pith. sign in

arxiv: 2312.05241 · v2 · pith:5U4ULZ56new · submitted 2023-12-08 · 💻 cs.CY

Contra generative AI detection in higher education assessments

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords detectiongenerativeacademicassessmentseducationintegrityeducationalhigher
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper presents a critical analysis of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) detection tools in higher education assessments. The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of generative AI, particularly in education, necessitates a reevaluation of traditional academic integrity mechanisms. We explore the effectiveness, vulnerabilities, and ethical implications of AI detection tools in the context of preserving academic integrity. Our study synthesises insights from various case studies, newspaper articles, and student testimonies to scrutinise the practical and philosophical challenges associated with AI detection. We argue that the reliance on detection mechanisms is misaligned with the educational landscape, where AI plays an increasingly widespread role. This paper advocates for a strategic shift towards robust assessment methods and educational policies that embrace generative AI usage while ensuring academic integrity and authenticity in assessments.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLMography: Transforming Human-AI Conversations into Traceability, Oversight, and Auditability Indicators

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    LLMography is a framework for generating KPI reports from human-AI conversations including prompt quality, human direction, AI dependency, and auditability scores, with a preliminary evaluation on 19 student reports s...