Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Shortcuts to Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.10943 v3 pith:5SEA3ZLI submitted 2021-12-21 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumqaoaapproximatecircuitalgorithmansatzinteractioninteractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum-classical hybrid algorithm intending to find the ground state of a target Hamiltonian. Theoretically, QAOA can obtain the approximate solution if the quantum circuit is deep enough. Actually, the performance of QAOA decreases practically if the quantum circuit is deep since near-term devices are not noise-free and the errors caused by noise accumulate as the quantum circuit increases. In order to reduce the depth of quantum circuits, we propose a new ansatz dubbed as "Shortcuts to QAOA" (S-QAOA), S-QAOA provides shortcuts to the ground state of target Hamiltonian by including more two-body interactions and releasing the parameter freedoms. To be specific, besides the existing ZZ interaction in the QAOA ansatz, other two-body interactions are introduced in the S-QAOA ansatz such that the approximate solutions could be obtained with smaller circuit depth. Considering the MaxCut problem and Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model, numerically computation shows the YY interaction has the best performance. The reason for this might arise from the counterdiabatic effect generated by YY interaction. On top of this, we release the freedom of parameters of two-body interactions, which a priori do not necessarily have to be fully identical, and numerical results show that it is worth paying the extra cost of having more parameter freedom since one has a greater improvement on success rate.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools