Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 60 references

X-ray beam-tracking microscopy resolves features at least 3 micrometers in size, smaller than the beam apertures, with the dark-field channel offering the highest resolution.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-28 04:28 UTC pith:5T74LIIK

load-bearing objection New OTF model for beam-tracking resolution derived from Fokker-Planck, with experiments showing sub-aperture performance and stronger dark-field sharpness, but the approximation step is the weakest link. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.05269 v1 pith:5T74LIIK submitted 2026-06-03 physics.optics physics.ins-det

Spatial resolution of X-ray beam-tracking microscopy

Harry Allan , Carlos Navarrete-Le\'on , Adam Doherty , Shashidhara Marathe , Kaz Wanelik , Marco Endrizzi This is my paper
classification physics.optics physics.ins-det
keywords X-ray beam-trackingspatial resolutionphase-contrast imagingdark-field imagingoptical transfer functionFokker-Planck equationsynchrotron imaginglaboratory X-ray sources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a complete optical transfer function model for spatial resolution in each of the three contrast channels of X-ray beam-tracking. The model uses the Fokker-Planck equation to show that resolution is not strictly set by aperture size. Experiments with both synchrotron and laboratory sources, using apertures of 15 micrometers and 10 micrometers, confirm a limiting resolution of at least 3 micrometers. This result is especially pronounced in the dark-field channel. A sympathetic reader would care because the findings supply a predictive tool for designing higher-resolution beam-tracking systems without requiring smaller apertures.

Core claim

Using the Fokker-Planck equation for near-field imaging, we derive optical transfer functions that fully describe the spatial resolution in transmission, phase, and dark-field channels of beam-tracking. Validation with synchrotron and lab setups using 15 μm and 10 μm apertures demonstrates a limiting resolution of at least 3 μm. This formally confirms the superior resolution of the dark-field channel compared to the others.

What carries the argument

The optical transfer function model derived from the Fokker-Planck equation for each contrast channel, which predicts how resolution depends on aperture size and propagation.

Load-bearing premise

The Fokker-Planck equation accurately captures the X-ray propagation physics that set the resolution limits in each imaging channel.

What would settle it

An experiment showing that the measured resolution in the dark-field channel is no better than in the transmission channel, or that it matches the aperture size rather than being smaller.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Dark-field images can capture finer details than transmission or phase images in the same setup.
  • System design can prioritize smaller effective resolutions by leveraging the model rather than just aperture size.
  • Experimental protocols can be optimized to exploit the higher resolution in dark-field.
  • The model allows prediction of resolution for different aperture shapes and sizes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could extend beam-tracking to applications requiring sub-aperture resolution, such as imaging of small biological structures.
  • Similar modeling might apply to other phase-contrast techniques using different equations.
  • Testing with even smaller apertures could reveal further limits or confirm the model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a complete optical transfer function (OTF) model for the transmission, phase, and dark-field channels of X-ray beam-tracking microscopy by invoking the Fokker-Planck equation for near-field propagation. Experiments performed with both synchrotron and laboratory sources, using 15 μm circular and 10 μm rectangular apertures, are reported to demonstrate a limiting spatial resolution of at least 3 μm (smaller than the apertures) and to confirm superior resolution in the dark-field channel relative to the other two.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies the first analytic description of aperture-driven resolution across all three contrast channels and supplies a parameter-free route (via the Fokker-Planck equation rather than empirical fits) to predict and optimize performance. The dual synchrotron/laboratory validation and the explicit confirmation of the dark-field advantage constitute concrete strengths that could directly inform aperture design and imaging protocols.

major comments (2)
  1. [model derivation section] Model derivation (the section that obtains the channel-specific OTFs from the Fokker-Planck equation): the mapping from the Fokker-Planck propagator to the three distinct OTFs must be shown explicitly, including the precise manner in which the finite aperture transmission function enters the small-angle scattering term; without these intermediate steps the claim that the model is fully derived rather than postulated cannot be verified.
  2. [experimental validation section] Experimental validation section (the paragraphs reporting the 3 μm limit): the quantitative procedure used to extract the limiting resolution from the measured edge or bar-pattern data (including the exact fitting function, data exclusion criteria, and error propagation) is required to substantiate that the reported 3 μm value is not an upper bound set by the analysis method itself.
minor comments (2)
  1. [figure captions] Figure captions should state the exact spatial frequencies at which the measured MTFs cross the conventional 10 % or 5 % threshold so that the 3 μm claim can be read directly from the plots.
  2. [introduction or methods] The abstract states that the model is 'derived' from the Fokker-Planck equation; the corresponding sentence in the main text should cite the specific form of the Fokker-Planck operator employed (e.g., the diffusion coefficient or the scattering kernel).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both can be resolved by expanding the relevant sections with additional explicit steps and procedural details, which we will incorporate in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [model derivation section] Model derivation (the section that obtains the channel-specific OTFs from the Fokker-Planck equation): the mapping from the Fokker-Planck propagator to the three distinct OTFs must be shown explicitly, including the precise manner in which the finite aperture transmission function enters the small-angle scattering term; without these intermediate steps the claim that the model is fully derived rather than postulated cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that the intermediate mapping steps from the Fokker-Planck propagator to the transmission, phase, and dark-field OTFs, including the explicit role of the finite aperture transmission function in the small-angle scattering term, should be presented in greater detail. The revised manuscript will expand the model derivation section to include these steps explicitly, ensuring the derivation is fully transparent and verifiable rather than appearing postulated. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [experimental validation section] Experimental validation section (the paragraphs reporting the 3 μm limit): the quantitative procedure used to extract the limiting resolution from the measured edge or bar-pattern data (including the exact fitting function, data exclusion criteria, and error propagation) is required to substantiate that the reported 3 μm value is not an upper bound set by the analysis method itself.

    Authors: We will revise the experimental validation section to provide a complete description of the quantitative procedure for determining the 3 μm limiting resolution. This will include the exact fitting function applied to the edge or bar-pattern data, the data exclusion criteria employed, and the full error propagation analysis. These additions will demonstrate that the reported resolution is not an artifact of the analysis method. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model derived from external Fokker-Planck equation with independent experimental validation

full rationale

The paper derives its OTF model for transmission, phase, and dark-field channels directly from the Fokker-Planck equation for near-field imaging, an external physical assumption not constructed from the paper's own data or prior fits. Experimental results with 10-15 µm apertures yielding 3 µm resolution are presented as validation rather than inputs to the model. No self-citation chains, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-definitional steps are indicated in the abstract or reader's summary. The central claims remain independent of the authors' own prior outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model depends on the Fokker-Planck equation as the governing propagation model and on the assumption that the experimental apertures and detector sampling are the dominant contributors to the measured transfer functions. No free parameters are mentioned in the abstract; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Fokker-Planck equation accurately describes near-field X-ray propagation for the beam-tracking geometry.
    Invoked to derive the optical transfer function for each contrast channel.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5707 in / 1273 out tokens · 26964 ms · 2026-06-28T04:28:12.184812+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

X-ray beam-tracking is a phase-contrast imaging technique capable of simultaneously retrieving transmission, phase, and dark-field images. Although the spatial resolution in beam-tracking is largely considered to be 'aperture driven', no model yet exists to describe this in full. The dark-field channel is of particular interest, due to previous observations of anomalously high sharpness compared to transmission and phase channels. We derive a full optical transfer function model for each contrast channel using the Fokker-Planck equation for near-field imaging. Experimental validation using both synchrotron-based and laboratory-based setups, with 15 um circular and 10 um rectangular apertures, reveals a limiting resolution of at least 3 um, much smaller than the apertures themselves. Together, the model and the supporting experiments offer a full description of spatial resolution in beam-tracking, and formally confirm the greater spatial resolution in the dark-field channel. These findings open new possibilities in system design and experimental protocols to exploit these capabilities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05269 by Adam Doherty, Carlos Navarrete-Le\'on, Harry Allan, Kaz Wanelik, Marco Endrizzi, Shashidhara Marathe.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: General geometries of X-ray beam-tracking imaging systems, utilising either 2D (a) or 1D (b) aper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Retrieved transmission (a), phase (b), and dark-field (c) signals from the resolution target using a 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ROIs in the transmission (a), refraction (b), and dark-field (c) images used for calculating the OTFs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The retrieved lab-based beam-tracking transmission image (a) is shown in contrast to the equivalent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Beamlets which are not adequately separated in relation to the system resolution can experience [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Direct Fourier inversion of the contrast reversal in the dark-field image (a) results in the image (b) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On the evolution and relative merits of hard x-ray phase-contrast imaging methods,

    S. Wilkins, Y. I. Nesterets, T. Gureyev, S. Mayo, A. Pogany, and A. Stevenson, “On the evolution and relative merits of hard x-ray phase-contrast imaging methods,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , vol. 372, no. 2010, p. 20130021, 2014

    2010

  2. [2]

    X-ray phase-contrast imaging,

    M. Endrizzi, “X-ray phase-contrast imaging,” Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment , vol. 878, pp. 88–98, 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Ct dose reduction factors in the thousands using x-ray phase contrast,

    M. J. Kitchen, G. A. Buckley, T. E. Gureyev, M. J. Wallace, N. Andres-Thio, K. Uesugi, N. Yagi, and S. B. Hooper, “Ct dose reduction factors in the thousands using x-ray phase contrast,” Scientific reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 15953, 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Phase-contrast imaging using polychro- matic hard x-rays,

    S. Wilkins, T. E. Gureyev, D. Gao, A. Pogany, and A. Stevenson, “Phase-contrast imaging using polychro- matic hard x-rays,” Nature, vol. 384, no. 6607, pp. 335–338, 1996

    1996

  5. [5]

    X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,

    T. Weitkamp, A. Diaz, C. David, F. Pfeiffer, M. Stampanoni, P. Cloetens, and E. Ziegler, “X-ray phase imaging with a grating interferometer,” Optics express , vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 6296–6304, 2005

    2005

  6. [6]

    Hard-x-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,

    F. Pfeiffer, M. Bech, O. Bunk, P. Kraft, E. F. Eikenberry, C. Brönnimann, C. Grünzweig, and C. David, “Hard-x-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer,” Nature materials, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 134–137, 2008

    2008

  7. [7]

    An innovative digital imaging set-up allowing a low-dose approach to phase contrast applications in the medical field,

    A. Olivo, F. Arfelli, G. Cantatore, R. Longo, R. Menk, S. Pani, M. Prest, P. Poropat, L. Rigon, G. Tromba, et al. , “An innovative digital imaging set-up allowing a low-dose approach to phase contrast applications in the medical field,” Medical physics, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1610–1619, 2001

    2001

  8. [8]

    A coded-aperture technique allowing x-ray phase contrast imaging with conven- tional sources,

    A. Olivo and R. Speller, “A coded-aperture technique allowing x-ray phase contrast imaging with conven- tional sources,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 91, no. 7, p. 074106, 2007

    2007

  9. [9]

    Spatial harmonic imaging of x-ray scattering— initial results,

    H. Wen, E. E. Bennett, M. M. Hegedus, and S. C. Carroll, “Spatial harmonic imaging of x-ray scattering— initial results,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging , vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 997–1002, 2008

    2008

  10. [10]

    Quantitative single-exposure x-ray phase contrast imaging using a single attenuation grid,

    K. S. Morgan, D. M. Paganin, and K. K. Siu, “Quantitative single-exposure x-ray phase contrast imaging using a single attenuation grid,” Optics express , vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 19781–19789, 2011

    2011

  11. [11]

    X-ray phase imaging with a paper analyzer,

    K. S. Morgan, D. M. Paganin, and K. K. Siu, “X-ray phase imaging with a paper analyzer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 100, no. 12, 2012

    2012

  12. [12]

    Two-dimensional x-ray beam phase sensing,

    S. Bérujon, E. Ziegler, R. Cerbino, and L. Peverini, “Two-dimensional x-ray beam phase sensing,” Physical review letters , vol. 108, no. 15, p. 158102, 2012

    2012

  13. [13]

    High-resolution and sensitivity bi-directional x-ray phase contrast imaging using 2d talbot array illuminators,

    A. Gustschin, M. Riedel, K. Taphorn, C. Petrich, W. Gottwald, W. Noichl, M. Busse, S. E. Francis, F. Beckmann, J. U. Hammel, et al. , “High-resolution and sensitivity bi-directional x-ray phase contrast imaging using 2d talbot array illuminators,” Optica, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1588–1595, 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    Beam tracking approach for single–shot retrieval of absorption, refraction, and dark–field signals with laboratory x–ray sources,

    F. A. Vittoria, G. K. Kallon, D. Basta, P. C. Diemoz, I. K. Robinson, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Beam tracking approach for single–shot retrieval of absorption, refraction, and dark–field signals with laboratory x–ray sources,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 106, no. 22, p. 224102, 2015. 10

    2015

  15. [15]

    Improved x-ray optics, especially for phase contrast imaging,

    S. Wilkins, “Improved x-ray optics, especially for phase contrast imaging,” International patent WO , vol. 1995005725, p. A1, 1995

    1995

  16. [16]

    Diffracting aperture based differential phase contrast for scanning x-ray microscopy,

    B. Kaulich, F. Polack, U. Neuhaeusler, J. Susini, E. di Fabrizio, and T. Wilhein, “Diffracting aperture based differential phase contrast for scanning x-ray microscopy,” Optics Express , vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 1111–1117, 2002

    2002

  17. [17]

    Quantitative phase imaging with a scanning transmission x-ray microscope,

    M. De Jonge, B. Hornberger, C. Holzner, D. Legnini, D. Paterson, I. McNulty, C. Jacobsen, and S. Vogt, “Quantitative phase imaging with a scanning transmission x-ray microscope,” Physical review letters , vol. 100, no. 16, p. 163902, 2008

    2008

  18. [18]

    Three-dimensional phase-contrast x-ray microtomography with scanning–imaging x-ray microscope optics,

    A. Takeuchi, K. Uesugi, and Y. Suzuki, “Three-dimensional phase-contrast x-ray microtomography with scanning–imaging x-ray microscope optics,” Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 793–800, 2013

    2013

  19. [19]

    Pepi lab: a flexible compact multi-modal setup for x-ray phase-contrast and spectral imaging,

    L. Brombal, F. Arfelli, R. H. Menk, L. Rigon, and F. Brun, “Pepi lab: a flexible compact multi-modal setup for x-ray phase-contrast and spectral imaging,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 4206, 2023

    2023

  20. [20]

    Tracking based, high-resolution single-shot multimodal x-ray imaging in the laboratory enabled by the sub-pixel resolution capabilities of the mönch detector,

    E. Dreier, A. Bergamaschi, G. K. Kallon, R. Brönnimann, U. L. Olsen, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Tracking based, high-resolution single-shot multimodal x-ray imaging in the laboratory enabled by the sub-pixel resolution capabilities of the mönch detector,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 117, no. 26, 2020

    2020

  21. [21]

    X-ray phase-contrast microtomography of soft tissues using a compact laboratory system with two-directional sensitivity,

    C. Navarrete-León, A. Doherty, S. Savvidis, M. F. Gerli, G. Piredda, A. Astolfo, D. Bate, S. Cipiccia, C. K. Hagen, A. Olivo, et al. , “X-ray phase-contrast microtomography of soft tissues using a compact laboratory system with two-directional sensitivity,” Optica, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 880–887, 2023

    2023

  22. [22]

    A laboratory-based beam tracking x-ray imaging method achieving two-dimensional phase sensitivity and isotropic resolution with unidirectional undersampling,

    G. Lioliou, C. Navarrete-León, A. Astolfo, S. Savvidis, D. Bate, M. Endrizzi, C. Hagen, and A. Olivo, “A laboratory-based beam tracking x-ray imaging method achieving two-dimensional phase sensitivity and isotropic resolution with unidirectional undersampling,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 8707, 2023

    2023

  23. [23]

    High-resolution extraction of absorption, refraction and scattering properties using x-ray scanning absorption grid imaging,

    C. Zhou, Y. Wang, S. Wang, J. Zhang, x. zhao, W. Huang, K. Zhang, and Q. Yuan, “High-resolution extraction of absorption, refraction and scattering properties using x-ray scanning absorption grid imaging,” Measurement Science and Technology , 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Beam tracking x-ray phase-contrast imaging using a conventional x-ray source,

    J. Li, J. Huang, X. Liu, Y. Lei, B. Mai, and C. Zhang, “Beam tracking x-ray phase-contrast imaging using a conventional x-ray source,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 19, p. 6089, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Laboratory-based x-ray microtomography with directional dark-field sensitivity,

    C. Navarrete-Leon, A. J. Gonzalez-Grajales, H. Allan, A. Doherty, A. Parmenter, R. D’Antuono, D. Bate, A. Astolfo, S. Cipiccia, C. K. Hagen, et al. , “Laboratory-based x-ray microtomography with directional dark-field sensitivity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04420 , 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Refractive microlens array for wave-front analysis in the medium to hard x-ray range,

    S. C. Mayo and B. Sexton, “Refractive microlens array for wave-front analysis in the medium to hard x-ray range,” Optics letters , vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 866–868, 2004

    2004

  27. [27]

    Scalable, large area compound array refractive lens for hard x-rays,

    S. Reich, T. dos Santos Rolo, A. Letzel, T. Baumbach, and A. Plech, “Scalable, large area compound array refractive lens for hard x-rays,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 112, no. 15, 2018

    2018

  28. [28]

    Shack–hartmann wavefront sensors based on 2d refractive lens arrays and super-resolution multi-contrast x-ray imaging,

    A. Mikhaylov, S. Reich, M. Zakharova, V. Vlnieska, R. Laptev, A. Plech, and D. Kunka, “Shack–hartmann wavefront sensors based on 2d refractive lens arrays and super-resolution multi-contrast x-ray imaging,” Journal of synchrotron radiation , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 788–795, 2020

    2020

  29. [29]

    Development of an array of compound refractive lenses for sub-pixel resolution, large field of view, and time-saving in scanning hard x-ray microscopy,

    T. Mamyrbayev, A. Opolka, A. Ershov, J. Gutekunst, P. Meyer, K. Ikematsu, A. Momose, and A. Last, “Development of an array of compound refractive lenses for sub-pixel resolution, large field of view, and time-saving in scanning hard x-ray microscopy,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4132, 2020

    2020

  30. [30]

    High-angular-sensitivity x-ray phase-contrast microtomography of soft tissue through a two-directional beam-tracking synchrotron set-up,

    C. Navarrete-León, P. S. Patrick, A. Doherty, H. Allan, S. Cipiccia, S. Marathe, K. Wanelik, M. Esposito, C. K. Hagen, A. Olivo, et al., “High-angular-sensitivity x-ray phase-contrast microtomography of soft tissue through a two-directional beam-tracking synchrotron set-up,” Synchrotron Radiation, vol. 31, no. 5, 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    Mul- timodal phase-based x-ray microtomography with nonmicrofocal laboratory sources,

    F. A. Vittoria, M. Endrizzi, G. K. Kallon, C. K. Hagen, F. Iacoviello, P. De Coppi, and A. Olivo, “Mul- timodal phase-based x-ray microtomography with nonmicrofocal laboratory sources,” Physical Review Ap- plied, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 064009, 2017

    2017

  32. [32]

    A laboratory-based, low-energy, multi-modal x-ray microscope with user-defined resolution,

    M. Esposito, L. Massimi, I. Buchanan, J. D. Ferrara, M. Endrizzi, and A. Olivo, “A laboratory-based, low-energy, multi-modal x-ray microscope with user-defined resolution,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 120, no. 23, 2022. 11

    2022

  33. [33]

    Virtual edge illumination and one dimensional beam tracking for absorption, refraction, and scattering retrieval,

    F. A. Vittoria, M. Endrizzi, P. C. Diemoz, U. H. Wagner, C. Rau, I. K. Robinson, and A. Olivo, “Virtual edge illumination and one dimensional beam tracking for absorption, refraction, and scattering retrieval,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 104, no. 13, 2014

    2014

  34. [34]

    Dynamic multicontrast x-ray imaging method applied to additive manufacturing,

    L. Massimi, S. J. Clark, S. Marussi, A. Doherty, J. Schulz, S. Marathe, C. Rau, M. Endrizzi, P. D. Lee, and A. Olivo, “Dynamic multicontrast x-ray imaging method applied to additive manufacturing,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 127, no. 21, p. 215503, 2021

    2021

  35. [35]

    Femtosecond multimodal imaging with a laser-driven x-ray source,

    A. Doherty, S. Fourmaux, A. Astolfo, R. Ziesche, J. Wood, O. Finlay, W. Stolpe, D. Batey, I. Manke, F. Légaré, et al. , “Femtosecond multimodal imaging with a laser-driven x-ray source,” Communications Physics, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 288, 2023

    2023

  36. [36]

    Multi-contrast x-ray microtomography of human lung specimens with an extended field-of-view,

    H. Allan, A. Doherty, C. Navarrete-León, O. R. I. Morgó, Y. Jia, C. Percival, Z. Hagel, K. E. J. Otter, C. R. Khaw, K. H. Gowers, et al. , “Multi-contrast x-ray microtomography of human lung specimens with an extended field-of-view,” Medical Physics, vol. 53, no. 2, p. e70335, 2026

    2026

  37. [37]

    Spatial resolution of edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging,

    P. C. Diemoz, F. A. Vittoria, and A. Olivo, “Spatial resolution of edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging,” Optics express , vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 15514–15529, 2014

    2014

  38. [38]

    Edge-illumination x-ray dark-field tomography,

    A. Doherty, S. Savvidis, C. Navarrete-León, M. F. Gerli, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Edge-illumination x-ray dark-field tomography,” Physical Review Applied , vol. 19, no. 5, p. 054042, 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    Hybrid dark-field and attenuation contrast retrieval for laboratory-based x-ray tomography,

    A. Doherty, I. Buchanan, O. Roche i Morgó, A. Astolfo, S. Savvidis, M. F. Gerli, A. Citro, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Hybrid dark-field and attenuation contrast retrieval for laboratory-based x-ray tomography,” Optica, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1603–1613, 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    X-ray fokker–planck equation for paraxial imaging,

    D. M. Paganin and K. S. Morgan, “X-ray fokker–planck equation for paraxial imaging,” Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 17537, 2019

    2019

  41. [41]

    Applying the fokker–planck equation to grating-based x-ray phase and dark-field imaging,

    K. S. Morgan and D. M. Paganin, “Applying the fokker–planck equation to grating-based x-ray phase and dark-field imaging,” Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 17465, 2019

    2019

  42. [42]

    On the equivalence of the x-ray scattering retrieval with beam tracking and analyser-based imaging using a synchrotron source,

    C. Peiffer, L. Brombal, C. M. Jones, F. Arfelli, A. Astolfo, D. Dreossi, M. Endrizzi, C. Hagen, A. Mazzolani, R. Menk, et al., “On the equivalence of the x-ray scattering retrieval with beam tracking and analyser-based imaging using a synchrotron source,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , vol. 56, no. 45, p. 45LT02, 2023

    2023

  43. [43]

    Direct x-ray scattering signal measurements in edge-illumination/ beam- tracking imaging and their interplay with the variance of the refraction signals,

    I. Buchanan, S. Cipiccia, C. Peiffer, C. Navarrete-León, A. Astolfo, T. Partridge, M. Esposito, L. Fardin, A. Bravin, C. K. Hagen, et al. , “Direct x-ray scattering signal measurements in edge-illumination/ beam- tracking imaging and their interplay with the variance of the refraction signals,” Applied Physics Reviews , vol. 10, no. 4, 2023

    2023

  44. [44]

    On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray talbot interferometry,

    W. Yashiro, Y. Terui, K. Kawabata, and A. Momose, “On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray talbot interferometry,” Optics express , vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 16890–16901, 2010

    2010

  45. [45]

    Laboratory-based x-ray dark-field microscopy,

    M. Esposito, I. Buchanan, L. Massimi, J. D. Ferrara, P. R. Shearing, A. Olivo, and M. Endrizzi, “Laboratory-based x-ray dark-field microscopy,” Physical review applied , vol. 20, no. 6, p. 064039, 2023

    2023

  46. [46]

    Universal reconstruction method for x-ray scattering tensor tomography based on wave- front modulation,

    G. Lautizi, A. Studer, M.-C. Zdora, F. De Marco, J. Kim, V. Di Trapani, F. Marone, P. Thibault, and M. Stampanoni, “Universal reconstruction method for x-ray scattering tensor tomography based on wave- front modulation,” Physical Review Applied , vol. 22, no. 2, p. 024031, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathe- matical tables , vol. 55. US Government printing office, 1948

    1948

  48. [48]

    A two-directional approach for grating based differential phase contrast imaging using hard x-rays,

    C. Kottler, C. David, F. Pfeiffer, and O. Bunk, “A two-directional approach for grating based differential phase contrast imaging using hard x-rays,” Optics express , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1175–1181, 2007

    2007

  49. [49]

    A new user facility with flexible multi-scale, multi-contrast micro-ct capabilities,

    O. Roche i Morgó, Y. Jia, H. Allan, A. Doherty, C. Navarrete-León, A. Astolfo, L. Jiang, J. D. Ferrara, and M. Endrizzi, “A new user facility with flexible multi-scale, multi-contrast micro-ct capabilities,” in Developments in X-Ray Tomography XV , vol. 13152, p. 1315209, SPIE, 2024

    2024

  50. [50]

    The specification of imaging properties by response to a sine wave input,

    J. W. Coltman, “The specification of imaging properties by response to a sine wave input,” Journal of the Optical Society of America , vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 468–471, 1954

    1954

  51. [51]

    Digital cameras – Resolution and spatial frequency re- sponses,

    International Organization for Standardization, “Digital cameras – Resolution and spatial frequency re- sponses,” Standard ISO 12233:2024, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Sept. 2024. 12

    2024

  52. [52]

    Mtf evaluation of in-line phase contrast imaging system,

    X. Sun, F. Gao, H. Zhao, L. Zhang, J. Li, and Z. Zhou, “Mtf evaluation of in-line phase contrast imaging system,” in Quantitative Phase Imaging III , vol. 10074, pp. 120–127, SPIE, 2017

    2017

  53. [53]

    Impact of a single dis- tance phase retrieval algorithm on spatial resolution in x-ray inline phase sensitive imaging,

    M. U. Ghani, B. Gregory, F. Omoumi, B. Zheng, A. Yan, X. Wu, and H. Liu, “Impact of a single dis- tance phase retrieval algorithm on spatial resolution in x-ray inline phase sensitive imaging,” Biomedical spectroscopy and imaging , vol. 8, no. 1-2, pp. 29–40, 2019

    2019

  54. [54]

    Contrast and resolution in imaging with a microfocus x-ray source,

    A. Pogany, D. Gao, and S. Wilkins, “Contrast and resolution in imaging with a microfocus x-ray source,” Review of Scientific Instruments , vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 2774–2782, 1997

    1997

  55. [55]

    Hard x-ray phase contrast imaging using single absorption grating and hybrid semiconductor pixel detector,

    F. Krejci, J. Jakubek, and M. Kroupa, “Hard x-ray phase contrast imaging using single absorption grating and hybrid semiconductor pixel detector,” Review of Scientific Instruments , vol. 81, no. 11, 2010

    2010

  56. [56]

    Comparing signal intensity and refraction sensitivity of double and single mask edge illumination lab-based x-ray phase contrast imaging set-ups,

    G. K. Kallon, P. Diemoz, F. Vittoria, D. Basta, M. Endrizzi, and A. Olivo, “Comparing signal intensity and refraction sensitivity of double and single mask edge illumination lab-based x-ray phase contrast imaging set-ups,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , vol. 50, no. 41, p. 415401, 2017

    2017

  57. [57]

    Application of noise2inverse and adaptation (noise2phase) to single-mask x-ray phase contrast micro- computed tomography,

    K. Shah, G. Lioliou, D. Chen, A. Denker, P. Munro, M. Endrizzi, A. Astolfo, A. Olivo, and C. K. Hagen, “Application of noise2inverse and adaptation (noise2phase) to single-mask x-ray phase contrast micro- computed tomography,” Journal of Microscopy , 2025

    2025

  58. [58]

    Modulation transfer function (mtf) evaluation for x-ray phase imaging system employing attenuation masks,

    G. Havariyoun, L. Massimi, C. Hagen, M. Endrizzi, and A. Olivo, “Modulation transfer function (mtf) evaluation for x-ray phase imaging system employing attenuation masks,” Physics in Medicine & Biology , vol. 68, no. 9, p. 09NT02, 2023

    2023

  59. [59]

    Retrieval of weak x-ray scattering using edge illumination,

    C. J. M. Jones, F. A. Vittoria, A. Olivo, M. Endrizzi, and P. R. Munro, “Retrieval of weak x-ray scattering using edge illumination,” Optics Letters , vol. 43, no. 16, pp. 3874–3877, 2018

    2018

  60. [60]

    Strategies for efficient and fast wave optics simulation of coded-aperture and other x-ray phase-contrast imaging methods,

    F. A. Vittoria, P. C. Diemoz, M. Endrizzi, L. Rigon, F. C. Lopez, D. Dreossi, P. R. Munro, and A. Olivo, “Strategies for efficient and fast wave optics simulation of coded-aperture and other x-ray phase-contrast imaging methods,” Applied optics, vol. 52, no. 28, pp. 6940–6947, 2013. 13 Appendix 1 Detector crosstalk The derived model has assumed an ideal im...

    2013