Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DIRI: Adversarial Patient Reidentification with Large Language Models for Evaluating Clinical Text Anonymization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17035 v1 pith:5UQGOIMI submitted 2024-10-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords clinicaldeidentificationlanguagelargemethodpatienttextadversarial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sharing protected health information (PHI) is critical for furthering biomedical research. Before data can be distributed, practitioners often perform deidentification to remove any PHI contained in the text. Contemporary deidentification methods are evaluated on highly saturated datasets (tools achieve near-perfect accuracy) which may not reflect the full variability or complexity of real-world clinical text and annotating them is resource intensive, which is a barrier to real-world applications. To address this gap, we developed an adversarial approach using a large language model (LLM) to re-identify the patient corresponding to a redacted clinical note and evaluated the performance with a novel De-Identification/Re-Identification (DIRI) method. Our method uses a large language model to reidentify the patient corresponding to a redacted clinical note. We demonstrate our method on medical data from Weill Cornell Medicine anonymized with three deidentification tools: rule-based Philter and two deep-learning-based models, BiLSTM-CRF and ClinicalBERT. Although ClinicalBERT was the most effective, masking all identified PII, our tool still reidentified 9% of clinical notes Our study highlights significant weaknesses in current deidentification technologies while providing a tool for iterative development and improvement.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VSF-Med:A Vulnerability Scoring Framework for Medical Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    VSF-Med introduces an eight-dimension, judge-scored vulnerability score for medical VLMs and reports that all five tested models are most vulnerable to persistent attack effects, with Llama-3.2 showing the largest drop.

Pith tools