Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 46 references

A universal hydrodynamic transition in confined marine invertebrate larvae

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ciliated larvae between glass plates show a universal hydrodynamic vortex transition: two vortices under weak confinement, proliferating vortices under strong confinement, set by local protrusions rather than body plan.

desk verdict The experimental vortex-proliferation curve is real and worth publishing; the Stokeslet explanation is fitted to the data, so the universal mechanism is a hypothesis, not a result. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11744 v3 pith:5O7BMSHC submitted 2025-01-20 physics.flu-dyn physics.bio-phq-bio.QM

Bikram D. Shrestha , Santhan Chandragiri , Christian D. Gibson , Nina R. Couture , Melissa Ruszczyk , Vivek N. Prakash This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.bio-phq-bio.QM
keywords marineinvertebratelarvaeciliaryflowsconfinementvortexproliferationStokesletsquasi-2DflowechinodermlowReynoldsnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies millimeter-scale ciliated larvae of sea stars and sea urchins trapped between a slide and coverslip, as in standard microscope preparation. It claims that confinement itself drives a universal hydrodynamic transition: at weak squeeze (chamber height near larva depth) every larva produces the same two-vortex flow, while at strong squeeze (chamber height below one-third of larva depth) vortices proliferate, with the number set by local morphological features—arm tips, protrusions, sharp curvature changes—rather than by body plan. A low-Reynolds-number model based on superposition of trapped Stokeslets reproduces the observed flows. If correct, the result gives a unified explanation for why quasi-2D microscope flows of ciliated organisms look so different from tethered or free-swimming flows, and makes vortex count a quantitative readout of confinement strength and local anatomy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the confined Stokeslet pair: a point-force solution to slow viscous flow placed between two parallel no-slip walls, whose quasi-2D velocity field is obtained through the Brinkman approximation with the chamber height H setting the screening length. The paper superposes unit Stokeslets at experimentally identified local vorticity sources—arm tips, protrusions, and convex curvature changes—and shows that the number and arrangement of vortices in the resulting field follows the confinement strength. The mechanism is a size competition: stronger confinement increases wall friction, shrinks the dominant vortex pair, and gives suppressed secondary vortex pairs room to appear, producing vortex proliferation.

What would settle it

Record ciliary beat frequency, stroke amplitude, and beat direction at H/c = 1, H/c about 0.5, and H/c below one-third in the same larval species using high-speed microscopy. If these change systematically with the gap height, the vortex transition is at least partly behavioral and the universality claim fails; if they stay constant while vortex count rises, the hydrodynamic mechanism is confirmed. A complementary check is to repeat the experiment with a mechanical ciliated mimic whose forcing is fixed and known.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that vortex number around ciliated larvae is not an intrinsic property of the organism but a function of squeeze confinement H/c, where H is the gap between the plates and c is the larva's vertical depth. As the gap shrinks, wall friction shrinks the dominant vortex pair and releases additional vortex pairs whose sources were always present at morphological sites such as arm tips, protrusions, and convex curvature changes. This is why weak confinement converges to two vortices for all three larval types, strong confinement yields four vortices for the early sea star and six for the late sea star and sea urchin, and the most complex morphologies reach up to nine vortices at H/c around 0.2. A Stokeslet-superposition model with force points placed at those local sites captures the experimental fields qualitatively, with velocity decays between v~$r^{{-1}}$ and v~$r^{{-0.5}}$ that reflect the low-to-intermediate Reynolds regime (Re about 0.1 to 0.9).

Load-bearing premise

The claim that vortex proliferation is a universal hydrodynamic response assumes that squeezing the larva does not change how its cilia beat; if ciliary forcing itself is altered by the gap height, the observed transition could be behavioral rather than purely physical.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Microscope-based flow studies of ciliated larvae must report the confinement ratio H/c; otherwise vortex counts, flow speeds, and vortex positions are not comparable across organisms or laboratories.
  • Local anatomy is predictive: every arm tip, protrusion, or sharp convex curvature change is a potential vorticity source, so vortex count under strong confinement can be estimated from images of the larva alone.
  • Wall friction increases with confinement, so both flow speed and vortex distance from the body decrease roughly linearly as H/c drops, reorganizing the feeding current closer to the body.
  • The two-vortex weak-confinement state is a universal attractor across the three body plans studied, meaning the intrinsic larval flow is simpler than earlier multi-vortex microscope images suggested.
  • The same Stokeslet-superposition framework can predict confinement-induced flows for other ciliated organisms with complex forms, from micro- to milli-length scales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because local protrusions act as vorticity sources, other ciliated organisms with pronounced protrusions—such as Vorticella, Stentor, or coral polyps—should show the same confinement-driven proliferation; testing a smooth-bodied ciliate at matched H/c would isolate morphology from body plan.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's model neglects inertia while the experiments reach Re near 0.9; adding an Oseen correction should steepen the predicted velocity decay, and the crossover near Re equal to one could be measured directly by changing fluid viscosity.
  • Editorial inference: vortex-count thresholds could be repurposed as a non-invasive morphological assay, for example detecting arm-bud emergence or chemically induced malformations in larvae, since new protrusions unlock new vortex pairs only when confinement is strong enough.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. Shrestha et al. report an experimental and theoretical study of quasi-2D squeeze-confined flows around three types of echinoderm larvae (early and late sea star, sea urchin). They find that under weak confinement (H/c near 1) all larval types generate two vortices, while under strong confinement (H/c < 1/3) the vortex number increases to 4–9, with the specific number depending on larval morphology. They model the flows with superposed Stokeslets between parallel plates (Eq. 3) and propose a framework in which local morphological features (arm tips, protrusions, convex curvature changes) act as localized vorticity sources whose visibility is controlled by wall friction. The paper argues that this transition is universal across body plans and relevant to ciliated micro-organisms generally.

Significance. If the universal transition is established, this would be an important contribution to biological fluid dynamics: it would explain the long-standing discrepancy between tethered and squeeze-confined larval flow observations and link form–function relationships in ciliated larvae to a confinement-controlled hydrodynamic mechanism. The experimental dataset is substantial, covering three larval types, a wide range of confinement heights (50–850 µm), and multiple quantitative metrics (vortex number, speed, circulation, vortex size, distance to body), with nonparametric statistics applied appropriately. The 'local morphological sources' hypothesis is supported by qualitative experimental evidence, especially in Fig. 3 where weak vorticity patches at protrusions and arm tips are visible under weak confinement and grow as confinement increases. However, the paper's theoretical validation is currently circular because the Stokeslet number and placement are taken from the experimental vortex pattern, and the quantitative comparisons show systematic discrepancies in magnitude and decay scaling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods: Theoretical model for confinement-induced flows; Results: Experimental and Theoretical Flow Quantification] The theoretical model is circular as a test of the mechanism. The Methods state: 'A unit Stokeslet is used to model the flow field corresponding to a single vortex. To account for the multiple vortices that are developed in the experiments, we superpose multiple Stokeslets (corresponding to each vortex) on the same physical locations on the larval body (determined from experiments).' Thus the number and placement of Stokeslets are inputs taken from the experimental vortex pattern being explained, so Eq. (3) cannot independently predict the two-to-multiple-vortex transition. To support the claimed mechanism, the authors should either (a) prescribe Stokeslet count and positions a priori from morphology (arm tips, protrusions, convex curvature changes) and show that varying H in Eq. (3) produces two resolved vortices at H/c near 1 and four to six/nine at H/c below 1/3, or (b) explicitly reframe the model as a schematic/illustrative tool and rest the mechanism claim on the experimental evidence in Fig. 3. As written, the statement that the model 'captured' the observations overstates its evidential value.
  2. [Results: Experimental and Theoretical Flow Quantification, Fig. 2g–j] The quantitative comparison between theory and experiment shows systematic discrepancies that are acknowledged in the text but not reconciled with the paper's stronger claims. The text states: 'Our theoretical model captures the experimental velocity decay trends reasonably well, but not the magnitudes' and that experimental decays 'more closely follow the v∼r^-0.5 decay,' while a point force confined between two no-slip walls is stated to give v∼r^-2. Given these mismatches, statements such as 'excellent agreement' (Fig. 2b,d captions) and 'captured ... very well' (Results) overstate performance. The authors should provide quantitative error metrics (e.g., relative velocity errors per vortex pair), correct the overstatements, and clarify which decay scaling the model actually predicts for the geometry used.
  3. [Discussion, Limitations paragraph] The universality claim depends on the assumption that 'squeeze-confinement does not substantially affect local ciliary beating in our experiments,' but no evidence is presented to rule out a behavioral response. If ciliary forcing changes with H, the vortex-number transition could be behavioral rather than a purely hydrodynamic response to confinement. A concrete test would be to measure ciliary beat frequency or near-field forcing at different H (e.g., high-speed imaging of ciliary bands or particle tracking close to the ciliated surface), or to use non-living/heat-killed larvae under identical confinement. Without such a control, the claim that the transition is a universal hydrodynamic mechanism needs to be softened.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Results, section on strong confinement in late stage sea star] The text says 'six vortices under strong confinement (2/3 ≤ H/c ≤ 1, Fig. 1d, Fig. 2d)', but 2/3 ≤ H/c ≤ 1 is defined as weak confinement; this should read 0 ≤ H/c < 1/3.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (2)] The operators ∇xy and ∇²xy are not defined; please define them explicitly (e.g., in-plane gradient and Laplacian in the x-y plane).
  3. [Results, Fig. 2g–j] The text states that the expected decay for a point source between walls is v∼r^-2, yet the model curves are described as decaying as v∼r^-1 and v∼r^-0.5. Please reconcile this inconsistency and label the plotted scaling lines accordingly.
  4. [Fig. 3d,e and Extended Data Fig. 5] The vortex-diameter measurements are described as 'jittered' and thresholded, but no sample sizes, confidence intervals, or threshold-robustness analysis are provided. Please add these details so that the claimed decrease of Pair 1 size and increase of Pair 2/3 size can be evaluated.
  5. [Results, first paragraph of 'Confinement-induced flows...'] There is a typo: 'with with extended rigid arms' should read 'with extended rigid arms'.
  6. [Data and code availability] The statements say 'link to be provided after completion of peer review'; for a quantitative study of this type, deposition before acceptance would be expected to allow reproducibility assessment.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Stokeslet model reproduces vortex counts and locations by construction; the central mechanism claim is fitted, not independently predicted.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods, 'Theoretical model for confinement-induced flows']
    "A unit Stokeslet is used to model the flow field corresponding to a single vortex. To account for the multiple vortices that are developed in the experiments, we superpose multiple Stokeslets (corresponding to each vortex) on the same physical locations on the larval body (determined from experiments) and obtain the resultant theoretical velocity field."

    The model's vortex count and vortex-center locations are inputs taken from the very experimental flow fields the model is said to capture. Since each Stokeslet corresponds to one observed vortex and is placed on the larval body at a position 'determined from experiments,' the theoretical flow field necessarily reproduces the experimental vortex topology. The subsequent claim that local morphological features act as vorticity sources is therefore not independently tested: the features were selected because vortices were already seen there in the same experiments. The only partially independent output is the velocity-decay shape, which the paper itself describes as agreeing only qualitatively with experiments.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Results, 'Experimental and Theoretical Flow Quantification']
    "We input values for the force (F) and chamber height (H) corresponding to experiments into the theoretical model to compare the experimental flow-field results (Methods, Supplementary Information)."

    The Stokeslet strength F is an adjustable amplitude matched to the experimental flows, so the velocity-magnitude comparisons are fitted rather than predicted; H is a genuine experimental control, but F is not fixed a priori. Thus the model's 'good agreement' in velocity magnitude is partly guaranteed by the fitted force, and the remaining independent content is limited to the decay shape, which the paper concedes is not quantitatively captured.

full rationale

The core experimental observation—two vortices under weak confinement and more vortices under strong confinement across all three larval types—is independent and not circular. The circularity lies in the theoretical validation of the proposed mechanism: the Stokeslet model is explicitly constructed by placing one Stokeslet per experimentally observed vortex at experimentally determined positions, so the resulting vortex count and locations are guaranteed by construction rather than derived from morphology or from the confinement parameter alone. This is a fitted re-description of the experimental flow fields with Green's functions, not a parameter-free prediction of the vortex-number transition. The paper is honest that the model is only qualitatively accurate and that quantitative velocity decay is not captured; nevertheless, the central mechanistic claim that local morphological features control vorticity proliferation is not independently supported by the model as presented. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present: the theoretical basis cites Liron and Mochon and Mondal et al., not the authors' own prior results, so the self-citation rules do not raise the score further. The limitation about unchanged ciliary beating is an empirical assumption that weakens the mechanistic interpretation, but it is not itself a circularity. Overall, the experimental phenomenology stands, but the model-derived mechanism reduces by construction to its inputs, giving a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of experimental observations and a model whose ingredients (Stokeslet count and positions) are chosen from the data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Stokeslet number and positions = Selected per larva and confinement: e.g., early sea star: 2 pairs (weak), 2 pairs (strong); late sea star: 2 pairs…
    The number of Stokeslets and their locations on the larval body are chosen from the experimental vortex locations and morphological features (Methods: 'on the same physical locations on the larval body (determined from experiments)'). This makes the vortex count in the model a fitted output, not a prediction.
  • Stokeslet force magnitude F = 1 (unit)
    The model uses a unit Stokeslet per vortex, so it does not predict absolute velocity magnitudes. The authors acknowledge magnitudes do not match experiments (velocity decay captures trends but not magnitudes).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Stokes equation and Brinkman approximation with no-slip parallel plates
    Used in Methods Eqs. (1)-(2), following the established model of Liron & Mochon and Mondal et al.
  • domain assumption Quasi-2D mid-plane flow is representative of the full 3D flow
    The authors focus on z=H/2 and show limited comparison across z-planes (Extended Data Fig. 2), but only for two cases.
  • ad hoc to paper Ciliary bands can be represented as discrete point forces (Stokeslets)
    The distributed ciliary forcing is collapsed to point forces at morphological features; this is a strong simplification not derived from the ciliary anatomy.
  • domain assumption Confinement does not change ciliary beating
    Stated in Limitations: 'we have assumed that squeeze-confinement does not substantially affect local ciliary beating'.
  • domain assumption Inertial effects are small enough for Stokes-flow model to be qualitatively valid at Re 0.1-0.9
    The authors note Re ~ 0.1-0.9 and admit the Stokes model does not work quantitatively because it omits inertia; the qualitative agreement is taken as sufficient.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A universal hydrodynamic transition in confined marine invertebrate larvae." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5O7BMSHC

@misc{pith2026250111744,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A universal hydrodynamic transition in confined marine invertebrate larvae},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5O7BMSHC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11744}
}
read the original abstract

The ocean is teeming with a myriad of mm-sized invertebrate planktonic larvae, which thrive in a viscous fluid environment. Many of them rely on ciliary beating to generate fluid flows for locomotion and feeding. Their larval forms, local morphologies, and ciliation patterns exhibit remarkable diversity, producing intricate and dynamic 3D flows that are notoriously difficult to characterize in laboratory settings. Traditional microscopic imaging techniques typically involve gently squeeze-confining the soft larvae between a glass slide and cover slip to study their flows in quasi-2D. However, a comprehensive hydrodynamic framework for the low-to-intermediate Reynolds number (<1) flows in quasi-2D confinement, particularly in light of their complex forms, has remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate that vortices around larvae proliferate with increasing confinement and illuminate the underlying physical mechanism. We experimentally quantify confinement-induced flows in larvae of sea stars and sea urchins. The flows exhibited strikingly universal patterns: under weak confinement, all larvae generated two vortices, whereas under strong confinement, the number of generated vortices significantly increased. The experimental observations were well captured by a low Reynolds number theoretical model based on the superposition of confined Stokeslets. Building on experiments and theory, we developed a comprehensive framework for confinement-induced flows, which suggests that vorticity dynamics are primarily determined by local morphological features, rather than solely the body plan. Our work provides fundamental insights into form-functional relationships between larval morphology and flow generation. Our findings are broadly applicable to understanding flows generated by a wide range of ciliated organisms with complex forms and morphologies, from micro- to milli-length-scales.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2020)

    Sardet, C.: Plankton: Wonders of the Drifting World. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Reports on progress in physics 72(9), 096601 (2009)

    Lauga, E., Powers, T.R.: The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Reports on progress in physics 72(9), 096601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Nature Reviews Physics 2(2), 74–88 (2020)

    Gilpin, W., Bull, M.S., Prakash, M.: The multiscale physics of cilia and flagella. Nature Reviews Physics 2(2), 74–88 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    American Zoologist31(4), 707–725 (1991)

    Emlet, R.B.: Functional constraints on the evolution of larval forms of marine invertebrates: experimental and comparative evidence. American Zoologist31(4), 707–725 (1991)

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    Nature Physics 13(4), 380–386 (2017)

    Gilpin, W., Prakash, V.N., Prakash, M.: Vortex arrays and ciliary tangles underlie the feeding–swimming trade-off in starfish larvae. Nature Physics 13(4), 380–386 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Journal of Engineering Mathematics 10(4), 287–303 (1976)

    Liron, N., Mochon, S.: Stokes flow for a stokeslet between two parallel flat plates. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 10(4), 287–303 (1976)

    work page 1976

  7. [7]

    Elife 10, 67663 (2021) 20

    Mondal, D., Prabhune, A.G., Ramaswamy, S., Sharma, P.: Strong confinement of active microalgae leads to inversion of vortex flow and enhanced mixing. Elife 10, 67663 (2021) 20

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)

    Denny, M.W.: Air and Water: the Biology and Physics of Life’s Media. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)

    work page 1993

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Princeton university press, Princeton (2020)

    Vogel, S.: Life in Moving Fluids: the Physical Biology of Flow-revised and Expanded Second Edition. Princeton university press, Princeton (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Physical Review Fluids 4(11), 110501 (2019)

    Dabiri, J.O.: Landmarks and frontiers in biological fluid dynamics. Physical Review Fluids 4(11), 110501 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Nature Physics 19(12), 1744– 1745 (2023)

    Wan, K.Y.: Life through the fluid dynamics lens. Nature Physics 19(12), 1744– 1745 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Integrative and comparative biology 61(5), 1674–1688 (2021)

    Byron, M.L., Murphy, D.W., Katija, K., Hoover, A.P., Daniels, J., Garayev, K., Takagi, D., Kanso, E., Gemmell, B.J., Ruszczyk, M., et al.: Metachronal motion across scales: current challenges and future directions. Integrative and comparative biology 61(5), 1674–1688 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Physical Review Fluids 2(9), 090501 (2017)

    Gilpin, W., Prakash, V.N., Prakash, M.: Dynamic vortex arrays created by starfish larvae. Physical Review Fluids 2(9), 090501 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 56(1), 119–145 (2024)

    Ishikawa, T.: Fluid dynamics of squirmers and ciliated microorganisms. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 56(1), 119–145 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7(46), 851–862 (2010)

    Pepper, R.E., Roper, M., Ryu, S., Matsudaira, P., Stone, H.A.: Nearby boundaries create eddies near microscopic filter feeders. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7(46), 851–862 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Biophysical journal 105(8), 1796–1804 (2013)

    Pepper, R.E., Roper, M., Ryu, S., Matsumoto, N., Nagai, M., Stone, H.A.: A new angle on microscopic suspension feeders near boundaries. Biophysical journal 105(8), 1796–1804 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Nature Physics, 1–8 (2025)

    Shekhar, S., Guo, H., Colin, S.P., Marshall, W., Kanso, E., Costello, J.H.: Coop- erative hydrodynamics accompany multicellular-like colonial organization in the unicellular ciliate stentor. Nature Physics, 1–8 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(37), 13391–13396 (2014)

    Shapiro, O.H., Fernandez, V.I., Garren, M., Guasto, J.S., Debaillon-Vesque, F.P., Kramarsky-Winter, E., Vardi, A., Stocker, R.: Vortical ciliary flows actively enhance mass transport in reef corals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(37), 13391–13396 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Current Biology 32(19), 998–1000 (2022)

    Kiel, P.M., Prakash, V.N.: Coral physiology: Going with the ciliary flow. Current Biology 32(19), 998–1000 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Nature Physics 20(10), 1679–1686 (2024)

    Ling, F., Essock-Burns, T., McFall-Ngai, M., Katija, K., Nawroth, J.C., Kanso, E.: Flow physics guides morphology of ciliated organs. Nature Physics 20(10), 1679–1686 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Marine ecology progress series

    Emlet, R.B.: Flow fields around ciliated larvae: Effects of natural and artificial 21 tethers. Marine ecology progress series. Oldendorf 63(2), 211–225 (1990)

    1990

  14. [22]

    Journal of Experimental Biology 210(2), 299–310 (2007)

    Catton, K.B., Webster, D.R., Brown, J., Yen, J.: Quantitative analysis of teth- ered and free-swimming copepodid flow fields. Journal of Experimental Biology 210(2), 299–310 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 806, 35–70 (2016)

    Mathijssen, A.J., Doostmohammadi, A., Yeomans, J.M., Shendruk, T.N.: Hydro- dynamics of micro-swimmers in films. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 806, 35–70 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Nature Physics 13(6), 520–521 (2017)

    Dassow, G., Emlet, R., Gr¨ unbaum, D.: Boundary effects on currents around ciliated larvae. Nature Physics 13(6), 520–521 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Nature Physics 13(6), 521–522 (2017)

    Gilpin, W., Prakash, V.N., Prakash, M.: Reply to’boundary effects on currents around ciliated larvae’. Nature Physics 13(6), 521–522 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Physical Review Letters 123(24), 248102 (2019)

    Jeanneret, R., Pushkin, D.O., Polin, M.: Confinement enhances the diversity of microbial flow fields. Physical Review Letters 123(24), 248102 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Elife 11, 76519 (2022)

    Bentley, S.A., Laeverenz-Schlogelhofer, H., Anagnostidis, V., Cammann, J., Mazza, M.G., Gielen, F., Wan, K.Y.: Phenotyping single-cell motility in microflu- idic confinement. Elife 11, 76519 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Integrative and Comparative Biology 63(6), 1485–1508 (2023)

    Bondoc-Naumovitz, K.G., Laeverenz-Schlogelhofer, H., Poon, R.N., Boggon, A.K., Bentley, S.A., Cortese, D., Wan, K.Y.: Methods and measures for investigat- ing microscale motility. Integrative and Comparative Biology 63(6), 1485–1508 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Physical Review Fluids 8(12), 123103 (2023)

    Selvan, S.A., Duck, P.W., Pihler-Puzovi´ c, D., Brumley, D.R.: Point torque representations of ciliary flows. Physical Review Fluids 8(12), 123103 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Radhakrishnan, B., Purushothaman, A., Dey, R., Thampi, S.P.: Confinement induced three-dimensional trajectories of microswimmers in rectangular channels

    N. Radhakrishnan, B., Purushothaman, A., Dey, R., Thampi, S.P.: Confinement induced three-dimensional trajectories of microswimmers in rectangular channels. Physical Review Fluids 9(8), 083302 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Nature Methods 17(10), 1040–1051 (2020)

    Krishnamurthy, D., Li, H., Rey, F., Cambournac, P., Larson, A.G., Li, E., Prakash, M.: Scale-free vertical tracking microscopy. Nature Methods 17(10), 1040–1051 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Journal of Experimental Biology 220(19), 3411–3418 (2017)

    Gilpin, W., Prakash, V.N., Prakash, M.: Flowtrace: simple visualization of coher- ent structures in biological fluid flows. Journal of Experimental Biology 220(19), 3411–3418 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Journal of open research software 2(1), 30 (2014) 22

    Stamhuis, E., Thielicke, W.: Pivlab–towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in matlab. Journal of open research software 2(1), 30 (2014) 22

    2014

  26. [34]

    Aquatic Ecology 40(4), 463–479 (2006)

    Stamhuis, E.J.: Basics and principles of particle image velocimetry (piv) for map- ping biogenic and biologically relevant flows. Aquatic Ecology 40(4), 463–479 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    applications to electron microscopy

    Mazia, D., Schatten, G., Sale, W.: Adhesion of cells to surfaces coated with polylysine. applications to electron microscopy. The Journal of cell biology 66(1), 198–200 (1975)

    1975

  28. [36]

    Nature 607(7918), 287–293 (2022)

    Tan, T.H., Mietke, A., Li, J., Chen, Y., Higinbotham, H., Foster, P.J., Gokhale, S., Dunkel, J., Fakhri, N.: Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals. Nature 607(7918), 287–293 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Communications Physics 7(1), 93 (2024)

    B´ ardfalvy, D.,ˇSkult´ ety, V., Nardini, C., Morozov, A., Stenhammar, J.: Collective motion in a sheet of microswimmers. Communications Physics 7(1), 93 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Developmental Biology 525, 139–154 (2025)

    Lion, A.T., Bodine, S.M., McCutcheon, K.R., Ghogale, M., Chandragiri, S., Abayawardena, D., Shrestha, B.D., Descoteaux, A., Alvarez, K., Balkman, J.A., Cocke, B., Wikramanayake, A.H., Schlezinger, J., Wong, J.Y., Prakash, V.N., Bradham, C.A.: Pfas compounds pfoa and gen x are ...

    2025

  31. [39]

    Science 345(6193), 144– 145 (2014)

    Law, K.L., Thompson, R.C.: Microplastics in the seas. Science 345(6193), 144– 145 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Environmental Pollution 245, 98–110 (2019)

    Botterell, Z.L., Beaumont, N., Dorrington, T., Steinke, M., Thompson, R.C., Lin- deque, P.K.: Bioavailability and effects of microplastics on marine zooplankton: A review. Environmental Pollution 245, 98–110 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(35), 2304519120 (2023)

    Cui, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, T., Toonder, J.M.: Miniaturized metachronal magnetic artificial cilia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(35), 2304519120 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    The American Naturalist 111(981), 981–994 (1977)

    Rubenstein, D.I., Koehl, M.A.: The mechanisms of filter feeding: some theoretical considerations. The American Naturalist 111(981), 981–994 (1977)

    1977

  35. [43]

    Nature Reviews Bioengineering 1(4), 236–251 (2023)

    Urso, M., Ussia, M., Pumera, M.: Smart micro-and nanorobots for water purification. Nature Reviews Bioengineering 1(4), 236–251 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Nature communications 12(1), 6455 (2021)

    Dillinger, C., Nama, N., Ahmed, D.: Ultrasound-activated ciliary bands for microrobotic systems inspired by starfish. Nature communications 12(1), 6455 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Chemical Reviews 122(5), 5365–5403 (2021)

    Soto, F., Karshalev, E., Zhang, F., Avila, B., Nourhani, A., Wang, J.: Smart materials for microrobots. Chemical Reviews 122(5), 5365–5403 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    bioRxiv, 2024–12 (2024) 23 Extended Data Fig

    Barone, V., Coronado, L., Ismail, D., Fiaz, S., Lyons, D.C.: Advances in culturing of the sea star patiria miniata. bioRxiv, 2024–12 (2024) 23 Extended Data Fig. 1: Fluid flow vortices around ciliated marine lar- vae under moderate squeeze confinement in experiments. Left pane...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.