Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Stellar feedback efficiencies: supernovae versus stellar winds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1511.05151 v2 pith:5TDIMA2L submitted 2015-11-16 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords energystellarfeedbackmassivewindskineticretainedstar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Stellar winds and supernova (SN) explosions of massive stars ("stellar feedback") create bubbles in the interstellar medium (ISM) and insert newly produced heavy elements and kinetic energy into their surroundings, possibly driving turbulence. Most of this energy is thermalized and immediately removed from the ISM by radiative cooling. The rest is available for driving ISM dynamics. In this work we estimate the amount of feedback energy retained as kinetic energy when the bubble walls have decelerated to the sound speed of the ambient medium. We show that the feedback of the most massive star outweighs the feedback from less massive stars. For a giant molecular cloud (GMC) mass of 1e5 solar masses (as e.g. found in the Orion GMCs) and a star formation efficiency of 8% the initial mass function predicts a most massive star of approximately 60 solar masses. For this stellar evolution model we test the dependence of the retained kinetic energy of the cold GMC gas on the inclusion of stellar winds. In our model winds insert 2.34 times the energy of a SN and create stellar wind bubbles serving as pressure reservoirs. We find that during the pressure driven phases of the bubble evolution radiative losses peak near the contact discontinuity (CD), and thus, the retained energy depends critically on the scales of the mixing processes across the CD. Taking into account the winds of massive stars increases the amount of kinetic energy deposited in the cold ISM from 0.1% to a few percent of the feedback energy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Per Astronomix ad Astra: High-Order Differentiable (Magneto)hydrodynamics with Energy-Conserving Self-Gravity

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new differentiable MHD+self-gravity simulator combines a fifth-order finite-difference WENO scheme with a fourth-order semi-discretely energy-conserving self-gravity module.

  2. FRANZ: Framework for analytical one-zone blastwave dynamics

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A local thin-shell blastwave framework recovers classical SNR limits and shows galactic shear, gravity, and filaments deform remnants and can systematically overestimate ages in structured media.

  3. Centrally concentrated star formation in young clusters II: Jet feedback

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Jet feedback in centrally concentrated clouds reduces star formation efficiency to 12-16% and yields cluster structures more consistent with observations than models without jets.

Pith tools