Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Feature Selection Methods for Uplift Modeling and Heterogeneous Treatment Effect

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.03447 v2 pith:5PPLZVJ6 submitted 2020-05-05 cs.LG stat.MEstat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.MEstat.ML
keywords methodsupliftfeaturemodelingselectionmodelsproposedavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Uplift modeling is a causal learning technique that estimates subgroup-level treatment effects. It is commonly used in industry and elsewhere for tasks such as targeting ads. In a typical setting, uplift models can take thousands of features as inputs, which is costly and results in problems such as overfitting and poor model interpretability. Consequently, there is a need to select a subset of the most important features for modeling. However, traditional methods for doing feature selection are not fit for the task because they are designed for standard machine learning models whose target is importantly different from uplift models. To address this, we introduce a set of feature selection methods explicitly designed for uplift modeling, drawing inspiration from statistics and information theory. We conduct empirical evaluations on the proposed methods on publicly available datasets, demonstrating the advantages of the proposed methods compared to traditional feature selection. We make the proposed methods publicly available as a part of the CausalML open-source package.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools