Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Distribution Aggregation via Continuous Thiele's Rules

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.01054 v1 pith:5TXJBLFC submitted 2024-08-02 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords textitcontinuousrulesthieleaggregationaverageaversionclass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We introduce the class of \textit{Continuous Thiele's Rules} that generalize the familiar \textbf{Thiele's rules} \cite{janson2018phragmens} of multi-winner voting to distribution aggregation problems. Each rule in that class maximizes $\sum_if(\pi^i)$ where $\pi^i$ is an agent $i$'s satisfaction and $f$ could be any twice differentiable, increasing and concave real function. Based on a single quantity we call the \textit{'Inequality Aversion'} of $f$ (elsewhere known as "Relative Risk Aversion"), we derive bounds on the Egalitarian loss, welfare loss and the approximation of \textit{Average Fair Share}, leading to a quantifiable, continuous presentation of their inevitable trade-offs. In particular, we show that the Nash Product Rule satisfies\textit{ Average Fair Share} in our setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Social Choice Analysis of Optimism's Retroactive Project Funding

    cs.GT 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    An abstract recommends the moving phantoms rule for RetroPGF funding on welfare and strategyproofness grounds, but the provided body is an unrelated topology paper, making the analysis unverifiable.

Pith tools