Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Reflection-less filter for superconducting quantum circuits

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 0.6 mm² superconducting filter absorbs reflections and blocks thermal photons in one package, with insertion loss below 1 dB over an 80% bandwidth centered at 8 GHz.

desk verdict The device work is real and the thermal-photon suppression measurement is the strongest part, but the paper's own error budget undercuts the headline 14.5 GHz return-loss claim; that needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20645 v1 pith:5V6Z7ZUV submitted 2025-06-25 quant-ph

Jessica Kedziora , Eric Q. Bui , Alec Yen , Andres E. Lombo , Kaidong Peng , Terence J. Weir , Kevin P. O'Brien This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords reflection-lessfilterssuperconductingcircuitscryogenicmicrowavethermalphotonsuppressiontraveling-waveparametricamplifiersreturnlossdualnetworksynthesisquantumcomputinghardware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a monolithic superconducting reflection-less filter can combine three functions that quantum microwave chains usually need separate components for: low-loss band-pass filtering, wideband absorption of reflections, and suppression of thermal photons emitted by its own terminating resistors. The device, fabricated with aluminum on silicon plus nichrome resistors, is small enough to co-fabricate with qubits and traveling-wave parametric amplifiers. If the claim holds, a single compact component could replace or supplement circulators and attenuators, improving amplifier gain flatness and qubit coherence by preserving a 50-ohm impedance environment. The paper also identifies symmetry-plane delay and mutual inductance as the main physical limits to the ideal reflection-less condition, and presents a design method that incorporates these effects without full-wave simulation of the entire filter.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the dual-network reflection-less filter: a symmetric two-port network designed so that its even-mode and odd-mode reflection coefficients are negatives of each other, which forces $S_{11}=S_{22}=0$ while allowing arbitrary reciprocal transmission. The band-pass version is synthesized from a lumped-element filter whose reactances are replaced by their reciprocal impedances (inductors become capacitors and vice versa), with resistors equal to the characteristic impedance. The paper identifies three non-ideal effects that spoil the perfect reflection-less condition — component tolerance, delay across the symmetry plane, and mutual coupling between spiral inductors — and handles the last two explicitly: delay is modeled analytically, and mutual inductance is computed from a Neumann-integral approximation and included in circuit simulation by converting coupled inductors into cascaded tee networks. This S-parameter cascade method lets the designers optimize inductor winding directions without full-wave simulation of the entire structure.

What would settle it

Recalibrate the packaged filter at 20 mK using a low-loss cryogenic switch or a direct on-wafer two-port measurement with a vector network analyzer whose tracking error is below 1 dB up to 15 GHz, then check whether $S_{11}$ remains below -10 dB continuously from DC through 14.5 GHz; if the return loss crosses -10 dB at any frequency below 14.5 GHz, the abstract's headline bandwidth is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a reflection-less band-pass filter can be realized in a superconducting, qubit-compatible process and packaged without losing its key specifications. The filter is built from a symmetrical two-port dual network in which the even-mode and odd-mode reflection coefficients are made equal and opposite, so the two-port reflection coefficients vanish while transmission remains frequency-selective. The fabricated device occupies 0.6 mm² and, including its connectorized package at 20 mK, achieves insertion loss below 1 dB over an 80% fractional bandwidth centered at 8 GHz, with return loss of 10 dB or better from DC to above 14.5 GHz as stated in the abstract. The paper further claims that the dual topology makes the transfer function from the termination resistors to the microwave ports a notch filter in the pass band, so thermal photons generated by the resistors are suppressed by orders of magnitude; this is supported by a qubit-based heating experiment in which DC heating of the filter resistors produced no measurable increase in the qubit's effective temperature, unlike a cryogenic attenuator in the same configuration.

Load-bearing premise

The headline return-loss specification rests on the assumption that the measurement system can actually resolve 10 dB return loss up to 14.5 GHz, but the paper's own error budget says the cables and switches limit observable 10 dB return loss to at or below 11 GHz.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the filter performs as claimed, a single compact device can provide band-pass filtering, wideband impedance matching, and thermal-photon suppression on the same qubit-compatible chip.
  • Placing the filter at the output of a traveling-wave parametric amplifier should flatten amplifier gain ripple caused by out-of-band reflections from circulators and isolators, as the paper's simulations show.
  • The filter's notch transfer function from its resistors to the RF ports means that even when pump or control signals dissipate power in the filter's stop band, the qubit pass band remains largely shielded from the resulting thermal photons.
  • The S-parameter cascade design methodology, including the Neumann-integral mutual-inductance search, makes it practical to optimize reflection-less filters monolithically without time-consuming full-wave simulation of every layout iteration.
  • Because the process is compatible with standard aluminum-on-silicon superconducting circuits, the filter can be added to existing qubit and readout fabrication flows without a separate packaging step.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's abstract claim of '10 dB packaged return loss from DC to above 14.5 GHz' is not actually supported by its own measurement-error analysis, which states that the observable 10 dB return loss is limited to at or below 11 GHz because of cable and switch tracking and matching errors; a reader should treat the higher-frequency portion of the headline specification as an extrapolation rather
  • The dual-network thermal-photon suppression property is likely general: any absorptive component built as a matched dual network should show a notch between its terminating resistors and its pass band, so the same idea could be applied to other cryogenic absorptive elements such as matched attenuators or isolator replacements.
  • The measured stop-band return loss of 13.5 dB was limited by the realized nichrome sheet resistance being 16 ohms instead of the 26-ohm target; improving resistor process control should directly improve the out-of-band reflection-less performance without changing the topology.
  • The qubit heating experiment demonstrates a practical test protocol for comparing any microwave component's thermal-photon emission: heat its internal resistors with DC power and monitor qubit effective temperature, which is a more direct metric for quantum hardware than raw noise-power measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents the design, fabrication, and cryogenic characterization of a superconducting reflection-less band-pass filter intended for protecting quantum circuits from return-loss-induced errors and for suppressing thermal photons. The filter is synthesized using Morgan's dual-network theory, fabricated with Al on high-resistivity Si with NiCr resistors, and measured in a connectorized package at 20 mK. The authors report low insertion loss (<1 dB with packaging), wideband return loss, and a differential qubit-heating experiment showing that heating the filter's resistors does not raise the qubit's effective temperature, unlike a conventional attenuator.

Significance. If the headline claims are established, this is a valuable component for superconducting quantum microwave chains: a compact (0.6 mm^2) filter that absorbs out-of-band reflections rather than reflecting them, with low pass-band loss and a built-in thermal-photon suppression mechanism. The qubit-heating differential measurement is a strong, independent validation of the thermal-photon suppression claim, and the design methodology using S-parameter cascades and partial full-wave simulation is practical and transferable. However, the central return-loss bandwidth claim is not supported by the paper's own error analysis, so the measured performance envelope needs to be restated or the measurement capability improved.

major comments (2)
  1. [V.A] The abstract claims '10 dB packaged return loss from DC to above 14.5 GHz' and the conclusion claims 'vector calibrated S11 below 10 dB from 1 to 14 GHz', but Section V.A states that the standards correction error exceeds 0.316 (i.e., 10 dB return loss) at 13 GHz, and further that cable tracking/matching errors limit the observable 10 dB return loss to at or below 11 GHz. These statements are mutually inconsistent: the highest frequency at which the measurement can resolve a 10 dB return loss is 11 GHz, not 14.5 GHz. Since the wideband return-loss specification is a primary advertised feature, the authors must either (a) present a calibrated measurement with a demonstrably adequate error budget up to 14.5 GHz, or (b) explicitly revise all headline claims (abstract, conclusion, and Table I) to the supported frequency range, with a clear statement that higher-frequency return loss is not established by the presented data.
  2. [VI] The measured device used 16-ohm resistors against a 26-ohm design target, and the paper notes this limits the stop-band return loss to 13.5 dB. The abstract and Table I do not mention this deviation, so a reader could reasonably infer that the reported performance is for the designed circuit. The paper should separate the as-designed simulation from the as-measured device, state the resistor-value discrepancy prominently in the results section and abstract, and discuss how the reduced resistor value affects the confidence in the claimed 10 dB return-loss bandwidth. The margin above 10 dB is thinner than the design would imply, particularly in the stop band, which matters for the headline claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II.A] In the text before Eq. (5), 'band bass version' should be 'band-pass version'.
  2. [V.A] The text says 'Monty Carlo' twice; it should be 'Monte Carlo'.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'over a 80% fractional bandwidth' is grammatically incorrect; it should be 'over an 80% fractional bandwidth'.
  4. [V.A] The sentence 'The standards’ error exceeds 0.316 (10 dB) at 13 GHz' should clarify that 0.316 is the voltage reflection coefficient magnitude corresponding to 10 dB return loss, to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [References] Reference [15] is incomplete: the URL contains '[insert date]' and should be replaced with the actual access date or a stable citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: filter synthesis comes from external Morgan dual-network theory and the measured S-parameters and qubit heating data independently verify the design; the stated calibration bandwidth limits are a non-circular measurement caveat.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its inputs. The filter synthesis is taken from Morgan and Boyd's published dual-network/even-odd mode theory (Ref. [12]); the paper uses Eqs. (5)-(7) from that external source to set starting component values and then optimizes against a target S-parameter response using standard circuit models and HFSS. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the measured insertion loss, return loss, and stop-band return loss are independent verifications of a design, and the measured device deviates from design (16-ohm vs 26-ohm resistors), which the paper explicitly reports. The thermal-photon suppression claim follows from the transfer function from the resistor ports to the microwave ports being a notch in the filter passband, a consequence of the dual-network topology; it is then tested by a separate qubit effective-temperature experiment with attenuator and thru-line controls, so it does not reduce to the claim itself. Self-citations ([3], [7], [15], [16]) are present but are used as background, simulator, and parameter sources for an illustrative TWPA simulation, not to establish the filter's measured performance; the load-bearing filter theory is external, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked. The manuscript does contain an explicit calibration limitation that should be weighed as a correctness risk rather than circularity: Section V.A states 'The standards' error exceeds 0.316 (10 dB) at 13 GHz' and 'the observable 10 dB return loss is limited to occur at or below 11 GHz,' which is inconsistent with the abstract's 'above 14.5 GHz' and the conclusion's 'below 10 dB from 1 to 14 GHz.' The measured part's resistor value (16 ohms vs 26-ohm target) also reduces stop-band return-loss margin to 13.5 dB. These are measurement/execution limitations that do not make the derivation circular; the core design theory and the independent measurement of its predicted effects are not equivalent to the inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard microwave network theory (passivity, even/odd decomposition), Morgan's published dual-network synthesis, and the assumption that the resistors behave as ideal thermal noise sources with the filter's notch transfer function. No arbitrary constants are fitted to make the predicted response match the measured data; the design optimization selects physical dimensions to meet a target response, which is not circular. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Passivity condition det(I - S^dagger S) >= 0 for a two-port network
    Used in Section II.A to establish that a network with S11 = S22 = 0 and |S21| <= 1 is physically realizable.
  • standard math Even/odd mode decomposition for symmetric two-port networks
    Used in Section II.A to express S11 and S21 in terms of Gamma_even and Gamma_odd.
  • domain assumption Dual network synthesis realizes Gamma_even = -Gamma_odd
    Adopted from Morgan [12] and reciprocal impedance theory [21]; this is the core topology assumption that makes the filter reflection-less.
  • domain assumption Termination resistors are modeled as an infinite transmission line with thermal noise
    Invoked in Section II.A to argue the resistor-to-port transfer function is a notch in the pass band; based on Clerk [22].
  • domain assumption Aluminum film is superconducting with negligible microwave loss at 20 mK
    Assumed in the interpretation of the low insertion loss and in the design; standard for Al at millikelvin temperatures.
  • domain assumption Room-temperature-characterized calibration standards remain valid at 20 mK after error correction
    Section V.A relies on a 3-term error model with standards measured at room temperature and applied at 20 mK; the paper's Monte Carlo analysis quantifies this risk.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reflection-less filter for superconducting quantum circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5V6Z7ZUV

@misc{pith2026250620645,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reflection-less filter for superconducting quantum circuits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5V6Z7ZUV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20645}
}
abstract

Protecting superconducting quantum circuits from non-ideal return loss, including out-of-band circulator behavior and enhancing the performance of broadband quantum-limited amplifiers can be accomplished using a superconducting version of a special class of microwave filters known as reflection-less filters. These filters can simultaneously permit low pass band loss to preserve quantum efficiency and broad band reflection-less characteristics in the stop and pass bands. The filter also suppresses thermal photons emitted in its pass band from the termination resistors by the nature of the dual network topology. This work will review the application, theory, design, and modeling of a superconducting reflection-less filter, followed by fabrication details and the presentation of cryogenic performance measurements of a monolithic device. The filter was fabricated using Al on Si, incorporating NiCr resistors, which allows for simple integration with other superconducting quantum devices. The filter with an area of 0.6 $\mathrm{\mathbf{mm^2}}$ achieves insertion loss below 1 dB, including its connectorized package over a 80\% fractional bandwidth centered at 8 GHz, and 10 dB packaged return loss from DC to above 14.5 GHz.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20645 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of TWPA performance simulated in differing configurations, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Construction of reflection-less filter: (a) Reciprocal impedance relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The band pass configuration of the reflection-less filter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The impact of delay across symmetry plane on return loss: (a) simplest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the effect of mutual coupling on filter performance: (a) Path [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: S-parameter method of including mutual inductance. Each box represents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Capacitor and inductor value simulations: (a) HFSS model of capacitor, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Final Design: (a) Final GDS for 5x5 mm chip level design including [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fabricated devices: (a) False-color representation of the filter structure. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cross-sectional schematic of the reflection-less filter on a high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: figure 11. The input line attenuators are selected to provide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Dilution refrigerator calibrated S11 and normalized through measure￾ment system. Lower stages are labeled in accordance with BlueFors docu￾mentation: Still, CP ”cold plate” and MXC is ”mixing chamber”. Vertical number boxes are multi-pole switches. Shaded boxes repres…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: System cal simulation: (a) Monty Carlo of corrected S [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) Measured performance of the superconducting reflection-less filter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (a) Detail of wire bond launch showing winged line adding capacitance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) Effective temperature of the qubit device computed using measured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Characterizing a four-qubit planar lattice for arbitrary error detection,

    J. M. Chow, S. J. Srinivasan, E. Magesan, A. D. C ´orcoles, D. W. Abraham, J. M. Gambetta, and M. Steffen, “Characterizing a four-qubit planar lattice for arbitrary error detection,” inQuantum Information and Computation XIII, E. Donkor, A. R. Pirich, and M. Hayduk, Eds., vol. 9500. SPIE, May 2015, p. 95001G. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2192740 2015

  2. [2]

    Experimentally verified, fast analytic, and numerical design of superconducting resonators in flip-chip architectures,

    H.-X. Li, D. Shiri, S. Kosen, M. Rommel, L. Chayanun, A. Nylander, R. Rehammar, G. Tancredi, M. Caputo, K. Grigoras, L. Gr ¨onberg, J. Govenius, and J. Bylander, “Experimentally verified, fast analytic, and numerical design of superconducting resonators in flip-chip architectures,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 4, p. 1–12, 2023. [Online]....

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Directional emission of a readout resonator for qubit measurement,

    A. Yen, Y . Ye, K. Peng, J. Wang, G. Cunningham, M. Gingras, B. M. Niedzielski, H. Stickler, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, and K. P. O’Brien, “Directional emission of a readout resonator for qubit measurement,” Physical Review Applied, vol. 22, no. 3, Sep. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.034035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.034035 2024

  4. [4]

    System Characterization of Dispersive Readout in Superconducting Qubits

    D. Sank, A. Opremcak, A. Bengtsson, M. Khezri, Z. Chen, O. Naaman, and A. Korotkov, “System characterization of dispersive readout in superconducting qubits,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2402.00413

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Design of absorptive superconducting filter,

    P. Ma, B. Wei, Y . Heng, C. Luo, X. Guo, and B. Cao, “Design of absorptive superconducting filter,”Electronics Letters, vol. 53, no. 11, p. 728–730, May 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el.2017.0768

    work page arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Model-based optimization of superconducting qubit readout,

    A. Bengtsson, A. Opremcak, M. Khezri, D. Sank, A. Bourassa, K. J. Satzinger, S. Hong, C. Erickson, B. J. Lester, K. C. Miao, A. N. Korotkov, J. Kelly, Z. Chen, and P. V . Klimov, “Model-based optimization of superconducting qubit readout,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 132, no. 10, Mar. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.100603

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.100603 2024

  7. [7]

    Floquet-mode traveling-wave parametric amplifiers,

    K. Peng, M. Naghiloo, J. Wang, G. D. Cunningham, Y . Ye, and K. P. O’Brien, “Floquet-mode traveling-wave parametric amplifiers,” PRX Quantum, vol. 3, no. 2, Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020306

    doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.020306 2022

  8. [8]

    The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility,

    F. Yan, S. Gustavsson, A. Kamal, J. Birenbaum, A. P. Sears, D. Hover, T. J. Gudmundsen, D. Rosenberg, G. Samach, S. Weber, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, J. Clarke, A. J. Kerman, and W. D. Oliver, “The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, Nov. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.103...

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms12964 2016

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Practical guide for building superconducting quantum devices,

    Y . Y . Gao, M. A. Rol, S. Touzard, and C. Wang, “Practical guide for building superconducting quantum devices,”PRX Quantum, vol. 2, no. 4, Nov. 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum. 2.040202

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    50ω characteristic impedance low-pass metal powder filters,

    F. P. Milliken, J. R. Rozen, G. A. Keefe, and R. H. Koch, “50ω characteristic impedance low-pass metal powder filters,”Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, no. 2, Feb. 2007. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2431770

    2007 doi

  3. [11]

    Traveling-wave parametric amplifier with passive reverse isolation,

    C. S. Kow and M. T. Bell, “Traveling-wave parametric amplifier with passive reverse isolation,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.04059

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Theoretical and experimental study of a new class of reflectionless filter,

    M. A. Morgan and T. A. Boyd, “Theoretical and experimental study of a new class of reflectionless filter,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 59, no. 5, May 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    On- chip millimeter-wave integrated absorptive bandstop filter in (bi)-cmos technology,

    Z. Ge, L. Chen, L. Yang, R. Gomez-Garcia, and X. Zhu, “On- chip millimeter-wave integrated absorptive bandstop filter in (bi)-cmos technology,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 114–117, Jan

  6. [14]

    Low-loss superconducting titanium nitride grown using plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy,

    C. J. K. Richardson, A. Alexander, C. G. Weddle, B. Arey, and M. Olszta, “Low-loss superconducting titanium nitride grown using plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 127, no. 23, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0008010

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Josephsoncircuits.jl,

    O’Brien and Peng, “Josephsoncircuits.jl,” https://github.com/kpobrien/ JosephsonCircuits.jl, n.d., online; accessed [insert date]

  8. [16]

    A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,

    C. Macklin, K. O’Brien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V . Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, “A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,”Science, vol. 350, no. 6258, p. 307–310, Oct. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1126/...

    2015

  9. [17]

    Power waves and the scattering matrix,

    K. Kurokawa, “Power waves and the scattering matrix,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 194–202, Mar

  10. [18]

    A. I. Zverev,Handbook of Filter Synthesis. Wiley-Interscience, 1967

    1967

  11. [19]

    Coupled-mode theory of optical waveguides,

    H. Haus, W. Huang, S. Kawakami, and N. Whitaker, “Coupled-mode theory of optical waveguides,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 16–23, 1987. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JLT. 1987.1075416

    1987

  12. [20]

    A method of analysis of symmetrical four- port networks,

    J. Reed and G. J. Wheeler, “A method of analysis of symmetrical four- port networks,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 1956

    1956

  13. [21]

    Modeling of mutual inductance between planar inductors on the same plane,

    F. Zhang, C. Ma, and T. Zhao, “Modeling of mutual inductance between planar inductors on the same plane,” inProceedings of the 2019 8th International Symposium on Next Generation Electronics (ISNE), 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 2, p. 1155–1208, Apr. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 82.1155

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    Absorptive filters in the realization of rcied activation jamming,

    A. Lebl, M. Mileusni, B. Pavic, and J. Radivojevic, “Absorptive filters in the realization of rcied activation jamming,” in2019 IEEE 31st International Conference on Microelectronics (MIEL). IEEE, Sep. 2019, p. 231–234. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIEL.2019. 8889582

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Allgemeine gesetze der inducierten elektrischen str ¨ome,

    F. E. Neumann, “Allgemeine gesetze der inducierten elektrischen str ¨ome,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 143, pp. 31–44, 1846

  17. [25]

    Microwave attenuators for use with quantum devices below 100 mk,

    J.-H. Yeh, J. LeFebvre, S. Premaratne, F. C. Wellstood, and B. S. Palmer, “Microwave attenuators for use with quantum devices below 100 mk,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 121, no. 22, p. 224501, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    scikit-rf: An open source python package for microwave network creation, analysis, and calibration [speaker’s corner],

    A. Arsenovic, J. Hillairet, J. Anderson, H. Forst ´en, V . Rieß, M. Eller, N. Sauber, R. Weikle, W. Barnhart, and F. Forstmayr, “scikit-rf: An open source python package for microwave network creation, analysis, and calibration [speaker’s corner],”IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol....

    2022

  19. [27]

    A method for building low loss multi-layer wiring for superconducting microwave devices,

    A. Dunsworth, R. Barends, Y . Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Fowler, B. Foxen, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, P. Klimov, E. Lucero, J. Mutus, M. Neeley, C. Neill, C. Quintana, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, T. White, H. Neven, J. Martinis, and A. Megrant, “A method for b...

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    Nichrome resistor properties and reliability,

    Rome Air Development Center, “Nichrome resistor properties and reliability,” Rome Air Development Center, Rome, NY , Tech. Rep. AD-765 534, Jun. 1973. [Online]. Available: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/ pdf/AD0765534.pdf

    1973

  21. [29]

    Cryogenic single-port calibration for superconducting microwave resonator measurements,

    H. Wang, S. Singh, C. R. H. McRae, J. C. Bardin, S.-X. Lin, N. Messaoudi, A. R. Castelli, Y . J. Rosen, E. T. Holland, D. P. Pappas, and J. Y . Mutus, “Cryogenic single-port calibration for superconducting microwave resonator measurements,”Quantum Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 3,...

    2021

  22. [30]

    Network analyzer error models and calibration methods,

    D. Rytting, “Network analyzer error models and calibration methods,” blub, Tech. Rep., n.d., online; http://emlab.uiuc.edu/ece451/appnotes/ Rytting NAModels.pdf

  23. [31]

    On the calibration process of automatic network analyzer systems (short papers),

    S. Rehnmark, “On the calibration process of automatic network analyzer systems (short papers),”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 457–458, Apr. 1974. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1974.1128250

    1974

  24. [32]

    An analysis of microwave de-embedding errors (technical notes),

    L. Glasser, “An analysis of microwave de-embedding errors (technical notes),”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 26, no. 5, p. 379–380, May 1978. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1978.1129395

    1978

  25. [33]

    Compact, reflectionless band-pass filter: Based on gaas ipd process for highly reliable communication,

    X. Li, M. Xing, G. Liu, X. Yang, C. Dai, and M. Hou, “Compact, reflectionless band-pass filter: Based on gaas ipd process for highly reliable communication,”Electronics, vol. 10, no. 23, p. 2998, Dec. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10232998

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    X-band quasi-reflectionless mmic band- pass filters with minimum number of components,

    D. Simpson and D. Psychogiou, “X-band quasi-reflectionless mmic band- pass filters with minimum number of components,”IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 4329–4334, jul 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Design of a miniaturized reflectionless bandpass filter with high selectivity for 5g network,

    G. Liu, M. Xing, X. Li, S. Xu, and C. Dai, “Design of a miniaturized reflectionless bandpass filter with high selectivity for 5g network,” in Recent Developments in Mechatronics and Intelligent Robotics (ICMIR 2019), ser. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, S. Patna...

    2019

  28. [36]

    Reflectionless Low Pass Filter, DC - 6000 MHz, 50&x3A9; — XLF-63+ — Mini-Circuits — minicircuits.com,

    “Reflectionless Low Pass Filter, DC - 6000 MHz, 50&x3A9; — XLF-63+ — Mini-Circuits — minicircuits.com,” https://www. minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=XLF-63%2B&srsltid= AfmBOooeqVsJ1ZH8hqfOylUA4k11gI43f2lnBPJ07i0MSag5n-IBwNQ7, [Accessed 08-04-2025]

    2025

  29. [37]

    Inherent thermal-noise problem in addressing qubits,

    S. Simbierowicz, M. Borrelli, V . Monarkha, V . Nuutinen, and R. E. Lake, “Inherent thermal-noise problem in addressing qubits,” PRX Quantum, vol. 5, no. 3, Jul. 2024. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.030302

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Driving a josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier into chaos: Effects of a non-sinusoidal current–phase relation,

    C. Guarcello, C. Barone, G. Carapella, V . Granata, G. Filatrella, A. Giachero, and S. Pagano, “Driving a josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier into chaos: Effects of a non-sinusoidal current–phase relation,”Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 189, p. 115598, Dec. 2024. [...

    2024

  31. [39]

    A 4-8 ghz kinetic inductance travelling-wave parametric amplifier using four-wave mixing with near quantum-limit noise performance,

    F. Faramarzi, R. Stephenson, S. Sypkens, B. H. Eom, H. LeDuc, and P. Day, “A 4-8 ghz kinetic inductance travelling-wave parametric amplifier using four-wave mixing with near quantum-limit noise performance,”

  32. [40]

    An rf-squid-based traveling-wave parametric amplifier with -84 dbm input saturation power across more than one octave bandwidth,

    V . Gaydamachenko, C. Kissling, and L. Gr ¨unhaupt, “An rf-squid-based traveling-wave parametric amplifier with -84 dbm input saturation power across more than one octave bandwidth,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02489

    2025

  33. [41]

    Single- shot readout of a superconducting qubit using a thermal detector,

    A. M. Gunyh ´o, S. Kundu, J. Ma, W. Liu, S. Niemel ¨a, G. Catto, V . Vadimov, V . Vesterinen, P. Singh, Q. Chen, and M. M¨ott¨onen, “Single- shot readout of a superconducting qubit using a thermal detector,”Nature Electronics, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 288–298, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Av...

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Decay- protected superconducting qubit with fast control enabled by integrated on-chip filters,

    A. Sah, S. Kundu, H. Suominen, Q. Chen, and M. M ¨ott¨onen, “Decay- protected superconducting qubit with fast control enabled by integrated on-chip filters,”Communications Physics, vol. 7, no. 1, Jul. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01733-3

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 6, no. 2, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550 Jessica Kedziorareceived the S....

    2019 doi

  36. [1965]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1965.1125964

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1965.1125964

    1965

  37. [2021]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2020.3036036

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2020.3036036

    2020

  38. [2024]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11751

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11751

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.