of Modern Physics 2016, 88 (2) 025005

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    H.; Wang, Y

    Ni, Z. H.; Wang, Y. Y.; Yu, T.; You, Y. M.; Shen, Z. X., Reduction of Fermi velocity in folded graphene observed by resonance Raman spectroscopy. Physical Review B 2008, 77 (23) 235403

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    W.; Dominguez-Adame, F., Tuning the Fermi velocity in Dirac materials with an electric field

    Diaz-Fernandez, A.; Chico, L.; Gonzalez, J. W.; Dominguez-Adame, F., Tuning the Fermi velocity in Dirac materials with an electric field. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 8058

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    S.; Cho, S.; Lee, S

    Kim, S.; Shin, S.; Kim, T.; Du, H.; Song, M.; Kim, K. S.; Cho, S.; Lee, S. W.; Seo, S., A reliable and controllable graphene doping method compatible with current CMOS technology and the demonstration of its device applications. Nanotechnology 2017, 28 (17) 175710

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    M.; Liu, F., Strain engineering of graphene: a review

    Si, C.; Sun, Z. M.; Liu, F., Strain engineering of graphene: a review. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (6), 3207-3217

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Chemical Society Reviews 2018, 47 (13), 4860-4908

    Anichini, C.; Czepa, W.; Pakulski, D.; Aliprandi, A.; Ciesielski, A.; Samori, P., Chemical sensing with 2D materials. Chemical Society Reviews 2018, 47 (13), 4860-4908

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Y.; Li, Z

    Li, Y. Y.; Li, Z. S.; Shen, P. K., Simultaneous Formation of Ultrahigh Surface Area and Three- Dimensional Hierarchical Porous Graphene-Like Networks for Fast and Highly Stable Supercapacitors. Advanced Materials 2013, 25 (17), 2474-2480

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    A., Electrodes modified with 3D graphene composites: a review on methods for preparation, properties and sensing applications

    Baig, N.; Saleh, T. A., Electrodes modified with 3D graphene composites: a review on methods for preparation, properties and sensing applications. Microchimica Acta 2018, 185 (6) UNSP 283

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    C 2018, 4, 4

    Hazra, A.; Basu, S., Graphene Nanoribbon as Potential On-Chip Interconnect Material—A Review. C 2018, 4, 4

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Y.; Avila, J.; Asensio, M

    Di Bernardo, I.; Avvisati, G.; Chen, C. Y.; Avila, J.; Asensio, M. C.; Hu, K. L.; Ito, Y.; Hines, P.; Lipton-Duffin, J.; Rintoul, L.; Motta, N.; Mariani, C.; Betti, M. G., Topology and doping effects in three-dimensional nanoporous graphene. Carbon 2018, 131, 258-265

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    L.; Chen, X

    Yi, C. L.; Chen, X. M.; Zhang, L. Y.; Wang, X. Q.; Ke, C. H., Nanomechanical z-shape folding of graphene on flat substrate. Extreme Mechanics Letters 2016, 9, 84-90

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    S.; Kim, S.; J., S

    Chang, J. S.; Kim, S.; J., S. H.; J., Y.; J., C. K.; Li, X.; Kim, S., Graphene Nanoribbons with Atomically Sharp Edges Produced by AFM Induced Self-Folding. Small 2018, 14 (47) 1803386

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    K.; Barnard, A

    Blees, M. K.; Barnard, A. W.; Rose, P. A.; Roberts, S. P.; McGill, K. L.; Huang, P. Y.; Ruyack, A. R.; Kevek, J. W.; Kobrin, B.; Muller, D. A.; McEuen, P. L., Graphene kirigami. Nature 2015, 524 (7564), 204-+

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    H.; Zhang, F.; Yan, Z.; Ma, Q.; Li, X

    Zhang, Y. H.; Zhang, F.; Yan, Z.; Ma, Q.; Li, X. L.; Huang, Y. G.; Rogers, J. A., Printing, folding and assembly methods for forming 3D mesostructures in advanced materials. Nature Reviews Materials 2017, 2 (4) 17019

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Physical Review Letters 2006, 97 (3) 036803

    Latil, S.; Henrard, L., Charge carriers in few-layer graphene films. Physical Review Letters 2006, 97 (3) 036803

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    K.; Kumar, D

    Goutham, S.; Bykkam, S.; Sadasivuni, K. K.; Kumar, D. S.; Ahmadipour, M.; Ahmad, Z. A.; Rao, K. V., Room temperature LPG resistive sensor based on the use of a few-layer graphene/SnO2 nanocomposite. Microchimica Acta 2018, 185 (1) UNSP 69

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    C.; Jachak, A.; Hurt, R

    Sanchez, V. C.; Jachak, A.; Hurt, R. H.; Kane, A. B., Biological Interactions of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials: An Interdisciplinary Review. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2012, 25 (1), 15-34. 22

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    T.; Ho, J.; Nezich, D.; Son, H

    Reina, A.; Jia, X. T.; Ho, J.; Nezich, D.; Son, H. B.; Bulovic, V.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Kong, J., Large Area, Few-Layer Graphene Films on Arbitrary Substrates by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nano Letters 2009, 9 (1), 30-35

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    R.; Chauhan, N.; Sharma, S.; Mathur, R

    Dhakate, S. R.; Chauhan, N.; Sharma, S.; Mathur, R. B., The production of multi-layer graphene nanoribbons from thermally reduced unzipped multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2011, 49 (13), 4170-4178

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    T.; Wu, B.; Guo, W.; Wang, L

    Li, Y. T.; Wu, B.; Guo, W.; Wang, L. F.; Li, J. B.; Liu, Y. Q., Tailoring graphene layer-to-layer growth. Nanotechnology 2017, 28 (26), 265101

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    G.; Pardanaud, C., A Guide to and Review of the Use of Multiwavelength Raman Spectroscopy for Characterizing Defective Aromatic Carbon Solids: from Graphene to Amorphous Carbons

    Merlen, A.; Buijnsters, J. G.; Pardanaud, C., A Guide to and Review of the Use of Multiwavelength Raman Spectroscopy for Characterizing Defective Aromatic Carbon Solids: from Graphene to Amorphous Carbons. Coatings 2017, 7 (10) 153

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    C.; Basko, D

    Ferrari, A. C.; Basko, D. M., Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nature Nanotechnology 2013, 8 (4), 235-246

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Nano Letters 2007, 7 (2), 238-242

    Graf, D.; Molitor, F.; Ensslin, K.; Stampfer, C.; Jungen, A.; Hierold, C.; Wirtz, L., Spatially resolved raman spectroscopy of single- and few-layer graphene. Nano Letters 2007, 7 (2), 238-242

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    Physical Review B 2011, 84 (3) 035433

    Venezuela, P.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F., Theory of double-resonant Raman spectra in graphene: Intensity and line shape of defect-induced and two-phonon bands. Physical Review B 2011, 84 (3) 035433

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    E.; Heinz, T

    Berciaud, S.; Ryu, S.; Brus, L. E.; Heinz, T. F., Probing the Intrinsic Properties of Exfoliated Graphene: Raman Spectroscopy of Free-Standing Monolayers. Nano Letters 2009, 9 (1), 346-352

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    R.; Felten, A.; Bakaraki, A.; Landois, P.; Colomer, J

    Bayle, M.; Reckinger, N.; Huntzinger, J. R.; Felten, A.; Bakaraki, A.; Landois, P.; Colomer, J. F.; Henrard, L.; Zahab, A. A.; Sauvajol, J. L.; Paillet, M., Dependence of the Raman spectrum characteristics on the number of layers and stacking orientation in few-layer graphene. Physica Status Solidi B-Basic Solid State Physics 2015, 252 (11), 2375-2379

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Physical Review B 2010, 82 (20) 201409

    Mohr, M.; Maultzsch, J.; Thomsen, C., Splitting of the Raman 2D band of graphene subjected to strain. Physical Review B 2010, 82 (20) 201409

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    L.; Htoon, H.; Brus, L

    Berciaud, S.; Li, X. L.; Htoon, H.; Brus, L. E.; Doorn, S. K.; Heinz, T. F., Intrinsic Line Shape of the Raman 2D-Mode in Freestanding Graphene Monolayers. Nano Letters 2013, 13 (8), 3517-3523

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Y.; Christopher, J

    Wang, X. Y.; Christopher, J. W.; Swan, A. K., 2D Raman band splitting in graphene: Charge screening and lifting of the K-point Kohn anomaly. Scientific Reports 2017, 7, 13539

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Physica Status Solidi B-Basic Solid State Physics 2016, 253 (12), 2326-2330

    Neumann, C.; Banszerus, L.; Schmitz, M.; Reichardt, S.; Sonntag, J.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Beschoten, B.; Stampfer, C., Line shape of the Raman 2D peak of graphene in van der Waals heterostructures. Physica Status Solidi B-Basic Solid State Physics 2016, 253 (12), 2326-2330

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Physical Review B 2009, 80 (23) 233407

    Casiraghi, C., Doping dependence of the Raman peaks intensity of graphene close to the Dirac point. Physical Review B 2009, 80 (23) 233407

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Journal of Materials Science 2010, 45 (19), 5135-5149

    Ferralis, N., Probing mechanical properties of graphene with Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Materials Science 2010, 45 (19), 5135-5149

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    E.; Ahn, G.; Shim, J.; Lee, Y

    Lee, J. E.; Ahn, G.; Shim, J.; Lee, Y. S.; Ryu, S., Optical separation of mechanical strain from charge doping in graphene. Nature Communications 2012, 3, 1024

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    J.; Heiranian, M.; Janicek, B.; Budrikis, Z.; Zapperi, S.; Huang, P

    Zhang, Y. J.; Heiranian, M.; Janicek, B.; Budrikis, Z.; Zapperi, S.; Huang, P. Y.; Johnson, H. T.; Aluru, N. R.; Lyding, J. W.; Mason, N., Strain Modulation of Graphene by Nanoscale Substrate Curvatures: A Molecular View. Nano Letters 2018, 18 (3), 2098-2104

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    S.; Heeg, S.; Alvarez, M

    Mueller, N. S.; Heeg, S.; Alvarez, M. P.; Kusch, P.; Wasserroth, S.; Clark, N.; Schedin, F.; Parthenios, J.; Papagelis, K.; Galiotis, C.; Kalbac, M.; Vijayaraghavan, A.; Huebner, U.; Gorbachev, R.; Frank, O.; Reich, S., Evaluating arbitrary strain configurations and doping in graphene with Raman spectroscopy. 2D Materials 2018, 5 (1) 015016

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    G.; Novotny, L., Raman characterization of defects and dopants in graphene

    Beams, R.; Cancado, L. G.; Novotny, L., Raman characterization of defects and dopants in graphene. Journal of Physics-Condensed Matter 2015, 27 (8) 083002

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    G.; da Silva, M

    Cancado, L. G.; da Silva, M. G.; Ferreira, E. H. M.; Hof, F.; Kampioti, K.; Huang, K.; Penicaud, A.; Achete, C. A.; Capaz, R. B.; Jorio, A., Disentangling contributions of point and line defects in the Raman spectra of graphene-related materials. 2D Materials 2017, 4 (2) 025039. 23

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    G.; Takai, K.; Enoki, T.; Endo, M.; Kim, Y

    Cancado, L. G.; Takai, K.; Enoki, T.; Endo, M.; Kim, Y. A.; Mizusaki, H.; Speziali, N. L.; Jorio, A.; Pimenta, M. A., Measuring the degree of stacking order in graphite by Raman spectroscopy. Carbon 2008, 46 (2), 272-275

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Carbon 2018, 133, 254-259

    Herziger, F.; Tyborski, C.; Ochedowski, O.; Schleberger, M.; Maultzsch, J., Tunable quantum interference in bilayer graphene in double-resonant Raman scattering. Carbon 2018, 133, 254-259

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    L., Effect of rotational stacking faults on the Raman spectra of folded graphene

    Poncharal, P.; Ayari, A.; Michel, T.; Sauvajol, J. L., Effect of rotational stacking faults on the Raman spectra of folded graphene. Physical Review B 2009, 79 (19) 195417

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Eliel, G. S. N.; Ribeiro, H. B.; Sato, K.; Saito, R.; Lu, C. C.; Chiu, P. W.; Fantini, C.; Righi, A.; Pimenta, M. A., Raman Excitation Profile of the G-band Enhancement in Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Brazilian Journal of Physics 2017, 47 (6), 589-593

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    C.; Meyer, J

    Ferrari, A. C.; Meyer, J. C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K. S.; Roth, S.; Geim, A. K., Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Physical Review Letters 2006, 97 (18) 187401

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    S.; Hoffmann, A.; Mauri, F.; Maultzsch, J., Signature of the two-dimensional phonon dispersion in graphene probed by double-resonant Raman scattering

    May, P.; Lazzeri, M.; Venezuela, P.; Herziger, F.; Callsen, G.; Reparaz, J. S.; Hoffmann, A.; Mauri, F.; Maultzsch, J., Signature of the two-dimensional phonon dispersion in graphene probed by double-resonant Raman scattering. Physical Review B 2013, 87 (7) 075402

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    A.; Clair, S.; Patrone, L.; Abel, M.; Porte, L.; Chuzel, O.; Parrain, J

    Valyaev, D. A.; Clair, S.; Patrone, L.; Abel, M.; Porte, L.; Chuzel, O.; Parrain, J. L., Grafting a homogeneous transition metal catalyst onto a silicon AFM probe: a promising strategy for chemically constructive nanolithography. Chemical Science 2013, 4 (7), 2815-2821

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    A.; Francois, C.; Patrone, L.; Balaban, T

    Mesquita, V.; Botton, J.; Valyaev, D. A.; Francois, C.; Patrone, L.; Balaban, T. S.; Abel, M.; Parrain, J. L.; Chuzel, O.; Clair, S., Catalytic Scanning Probe Nanolithography (cSPL): Control of the AFM Parameters in Order to Achieve Sub-100-nm Spatially Resolved Epoxidation of Alkenes Grafted onto a Surface. Langmuir 2016, 32 (16), 4034-4042

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    H.; Li, Z

    Lui, C. H.; Li, Z. Q.; Chen, Z. Y.; Klimov, P. V.; Brus, L. E.; Heinz, T. F., Imaging Stacking Order in Few-Layer Graphene. Nano Letters 2011, 11 (1), 164-169

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Carbon 2016, 105, 556-565

    Ramirez-Jimenez, R.; Alvarez-Fraga, L.; Jimenez-Villacorta, F.; Climent-Pascual, E.; Prieto, C.; de Andres, A., Interference enhanced Raman effect in graphene bubbles. Carbon 2016, 105, 556-565

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces 2017, 9 (4), 4119-4125

    Alvarez-Fraga, L.; Climent-Pascual, E.; Aguilar-Pujol, M.; Ramirez-Jimenez, R.; Jimenez- Villacorta, F.; Prieto, C.; de Andres, A., Efficient Heterostructures for Combined Interference and Plasmon Resonance Raman Amplification. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces 2017, 9 (4), 4119-4125

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    K.; Waghmare, U

    Das, A.; Pisana, S.; Chakraborty, B.; Piscanec, S.; Saha, S. K.; Waghmare, U. V.; Novoselov, K. S.; Krishnamurthy, H. R.; Geim, A. K.; Ferrari, A. C.; Sood, A. K., Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor. Nature Nanotechnology 2008, 3 (4), 210-215

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    K.; Ijas, M.; Yoon, D.; Sassi, U.; Ferrari, A

    Bruna, M.; Ott, A. K.; Ijas, M.; Yoon, D.; Sassi, U.; Ferrari, A. C., Doping Dependence of the Raman Spectrum of Defected Graphene. Acs Nano 2014, 8 (7), 7432-7441

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Physica Status Solidi B-Basic Solid State Physics 2016, 253 (12), 2355-2361

    Bousa, M.; Anagnostopoulos, G.; del Corro, E.; Drogowska, K.; Pekarek, J.; Kavan, L.; Kalbac, M.; Parthenios, J.; Papagelis, K.; Galiotis, C.; Frank, O., Stress and charge transfer in uniaxially strained CVD graphene. Physica Status Solidi B-Basic Solid State Physics 2016, 253 (12), 2355-2361

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    T.; He, R.; Jie, Y

    Ji, J. T.; He, R.; Jie, Y. H.; Zhang, A. M.; Ma, X. L.; Pan, L. J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L. Y.; Zhang, Q. M., Modification of electronic band structure in mL plus nL (m=1, 2; n=1-5) free-stacking graphene. Applied Physics Letters 2016, 109 (15) 153111

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Carbon 1984, 22 (4-5), 375-385

    Lespade, P.; Marchand, A.; Couzi, M.; Cruege, F., Characterization of carbon materials with raman microspectrometry. Carbon 1984, 22 (4-5), 375-385

    work page 1984

  56. [56]

    M., Calculation of the Raman G peak intensity in monolayer graphene: role of Ward identities

    Basko, D. M., Calculation of the Raman G peak intensity in monolayer graphene: role of Ward identities. New Journal of Physics 2009, 11, 095011

    work page 2009

  57. [57]

    F.; Park, C

    Chen, C. F.; Park, C. H.; Boudouris, B. W.; Horng, J.; Geng, B. S.; Girit, C.; Zettl, A.; Crommie, M. F.; Segalman, R. A.; Louie, S. G.; Wang, F., Controlling inelastic light scattering quantum pathways in graphene. Nature 2011, 471 (7340), 617-620. 24

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    Physical Review B 2017, 95 (19) 195422

    Reichardt, S.; Wirtz, L., Ab initio calculation of the G peak intensity of graphene: Laser-energy and Fermi-energy dependence and importance of quantum interference effects. Physical Review B 2017, 95 (19) 195422

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    M.; Xue, Z

    Hu, K. M.; Xue, Z. Y.; Liu, Y. Q.; Long, H.; Peng, B.; Yan, H.; Di, Z. F.; Wang, X.; Lin, L.; Zhang, W. M., Tension-Induced Raman Enhancement of Graphene Membranes in the Stretched State. Small 2019, 15 (2) 1804337

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    X.; Cortijo, S.; Cremades, A.; Prieto, C.; de Andres, A., Grain selective Cu oxidation and anomalous shift of graphene 2D Raman peak in the graphene-Cu system

    Bartolome, J.; Alvarez-Fraga, L.; Aguilar-Pujol, M. X.; Cortijo, S.; Cremades, A.; Prieto, C.; de Andres, A., Grain selective Cu oxidation and anomalous shift of graphene 2D Raman peak in the graphene-Cu system. 2D Materials 2019, 6 (1) 015023

    work page 2019