REVIEW 1 cited by
A few entanglement criterion for two-qubit and two-qudit system based on realignment operation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
It is known that realignment crierion is necessary but not a sufficient criterion for lower as well as higher dimensional system. In this work, we first consider a two-qubit system and derived the necessary and sufficient condition based on realignment operation for a particular class of two-qubit system. Thus we solved the problem of if and only if condition partially for a particular class of two-qubit state. We have shown that the derived necessary and sufficient condition detects two-qubit entangled states, which are not detected by the realignment criterion. Next, we discuss the higher dimensional system and obtained the necessary condition on the minimum singular value of the realigned matrix of $d\otimes d$ dimensional separable states. Moreover, we provide the geometrical interpretation of the derived separability criterion for $d\otimes d$ dimensional system. Furthermore, we show that our criterion may also detect bound entangled state. The entanglement detection criterion studied here is beneficial in the sense that it requires to calculate only minimum singular value of the realigned matrix while on the other hand realignment criterion requires all singular values of the realigned matrix. Thus, our criterion has computational advantage over the realignment criterion.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Realignment Criterion: A necessary and sufficient condition for two-qubit $X$-states
The proposed necessary and sufficient realignment criterion for X-states is conditional on the PPT criterion and therefore reproduces PPT rather than providing an independent test.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.