Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated Essay Scoring Using Transformer Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.06874 v1 pith:5XA5F3VG submitted 2021-10-13 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords approachmodelsscoringtransformer-basedanalysisautomatedclassificationessay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated essay scoring (AES) is gaining increasing attention in the education sector as it significantly reduces the burden of manual scoring and allows ad hoc feedback for learners. Natural language processing based on machine learning has been shown to be particularly suitable for text classification and AES. While many machine-learning approaches for AES still rely on a bag-of-words (BOW) approach, we consider a transformer-based approach in this paper, compare its performance to a logistic regression model based on the BOW approach and discuss their differences. The analysis is based on 2,088 email responses to a problem-solving task, that were manually labeled in terms of politeness. Both transformer models considered in that analysis outperformed without any hyper-parameter tuning the regression-based model. We argue that for AES tasks such as politeness classification, the transformer-based approach has significant advantages, while a BOW approach suffers from not taking word order into account and reducing the words to their stem. Further, we show how such models can help increase the accuracy of human raters, and we provide a detailed instruction on how to implement transformer-based models for one's own purpose.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantifying Holistic Review: A Multi-Modal Approach to College Admissions Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    CAPS fuses LLM essay scores, semantic embeddings, and regression weights into one admissions score, but validates it only on synthetic applicants.

Pith tools