Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky versus the Spherical Shell Model: A Comparative Study of pf-Shell Nuclei

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv nucl-th/0502057 v1 pith:5TRCIPFQ submitted 2005-02-19 nucl-th

classification nucl-th
keywords modelshellnilsson-strutinskynucleicomparativecomparedcrankedenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A comparative study is performed of a deformed mean field theory, represented by the cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky (CNS) model, and the spherical shell model. Energy spectra, occupation numbers, B(E2)-values, and spectroscopic quadrupole moments in the light pf shell nuclei are calculated in the two models and compared. The result is also compared to available experimental data which are generally well described by the shell model. Although the Nilsson-Strutinsky calculation does not include pairing, both the subshell occupation numbers and quadrupole properties are found to be rather similar in the two models. It is also shown that ``unpaired'' shell model calculations produce very similar energies as the CNS at all spins. The role of the pairing energy in the description of backbending and signature splitting in odd-mass nuclei is also discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Quantum Simulation of Rotating Nuclei using Quantum Variational Algorithms

    nucl-th 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    VQE on small CNS-inspired nuclear models matches exact diagonalization only in the simplest cases, with errors up to 1.09 in the 8-qubit models, despite the abstract claiming errors below 1e-4.

Pith tools