Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Self-supervised Graph Neural Networks without explicit negative sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.14958 v4 pith:5U2UUXPH submitted 2021-03-27 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords contrastivedatatechniquesaugmentationgraphlearningpowerfulself-supervised
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real world data is mostly unlabeled or only few instances are labeled. Manually labeling data is a very expensive and daunting task. This calls for unsupervised learning techniques that are powerful enough to achieve comparable results as semi-supervised/supervised techniques. Contrastive self-supervised learning has emerged as a powerful direction, in some cases outperforming supervised techniques. In this study, we propose, SelfGNN, a novel contrastive self-supervised graph neural network (GNN) without relying on explicit contrastive terms. We leverage Batch Normalization, which introduces implicit contrastive terms, without sacrificing performance. Furthermore, as data augmentation is key in contrastive learning, we introduce four feature augmentation (FA) techniques for graphs. Though graph topological augmentation (TA) is commonly used, our empirical findings show that FA perform as good as TA. Moreover, FA incurs no computational overhead, unlike TA, which often has O(N^3) time complexity, N-number of nodes. Our empirical evaluation on seven publicly available real-world data shows that, SelfGNN is powerful and leads to a performance comparable with SOTA supervised GNNs and always better than SOTA semi-supervised and unsupervised GNNs. The source code is available at https://github.com/zekarias-tilahun/SelfGNN.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Graph Prompting for Graph Learning Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of graph prompting methods that categorizes them by the stage at which prompts are applied: data, representation, or task.

Pith tools