pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18362 · v1 · pith:5MYQC2ELnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ✦ hep-th

Tracing Transcendentality in Protected Correlators of N=4 SYM

Marco S. Bianchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords N=4 SYMprotected operatorstwo-point functionstranscendentalitydimensional reductionplanar limitstress-tensor multipletlocalization
0
0 comments X

The pith

The number of stress-tensor multiplet factors controls the full two-loop dependence of protected correlators in N=4 SYM.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes two-point functions of protected scalar operators in N=4 SYM through two loops for all trace structures up to dimension 10. One-loop corrections turn out to be universal across dimensions. At two loops a partial breaking of uniform transcendentality appears for higher-dimensional operators, but this breaking follows a pattern that depends only on the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors inside each operator. Because the pattern is fully predictable, the authors obtain an extrapolation formula that gives the two-loop result at any dimension and any trace structure. The extrapolated expressions match all available localization results.

Core claim

In N=4 SYM the two-loop corrections to two-point functions of protected operators in dimensional reduction exhibit a controlled partial breaking of uniform transcendentality. This breaking can be cancelled by suitable linear combinations of correlators in a fully predictable way. The entire dependence on dimension and trace structure is fixed by the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors carried by the operator, which yields a complete planar extrapolation valid at arbitrary dimension.

What carries the argument

The number of stress-tensor multiplet factors in the operator, which alone determines the dimension and trace dependence of the two-loop correlator.

If this is right

  • The two-loop correlator at any dimension is fixed once the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors is known.
  • Linear combinations of correlators can be chosen to restore uniform transcendentality at two loops.
  • The extrapolation formula applies to every trace structure in the planar limit.
  • One-loop corrections remain universal for all dimensions and all trace structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same counting may simplify higher-loop or higher-point protected observables.
  • The ability to cancel transcendentality breaking by linear combination could be used to isolate pure transcendental pieces in related quantities.
  • The agreement with localization hints that the extrapolation captures non-perturbative information.

Load-bearing premise

The pattern seen in explicit computations up to dimension 10 continues without new corrections or breakdowns for operators of arbitrary dimension in the planar limit.

What would settle it

A two-loop computation for an operator of dimension 12 whose result deviates from the dependence predicted solely by the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors.

read the original abstract

We study two-point functions of protected scalar operators in N=4 SYM, focusing on their transcendentality properties in dimensional reduction, where quantum corrections are subleading in the regulator. We compute the correlators explicitly through two loops and operators up to classical dimension 10, for all trace structures. The one-loop correction is universal. At two loops, we find a controlled partial breaking of uniform transcendentality for higher-dimensional operators, which can be cancelled by suitable combinations of correlators in a fully predictable way. A main result is a complete planar extrapolation for two-loop correlators at arbitrary dimension and trace structure, whose dependence is entirely controlled by the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors in the operator. The perturbative results agree with localization predictions in all cases where comparisons are possible.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper computes two-point functions of protected scalar operators in N=4 SYM through two loops for all trace structures and operators up to classical dimension 10. It reports a universal one-loop correction and a controlled partial breaking of uniform transcendentality at two loops that can be cancelled by linear combinations of correlators. The central claim is a complete planar extrapolation formula for the two-loop correlators valid at arbitrary dimension and trace structure, with all dependence controlled solely by the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors in the operator; the results agree with localization in all comparable cases.

Significance. If the extrapolation is rigorously justified, the result would supply an efficient, parameter-free description of two-loop protected correlators beyond explicit computation, clarifying how transcendentality properties are governed by operator structure in the planar limit and potentially aiding higher-loop or higher-dimension studies.

major comments (1)
  1. [Main result on planar extrapolation] The main result (extrapolation to arbitrary dimension) is stated to follow from explicit computations through dimension 10 plus observed cancellations of partial transcendentality breaking. No independent all-dimension derivation, recursion relation, or symmetry argument is provided that would guarantee the pattern persists without new corrections at higher dimensions; this makes the claim rest on an observed pattern whose continuation is an assumption rather than a derived property.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment on the justification of the planar extrapolation below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The main result (extrapolation to arbitrary dimension) is stated to follow from explicit computations through dimension 10 plus observed cancellations of partial transcendentality breaking. No independent all-dimension derivation, recursion relation, or symmetry argument is provided that would guarantee the pattern persists without new corrections at higher dimensions; this makes the claim rest on an observed pattern whose continuation is an assumption rather than a derived property.

    Authors: We agree that the extrapolation formula is inferred from explicit two-loop computations up to classical dimension 10 together with the observed pattern that partial transcendentality breaking cancels in a manner fully determined by the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors. No independent all-dimension derivation, recursion, or symmetry argument is supplied in the paper. The robustness of the pattern across every trace structure examined, together with exact agreement with localization in all comparable cases, provides strong empirical support, but we acknowledge that continuation beyond dimension 10 remains a conjecture rather than a proven property. In revision we will add an explicit statement clarifying the conjectural status of the extrapolation and the computational evidence on which it rests. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; extrapolation from explicit computations up to dim 10 with external checks

full rationale

The paper computes two-loop correlators explicitly through dimension 10 for all trace structures, observes a pattern of controlled partial breaking of uniform transcendentality that cancels in predictable combinations, and presents a planar extrapolation to arbitrary dimension whose dependence is controlled by the number of stress-tensor multiplet factors. No equations or statements in the provided text reduce this extrapolation to a self-definitional fit, a parameter fitted to the target quantity itself, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The abstract notes agreement with localization predictions in comparable cases, supplying independent external content. The derivation therefore remains self-contained through direct computation and pattern observation rather than collapsing to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond standard assumptions of perturbative SYM calculations in dimensional reduction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5654 in / 1250 out tokens · 27610 ms · 2026-06-26T23:12:59.485646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett

    N. Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 3–32, [1012.3982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    S. Lee, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani and N. Seiberg,Three point functions of chiral operators in D = 4, N=4 SYM at large N,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 697–718, [hep-th/9806074]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    K. A. Intriligator and W. Skiba,Bonus symmetry and the operator product expansion of N=4 SuperYang-Mills,Nucl. Phys. B559(1999) 165–183, [hep-th/9905020]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    B. Eden, P. S. Howe and P. C. West,Nilpotent invariants in N=4 SYM,Phys. Lett. B463(1999) 19–26, [hep-th/9905085]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    Arutyunov, B

    G. Arutyunov, B. Eden and E. Sokatchev,On nonrenormalization and OPE in superconformal field theories,Nucl. Phys.B619(2001) 359–372, [hep-th/0105254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    P. J. Heslop and P. S. Howe,OPEs and three-point correlators of protected operators in N=4 SYM,Nucl. Phys.B626(2002) 265–286, [hep-th/0107212]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    B. Eden, P. S. Howe, C. Schubert, E. Sokatchev and P. C. West,Four point functions in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at two loops,Nucl. Phys.B557(1999) 355–379, [hep-th/9811172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  8. [8]

    B. Eden, P. S. Howe, C. Schubert, E. Sokatchev and P. C. West,Simplifications of four point functions in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at two loops,Phys. Lett. B466(1999) 20–26, [hep-th/9906051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    B. Eden, C. Schubert and E. Sokatchev,Three loop four point correlator in N=4 SYM, Phys. Lett.B482(2000) 309–314, [hep-th/0003096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  10. [10]

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn,Superconformal symmetry, correlation functions and the operator product expansion,Nucl. Phys.B629(2002) 3–73, [hep-th/0112251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  11. [11]

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn,Conformal partial wave expansions for N=4 chiral four point functions,Annals Phys.321(2006) 581–626, [hep-th/0412335]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and V. A. Smirnov,Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 085001, [hep-th/0505205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich,Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151605, [1006.5703]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr and V. A. Smirnov,An Analytic Result for the Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,JHEP03(2010) 099, [0911.5332]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr and V. A. Smirnov,The Two-Loop Hexagon Wilson Loop in N = 4 SYM,JHEP05(2010) 084, [1003.1702]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    W. L. van Neerven,Infrared Behavior of On-shell Form-factors in aN= 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Field Theory,Z. Phys. C30(1986) 595

    1986

  17. [17]

    L. V. Bork, D. I. Kazakov and G. S. Vartanov,On form factors in N=4 sym,JHEP02 (2011) 063, [1011.2440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and T. Huber,The three-loop form factor in N=4 super Yang-Mills,JHEP03(2012) 101, [1112.4524]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Travaglini and G. Yang,Analytic two-loop form factors in N=4 SYM,JHEP05(2012) 082, [1201.4170]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    Brandhuber, B

    A. Brandhuber, B. Penante, G. Travaglini and C. Wen,The last of the simple remainders,JHEP08(2014) 100, [1406.1443]. – 26 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Banerjee, P

    P. Banerjee, P. K. Dhani, M. Mahakhud, V. Ravindran and S. Seth,Finite remainders of the Konishi at two loops inN= 4SYM,JHEP05(2017) 085, [1612.00885]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Huber, A

    T. Huber, A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer, R. M. Schabinger and G. Yang,The four-loop cusp anomalous dimension from theN= 4Sudakov form factor,Phys. Lett. B807 (2020) 135543, [1912.13459]

    arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Lin and G

    G. Lin and G. Yang,Non-planar form factors of generic local operators via on-shell unitarity and color-kinematics duality,JHEP04(2021) 176, [2011.06540]

    arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Agarwal, A

    B. Agarwal, A. von Manteuffel, E. Panzer and R. M. Schabinger,Four-loop collinear anomalous dimensions in QCD and N=4 super Yang-Mills,Phys. Lett. B820(2021) 136503, [2102.09725]

    arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    R. N. Lee, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov and M. Steinhauser,The four-loopN= 4 SYM Sudakov form factor,JHEP01(2022) 091, [2110.13166]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov and J. Trnka,Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes. Cambridge University Press, 4, 2016, 10.1017/CBO9781316091548

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781316091548 2016

  27. [27]

    A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov and V. N. Velizhanin,Anomalous dimensions of Wilson operators in N=4 SYM theory,Phys. Lett.B557(2003) 114–120, [hep-ph/0301021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  28. [28]

    A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov, A. I. Onishchenko and V. N. Velizhanin,Three loop universal anomalous dimension of the Wilson operators inN= 4SUSY Yang-Mills model,Phys. Lett.B595(2004) 521–529, [hep-th/0404092]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  29. [29]

    Eden and M

    B. Eden and M. Staudacher,Integrability and transcendentality,J. Stat. Mech.0611 (2006) P11014, [hep-th/0603157]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    Beisert, B

    N. Beisert, B. Eden and M. Staudacher,Transcendentality and Crossing,J. Stat. Mech. 0701(2007) P01021, [hep-th/0610251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    Marboe, V

    C. Marboe, V. Velizhanin and D. Volin,Six-loop anomalous dimension of twist-two operators in planarN= 4SYM theory,JHEP07(2015) 084, [1412.4762]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Marboe and V

    C. Marboe and V. Velizhanin,Twist-2 at seven loops in planarN= 4 SYM theory: full result and analytic properties,JHEP11(2016) 013, [1607.06047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    B. A. Kniehl and V. N. Velizhanin,Non-planar universal anomalous dimension of twist-two operators with general Lorentz spin at four loops inN= 4SYM theory,Nucl. Phys. B968(2021) 115429, [2103.16420]

    arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond and J. M. Henn,Bootstrapping the three-loop hexagon, JHEP11(2011) 023, [1108.4461]. – 27 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond and J. M. Henn,Analytic result for the two-loop six-point NMHV amplitude in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2012) 024, [1111.1704]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, M. von Hippel and J. Pennington,Hexagon functions and the three-loop remainder function,JHEP12(2013) 049, [1308.2276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    J. M. Drummond, G. Papathanasiou and M. Spradlin,A Symbol of Uniqueness: The Cluster Bootstrap for the 3-Loop MHV Heptagon,JHEP03(2015) 072, [1412.3763]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod and M. von Hippel,Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 241601, [1609.00669]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    L. J. Dixon, J. Drummond, T. Harrington, A. J. McLeod, G. Papathanasiou and M. Spradlin,Heptagons from the Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap,JHEP02(2017) 137, [1612.08976]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and G. Papathanasiou,Cluster adjacency and the four-loop NMHV heptagon,JHEP03(2019) 087, [1812.04640]

    arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou,Six-Gluon amplitudes in planarN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory at six and seven loops,JHEP08(2019) 016, [1903.10890]

    arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    L. J. Dixon and Y.-T. Liu,Lifting Heptagon Symbols to Functions,JHEP10(2020) 031, [2007.12966]

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    L. J. Dixon, A. J. McLeod and M. Wilhelm,A Three-Point Form Factor Through Five Loops,JHEP04(2021) 147, [2012.12286]

    arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod and M. Wilhelm,Bootstrapping a stress-tensor form factor through eight loops,JHEP07(2022) 153, [2204.11901]

    arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    L. J. Dixon, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, Y.-T. Liu, A. J. McLeod and M. Wilhelm,Antipodal Self-Duality for a Four-Particle Form Factor,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111601, [2212.02410]

    arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 251601, [1304.1806]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    M. S. Bianchi,Protected and uniformly transcendental,JHEP09(2023) 121, [2306.06239]

    arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,JHEP10(2008) 091, [0806.1218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman and D. L. Jafferis,Fractional M2-branes,JHEP11(2008) 043, [0807.4924]. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    M. S. Bianchi,Transcendentality of ABJM two-point functions,JHEP12(2024) 188, [2410.23395]

    arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    M. S. Bianchi,Uniformly transcendental bases for protected two-point functions,JHEP 04(2026) 207, [2512.11516]

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Siegel,Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularization via Dimensional Reduction, Phys

    W. Siegel,Supersymmetric Dimensional Regularization via Dimensional Reduction, Phys. Lett.B84(1979) 193–196

    1979

  53. [53]

    D. M. Capper, D. R. T. Jones and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Regularization by Dimensional Reduction of Supersymmetric and Nonsupersymmetric Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys.B167(1980) 479–499

    1980

  54. [54]

    V. N. Velizhanin,Three-loop renormalization of the N=1, N=2, N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories,Nucl. Phys.B818(2009) 95–100, [0809.2509]

    arXiv 2009

  55. [55]

    Chakraborty and S.-O

    M. Chakraborty and S.-O. Moch,Dimensional Reduction is Supersymmetric at Three Loops,2603.02892

    arXiv

  56. [56]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by Parts: The Algorithm to Calculate beta Functions in 4 Loops,Nucl. Phys.B192(1981) 159–204

    1981

  57. [57]

    F. V. Tkachov,A Theorem on Analytical Calculability of Four Loop Renormalization Group Functions,Phys. Lett.B100(1981) 65–68

    1981

  58. [58]

    Laporta and E

    S. Laporta and E. Remiddi,The Analytical value of the electron (g-2) at order alpha**3 in QED,Phys. Lett.B379(1996) 283–291, [hep-ph/9602417]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  59. [59]

    Laporta,High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int

    S. Laporta,High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys.A15(2000) 5087–5159, [hep-ph/0102033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  60. [60]

    Two-point functions in 4−2ϵ dimensions from localization

    A. Georgoudis, J. Minahan, A. Nedelin and C. Wen, “Two-point functions in 4−2ϵ dimensions from localization.” to appear

  61. [61]

    J. A. Minahan,Localizing gauge theories onS d,JHEP04(2016) 152, [1512.06924]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    J. A. Minahan and U. Naseer,One-loop tests of supersymmetric gauge theories on spheres,JHEP07(2017) 074, [1703.07435]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Gorantis, J

    A. Gorantis, J. A. Minahan and U. Naseer,Analytic continuation of dimensions in supersymmetric localization,JHEP02(2018) 070, [1711.05669]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    J. A. Minahan and M. Zabzine,Gauge theories with 16 supersymmetries on spheres, JHEP03(2015) 155, [1502.07154]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Brown, C

    A. Brown, C. Wen and H. Xie,Laplace-difference equation for integrated correlators of operators with general charges in N = 4 SYM,JHEP06(2023) 066, [2303.13195]

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. A. M. Vermaseren,Forcer, a FORM program for the parametric reduction of four-loop massless propagator diagrams,Comput. Phys. Commun.253(2020) 107198, [1704.06650]. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren,New features of FORM,math-ph/0010025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren,FORM version 4.2,1707.06453

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Davies, T

    J. Davies, T. Kaneko, C. Marinissen, T. Ueda and J. A. M. Vermaseren,FORM Version 5.0,2601.19982

    arXiv

  70. [70]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation,J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation,J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279–289

    1993

  71. [71]

    van Ritbergen, A

    T. van Ritbergen, A. N. Schellekens and J. A. M. Vermaseren,Group theory factors for Feynman diagrams,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A14(1999) 41–96, [hep-ph/9802376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  72. [72]

    Gerchkovitz, J

    E. Gerchkovitz, J. Gomis, N. Ishtiaque, A. Karasik, Z. Komargodski and S. S. Pufu, Correlation Functions of Coulomb Branch Operators,JHEP01(2017) 103, [1602.05971]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Young,ABJ(M) Chiral Primary Three-Point Function at Two-loops,JHEP07 (2014) 120, [1404.1117]

    D. Young,ABJ(M) Chiral Primary Three-Point Function at Two-loops,JHEP07 (2014) 120, [1404.1117]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Young,An Extremal Chiral Primary Three-Point Function at Two-loops in ABJ(M),JHEP12(2014) 141, [1411.0626]

    D. Young,An Extremal Chiral Primary Three-Point Function at Two-loops in ABJ(M),JHEP12(2014) 141, [1411.0626]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    M. S. Bianchi,On three-point functions in ABJM and the latitude Wilson loop,JHEP 10(2020) 075, [2005.09522]

    arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    P. A. Baikov and K. G. Chetyrkin,Four Loop Massless Propagators: An Algebraic Evaluation of All Master Integrals,Nucl. Phys. B837(2010) 186–220, [1004.1153]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  77. [77]

    R. N. Lee, A. V. Smirnov and V. A. Smirnov,Master Integrals for Four-Loop Massless Propagators up to Transcendentality Weight Twelve,Nucl. Phys. B856(2012) 95–110, [1108.0732]. – 30 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012