Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Displacement-Field-Driven Transition between Superconductivity and Valley Ferromagnetism in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a displacement field D alone can switch a spin-orbit-coupled hexagonal system at van Hove filling between a chiral d/p-wave superconductor and a valley ferromagnet, through D-dependent inter-van-Hove interactions arisi

desk verdict A genuinely new D-controlled SC-to-vFM mechanism built on the authors' earlier patch-RG work, but a load-bearing sign inconsistency in the D-dependence of the couplings and an absent SM keep this from being fully checkable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21119 v1 pith:5MTGLO6M submitted 2025-08-28 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Hyeok-Jun Yang , Yi-Ting Hsu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords vanHovesingularitydisplacementfieldchiralsuperconductivityvalleyferromagnetismtwistedbilayerWSe2renormalizationgroupspin-orbitcouplingmoirematerials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a displacement field D is enough to drive a clean transition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism in two-dimensional spin-orbit-coupled hexagonal materials sitting at a van Hove filling. The key is not Fermi-surface detail but six van Hove points where the density of states diverges; D changes how screened Coulomb interactions are projected onto these patches through Bloch wavefunction overlaps. Treating a six-patch model with renormalization group methods, the authors find chiral d/p-wave superconductivity for DDc, with Dc about 33 meV for 5° twisted bilayer WSe2. If correct, this offers a generic model-light explanation for superconductivity-to-magnetism transitions seen in recent tWSe2 experiments and predicts a topological chiral superconductor plus a finite-magnetization valley-ordered state.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a six-patch van Hove model: momentum is restricted to small patches around three VH points per valley (P1, P2, P3 and their negatives), justified by the logarithmically divergent density of states. The four inequivalent inter-patch couplings g2, g3, g6, and g6' come from projecting layer-resolved screened Coulomb interactions onto the top band, and their bare values depend on D through three Bloch-overlap functions Lambda1(D), Lambda2(D), and Lambda3(D). One-loop renormalization group flow in inverse energy scale then yields instability tendencies; the two leading are beta_d/p-SC = G2 - G3 and beta_vFM = -d(y)(G2 - 2G6 + 2G6'). Sign changes in g2 and g6 with increasing D dri

What would settle it

Measure magnetic circular dichroism and phase-sensitive pairing probes on 5° twisted bilayer WSe2 while sweeping D at van Hove filling: the paper predicts finite magnetization and valley-reconstructed bands only above D around 33 meV, and a fully gapped chiral E-irrep gap with Chern number 2 below it. Seeing an s-wave gap or a zero-magnetization antiferromagnetic order instead would rule out this specific mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the displacement field controls the effective interactions among six van Hove singularities enough to generate a Stoner-like zero-temperature transition. At weak D, an inter-valley density-density interaction turns attractive through particle-hole fluctuations and, together with a repulsive inter-valley scattering, selects a two-component nodal d/p-wave pairing that condenses into a chiral topological superconductor with Chern number 2. At stronger D, the same interaction flips into a repulsion and an intra-valley interaction becomes attractive, so the dominant instability becomes valley ferromagnetism: a finite magnetization from imbalanced spin-up density in valle

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative phase boundary, Dc approximately 33 meV, rests on a phenomenological density-of-states normalization and an unspecified size for the six momentum patches, so the exact critical field could move even if the mechanism is right.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For D<Dc the favored superconducting state is a chiral d/p-wave gap in the two-dimensional E irrep of C3v, fully gapped and topological with Chern number 2.
  • For D>Dc the valley ferromagnetic phase has finite magnetization that is spatially non-uniform, so it can be distinguished from antiferromagnetism by magnetic dichroism, ARPES, and spin-resolved local probes.
  • The same six-van-Hove mechanism should appear in other few-layer hexagonal van der Waals systems with spin-valley locking near van Hove filling, including untwisted multilayers, as long as the Fermi surface away from the VH points has no perfect nesting.
  • The d/p-wave pairing remains the leading superconducting instability away from the van Hove filling, with critical temperature peaked at the van Hove filling.
  • Twist angle is another experimental knob that changes the van Hove interactions and could drive the same Stoner-like superconductivity-to-valley-ferromagnetism transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is right, any knob that changes the Bloch wavefunction overlaps at the van Hove points—strain, dielectric screening, or layer number—should shift Dc in a predictable way, a test the paper does not spell out.
  • The claim implies Fermi-surface details are largely irrelevant, so patch-only effective Hamiltonians with D-dependent renormalized couplings could make quantitative predictions for other twist angles without full continuum calculations.
  • A finite-magnetization, time-reversal-breaking valley-ordered state should also appear in anomalous Hall or Kerr rotation measurements, beyond the dichroism and ARPES probes the paper lists.
  • The same logic may extend to higher-order van Hove singularities with power-law density of states, where the stronger divergence could enlarge the superconducting region or shift Dc relative to the logarithmic-VHS case considered here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a displacement-field (D) controlled transition between chiral d/p-wave superconductivity and a spatially non-uniform valley ferromagnetic (vFM) phase in two-dimensional spin-orbit-coupled hexagonal systems at van Hove filling. The mechanism is built from a six-patch model centered on the three VHS per valley of a twisted homobilayer TMD continuum model; the D dependence enters through the Bloch-wave overlaps in the projection of screened Coulomb interactions onto the topmost bands, and one-loop renormalization group (RG) is used to compare instability tendencies. For parameters of 5° twisted bilayer WSe2, the authors find a superconductor for D<Dc≈33 meV and vFM for D>Dc, and they discuss experimental diagnostics and material platforms.

Significance. If the central result holds, the paper provides a relatively simple and general mechanism for the recently observed SC-to-magnetism transitions in twisted TMDs, with falsifiable predictions (magnetic dichroism, optical absorption, phase-sensitive pairing probes). A strength is that the D dependence is derived, not inserted by hand, and the RG approach treats competing instabilities on equal footing. However, the quantitative phase boundary and even the qualitative mechanism rely on assumptions and equations that are either inconsistent in the printed text or located in an unavailable Supplementary Material, so the current manuscript cannot be fully evaluated.

major comments (5)
  1. [Equation (5) and paragraph after Eq. (6)] The text states that since Λ1 is a decreasing function of D and Vll(0)−Vl̄l(0)>0, the couplings g̃2 and g̃′6 decrease with D. This is the opposite of what Eq. (5) gives: g̃2 = g̃′6 = Vll(0) − Λ1(D)(Vll(0) − Vl̄l(0)), so if Λ1 decreases, g̃2 and g̃′6 increase. The same paragraph asserts g̃6 increases, but g̃6 = g̃2 − g̃3, so with g̃2 increasing and g̃3 increasing the net trend is undetermined without numbers. This sign error is load-bearing because the D-dependence of the bare interactions is the proposed driving mechanism. Please correct the monotonicity statement or show explicitly how the numerical code treats Eq. (5).
  2. [Equation (8) and paragraph after Eq. (8)] Substituting the identities G6 = G2 − G3 and G′6 = G2 into the printed βvFM = −d(y)(G2 − 2G6 + 2G′6) gives βvFM = −d(y)(G2 + 2G3), i.e., G6 cancels identically. This contradicts the explanatory paragraph that says 'the intra-valley density-density interaction g6 flips from a relevant repulsion that hurts vFM into an attraction that supports vFM (see Eq. 8).' Either Eq. (8) is misprinted, or the mechanism described in the text is incorrect. This must be resolved before the RG interpretation can be trusted.
  3. [Renormalization group analysis (Eq. (7) and SM Section II)] The central quantitative results—the beta functions, the coefficients dlm, the linear combinations Γj, and the comparison of vFM vs AFM tendencies in Fig. 4—are all relegated to the Supplementary Material, which was not provided with the manuscript. As a result, the core RG flow cannot be independently checked. For a journal publication, the essential equations should either appear in the main text or be supplied in a form the referee can verify.
  4. [Patch model and footnote [61]] The quantitative value Dc≈33 meV depends on the phenomenological density-of-states normalization ν0=1/(2πW) and on the patch size kΛ, which is only constrained as kΛ≪G0. No sensitivity study is given, so it is unclear whether the phase boundary is robust to changes in these choices. Since the paper compares directly to experiment, please provide a scan over reasonable ν0 and kΛ or an argument that the phase boundary is insensitive to them.
  5. [Topological superconductivity section] The claim 'chiral d/p-wave SC that is topological with Chern number 2' is asserted without a calculation or a cited derivation. The chiral combination argument from the E irrep does not by itself fix the Chern number; a Berry-phase or winding-number evaluation is needed. This is a secondary result, but if it is to be advertised in the abstract and section heading, it should be supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1(a) caption] The caption refers to 'RG results in Fig. 4b' and 'mean-field calculation in Fig. 4c', but Fig. 4 has only panels (a) and (b). Probably a reference to Fig. 3(b,c) is intended.
  2. [Notation near Eq. (5)] The notation 'Λ1(2,3)' is ambiguous; write 'Λ1 and (Λ2,Λ3)' explicitly. Also define the overline l convention immediately before Eq. (5).
  3. [Equation (8)] State clearly whether G2, G3, G6, G′6 are the dimensionless running couplings gi(y) evaluated at y=y_c or the bare values; the notation is inconsistent with the tilde quantities in Eq. (5).
  4. [Reference [60]] The Supplementary Material reference contains only 'URL'; the actual URL should be provided in the bibliography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the D-dependence is computed from band projections and the RG phase boundary is an output, not a fit.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained: the displacement-field dependence enters through the Bloch-overlap factors Λ_i(D) in Eqs. (5)–(6), which are obtained by projecting the layer-density operators of Eq. (2) onto the topmost band of the continuum model Eq. (1); no term in H_patch is adjusted by hand to produce the transition. The RG analysis then evolves these initial couplings using the one-loop beta functions of Ref. [28]; although Ref. [28] is a prior paper by one of the present authors, it is an independent, published methodological result with stated assumptions and is not an unverified uniqueness claim imported to force the conclusion. The numerical value D_c ≈ 33 meV is an output of the flow, not a fitted input; the experimental value U = 109 meV is used only for the off-VH-filling T_c curve in Fig. 3c and does not enter the SC-vFM competition in Fig. 2b. I therefore find no step where a prediction reduces by construction to its input. One non-circular internal inconsistency should be flagged for the correctness pass: the sentence after Eq. (6) states "since Λ_{1(2,3)} are decreasing (increasing) functions of D and V_ll(0) − V_{l̄l}(0) > 0, we find that g̃2 and g̃6 decrease with D while g̃3 and g̃6 increase with D," but Eq. (5) gives g̃2 = g̃′6 = V_ll(0) − Λ_1(D)(V_ll(0) − V_{l̄l}(0)), which increases as Λ_1 decreases. This is a sign/monotonicity error in the text, not a circularity, and it does not alter the fact that the phase diagram is computed from the equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computation depends on the standard patch-RG framework from the authors' earlier work (Ref [28]), on explicit material parameters from prior experiments, and on several hand-picked scales (patch size, nu0, Delta_vFM). No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the vFM and chiral d/p-SC are symmetry-allowed magnetic and pairing orders, not invented entities.

free parameters (6)
  • U = 109 meV = 109 meV
    Bare Hubbard interaction taken from Ref [27], the experimental paper reporting the SC-to-magnetism transition; used in the linearized gap equation for Tc (Fig. 3c).
  • nu0 = 1/(2 pi W) = 1/(2 pi W), W unspecified
    Phenomenological density-of-states normalization at VH filling (footnote [61]); sets the y-scale of the RG flow and affects the quantitative value of Dc.
  • Patch size k_Lambda = not specified
    Only constrained by k_Lambda << G0; the actual value determines the high-energy cutoff y=0 for the RG and can shift the phase boundary.
  • Coulomb screening parameters (h=3a0, eps=25, d=20 nm) = h=3a0, eps=25, d=20 nm
    Chosen to compute V_ll'(k) in Fig. 1d; fix the interaction strengths entering Eq. 5.
  • Continuum band parameters (m*=0.45me, a0=3.317 A, v=9.0 meV, psi=128 deg, w=18 meV) = as listed
    From Ref [45] for theta=5 degrees tWSe2; determine VHS positions, dispersion, and D-dependent overlaps.
  • Delta_vFM = 50 meV = 50 meV
    Order parameter strength chosen ad hoc for the real-space magnetization plot in Fig. 3f; not derived from the RG.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The six VH patches with size k_Lambda << G0 capture all relevant Fermi-surface instabilities at nV(D).
    Justified only by the diverging DOS at VH points; the paper reduces the full mBZ to Hpatch based on this, in the 'Patch model' section.
  • domain assumption Topmost valence bands at K and K' are spin-up and spin-down with Ising spin-orbit locking.
    Standard for TMD homobilayers, used throughout the continuum model Eq. 1.
  • domain assumption Coulomb interactions are screened double-gate potentials with G=0 components only, as V_ll'(k) decays fast in k.
    Stated in footnote [47]; controls the interaction matrix elements in Eq. 5.
  • domain assumption One-loop RG for the four couplings g2,g3,g6,g6' correctly captures the leading instabilities in the weak-to-intermediate coupling regime.
    The paper builds on Ref [28] and claims this in 'Step 1'; the actual beta functions are not shown in the main text.
  • domain assumption Screened Coulomb interaction is stronger than electron-phonon coupling away from the VH filling.
    Explicitly stated in 'Topological superconductivity at D<Dc' to extend the chiral d/p SC result away from nV.
  • domain assumption The Fermi surface away from VH points has no perfect nesting in the 5 degree tWSe2 case.
    Explicitly stated when discussing the relevance to Ref [27]: 'if the FS away from VH points does not exhibit perfect nesting'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Displacement-Field-Driven Transition between Superconductivity and Valley Ferromagnetism in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5MTGLO6M

@misc{pith2026250821119,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Displacement-Field-Driven Transition between Superconductivity and Valley Ferromagnetism in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5MTGLO6M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21119}
}
abstract

Recent experiments have observed transitions between superconductivity and correlated magnetism in twisted bilayer WSe$_2$ near van-Hove fillings, driven by the displacement field $D$. Motivated by the experiment, we theoretically propose a general mechanism for a $D$-controlled transition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism in two-dimensional (2D) spin-orbit-coupled hexagonal systems, where van Hove singularities (VHS) lie on the Fermi level. We show that such a transition can be naturally captured by a simple VHS-only model without Fermi surface details, where the inter-VHS interactions that govern the Fermi surface instabilities is controlled by $D$ through the band projection of screened Coulomb interaction. By treating this simple model with renormalization group technique beyond mean-field level, we find that a chiral $d/p$-wave superconductivity naturally dominates under a weak displacement field $D<D_c$. At a stronger displacement field $D>D_c$, a \textit{valley ferromagnetic phase} (vFM) takes over, which is spatially non-uniform due to valley-modulated magnetization. Finally, we discuss generic conditions for the predicted superconductivity-to-ferromagnetism transition to take place in the rich family of few-layer hexagonal van der Waals material systems. Taking twisted bilayer WSe$_2$ as a case study, we discuss experimental detections that can falsify our prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21119 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The phase diagram of tTMD as a function of hole filling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) The bare interaction values of Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Graphical representation of the mixture of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Non-interacting susceptibility (only [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Y . Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse2, Nature 637, 833 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    2a and b, the initial conditions ˜g2,3,6,6′ exhibit different field-dependence through the Bloch-function overlaps at y = 0 (see Eqs

    As shown in Fig. 2a and b, the initial conditions ˜g2,3,6,6′ exhibit different field-dependence through the Bloch-function overlaps at y = 0 (see Eqs. 5, 6) so that the signs and rele- vance of gi(y) in the low-energy limit y → ∞, and thus the instability tendency βj, can qualitatively alter as D increases. A change in the dominant instability j can thus ...

    work page

  3. [2]

    S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. Fang, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, and E. Kaxiras, Twistronics: Manipulating the electronic properties of two-dimensional layered structures through their twist angle, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075420 (2017)

    2017

  4. [3]

    K. Kim, A. DaSilva, S. Huang, B. Fallahazad, S. Laren- tis, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. J. LeRoy, A. H. Mac- Donald, and E. Tutuc, Tunable moir ´e bands and strong cor- relations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 3364 (2017), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1620140114

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1620140114 2017

  5. [4]

    B. L. Chittari, G. Chen, Y . Zhang, F. Wang, and J. Jung, Gate- tunable topological flat bands in trilayer graphene boron-nitride moir´e superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 016401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalcogenide moir ´e bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [6]

    4 are related to the Coulomb potentials in Eq

    as well as the inter-valley scattering ˜g3 in Eq. 4 are related to the Coulomb potentials in Eq. 2 as ˜g2 = ˜g′ 6 = Vll(0) − Λ1(D)(Vll(0) − Vl¯l(0)), ˜g3 = Vll(Q)Λ2(D) + Vl¯l(Q)Λ3(D), ˜g6 = ˜g2 − ˜g3, (5) where Q ≡ Qnm = |Pn − Pm| for all patches n and m, and Λ1(D) = |Λ↑,t(P1, P1)Λ↑,b(P1, P1)|, Λ2(D) = |Λ↑,t(P1, P2)|2 + |Λ↑,b(P1, P2)|2, Λ3(D) = 2|Λ↑,t(P1,...

    work page

  8. [7]

    G. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Wu, B. Lyu, H. Li, B. L. Chittari, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, J. Jung, Y . Zhang, and F. Wang, Evidence of a gate-tunable mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moir´e superlattice, Nature Physics 15, 237 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature 574, 653 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, I. T. Rosen, E. J. Fox, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jung, Z. Shi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y . Zhang, and F. Wang, Signa- tures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moir ´e superlattice, Nature 572, 215 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, Y .-H. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, T. Senthil, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y . Zhang, and F. Wang, Tun- able correlated chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moir ´e superlattice, Nature 579, 56–61 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    Y . Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y . Xu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Simulation of hubbard model physics in wse2/ws2 moir´e super- lattices, Nature 579, 353 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    Y . Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies-Bigorda, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer– bilayer graphene, Nature 583, 215 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    N. P. Kazmierczak, M. Van Winkle, C. Ophus, K. C. Bustillo, S. Carr, H. G. Brown, J. Ciston, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and D. K. Bediako, Strain fields in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Materials 20, 956 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    Y . Cao, V . Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxi- ras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Y . Cao, V . Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y . Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxi- ras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aav1910

    2019 doi

  10. [17]

    Kerelsky, L

    A. Kerelsky, L. J. McGilly, D. M. Kennes, L. Xian, M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, C. Dean, A. Rubio, and A. N. Pasupathy, Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene, Na- ture 572, 95 (2019)

    2019

  11. [18]

    Y . Choi, J. Kemmer, Y . Peng, A. Thomson, H. Arora, R. Polski, Y . Zhang, H. Ren, J. Alicea, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Nadj-Perge, Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle, Nature Physics 15, 1174 (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moir ´e heterostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aay5533

    2020 doi

  13. [20]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters fill- ing in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 365, 605 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science....

    2019 doi

  14. [21]

    S. L. Tomarken, Y . Cao, A. Demir, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. C. Ashoori, Electronic compressibil- ity of magic-angle graphene superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 046601 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    Wang, E.-M

    L. Wang, E.-M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, L. Xian, D. A. Rhodes, C. Tan, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, Y . Bai, B. Kim, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. Zhu, J. Hone, A. Rubio, A. N. Pasupa- thy, and C. R. Dean, Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenid...

    2020

  16. [23]

    Y . Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V . Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Correlated insulating states at fractional fillings of moir ´e superlattices, Nature 587, 214 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    C. Jin, Z. Tao, T. Li, Y . Xu, Y . Tang, J. Zhu, S. Liu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, L. Fu, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Stripe phases in wse2/ws2 moir ´e superlattices, Nature Materi- als 20, 940 (2021)

    2021

  18. [25]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and E. Kaxiras, Pressure dependence of the magic twist angle in graphene superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085144 (2018)

    2018

  19. [26]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y . Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Ueno, E. Tu- tuc, and B. J. LeRoy, Flat bands in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Physics 16, 1093 (2020)

    2020

  20. [27]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of mos2 and other group-vi dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Y . Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, L. Holtzman, M. Cothrine, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, A. J. Millis, A. Pasupathy, and C. R. Dean, Superconductivity in 5.0° twisted bilayer wse2, Nature 637, 839 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Y .-T. Hsu, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Spin-valley locked in- stabilities in moir ´e transition metal dichalcogenides with con- ventional and higher-order van hove singularities, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195134 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Zegrodnik and A

    M. Zegrodnik and A. Biborski, Mixed singlet-triplet supercon- ducting state within the moir´e t−j−u model applied to twisted bilayer wse2, Phys. Rev. B 108, 064506 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Zhou and Y .-H

    B. Zhou and Y .-H. Zhang, Chiral and nodal superconductors in the t−j model with valley contrasting flux on a triangular moir´e lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, 155111 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Y .-M. Wu, Z. Wu, and H. Yao, Pair-density-wave and chiral superconductivity in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalco- genides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Akbar, A

    W. Akbar, A. Biborski, L. Rademaker, and M. Zegrodnik, Topo- logical superconductivity with mixed singlet-triplet pairing in moir´e transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064516 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Zhu, Y .-Z

    J. Zhu, Y .-Z. Chou, M. Xie, and S. Das Sarma, Superconduc- tivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. B 111, L060501 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    F. Xie, L. Chen, S. Sur, Y . Fang, J. Cano, and Q. Si, Super- conductivity in twisted wse2 from topology-induced quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136503 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Guerci, D

    D. Guerci, D. Kaplan, J. Ingham, J. H. Pixley, and A. J. Millis, Topological superconductivity from repulsive interactions in twisted wse2 (2024), arXiv:2408.16075 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Schrade and L

    C. Schrade and L. Fu, Nematic, chiral, and topological super- conductivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035143 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Qin, W.-X

    W. Qin, W.-X. Qiu, and F. Wu, Kohn-luttinger mechanism of superconductivity in twisted bilayer wse2: Gate-tunable uncon- ventional pairing symmetry (2024), arXiv:2409.16114 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2024

  32. [40]

    A. V . Chubukov and C. M. Varma, Quantum criticality and superconductivity in twisted transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014507 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Christos, P

    M. Christos, P. M. Bonetti, and M. S. Scheurer, Approximate symmetries, insulators, and superconductivity in continuum- model description of twisted wse 2 (2024), arXiv:2407.02393 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. Kim, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, X. Wang, and D. Chowdhury, Theory of correlated insulators and superconductor at ν = 1 in twisted wse2, Nature Communications 16, 1701 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Kn ¨uppel, J

    P. Kn ¨uppel, J. Zhu, Y . Xia, Z. Xia, Z. Han, Y . Zeng, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Correlated states controlled by a tunable van hove singularity in moir ´e wse2 bi- layers, Nature Communications 16, 1959 (2025)

    1959

  36. [44]

    L. Peng, C. D. Beule, D. Li, L. Yang, E. J. Mele, and S. Adam, Magnetism in twisted bilayer wse 2 (2025), arXiv:2503.09689 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  37. [45]

    Tuo, M.-R

    C. Tuo, M.-R. Li, Z. Wu, W. Sun, and H. Yao, Theory of topological superconductivity and antiferromagnetic correlated insulators in twisted bilayer wse 2 (2024), arXiv:2409.06779 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  38. [46]

    Fischer, L

    A. Fischer, L. Klebl, V . Cr ´epel, S. Ryee, A. Rubio, L. Xian, T. O. Wehling, A. Georges, D. M. Kennes, and A. J. Millis, The- ory of intervalley-coherent afm order and topological supercon- ductivity in twse2 (2024), arXiv:2412.14296 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  39. [47]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V . Cr´epel, Y . Zhang, and L. Fu, Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nature Communica- tions 12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. H. MacDon- ald, Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalco- genide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    1d (see Supplementary Material (SM) Section I [60])

    By solving the Poisson equation with double-gate boundary conditions, we obtain the k-dependence of Vll′ (k) in Fig. 1d (see Supplementary Material (SM) Section I [60]). Since Vll′ (k) decays fast with k, we will neglect the G ̸= 0 com- ponents for simplicity

  42. [50]

    Shankar, Renormalization-group approach to interacting fermions, Rev

    R. Shankar, Renormalization-group approach to interacting fermions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 129 (1994)

    1994

  43. [51]

    Furukawa, T

    N. Furukawa, T. M. Rice, and M. Salmhofer, Truncation of a two-dimensional fermi surface due to quasiparticle gap forma- tion at the saddle points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3195 (1998)

    1998

  44. [52]

    K. L. Hur and T. Maurice Rice, Superconductivity close to the mott state: From condensed-matter systems to superfluidity in optical lattices, Annals of Physics 324, 1452 (2009), july 2009 Special Issue

    2009

  45. [53]

    A. V . Chubukov, D. V . Efremov, and I. Eremin, Magnetism, su- perconductivity, and pairing symmetry in iron-based supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134512 (2008)

    2008

  46. [54]

    Nandkishore, L

    R. Nandkishore, L. S. Levitov, and A. V . Chubukov, Chiral su- perconductivity from repulsive interactions in doped graphene, Nature Physics 8, 158 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Isobe, N

    H. Isobe, N. F. Q. Yuan, and L. Fu, Unconventional supercon- ductivity and density waves in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041041 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Lin and R

    Y .-P. Lin and R. M. Nandkishore, Chiral twist on the high- Tc phase diagram in moir ´e heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085136 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Y .-T. Hsu, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Topological supercon- ductivity, ferromagnetism, and valley-polarized phases in moir´e systems: Renormalization group analysis for twisted double bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085103 (2020). 8

    2020

  50. [58]

    Classen, A

    L. Classen, A. V . Chubukov, C. Honerkamp, and M. M. Scherer, Competing orders at higher-order van hove points, Phys. Rev. B 102, 125141 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Lin and R

    Y .-P. Lin and R. M. Nandkishore, Parquet renormalization group analysis of weak-coupling instabilities with multiple high-order van hove points inside the brillouin zone, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245122 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    D.-C. Lu, T. Wang, S. Chatterjee, and Y .-Z. You, Correlated metals and unconventional superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene: A renormalization group analysis, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155115 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    J. H. Son, Y .-T. Hsu, and E.-A. Kim, Switching between su- perconductivity and current density waves in bernal bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 111, 115144 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Double- gate Coulomb interaction, II

    See Supplementary Materials at URL for details on I. Double- gate Coulomb interaction, II. RG equations

  55. [63]

    The prefactor ν0 depends on the specific dispersion obtained from Eq. 1. For the RG calculation, we take the phenomenolog- ical value ν0 = 1 2πW for the bandwidth W

  56. [65]

    Y .-T. Hsu, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Topological supercon- ductivity, ferromagnetism, and valley-polarized phases in moir´e systems: Renormalization group analysis for twisted double bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 102, 085103 (2020)

    2020

  57. [66]

    Yang and Y .-T

    H.-J. Yang and Y .-T. Hsu, Optical absorption signatures of su- perconductors driven by van hove singularities, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054514 (2025)

    2025

  58. [67]

    Y .-T. Hsu, A. Vaezi, M. H. Fischer, and E.-A. Kim, Topolog- ical superconductivity in monolayer transition metal dichalco- genides, Nature Communications 8, 14985 (2017)

    2017

  59. [68]

    B. Gao, M. Ghafariasl, M. J. Mehrabad, T.-S. Huang, L. Zhang, D. Session, P. Upadhyay, R. Ma, G. Alshalan, D. G. S. Forero, S. Sarkar, S. Park, H. Jang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Xie, Y . Zhou, and M. Hafezi, Probing quantum anomalous hall states in twisted bilayer wse2 vi...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.