Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Parton Distributions and New Physics Searches: the Drell-Yan Forward-Backward Asymmetry as a Case Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.08115 v2 pith:5LE2LNVV submitted 2022-09-16 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords asymmetrypdfsphysicsmassesbehaviourdiscussforward-backwardlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We discuss the sensitivity of theoretical predictions of observables used in searches for new physics to parton distributions (PDFs) at large momentum fraction $x$. Specifically, we consider the neutral-current Drell-Yan production of gauge bosons with invariant masses in the TeV range, for which the forward-backward asymmetry of charged leptons from the decay of the gauge boson in its rest frame is a traditional probe of new physics. We show that the qualitative behaviour of the asymmetry depends strongly on the assumptions made in determining the underlying PDFs. We discuss and compare the large-$x$ behaviour of various different PDF sets, and find that they differ significantly. Consequently, the shape of the asymmetry observed at lower dilepton invariant masses, where all PDF sets are in reasonable agreement because of the presence of experimental constraints, is not necessarily reproduced at large masses where the PDFs are mostly unconstrained by data. It follows that the shape of the asymmetry at high masses may depend on assumptions made in the PDF parametrization, and thus deviations from the traditionally expected behaviour cannot be taken as a reliable indication of new physics. We demonstrate that forward-backward asymmetry measurements could help in constraining PDFs at large $x$ and discuss the accuracy that would be required to disentangle the effects of new physics from uncertainties in the PDFs in this region.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tailored PDFs for New Physics searches

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using closure tests with W', Z', and coloron models, the paper shows that either excluding high-energy data or fitting PDFs jointly with SMEFT coefficients prevents new-physics signals from being absorbed into the pro...

  2. Parton distributions confront LHC Run II data: a quantitative appraisal

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic NNLO data-theory comparison shows that the main PDF sets generalise to unseen LHC and HERA data about equally well once PDF, alpha_s, and missing higher order uncertainties are included.

  3. Mixed QCD-EW corrections to the neutral-current Drell-Yan process

    hep-ph 2024-12 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Exact mixed QCD-EW corrections at order alpha_s alpha to neutral-current Drell-Yan production are computed and applied to distributions, the forward-backward asymmetry, and dressed leptons.

  4. Fingerprinting New Physics with Effective Field Theories

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A thesis compiling published SMEFT global fits, automated UV-model constraints, and ML-based unbinned observables, with projections for HL-LHC, FCC-ee, and CEPC.

Pith tools