Two channel heat conduction in the superconducting state of the as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys

L. S. Sharath Chandra; M. K. Chattopadhyay; Sabyasachi Paul

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 15 references

Two channel heat conduction in the superconducting state of the as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the experimentally observed excess thermal conductivity in superconducting V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys is the signature of two parallel heat-conduction channels, one superconducting and one normal, with the normal channel…

desk verdict Fresh κ(T) and C(T) data for as-cast V-Zr alloys, but the two-channel model rests on a series-resistivity equation that forbids the claimed normal channel at low T. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10570 v1 pith:5QPJICRK submitted 2019-08-28 cond-mat.supr-con

Sabyasachi Paul , L. S. Sharath Chandra , M. K. Chattopadhyay This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-con

keywords thermalconductivitysuperconductivityV-ZralloysC15LavesphaseheatcapacitymultiphasesuperconductorsBCStheorytwo-channelconduction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports heat capacity and thermal conductivity measurements on as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys and claims that the superconducting state conducts heat far better than the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory would predict. It identifies three superconducting phases from distinct jumps in $C(T)$ — $\beta$-V at 5.4 K, $\gamma$-ZrV$_2$ at 8.2 K, and $\gamma'$-ZrV$_2$ at 8.5 K — together with non-superconducting $\alpha$-Zr and $\beta$-Zr phases. The excess thermal conductivity, the paper argues, is due to these phases forming two parallel channels for heat flow: a superconducting channel and a normal channel that stays open below $T_C$. Fitting the measured $\kappa(T)$ to this two-channel model yields normal-channel weight factors $c$ between 0.95 and 0.8, meaning more than 80% of the heat is carried by the normal channel. This matters because it shows that the phase mixture, not the intrinsic superconducting gap, controls heat transport in these potential high-field superconductor wires.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the parallel-channel model: the measured electronic thermal conductivity is written as a weighted combination of the superconducting BRT contribution and the normal-state electronic contribution, $\kappa_{es} = \kappa_{ei,n} R_{ei}/(cR_{ei} + 1 - c)$, with $c$ the normal-channel weight factor. $R_{ei}(\Delta(T)/k_B T)$ is the BRT ratio of eq. (4), computed with a gap ratio $\Delta/k_B T_C = 1.9$; $\kappa_{ei,n}$ itself is determined by a five-parameter fit to the normal-state data (electron-defect coefficient $A$, electron-phonon coefficient $B$, Debye temperature $\theta_D$, and phonon boundary and point-defect coefficients $N$ and $P$). The model works because the phonon contribution is unchanged below $T_C$ (electron-phonon scattering coefficient $C=0$), so the entire superconducting-state decrease in $\kappa$ is assigned to the electronic term, and any positive deviation from BRT is assigned to the parallel normal path.

What would settle it

Measure the thermal conductivity and heat capacity of an annealed, phase-pure ZrV$_2$ sample over 2-10 K, extract its actual $\Delta/k_B T_C$, and recompute $\kappa_{ei,s}$; if the measured $\kappa_{es}$ still lies above the BRT prediction even when no non-superconducting phases are present, the parallel-channel explanation is falsified. Alternatively, prepare an as-cast sample with a known, deliberately varied volume fraction of the normal $\alpha$-Zr/$\beta$-Zr phases and check that the fitted $c$ tracks that volume fraction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central finding is that the measured electronic thermal conductivity $\kappa_{es}(T)$ in the superconducting state of as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys lies well above the BCS prediction $\kappa_{ei,s}$ computed from the Bardeen-Rickayzen-Tewordt (BRT) ratio $R_{ei} = \kappa_{ei,s}/\kappa_{ei,n}$. The authors attribute this discrepancy to the coexistence of superconducting and non-superconducting phases: $\beta$-V, $\gamma$-ZrV$_2$, and $\gamma'$-ZrV$_2$ go superconducting below 8.5 K, while $\alpha$-Zr and $\beta$-Zr remain normal down to 2 K and therefore provide a parallel conduction path. They express the net electronic thermal conductivity as $\kappa_{es} = \kappa_{ei,n} R_{ei} / [c R_{ei} + (1-c)]$, where $c$ is the weight of the normal channel in the thermal resistivity; the fitted $c$ runs from 0.95 at $x=0.05$ to 0.80 at $x=0.40$. The paper concludes that in this superconducting state more than 80% of the heat is carried by the normal channel, and that the same parallel-channel physics will govern heat flow in V-Zr based superconducting wires.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation of the superconducting baseline uses a single gap ratio $\Delta/k_B T_C = 1.9$ taken from an annealed ZrV$_2$ sample whose heat-capacity analysis is not shown, and applies that ratio to the $\gamma$ and $\gamma'$ phases in every as-cast alloy; if the real gaps differ, the predicted $\kappa_{ei,s}$, the inferred excess conduction, and the fitted normal-channel weights all change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In these as-cast V-Zr alloys, the low-temperature thermal conductivity of the 'superconducting' wire is dominated by the normal phases, so thermal management and quench-stability estimates must use the normal-state conductivity rather than the BCS value.
The model predicts that the normal-channel weight $c$ decreases systematically with zirconium content, from 0.95 at $x=0.05$ to 0.80 at $x=0.40$, so increasing Zr content makes the superconducting channel more important.
For $x \ge 0.20$ the two-channel formula reproduces $\kappa_{es}(T)$ over the whole measured range, while for $x=0.05$ and $0.10$ the deviations below 5 K show that the large $\beta$-V volume fraction must be treated as part of the normal channel.
The same BRT baseline with $\Delta/k_B T_C = 1.9$ predicts a $\kappa_{es}$ much smaller than observed for every alloy, supporting the paper's assertion that an extra conduction path is always present.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test of the model would be to prepare a single-phase $\gamma$-ZrV$_2$ sample and measure its actual gap ratio; if the excess $\kappa_{es}$ persists in a sample with no normal phases, the two-channel explanation would have to be replaced by a renormalized-gap effect.
The same parallel-channel decomposition could be applied to other multiphase superconductors (for example, partially transformed A15 or Laves-phase wires) to separate intrinsic superconducting transport from normal-phase leakage.
Because the fitted $c$ values were obtained using a gap ratio from an annealed sample not shown in the paper, the numerical statement that 80-95% of heat flows in the normal channel should be read as conditional on that gap assumption; independent determination of $\Delta/k_B T_C$ for each phase could change the inferred channel weights.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: the paper has real experimental material, but its central model is wrong. Equation (5) is not a parallel-channel formula. For two parallel heat channels you add conductivities: κ_es = (1−c)κ_ei,s + cκ_ei,n. The authors instead add thermal resistivities, 1/κ_es = (1−c)/κ_ei,s + c/κ_ei,n, which describes channels in series. The resulting Eq. (6) makes κ_es approach zero as T→0 because R_ei→0. That directly contradicts the abstract and conclusion that a normal channel carries more than 80% of the heat. The fitted c values (0.8–0.95) do not fix this; they just absorb the model's internal inconsistency.

The experimental work deserves separate credit. The C(T) data show three distinct superconducting features, the metallography independently establishes β-V, γ-ZrV2, γ′-ZrV2, α-Zr and β-Zr, and the normal-state κ(T) fits with the standard scattering model are plausible. The observation that the measured superconducting-state κ exceeds the BCS estimate is a genuinely new data point for these specific as-cast alloys. That part is useful and could stand alone.

Soft spots beyond Eq. (5): the gap ratio Δ/k_B T_c = 1.9 is taken from an annealed ZrV2 sample whose C(T) is “not shown here,” and no independent constraint is given for c. If the actual gap ratio differs, κ_ei,s, the inferred excess conduction, and the fitted c all shift. The poor fit below 5 K for x = 0.05 and 0.10 is attributed to the β-V phase, which may be reasonable, but it also shows that a single c parameter is not capturing the full phase physics.

My reading: the data could be salvaged in a different frame, but the central interpretation—two parallel heat channels with >80% normal heat transport—does not follow from the equations as written. The paper deserves a serious referee because the measurements are real and the error is instructive, but the current analysis cannot be accepted. If I were the editor, I would send it to peer review with a specific charge: check the series/parallel algebra in Eq. (5) and redo the analysis with the correct parallel formula, or drop the channel interpretation.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports heat capacity C(T) and thermal conductivity κ(T) measurements on as-cast V_{1-x}Zr_x alloys with x = 0.05–0.40, identifying three superconducting phases (β-V at 5.4 K, γ-ZrV2 at 8.2 K, and γ′-ZrV2 at 8.5 K) and non-superconducting α-Zr and β-Zr phases by metallography. In the superconducting state the authors find that the measured electronic thermal conductivity κ_es is larger than the BCS prediction κ_ei,s. They attribute this excess to a normal-state heat-conduction channel operating in parallel with the superconducting channel, and they introduce a two-channel formula with a fitted weight factor c. The fits yield c between 0.95 and 0.80, which they translate into the conclusion that more than 80% of the heat is carried by the normal channel in the superconducting state, a result they connect to the coexistence of multiple phases and to the materials' possible high-field applications.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would provide a useful demonstration that multi-phase coexistence can strongly modify thermal transport in a superconducting alloy, with potential consequences for the design of V-Zr based superconducting wires. The manuscript has several genuine strengths: it reports systematic thermal and calorimetric data across six compositions, identifies the relevant phases by metallography, provides a normal-state fitting model with tabulated parameters, and uses the Bardeen-Rickayzen-Tewordt theory for the superconducting electronic thermal conductivity. The physical hypothesis of parallel normal and superconducting heat paths is plausible given the independent microstructural evidence. However, the quantitative analysis that supports the central claim is built on an incorrect combination rule for parallel channels, and the BCS baseline is partly based on data not shown in the paper. As written, the manuscript does not establish the stated normal-channel heat fraction.

major comments (3)

[Eq. (5) and Eq. (6), Section 3] Equation (5) is presented as the combination of two conducting channels in parallel, but it actually adds thermal resistivities, which is the series combination rule. For two parallel heat-conduction channels the conductivities must add: κ_es = (1−c)κ_ei,s + cκ_ei,n. Substituting κ_ei,s = R_ei κ_ei,n into Eq. (5) gives Eq. (6), whose low-temperature limit is κ_es → 0 for any value of c because R_ei → 0. Thus the fitted c in Table 1 cannot be interpreted as the fraction of heat carried by the normal channel, and the conclusion that "more than 80% of the heat is carried by the normal channel" (Section 4) is not supported by the model. The analysis must be redone with the correct parallel-channel formula, and the fit quality and the physical meaning of c must be reassessed.
[Section 3, paragraph beginning "To estimate κ_ei,s"] The BCS baseline for κ_ei,s uses Δ/k_B T_c = 1.9 "obtained from the analysis of C(T) of an annealed ZrV2 sample which has only γ and γ′ phases (not shown here)". The excess conductivity is defined relative to this baseline, so the entire conclusion depends on an unshown and unverifiable input. If the gap ratio of the γ and γ′ phases in the as-cast alloys differs from 1.9, then κ_ei,s, the fitted c, and all residuals change. The authors should present the C(T) analysis on which this value rests, or justify quantitatively why the gap ratio transfers unchanged to every alloy composition.
[Section 3, paragraph beginning "Since the change in κ just below T_C is quite small"] The analysis assumes T_C = 8.5 K for both γ-ZrV2 and γ′-ZrV2, although the C(T) data show a distinct jump at about 8.2 K and a separate feature at 8.5 K (Fig. 2). Because the BRT ratio R_ei depends sensitively on T/T_C just below T_C, using 8.5 K for the majority γ phase overestimates R_ei in the range 5–8.2 K and changes the inferred κ_ei,s and the fitted c. A sensitivity analysis using T_C = 8.2 K for the γ phase is needed before the normal-channel fraction can be quantified reliably.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (3)] In Eq. (3) the variable x is defined as ℏ/k_B T, but the BRT-type integral requires x = ℏω/k_B T; the phonon frequency ω appears to be missing in the definition.
[Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including "Free Eelectron Laser", "th an", "Plank's constant", and "Hanium-Vanadium" in Ref. [11] (presumably "Hafnium-Vanadium" or "Vanadium-Zirconium").
[Section 3, discussion after Eq. (6)] The description of c as "the weight factor for the thermal resistivity in the normal state of ZrV2 phase" is confusing: in Eq. (5) c multiplies the inverse normal-state conductivity of the whole normal channel, which the paper identifies as comprising α-Zr, β-V, and β-Zr, not ZrV2 alone.
[Table 1 and Fig. 3(b)] Table 1 lists N/M and P/M without defining M in the table or its caption; M appears in Eq. (3) and should be specified if these are normalized coefficients. In addition, the normal-state curves in Fig. 3(b) are extrapolated down to 2 K without data below 6 K, and the sensitivity of κ_es to this extrapolation should be stated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Central 'two-channel heat conduction' claim reduces to the fitted weight c in Eq. (5); the 'more than 80% normal channel' conclusion is a re-labeling of the fit, not a prediction.

fitted input called prediction [Section 3, after Fig. 4, Eqs. (5)-(6), Table 1; Conclusions]
"In such cases, by taking two conducting channels in parallel, the temperature dependence of κei,s can be expressed as κ−1 es = (1 − c)κ−1 ei,s + cκ−1 ei,n. (5) ... where c is the weight factor for the thermal resistivity in the normal state of ZrV2 phase. The solid lines are the fit to the data obtained using eq.5. The values of c are given in table 1. ... We have also shown that in the superconducting state, more than 80% of the heat is carried by the normal channel."

The model is not predictive: c is a free parameter adjusted to reproduce κes(T), and any excess over the chosen BCS κei,s can be absorbed by c in [0,1]. The 'more than 80% normal channel' statement is a restatement of the fitted c values (0.80–0.95), not a consequence that the data could have rejected. Moreover, the BCS baseline uses Δ/kBTC = 1.9 from the authors' own annealed ZrV2 C(T) data that is 'not shown here', so the excess that the two-channel model is fitted to is itself defined relative to an unshown input. The coexistence of phases is independently real, but the central quantitative conclusion is a fit dressed as a derivation.

full rationale

Most of the paper's evidence (metallography, heat-capacity jumps, normal-state κ) is independent, and the citations to the authors' prior work are not the load-bearing circular step. The circularity risk is concentrated in the superconducting-state analysis: the comparison to BCS theory is made with a gap ratio Δ/kBTC = 1.9 taken from an unshown C(T) fit, and the excess is then modeled by Eq. (5) with one fitted parameter c. Because c is fit to exactly the same κes data that the model is supposed to explain, the 'two-channel' interpretation and the 'more than 80%' claim are not falsifiable predictions; they are the fit reported in different words. The phase-coexistence premise has independent metallographic support, so this is partial, not total, circularity. I also note, without scoring it as circular, that Eq. (5) is a series combination of thermal resistivities rather than a parallel combination of conductivities, and Eq. (6) makes κes → 0 at low T; that internal-consistency problem would remain even if c were fixed independently.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a multi-stage fitting pipeline: five parameters (A, B, theta_D, N/M, P/M) are fitted to the normal-state kappa, the BCS baseline uses a gap ratio from an unshown annealed ZrV2 sample, and then c is fitted to the remaining excess. The model equation itself (Eq. 5) contradicts the stated parallel-channel picture, making these assumptions load-bearing but not independently supported.

free parameters (6)

A (electron-impurity thermal resistivity coefficient) = 2.09 to 8.27 mW^-1 K^2 for x=0.05 to 0.40
Fitted to normal-state kappa(T) in Eq. (2).
B (electron-phonon thermal resistivity coefficient) = 5.99e-6 to 11.32e-6 mW^-1 K^-1
Fitted to normal-state kappa(T).
theta_D (Debye temperature) = 397 to 430 K
Used as fitting parameter because it cannot be extracted from C(T) due to multiple phases.
N/M (normalized boundary scattering coefficient) = 8.53e3 to 1.88e5 mW^-1 K^4
Fitted in phonon conductivity Eq. (3).
P/M (normalized point-defect scattering coefficient) = 0.011 to 0.024 mW^-1
Fitted in phonon conductivity Eq. (3).
c (normal-channel weight factor) = 0.95 (x=0.05) to 0.80 (x=0.40)
Fitted to the superconducting-state kappa_es(T) via Eq. (6); absorbs any excess conductivity.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The normal-state thermal conductivity can be described by Eqs. (1)-(3) with phonon-electron and phonon-dislocation scattering set to zero (C=0, L=0).
Authors justify via metallography and pinning force analysis; this is a strong simplification.
domain assumption The phonon thermal conductivity is unchanged in the superconducting state (kappa_ls = kappa_ln).
Standard BRT assumption, but with multiple phases and normal inclusions the phonon scattering may change.
domain assumption The superconducting energy gap ratio Delta/k_B T_c = 1.9, obtained from an annealed ZrV2 sample, applies to the gamma and gamma-prime phases in the as-cast alloys.
The supporting C(T) data are not shown, and the as-cast gamma/gamma-prime phases may differ from annealed bulk.
ad hoc to paper The transition temperatures of gamma-prime-ZrV2 and gamma-ZrV2 are both treated as 8.5 K for the kappa analysis, despite C(T) showing a distinct jump at 8.2 K.
The authors state 'we can assume' this; it ignores the TC2=8.2 K feature.
ad hoc to paper The two conduction channels combine as in Eq. (5), where thermal resistivities add.
This is a series combination, despite being described as parallel; it is the central modeling assumption and is internally inconsistent with the claimed parallel normal channel.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two channel heat conduction in the superconducting state of the as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5QPJICRK

@misc{pith2026190810570,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two channel heat conduction in the superconducting state of the as-cast V$_1-x$Zr$_x$ alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5QPJICRK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10570}
}

abstract

We present here the temperature dependence of heat capacity ($C$($T$)) and thermal conductivity ($\kappa$($T$)) in the superconducting state as well as in the normal state of as-cast V$_{1-x}$Zr$_x$ alloys. Distinct jumps in the $C$($T$) of the alloys indicate the presence of three superconducting phases with transition temperatures $T_{C1}$ = 5.4~K, $T_{C2}$ = 8.2~K and $T_{C3}$ = 8.5~K. From the metallography micrographs, these three phases are identified to be $\beta$-V, $\gamma$-ZrV$_2$, and $\gamma'$-ZrV$_2$ respectively. Apart from these phases, $\alpha$-Zr and $\beta$-Zr phases are also detected in these samples. The experimental $\kappa$($T$) in the superconducting state of these alloys is observed to be significantly higher than that expected theoretically. Our analysis suggests that the above observation is due to the coexistence of multiple superconducting and non superconducting phases which resulted in the two-parallel channels for the conduction of heat.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.10570 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** (colour online) Temperature dependence of heat capacit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (colour online) (a) Temperature dependence of normal s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (colour online) Results of the analysis of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

Inoue, T

K. Inoue, T. Kuroda, and K. Tachikawa, Superconducting prop erties of V 2(Hf,Zr) laves phase multiﬁlamentary wires, J. Nucl. Mat. 133&134 (1985) 815 -818

work page 1985
[2]

Tenhover, High critical currents obtained by heat treating r apidly quenched Hf-Zr-V metallic glasses, IEEE Trans

M. Tenhover, High critical currents obtained by heat treating r apidly quenched Hf-Zr-V metallic glasses, IEEE Trans. Mag. 17 (1981) 10 21- 1024

work page 1981
[3]

Tachikawa, Research and development at the Japanese natio nal re- search institute for metals, Cryogenics, 19 (1979) 307-315

K. Tachikawa, Research and development at the Japanese natio nal re- search institute for metals, Cryogenics, 19 (1979) 307-315

work page 1979
[4]

B. S. Brown, J. W. Hafstrom and T. E. Klippert, Changes in the su per- conducting critical temperature after fast-neutron irradiation , J. Appl. Phys. 48 (1977) 1759-1761

work page 1977
[5]

I. A. Naskidashvili, L. S. Topchyan, A. I. Naskidashvi-Li and E. S . Makarenkov, Inﬂuence of irradiation on the superconducting tra nsition temperature of intermetallic V 2Zr, Rad. Eﬀects Lett. 85 (1984) 97-102

work page 1984
[6]

Inoue, H

K. Inoue, H. Wada, T. Kuroda, and K. Tachikawa, Stress eﬀect s on superconducting properties of the composite-processed V 2(Hf,Zr), Appl. Phys. Lett. 38 (1981) 939-941

work page 1981
[7]

Hishinuma, A

Y. Hishinuma, A. Kikuchi, Y. Iijima, Y. Yoshida, T. Takeuchi, A. Nishimura and K. Inoue, The fabrication of a V-based Laves phase c om- pound superconductor through a rapid heating and quenching pro cess, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 17 (2004) 1031-1036

work page 2004
[8]

Segal, C

C. Segal, C. Tarantini, Z. H. Sung, P. J. Lee, B. Sailer, M. Thoene r, K. Schlenga, A. Ballarino, L. Bottura, B. Bordini, C. Scheuerlein, an d D. C. Larbalestier, Evaluation of critical current density and resid ual resistance ratio limits in powder in tube Nb 3Sn conductors, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29 (2016) 085003-1-10. 10

work page 2016

Show all 15 references

[9]

L. S. Sharath Chandra, S. Paul, A Khandelwal, A. Sagdeo, R. Ven katesh, Kranti Kumar, A. Banerjee and M. K. Chottopadhyay, Evolution o f high ﬁeld superconductivity and high critical current density in the as-c ast V1−xZrx alloys, arXiv:1908.07288 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[10]

J. T. Williams, Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1 3305 (The vanadium-zirconium alloy system , Iowa state collage) pp.1-73 (1954)

1954
[11]

Servant, Thermodynamic assessments of the phase diagra ms of the Hanium-Vanadium and Vanadium-Zirconium systems, J

C. Servant, Thermodynamic assessments of the phase diagra ms of the Hanium-Vanadium and Vanadium-Zirconium systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diﬀ. 26 (2005) 39-49

2005
[12]

See e. g. Tritt T M 2004 Thermal Conductivity: Theory, Properties and Applications (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York)

2004
[13]

L. S. Sharath Chandra, M. K. Chattopadhyay, S. B. Roy, V. C . Sahni and G. R. Myneni, Magneto thermal conductivity of superconduct ing Nb with intermediate level of impurity, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25 (20 12) 035010-1-12
[14]

S. Paul, L. S. Sharath Chandra and M. K. Chattopadhyay, Ren ormal- ization of electron-phonon coupling in the Mott-Ioﬀe-Regel limit due to point defects in the V 1−xTix alloy superconductors, J. Phys.: Condens. Mater, 31 (2019) 475801-1-9

2019
[15]

Bardeen, G

J. Bardeen, G. Rickayzen and L. Tewordt, Theory of the ther mal con- ductivity of superconductors, Phys. Rev. 113 (1959) 982-994. 11

1959

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Inoue, T

K. Inoue, T. Kuroda, and K. Tachikawa, Superconducting prop erties of V 2(Hf,Zr) laves phase multiﬁlamentary wires, J. Nucl. Mat. 133&134 (1985) 815 -818

work page 1985

[2] [2]

Tenhover, High critical currents obtained by heat treating r apidly quenched Hf-Zr-V metallic glasses, IEEE Trans

M. Tenhover, High critical currents obtained by heat treating r apidly quenched Hf-Zr-V metallic glasses, IEEE Trans. Mag. 17 (1981) 10 21- 1024

work page 1981

[3] [3]

Tachikawa, Research and development at the Japanese natio nal re- search institute for metals, Cryogenics, 19 (1979) 307-315

K. Tachikawa, Research and development at the Japanese natio nal re- search institute for metals, Cryogenics, 19 (1979) 307-315

work page 1979

[4] [4]

B. S. Brown, J. W. Hafstrom and T. E. Klippert, Changes in the su per- conducting critical temperature after fast-neutron irradiation , J. Appl. Phys. 48 (1977) 1759-1761

work page 1977

[5] [5]

I. A. Naskidashvili, L. S. Topchyan, A. I. Naskidashvi-Li and E. S . Makarenkov, Inﬂuence of irradiation on the superconducting tra nsition temperature of intermetallic V 2Zr, Rad. Eﬀects Lett. 85 (1984) 97-102

work page 1984

[6] [6]

Inoue, H

K. Inoue, H. Wada, T. Kuroda, and K. Tachikawa, Stress eﬀect s on superconducting properties of the composite-processed V 2(Hf,Zr), Appl. Phys. Lett. 38 (1981) 939-941

work page 1981

[7] [7]

Hishinuma, A

Y. Hishinuma, A. Kikuchi, Y. Iijima, Y. Yoshida, T. Takeuchi, A. Nishimura and K. Inoue, The fabrication of a V-based Laves phase c om- pound superconductor through a rapid heating and quenching pro cess, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 17 (2004) 1031-1036

work page 2004

[8] [8]

Segal, C

C. Segal, C. Tarantini, Z. H. Sung, P. J. Lee, B. Sailer, M. Thoene r, K. Schlenga, A. Ballarino, L. Bottura, B. Bordini, C. Scheuerlein, an d D. C. Larbalestier, Evaluation of critical current density and resid ual resistance ratio limits in powder in tube Nb 3Sn conductors, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29 (2016) 085003-1-10. 10

work page 2016