The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2502.16444 · v1 · pith:5OYU4W3Z · submitted 2025-02-23 · physics.flu-dyn · cs.LG· physics.ao-ph

Update hydrological states or meteorological forcings? Comparing data assimilation methods for differentiable hydrologic models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5OYU4W3Zrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification physics.flu-dyn cs.LGphysics.ao-ph
keywords datamodelsstatesdifferentiablelstmmethodsnetworksvariational
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Data assimilation (DA) enables hydrologic models to update their internal states using near-real-time observations for more accurate forecasts. With deep neural networks like long short-term memory (LSTM), using either lagged observations as inputs (called "data integration") or variational DA has shown success in improving forecasts. However, it is unclear which methods are performant or optimal for physics-informed machine learning ("differentiable") models, which represent only a small amount of physically-meaningful states while using deep networks to supply parameters or missing processes. Here we developed variational DA methods for differentiable models, including optimizing adjusters for just precipitation data, just model internal hydrological states, or both. Our results demonstrated that differentiable streamflow models using the CAMELS dataset can benefit strongly and equivalently from variational DA as LSTM, with one-day lead time median Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) elevated from 0.75 to 0.82. The resulting forecast matched or outperformed LSTM with DA in the eastern, northwestern, and central Great Plains regions of the conterminous United States. Both precipitation and state adjusters were needed to achieve these results, with the latter being substantially more effective on its own, and the former adding moderate benefits for high flows. Our DA framework does not need systematic training data and could serve as a practical DA scheme for whole river networks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.