Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Demographics-Informed Neural Network for Multi-Modal Spatiotemporal forecasting of Urban Growth and Travel Patterns Using Satellite Imagery

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A joint satellite-imagery and census model forecasts future urban land use, demographics, and travel behavior together, reporting higher structural similarity and much lower demographic error than two recurrent baselines.

desk verdict Useful dataset and a reasonable idea, but the evaluation is not interpretable: no split described, no persistence baseline, a 2012 Landsat 8 impossibility, and an unfair demo-loss comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12456 v2 pith:5PV6AYLH submitted 2025-06-14 cs.CV

Eugene Kofi Okrah Denteh , Andrews Danyo , Joshua Kofi Asamoah , Blessing Agyei Kyem , Armstrong Aboah This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords urbangrowthforecastingsatelliteimagerydemographics-informedneuralnetworktravelbehaviorpredictionspatiotemporalgatedresidualconnectionsAmericanCommunitySurveyLandsat8
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that urban forecasting gets better when a model is forced to keep satellite imagery and socio-demographic data consistent with each other, instead of predicting pixels alone. It proposes an encoder-decoder network with temporal gated residual connections that takes sequences of Landsat imagery plus county-level demographic vectors and predicts the next year's image, demographics, and travel behavior as one joint task. A demographic predictor reads the generated image and checks it against the target demographic vector, while a travel-behavior predictor reuses the demographic encoder; on the authors' U.S. county dataset this loop reaches SSIM 0.8342 and a demographic error of 0.14, compared with 0.95 and 0.96 for the two recurrent baselines. If the result holds, planners would have a way to test how development scenarios shift population composition and travel demand before building infrastructure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a demographic-consistency loop around a gated encoder-decoder. Temporal gated residual connections compute, at each decoder level, a gate from encoder and decoder features so the decoder can choose which spatial information to carry forward; the demographic predictor then decodes the generated image back into demographic variables, so the image loss is coupled to demographic plausibility. A semantic loss keeps the demographic predictor's latent representation aligned with the image bottleneck, and the travel-behavior predictor reuses the frozen demographic encoder to tie mobility outputs to the same representation.

What would settle it

Run the published dataset through a strict chronological split - train only on 2012-2018 imagery and demographics, test only on 2022-2023, with no county appearing in both sets - and recompute SSIM and demo-loss; if the demo-loss gap of 0.14 versus 0.95 disappears or SSIM falls to baseline levels, the claimed consistency advantage is a leakage artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that built environment, demographics, and travel behavior co-evolve and should be predicted as one bidirectional problem, not as separate tasks. The DINN architecture concatenates the input image sequence along the channel dimension, encodes it with DenseNet-style blocks, fuses the result with an MLP embedding of the demographic sequence at the bottleneck, and decodes through gated residual connections that selectively pass encoder features. A demographic predictor regresses the future demographic vector from the generated image, tying pixel generation to demographic fidelity, and a semantic loss aligns the demographic decoder's latent representation with the bottleneck features. On the authors' dataset of 825 U.S. counties with annual ACS data and Landsat 8 median composites from 2012 to 2023 (excluding 2020), the full model reports SSIM 0.8342 and demo-loss 0.14, beating the adapted PredRNN-V2 (0.8218, 0.95) and E3DLSTM (0.8146, 0.96) baselines. The demographic predictor accounts for about 80 percent of demographic variance ($R^2 = 0.799$) and the travel behavior predictor reaches $R^2 = 0.911$, which the authors interpret as quantitative evidence for co-evolutionary urban development.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison rests on the unstated train/test split: if the same county or overlapping years appear in both training and testing, the model could memorize temporal patterns instead of forecasting them, inflating the reported SSIM and demo-loss numbers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A planner could feed the model historical imagery and census data for a county and obtain a joint forecast of next year's land cover, population composition, and commute patterns.
  • Because the demographic predictor recovers education, race, and age from imagery, the model offers a remote-sensing-based proxy for census variables in years or regions where survey data are missing.
  • The demographic-consistency loss is what separates this model from vision-only baselines; the reported demo-loss gap implies that visual realism alone does not guarantee socially plausible forecasts.
  • The temporal difference heatmaps give a visual audit of where the model expects persistent change, which could be used to flag areas likely to need new infrastructure.
  • The released 2012-2023 dataset pairs Landsat composites with ACS and travel-behavior attributes for 825 counties, providing a longitudinal benchmark for multimodal urban forecasting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test beyond this paper is a strict temporal and geographic holdout - train on years before 2019 and test only on 2022-2023 with counties never seen in training - to separate the consistency mechanism's contribution from any temporal leakage.
  • The same loop could be transferred to other label-sparse settings where imagery is abundant and survey labels are scarce, such as poverty mapping, crop-yield estimation, or energy-demand forecasting.
  • If the bidirectional mapping is as strong as reported, the model could be inverted into a simulator that generates synthetic but demographically consistent future imagery under hypothetical population scenarios.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Demographics-Informed Neural Network (DINN) that jointly predicts future satellite imagery, demographic variables, and travel behavior from sequences of Landsat imagery and ACS county-level data for 825 U.S. counties over 2012-2023. The claimed contributions are a multi-objective loss with a semantic consistency term, a demographic predictor that extracts sociodemographic information from imagery, a travel behavior predictor, and a public dataset. The paper reports SSIM 0.8342, demographic prediction R^2 0.799, travel behavior R^2 0.911, and a demo-loss of 0.14 versus 0.95/0.96 for PredRNN-V2 and E3DLSTM, and interprets these results as validation of co-evolutionary and path-dependency theories of urban development.

Significance. If the reported results were reproducible, the joint modeling of visual, demographic, and travel data would be a useful contribution to urban forecasting, and the public multimodal dataset is a tangible asset. The ablation study and the attempt to connect prediction accuracy to established urban theories are also commendable. However, the current manuscript does not provide credible evidence for its central claim of superior performance, because several load-bearing evaluation and data issues remain unresolved: the train/test split is not described, a persistence baseline is absent, the demographic consistency comparison is confounded by training objective, the Landsat 8 data source is temporally impossible for 2012, and the semantic loss in Eq. (29) appears dimensionally ill-defined.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section IV (Experimental Setup)] No train/test split is described anywhere in the manuscript. The dataset is a panel of 825 counties over 11 years (9,075 county-year samples), and all reported test-set claims (Table VI, Figs. 8-11) depend on how these samples are partitioned. If the split is at the sample level, the same county appears in both training and testing with adjacent years, which would allow the model to memorize county-level appearance and demographics. This is load-bearing because the main evidence for the model's superiority is invalid under leakage. The authors must specify the exact split (e.g., held-out years, held-out counties, or both) and report results separately for spatial and temporal generalization.
  2. [Section IV.A.2 (Satellite Imagery Acquisition)] The manuscript states that Landsat 8 Collection 2 Level 2 imagery was acquired for all years 2012-2023, but Landsat 8 was launched in February 2013 and does not provide imagery for 2012. This is a factual inconsistency that affects the validity of the dataset for the first year of the study. Please clarify whether another sensor (e.g., Landsat 7) was used for 2012, or state the actual data source; otherwise the dataset cannot be reproduced.
  3. [Section III.D, Eq. (29)] The semantic consistency loss is dimensionally inconsistent. Eq. (19) defines S(d) as a 512-dimensional vector via AdaptiveAvgPool(B(d)), but Eq. (29) compares Normalize(S(d)) with Normalize(B(d)), where B(d) is the feature map from Eq. (17), which has spatial dimensions and 512 channels. The subtraction in Eq. (29) is therefore not well-defined unless B(d) is first pooled to a vector. Please correct the equation or clarify the intended pooling operation, since this loss is part of the training objective.
  4. [Section VI.D, Table VI] The Demo-loss comparison is not a fair head-to-head comparison. The proposed model is trained with the full multi-objective loss of Eq. (3), which includes Ldemo, whereas the adapted PredRNN-V2 and E3DLSTM baselines are described as having demographic encoders but there is no statement that they were trained with the same demographic loss term. The reported demo-loss gap of 0.14 versus 0.95/0.96 may therefore reflect the training objective rather than architectural superiority. The baselines must be trained with the same loss function, or the comparison should be reported under a common evaluation protocol.
  5. [Sections V and VI] No persistence baseline and no error bars are reported. Given that the imagery changes very subtly year to year (as the authors themselves note in Fig. 5), a persistence baseline that simply copies the previous year's image could achieve a high SSIM, and without it the absolute SSIM value of 0.8342 is not interpretable. Similarly, none of the reported metrics (MSE, SSIM, PSNR, Demo-loss, R^2) include variance across runs or across splits, so it is impossible to assess whether the reported differences are statistically meaningful. Please add a persistence baseline and report mean and standard deviation over multiple seeds or cross-validation folds.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'physiological realism' should presumably read 'physical realism'.
  2. [Section III.D and Table III] The loss weighting notation is inconsistent: Eq. (25) uses α, β, γ, and δ, but Table III reports α as image/demographic weighting and γ as MSE/SSIM weighting, while Eq. (26) uses λ for the image loss composition. Please align the notation.
  3. [Section V.C] The sentence 'The heatmaps uses a blue-yellow-red colormap' should be 'The heatmaps use...'.
  4. [Section VI.C, Table V] The discussion of the PSNR trade-off would benefit from an explicit comparison between Model 5 and Model 1, and the current text does not explain why a lower PSNR is acceptable beyond a qualitative claim about high-frequency error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity found; the model's empirical claims are tested against external baselines, while the unspecified train/test split is a correctness risk rather than a circularity.

full rationale

Walking the paper's derivation chain, the central claims are not equivalent to their inputs by construction. The model's objective, Eq. (25), combines image, demographic, travel, and semantic losses, and the reported SSIM and Demo-loss values are evaluation metrics computed on predicted outputs. There is no equation in which the quantity claimed as a prediction is defined in terms of the fitted parameters, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The demographic-consistency comparison is not circular on its face: although L_demo is a training objective for the proposed model, the baseline models are evaluated with the same metric, and training on a loss does not by itself guarantee a low held-out value. The more serious issue is that the paper never describes the train/test split (Section IV), so temporal or spatial leakage could inflate the reported numbers; however, an unspecified split is an experimental-validity concern, not a circularity. The self-citations in the paper, including references [9] and [22]-[27], are used for context and prior work and are not invoked as load-bearing mathematical justification. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the architecture choice. The change-heatmap formulation in Eq. (36) is a straightforward absolute-difference transform, but presenting it as a methodology is an originality concern rather than a circular derivation. Overall, the paper's claimed results rest on external data and external baselines, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on multiple hand-chosen constants and unvalidated assumptions about data representativeness and split design. The most serious assumption is the availability of Landsat 8 data in 2012, which is false and undermines the dataset timeline. No new theoretical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Loss weight alpha (image) = 0.7
    Manual weighting in L_total (Eq 25); not derived. beta=0.3; gamma and delta not reported.
  • Image loss composition lambda = 0.7 (MSE), 0.3 (SSIM)
    Manual trade-off in Eq 26.
  • AOI spatial extent = 10 km^2
    Fixed patch around county centroid, Section IV-A.2; arbitrary and affects imagery content.
  • Satellite image scaling gamma = 1.4
    Applied in Eq 34 for visual contrast; chosen by hand.
  • Cloud cover thresholds = 20% (relaxed 50%)
    Image selection filters in Section IV-A.2; affect median composites.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Landsat 8 Collection 2 imagery exists for all years 2012-2023.
    Stated in Section IV-A.2, but Landsat 8 launched in 2013; 2012 data cannot exist.
  • domain assumption A 10km x 10km patch around the county centroid represents the county's built environment and demographics.
    Section IV-A.2 defines AOI; no validation against county boundaries.
  • domain assumption Demographic-travel behavior correlation C(d_i, t_i) > tau (Eq 1) holds with an unestimated threshold tau, and bidirectional mappings F_{d->t} and F_{t->d} exist (Eq 2).
    Section III-A; tau is never estimated or validated.
  • domain assumption ACS 1-year estimates are reliable for modeling year-to-year changes.
    Section IV-A.1; small-area 1-year estimates have high margins of error.
  • domain assumption The train/test split prevents temporal leakage.
    No split is described in Section IV, but test accuracy is central to the claims.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Demographics-Informed Neural Network for Multi-Modal Spatiotemporal forecasting of Urban Growth and Travel Patterns Using Satellite Imagery." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5PV6AYLH

@misc{pith2026250612456,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Demographics-Informed Neural Network for Multi-Modal Spatiotemporal forecasting of Urban Growth and Travel Patterns Using Satellite Imagery},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5PV6AYLH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12456}
}
read the original abstract

This study presents a novel demographics informed deep learning framework designed to forecast urban spatial transformations by jointly modeling geographic satellite imagery, socio-demographics, and travel behavior dynamics. The proposed model employs an encoder-decoder architecture with temporal gated residual connections, integrating satellite imagery and demographic data to accurately forecast future spatial transformations. The study also introduces a demographics prediction component which ensures that predicted satellite imagery are consistent with demographic features, significantly enhancing physiological realism and socioeconomic accuracy. The framework is enhanced by a proposed multi-objective loss function complemented by a semantic loss function that balances visual realism with temporal coherence. The experimental results from this study demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed model compared to state-of-the-art models, achieving higher structural similarity (SSIM: 0.8342) and significantly improved demographic consistency (Demo-loss: 0.14 versus 0.95 and 0.96 for baseline models). Additionally, the study validates co-evolutionary theories of urban development, demonstrating quantifiable bidirectional influences between built environment characteristics and population patterns. The study also contributes a comprehensive multimodal dataset pairing satellite imagery sequences (2012-2023) with corresponding demographic and travel behavior attributes, addressing existing gaps in urban and transportation planning resources by explicitly connecting physical landscape evolution with socio-demographic patterns.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12456 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Overall Architecture of Demographics Informed Neural Network (DINN) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Satellite Image Prediction Architecture with Gated Residual Connec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Demographic Prediction Network Architecture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Travel Behavior Prediction Network Architecture, showing the frozen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temporal sequences of sample satellite imagery (2012-2018) demonstrating the subtle, progressive nature of landscape transformations across diverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean Absolute Percentage Change (MAPC) in demographic features between consecutive years (2012-2023). The heatmap reveals stark variability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Progressive Change Detection in Satellite Imagery (2012-2023). The figure illustrates the detection of subtle changes in satellite imagery over an 11-year period. The top row shows the base image from 2012. Each subsequent row represents a comparison between 2012 and a…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Scatter plots of predicted versus actual values for population, sex, age distributions, racial and ethnic demographics. The diagonal red line represents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Scatter plots of predicted versus actual values for educational attainment features. The diagonal red line represents perfect prediction. The green dots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: QQ plots of aggregated image prediction errors for 1-year, 2-year, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Scatter plots of predicted versus actual values for transportation modes, travel times, and vehicle availability metrics. The diagonal red line represents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Infrastructure investment: A review essay,

    E. M. Gramlich, “Infrastructure investment: A review essay,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1176–1196, 1994

    work page 1994

  2. [2]

    How does trans- portation facilitate regional economic development? a heuristic mapping of the literature,

    R. Pokharel, L. Bertolini, and M. te Br ¨ommelstroet, “How does trans- portation facilitate regional economic development? a heuristic mapping of the literature,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspec- tives, vol. 19, p. 100817, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Urban transportation networks resilience: Indicators, disturbances, and assessment methods,

    M. Z. Serdar, M. Koc ¸, and S. G. Al-Ghamdi, “Urban transportation networks resilience: Indicators, disturbances, and assessment methods,” Sustainable Cities and Society , vol. 76, p. 103452, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    An improved resnet50 model for predicting pavement condition index (pci) directly from pavement images,

    A. Danyo, A. Dontoh, and A. Aboah, “An improved resnet50 model for predicting pavement condition index (pci) directly from pavement images,” Road Materials and Pavement Design , pp. 1–18, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Examining the relationship between transportation infrastructure, ur- banization level and rural-urban income gap in china,

    M. Chanieabate, H. He, C. Guo, B. Abrahamgeremew, and Y . Huang, “Examining the relationship between transportation infrastructure, ur- banization level and rural-urban income gap in china,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 10, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    The impact of transportation and informa- tion infrastructure on urban productivity: Evidence from 256 cities in china,

    J. Wan, Q. Xie, and X. Fan, “The impact of transportation and informa- tion infrastructure on urban productivity: Evidence from 256 cities in china,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics , vol. 68, pp. 384– 392, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Impacts of the built environment on activity- travel behavior: Are there differences between public and private housing residents in hong kong?,

    D. Wang and X. Cao, “Impacts of the built environment on activity- travel behavior: Are there differences between public and private housing residents in hong kong?,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 103, pp. 25–35, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Deep hybrid model with satellite imagery: How to combine demand modeling and computer vision for travel behavior analysis?,

    Q. Wang, S. Wang, Y . Zheng, H. Lin, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, and J. Walker, “Deep hybrid model with satellite imagery: How to combine demand modeling and computer vision for travel behavior analysis?,” Trans- portation Research Part B: Methodological , vol. 179, p. 102869, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Integrating travel behavior forecasting and generative mod- eling for predicting future urban mobility and spatial transformations,

    E. Denteh, A. Danyo, J. K. Asamoah, B. A. Kyem, T. Addai, and A. Aboah, “Integrating travel behavior forecasting and generative mod- eling for predicting future urban mobility and spatial transformations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21158 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Non-linear relationship between built environment and active travel: A hybrid model considering spatial heterogeneity,

    L. Liu, Y . Li, D. Gruyer, and M. Tu, “Non-linear relationship between built environment and active travel: A hybrid model considering spatial heterogeneity,” International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Land use-transport interaction modelling: A review of the literature and future research directions,

    R. Acheampong and E. Silva, “Land use-transport interaction modelling: A review of the literature and future research directions,” Journal of Land use and Transport , vol. 8, pp. 1–28, 06 2015

    2015

  4. [12]

    Travel demand modeling and the assessment of environmental impacts: A literature review,

    K. Kim, D. Byrd, and S. Handy, “Travel demand modeling and the assessment of environmental impacts: A literature review,” UC Davis: National Center for Sustainable Transportation , 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    A comparison of static and dynamic traffic assignment under tolls: a study of the dallas-fort worth network,

    S. Boyles, S. V . Ukkusuri, S. T. Waller, and K. M. Kockelman, “A comparison of static and dynamic traffic assignment under tolls: a study of the dallas-fort worth network,” in 85th Annual meeting of the transportation research board, 2006

    2006

  6. [14]

    The multi-temporal urban development spacenet dataset,

    A. V . Etten, D. Hogan, J. Martinez-Manso, J. Shermeyer, N. Weir, and R. Lewis, “The multi-temporal urban development spacenet dataset,” 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Rochester’s inner loop freeway-to-boulevard project: A case study,

    C. Pugh, “Rochester’s inner loop freeway-to-boulevard project: A case study,” 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Metropolitan transportation planning: Lessons from the past, institutions for the future,

    G.-C. S. and, “Metropolitan transportation planning: Lessons from the past, institutions for the future,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 262–276, 2017

    2017

  9. [17]

    A review of public transport economics,

    D. H ¨orcher and A. Tirachini, “A review of public transport economics,” Economics of Transportation , vol. 25, p. 100196, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    The shortcomings of the conven- tional four step travel demand forecasting process,

    M. Mladenovic and A. Trifunovic, “The shortcomings of the conven- tional four step travel demand forecasting process,” Journal of Road and Traffic Engineering, 01 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability,

    S. E. Bibri, J. Krogstie, and M. K ¨arrholm, “Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability,” Developments in the Built Environment , vol. 4, p. 100021, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Sustainable transportation planning, a new academic spe- cialization in the usa,

    C. J. Balsas, “Sustainable transportation planning, a new academic spe- cialization in the usa,” International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    A systematic survey on big data and artificial intelligence algorithms for intelligent transportation system,

    S. Abirami, M. Pethuraj, M. Uthayakumar, and P. Chitra, “A systematic survey on big data and artificial intelligence algorithms for intelligent transportation system,” Case Studies On Transport Policy , p. 101247, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Advancing pavement distress detection in developing countries: A novel deep learning approach with locally-collected datasets,

    B. A. Kyem, E. K. O. Denteh, J. K. Asamoah, K. A. Tutu, and A. Aboah, “Advancing pavement distress detection in developing countries: A novel deep learning approach with locally-collected datasets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05649, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Pavecap: The first multimodal framework for comprehensive pavement condition assessment with dense captioning and pci estimation,

    B. A. Kyem, E. K. O. Denteh, J. K. Asamoah, and A. Aboah, “Pavecap: The first multimodal framework for comprehensive pavement condition assessment with dense captioning and pci estimation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04110, 2024. PREPRINT 18

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Weather- adaptive synthetic data generation for enhanced power line inspection using stargan,

    B. A. Kyem, J. K. Asamoah, Y . Huang, and A. Aboah, “Weather- adaptive synthetic data generation for enhanced power line inspection using stargan,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 193882–193901, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Context-cracknet: A context-aware framework for precise segmentation of tiny cracks in pavement images,

    B. A. Kyem, J. K. Asamoah, and A. Aboah, “Context-cracknet: A context-aware framework for precise segmentation of tiny cracks in pavement images,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14413 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Saam-reflectnet: Sign-aware attention-based multitasking framework for integrated traffic sign detection and retroreflectivity estimation,

    J. K. Asamoah, B. A. Kyem, N.-D. Obeng-Amoako, and A. Aboah, “Saam-reflectnet: Sign-aware attention-based multitasking framework for integrated traffic sign detection and retroreflectivity estimation,” Expert Systems with Applications , p. 128003, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Visual dominance and emerging multimodal approaches in distracted driving detection: A review of machine learning techniques,

    A. Dontoh, S. Ivey, L. Sirbaugh, A. Danyo, and A. Aboah, “Visual dominance and emerging multimodal approaches in distracted driving detection: A review of machine learning techniques,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01973, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Projecting global urban area growth through 2100 based on historical time series data and future shared socioeconomic pathways,

    X. Li, Y . Zhou, J. Eom, S. Yu, and G. R. Asrar, “Projecting global urban area growth through 2100 based on historical time series data and future shared socioeconomic pathways,” Earth’s Future, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 351– 362, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Characteristics and factors influencing the expansion of urban construction land in china,

    X. Zhang and H. Han, “Characteristics and factors influencing the expansion of urban construction land in china,” Scientific Reports , vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16040, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Highway to inequity: the disparate impact of the interstate highway system on poor and minority communities in american cities,

    D. Karas, “Highway to inequity: the disparate impact of the interstate highway system on poor and minority communities in american cities,” New Visions for Public Affairs , vol. 7, no. April, pp. 9–21, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior,

    X. Lu and E. I. Pas, “Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1999

    1999

  24. [32]

    Factors that affect travel behaviour in developing cities: A methodological review,

    M. Mwale, R. Luke, and N. Pisa, “Factors that affect travel behaviour in developing cities: A methodological review,”Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 16, p. 100683, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone,

    N. Gorelick, M. Hancher, M. Dixon, S. Ilyushchenko, D. Thau, and R. Moore, “Google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone,” Remote Sensing of Environment , vol. 202, pp. 18–27, 2017. Big Remotely Sensed Data: tools, applications and experiences

    2017

  26. [34]

    Travel demand and the 3ds: Density, diversity, and design,

    R. Cervero and K. Kockelman, “Travel demand and the 3ds: Density, diversity, and design,” Transportation research part D: Transport and environment, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199–219, 1997

    1997

  27. [35]

    The causes of metropolitan suburban- ization,

    P. Mieszkowski and E. S. Mills, “The causes of metropolitan suburban- ization,” Journal of Economic perspectives , vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 135–147, 1993

    1993

  28. [36]

    “the creative class

    R. Florida, ““the creative class”: from the rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (2002),” in The City Reader , pp. 175–181, Routledge, 2011

    2002

  29. [37]

    American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass,

    D. S. Massey and N. A. Denton, “American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass,” in Social Stratification, Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, Second Edition , pp. 660–670, Routledge, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    W. B. Arthur, Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy . University of michigan Press, 1994

    1994

  31. [39]

    Travel and the built environment: a syn- thesis,

    R. Ewing and R. Cervero, “Travel and the built environment: a syn- thesis,” Transportation research record, vol. 1780, no. 1, pp. 87–114, 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    What about people in regional science,

    T. H ¨agerstrand, “What about people in regional science,” Transport Sociology: Social aspects of transport planning , pp. 143–158, 1970

    1970

  33. [41]

    Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of us cities with a global survey,

    P. W. Newman and J. R. Kenworthy, “Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of us cities with a global survey,” Journal of the American planning association, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 24–37, 1989

    1989

  34. [42]

    Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures,

    B. E. Saelens, J. F. Sallis, and L. D. Frank, “Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures,” Annals of behavioral medicine , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 80–91, 2003

    2003

  35. [43]

    Examining the impacts of residential self- selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies,

    P. L. Mokhtarian and X. Cao, “Examining the impacts of residential self- selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological , vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 204–228, 2008

    2008

  36. [44]

    Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?,

    K. Lucas, “Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?,” Transport policy, vol. 20, pp. 105–113, 2012. VIII. B IOGRAPHY SECTION Eugene Kofi Okrah Denteh Eugene Kofi Okrah Denteh is a first year Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at North Dakota State University (NDSU),...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.