Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

User Decision Guidance with Selective Explanation Presentation from Explainable-AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18016 v3 pith:5TDPVRYR submitted 2024-02-28 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords explanationsdecisionuseridsssx-selectorai-suggesteddecisionsexplanation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of selecting explanations for XAI (Explainable AI)-based Intelligent Decision Support Systems (IDSSs). IDSSs have shown promise in improving user decisions through XAI-generated explanations along with AI predictions, and the development of XAI made it possible to generate a variety of such explanations. However, how IDSSs should select explanations to enhance user decision-making remains an open question. This paper proposes X-Selector, a method for selectively presenting XAI explanations. It enables IDSSs to strategically guide users to an AI-suggested decision by predicting the impact of different combinations of explanations on a user's decision and selecting the combination that is expected to minimize the discrepancy between an AI suggestion and a user decision. We compared the efficacy of X-Selector with two naive strategies (all possible explanations and explanations only for the most likely prediction) and two baselines (no explanation and no AI support). The results suggest the potential of X-Selector to guide users to AI-suggested decisions and improve task performance under the condition of a high AI accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Engaging with AI: How Interface Design Shapes Human-AI Collaboration in High-Stakes Decision-Making

    cs.HC 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a controlled comparison, AI confidence levels and text explanations improved human-AI decision accuracy, while reflective questions and human feedback increased effort and reduced trust.

Pith tools