Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Exact plane symmetric black bounce with a perfect-fluid exterior obeying a linear equation of state

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the maximally extended plane-symmetric Gamboa solution with a perfect fluid obeying a linear equation of state is, for a range of the equation-of-state parameter, either a globally regular black bounce whose Killing…

desk verdict The new piece is the regular-attachment classification; the black-bounce/black-hole dichotomy is real but conditional on a fixed equation-of-state parameter across the horizon. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14872 v2 pith:627HFZOG submitted 2025-06-17 gr-qc

Hideki Maeda , Cristian Martinez This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1583C75 PACS 04.20.-q04.20.Jb04.40.-b04.70.Bw
keywords blackbounceGamboasolutionKillinghorizonperfectfluidplane-symmetricspacetimelinearequationofstatenullenergyconditionspacelikesingularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies an exact two-parameter family of plane-symmetric spacetimes in n(≥4) dimensions, the Gamboa solution, whose matter is a perfect fluid obeying the linear equation of state p = χρ. It establishes that, for χ ∈ [-1/3,0), the solution possesses a nondegenerate Killing horizon, and it classifies every regular way to attach two Gamboa solutions at that horizon without a lightlike thin shell. For the asymptotically topological Schwarzschild-Tangherlini branch with χ ∈ (-(n-3)/(3n-5),0), the maximal extension under unchanged χ is shown to be one of two spacetimes: a globally regular black bounce whose Killing horizon is also the bounce null surface, or a black hole with a spacelike curvature singularity inside the horizon. A reader might care because this realizes a black bounce in ordinary general relativity with one of the simplest matter models, and the bounce itself requires no fine-tuning of parameters, although a smooth C∞ horizon requires special discrete values of χ. The null energy condition is violated everywhere away from the horizon, so the bounce is expected to be dynamically unstable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the single-null coordinate system ds² = -H(x)dv² + 2dv dx + r(x)²dl²_{n-2}, obtained from quasiglobal coordinates by introducing an ingoing null coordinate v := t + ∫H⁻¹dx. Near the Killing horizon x = x_h, the metric functions behave as H(x) ≃ H₁Δ + H_{3+β}$Δ^{{3+β}}$ and r(x) ≃ r_h + r_{2+β}$Δ^{{2+β}}$ with Δ := x - x_h. These expansions show that x = x_h is a nondegenerate Killing horizon whenever r(x) is continuous there, and that the glued metric is C∞ exactly when β is the same nonnegative integer on both sides of the horizon and the interior parameter satisfies a fine-tuning relation. The parameter β := -(1+3χ)/(2χ) therefore controls the differentiability: β integer corresponds to χ = -1/(1+2N), and the parity of N decides between the bounce and the singular extension. The sign of the interior mass parameter M or ar M determines whether r(x) turns around (bounce) or runs to zero (singularity).

What would settle it

For n = 5 and χ = -1/7 (odd N = 3), the paper predicts a C∞ black bounce when the interior parameter is M_- = -M_+; one could explicitly construct the null coordinates and check that r(x) is monotone increasing for x < x_h, that all curvature invariants are finite, and that no non-smooth term appears in the metric at any order in Δ. If instead a singularity, a thin shell, or a lower-order non-smooth term appears, the bounce classification fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Gamboa solution admits a nondegenerate Killing horizon for χ ∈ [-1/3,0), and that for the asymptotically topological Schwarzschild-Tangherlini branch with χ ∈ (-(n-3)/(3n-5),0) the maximal extension under fixed χ is exhaustively described by two possibilities. If the interior region x < x_h is described by the same form of the solution with the opposite sign of M (M = M_- > 0), the radial function r(x) decreases monotonically from infinity on the far side to the horizon and then increases to infinity again, producing a globally regular black bounce in which the Killing horizon acts simultaneously as a null bounce surface, a wormhole throat, and an event horizon. If instead the interior is described by the complementary form of the solution with ar M < 0, r(x) increases monotonically toward a curvature singularity at r = 0, giving a black hole with a nondegenerate horizon and a spacelike singularity. The matter beyond the horizon is not a perfect fluid but an anisotropic fluid, equivalently a spacelike (tachyonic) perfect fluid, and the metric at the horizon is C∞ only for χ = -1/(1+2N) with a parity condition on N and a fine-tuned interior parameter; otherwise it is merely $C^{{1,1}}$, which is still enough to avoid curvature singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of the maximal extension assumes that the equation-of-state parameter χ (and with it β and h₁) is the same in the dynamical region beyond the Killing horizon as in the static exterior; if χ changes across the horizon, regular attachments still exist but the two Penrose diagrams and Table IV need not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every n ≥ 4 and every χ in (χ0,0), the same static exterior can be extended in two inequivalent ways, so the global structure is not fixed by the exterior alone.
  • The black-bounce extension contains no inner horizon, so the mass-inflation instability associated with regular-center black holes is absent.
  • In the black-bounce (respectively black-hole) case the metric at the horizon is C∞ only for χ = -1/(1+2N) with odd (respectively even) N satisfying N > (n-1)/(n-3), together with a fine-tuned interior parameter such as M_- = -M_+ or ar M_- = M_+.
  • The matter beyond the horizon is an anisotropic fluid, interpretable as a spacelike (tachyonic) perfect fluid, so the perfect-fluid exterior continues into an interior that is not a perfect fluid in the usual sense.
  • At χ = -1/3 the matter on the Killing horizon is a negative-energy null dust, which violates all standard energy conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction exploits planar symmetry (a flat (n-2)-dimensional base), so a spherical or hyperbolic analogue would require solving different radial equations; the paper's closing remark notes that an asymptotically flat spherically symmetric perfect-fluid black bounce is left open.
  • Because continuity of r(x) is the only condition for a regular attachment, two Gamboa regions with different equation-of-state parameters can be joined at the horizon without a thin shell, suggesting that a fluid's equation of state could change discontinuously across a Killing horizon in a way that standard junction conditions might otherwise forbid.
  • The discrete set χ = -1/(1+2N) at which the horizon is C∞ is measure zero in the allowed interval, so generically the regular horizon is only C^{1,1}; this may be invisible to geodesic observers but could affect high-frequency test fields or subleading corrections to black-hole thermodynamics.
  • A natural next step is a linear perturbation analysis; the paper itself expects dynamical instability, so a concrete test would be to look for growing quasinormal modes in the quasinormal spectrum of these black bounces.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the Gamboa solution, an n-dimensional static plane-symmetric general-relativity solution sourced by a perfect fluid obeying p = χρ. It rewrites the solution in a new form, shows that a nondegenerate Killing horizon exists only for χ = -1 and χ ∈ [-1/3, 0), classifies all C^{1,1} and C^∞ attachments of two Gamboa solutions across that horizon (allowing χ to differ on the two sides), and constructs global extensions for χ ∈ (χ0, 0) under the explicit assumption that χ is unchanged in the extended dynamical region. Depending on the interior branch, the extension is claimed to be either a globally regular black bounce whose Killing horizon is a bounce null hypersurface, or a black hole with a spacelike curvature singularity inside the horizon. Appendices provide a new derivation of the solution with a Ricci-flat base manifold, a proof of regularity of the bifurcation surface, and an explicit horizon matter description for χ = -1/3.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides an explicit exact black-bounce construction in general relativity sourced by a very simple matter model in the exterior, with precise regularity conditions at the horizon and a clean classification of thin-shell-free attachments. The derivation in Appendix A and the explicit special-case solution in Sec. III.A are checkable and constitute a solid technical contribution. The work also clarifies for which discrete values of χ the metric is C^∞ at the horizon, including the fine-tuning conditions in the extended region. The main global classification, however, is conditional on the constant-χ assumption and relies on several previous results of the authors, so the scope of the central claim is narrower than the title alone might suggest.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (3.5); Appendix B] The asymptotic expansion (3.5) near the Killing horizon is imported as "given in the proof of Proposition 6 in Ref. [57]" and is not derived in this paper. This expansion underlies the regularity statements of Proposition 1 and is used directly in Appendix B (Eqs. (B1)-(B5)) to establish the regularity of the bifurcation surface. Because these are load-bearing for the central claims, please provide a self-contained derivation of (3.5) from Eqs. (2.26) and (2.28), or state precisely the theorem in Ref. [57] that supplies it and the hypotheses under which it applies.
  2. [Sec. IV, first paragraph; Table IV; Figs. 1-2] The dichotomy between a regular black bounce and a black hole with a spacelike singularity is established only under the assumption that the equation-of-state parameter χ is unchanged in the extended dynamical region. The paper states this assumption explicitly, but Proposition 1 shows that regular C^{1,1} attachments with χ_- ≠ χ_+ are possible whenever Eq. (3.15) holds, and for χ_- ∈ [-1/3, χ0) the r = 0 boundary is non-null without being spacelike, so the singularity structure can differ from Table IV. Please frame the main result as explicitly conditional in the abstract and in Sec. V, or add a discussion of the χ-discontinuous extensions.
  3. [Sec. IV; Figs. 1-2] The phrase "maximally extended" is not justified by the arguments given. The paper constructs an extension across the Killing horizon and, in the black-bounce case, obtains a spacetime with two asymptotic regions, but it does not prove inextendibility (e.g., that all incomplete geodesics have been covered or that no further extension exists). Please provide such an argument or replace the term with "an extension" throughout.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. V, item 1] The statement that the null energy condition is violated everywhere except on the horizon is not correct for χ = -1/3, because Appendix C shows a horizon null dust with negative energy density; please qualify the claim.
  2. [Sec. II.D, Eqs. (2.35), (2.38), (2.40)] The notation "χ = (χ0, 0)" should read "χ ∈ (χ0, 0)" in these equations and the surrounding text.
  3. [Sec. III.B, Lemma 1 proof] The gauge choice Ω = -(2+β)/(M Π1) presumes M ≠ 0; this is consistent with the paper's assumptions but should be stated explicitly before the substitution.
  4. [Sec. V, item 1 and title] The summary describes the result as a black bounce with a perfect-fluid exterior; given that the interior matter is an anisotropic fluid interpreted as a spacelike perfect fluid and violates the NEC, consider stating this more prominently in the abstract as well as in the body.
  5. [Sec. III.A, around Eq. (3.2)] The special-case discussion would benefit from a remark that for m < 0 or \bar{m} < 0 the radius r(x) reaches zero at finite x, so the domain of the new form is not the full real line.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; the black-bounce/black-hole dichotomy is a conditional construction from the exact Gamboa solution, with only minor self-citations for general regularity theorems.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The Gamboa solution is re-derived independently in Appendix A from the Einstein equations (Eqs. (A2)-(A14)), and the two-parameter metric (2.4) is not fitted to any target prediction. Proposition 1's C^{1,1} attachment conditions are obtained from the explicit asymptotic expansions (3.10)-(3.14) computed in Lemma 1 directly from the metric, and the continuity conditions (3.15)-(3.17) are genuine matching conditions, not definitions of the conclusions. The C^\infty refinement does invoke the authors' prior Propositions 6 and 9 of Ref. [57] and Ref. [58], but these are stated as general theorems about Killing horizons and matter on horizons, not as restatements of the present black-bounce construction; no quoted passage shows that those cited results assume the target dichotomy. The black-bounce/black-hole classification in Sec. IV is explicitly conditional on 'the value of χ is unchanged in the extended region', which is an honest scope restriction rather than a hidden fit. The two branches are constructed by choosing the interior Gamboa form (Eq. (2.4) with M_->0 versus Eq. (2.13) with \bar M_-<0) that satisfies the matching condition; this is a classification of possible regular attachments, not a prediction forced by the input. Therefore, at most there is a minor self-citation dependence, and it is not load-bearing for the primary result.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or geometrical entities. The null-dust fluid on the horizon for χ=-1/3 (Appendix C) is a derived stress-energy distribution, not a new ingredient. The free parameters of the solution are the integration constants M and h1 plus the equation-of-state parameter χ; the only genuinely ad hoc numerical choice is the fine-tuning of the interior mass parameter required for C∞ smoothness.

free parameters (4)
  • M (mass parameter)
    Integration constant in the Gamboa solution (2.4) and (2.13); its sign selects a static (M<0) or dynamical (M>0) side. Not fitted to data.
  • h1 (matter parameter)
    Integration constant with h1>0 that fixes the horizon radius r_h through (2.23); not fitted to data.
  • χ (equation-of-state parameter)
    Parameter in p=χρ; chosen by hand in the ranges [-1/3,0) and (χ0,0) for the analysis. The black-bounce and black-hole conclusions in Sec. IV depend on χ belonging to (χ0,0).
  • M_- or \bar{M}_- (extended-region mass parameter) = M_- = -M_+ for the black bounce; \bar{M}_- = M_+ for the black hole, in the C∞ cases
    The fine-tuning condition for a C∞ horizon stated in Sec. IV and Table IV. Without this choice the metric is only C1,1 at the horizon.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Einstein field equations in n≥4 dimensions with a perfect-fluid energy-momentum tensor (2.1)
    The entire analysis is carried out in general relativity with the standard Einstein equations, stated in Eq. (2.1).
  • domain assumption Plane symmetry with an (n-2)-dimensional flat base manifold dl^2_{n-2}
    The line element (2.4) is restricted to planar symmetry; the authors deliberately do not use the Ricci-flat generalization of Appendix A.
  • domain assumption The C1,1 metric regularity criterion is sufficient for a regular horizon
    Invoked in Sec. II.C to call the horizon regular, citing Sec. 2.3 of Ref. [57]. This is a stated regularity standard rather than a derived result in this paper.
  • standard math Proposition 6 and Proposition 9 of Ref. [57] and Proposition 2 of Ref. [58] are valid
    The asymptotic expansion (3.5) near the horizon is imported from Proposition 6 of Ref. [57], and the C∞ attachment is concluded via Proposition 9 of Ref. [57]. These are published theorems by the same authors, assumed without proof here.
  • ad hoc to paper The value of χ is unchanged in the extended dynamical region beyond the horizon
    Stated in Sec. IV as the assumption under which the maximal-extension classification is made. It is a simplifying physical choice, not forced by the field equations, and it bounds the generality of Table IV.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact plane symmetric black bounce with a perfect-fluid exterior obeying a linear equation of state." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/627HFZOG

@misc{pith2026250614872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact plane symmetric black bounce with a perfect-fluid exterior obeying a linear equation of state},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/627HFZOG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14872}
}
abstract

We investigate an exact two-parameter family of plane symmetric solutions admitting a hypersurface-orthogonal Killing vector in general relativity with a perfect fluid obeying a linear equation of state $p=\chi\rho$ in $n(\ge 4)$ dimensions, obtained by Gamboa in 2012. The Gamboa solution is identical to the topological Schwarzschild-Tangherlini-(anti-)de~Sitter $\Lambda$-vacuum solution for $\chi=-1$ and admits a nondegenerate Killing horizon only for $\chi=-1$ and $\chi\in[-1/3,0)$. We identify all possible regular attachments of two Gamboa solutions for $\chi\in[-1/3,0)$ at the Killing horizon without a lightlike thin shell, where $\chi$ may have different values on each side of the horizon. We also present the maximal extension of the static and asymptotically topological Schwarzschild-Tangherlini Gamboa solution, realized only for $\chi\in(-(n-3)/(3n-5),0)$, under the assumption that the value of $\chi$ is unchanged in the extended dynamical region beyond the horizon. The maximally extended spacetime describes either (i) a globally regular black bounce whose Killing horizon coincides with a bounce null hypersurface or (ii) a black hole with a spacelike curvature singularity inside the horizon. The matter field inside the horizon is not a perfect fluid but rather an anisotropic fluid that can be interpreted as a spacelike (tachyonic) perfect fluid. A fine-tuning of the parameters is unnecessary for the black bounce, but the null energy condition is violated everywhere except on the horizon. In the black-bounce (black-hole) case, the metric in the regular coordinate system is $C^\infty$ only for $\chi=-1/(1+2N)$ with odd (even) $N$ satisfying $N>(n-1)/(n-3)$, and if one of the parameters in the extended region is fine-tuned.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14872 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: A black-hole spacetime as a maximal extension of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    Gravitational lensing in the Simpson- Visser black-bounce spacetime in a strong deflec- tion limit

    N. Tsukamoto, “Gravitational lensing in the Simpson- Visser black-bounce spacetime in a strong deflec- tion limit”, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.2, 024033 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024033 [arXiv:2011.03932 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [57]

    Probing a black-bounce, traversable wormhole with weak deflection gravitational lensing

    X. T. Cheng and Y. Xie, “Probing a black-bounce, traversable wormhole with weak deflection gravitational lensing”, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.6, 064040 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.064040

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.064040 2021

  3. [1]

    According to the results in Sec

    gives dr dx = − M Π1 2 + β Π(1+β)/(2+β), (4.1) which shows that r(x) is a monotonically increasing func- tion in this static domain. According to the results in Sec. II D, the asymptotically S-T region r → ∞ corre- sponding to x → ∞ is null infinity and causally null in the Penrose diagram. Under the assumption that β is the same on both sides of the horiz...

    work page

  4. [2]

    For any value of χ ∈ (χ0, 0), the maximally ex- tended spacetime describes (i) a globally regular and asymptotically topological S-T black bounce with a nondegenerate Killing horizon which coin- cides with a bounce null hypersurface, or (ii) an 10 asymptotically topological S-T black hole with a nondegenerate Killing horizon and a spacelike cur- vature si...

    work page

  5. [3]

    In the black-bounce case, the metric in the single- null coordinates (2.29) is C∞ only for χ = −1/(1 + 2N ) with odd N satisfying N > (n − 1)/(n − 3), and if the parameter in the extended region is given by M = −M+(> 0)

    work page

  6. [4]

    Because the NEC is violated away from the Killing horizon, our black-bounce spacetime is expected to be dynamically unstable

    In the black-hole case, the metric in the single-null coordinates (2.29) is C∞ only for an odd β or, equivalently, χ = −1/(1 + 2 N ) with even N sat- isfying N > (n − 1)/(n − 3), and if the parameter in the extended region is given by ¯M = M+(< 0). Because the NEC is violated away from the Killing horizon, our black-bounce spacetime is expected to be dyna...

    work page

  7. [5]

    Quest for realistic non-singular black-hole geometries: regular-center type

    H. Maeda, “Quest for realistic non-singular black-hole geometries: regular-center type”, JHEP 11 (2022), 108 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022)108 [arXiv:2107.04791 [gr- qc]]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [6]

    Non-singular general relativistic grav ita- tional collapse

    J.M. Bardeen, “Non-singular general relativistic grav ita- tional collapse”, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Gravitation and the Theory of Relativ- ity, (Publishing House of Tbilisi University, Tbilisi, 1968) p. 87

    work page 1968

Show all 65 references
  1. [7]

    Formation and evaporation of reg- ular black holes

    S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of reg- ular black holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 031103 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031103 [arXiv:gr- qc/0506126 [gr-qc]]

    2006

  2. [8]

    Regular electrically charged structure s in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general rel- ativity

    I. Dymnikova, “Regular electrically charged structure s in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general rel- ativity”, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004), 4417-4429 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/18/009 [arXiv:gr-qc/0407072 [gr-qc]]

    2004 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity

    Z. Y. Fan and X. Wang, “Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity”, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.12, 124027 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124027 [arXiv:1610.02636 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [10]

    The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole

    E. Ay´ on-Beato and A. Garc ´ ıa, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole”, Phys. Lett. B 493, 149- 152 (2000) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01125-4 [arXiv:gr - qc/0009077 [gr-qc]]

    2000

  5. [11]

    A note on singular and non- singular black holes

    S. Chinaglia and S. Zerbini, “A note on singular and non- singular black holes”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 49 (2017) no.6, 75 doi:10.1007/s10714-017-2235-6 [arXiv:1704.08516 [gr - qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Resolution of Reissner- Nordstr¨ om singularities by higher-derivative correc- tions

    P. A. Cano and ´A. Murcia, “Resolution of Reissner- Nordstr¨ om singularities by higher-derivative correc- tions”, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) no.7, 075014 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abd923 [arXiv:2006.15149 [hep- th]]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Reg- ular black holes from pure gravity

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano and R. A. Hennigar, “Reg- ular black holes from pure gravity”, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139260 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139260 [arXiv:2403.04827 [gr-qc]]

    2025

  8. [14]

    Regu- lar black holes and black universes

    K. A. Bronnikov, V. N. Melnikov and H. Dehnen, “Regu- lar black holes and black universes”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 39 (2007), 973-987 doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0430-6 [arXiv:g r- qc/0611022 [gr-qc]]

    2007

  9. [15]

    Black-bounce to traversable wormhole

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole”, JCAP 02 (2019), 042 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2019/02/042 [arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Inner-horizon instability a nd mass inflation in black holes

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, “Inner-horizon instability a nd mass inflation in black holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1663- 1666 (1989) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1663

    1989 doi

  11. [17]

    Internal structure of black holes

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, “Internal structure of black holes”, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1796-1809 (1990) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1796

    1990 doi

  12. [18]

    Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution

    A. Ori, “Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 789- 792 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.789

    1991 doi

  13. [19]

    Reg- ular black holes with stable cores

    A. Bonanno, A. P. Khosravi and F. Saueressig, “Reg- ular black holes with stable cores”, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.12, 124027 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.124027 [arXiv:2010.04226 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Inner horizon instability and the unstable cores of regular black holes

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pa- cilio and M. Visser, “Inner horizon instability and the unstable cores of regular black holes”, JHEP 05, 132 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)132 [arXiv:2101.05006 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [21]

    On the Inner Horizon Instability of Non-Singular Black Holes

    F. Di Filippo, R. Carballo-Rubio, S. Liberati, C. Pa- cilio and M. Visser, “On the Inner Horizon Instability of Non-Singular Black Holes”, Universe 8 (2022) no.4, 204 doi:10.3390/universe8040204 [arXiv:2203.14516 [gr-qc] ]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Regular black holes without mass inflation instability

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pa- 13 cilio and M. Visser, “Regular black holes without mass inflation instability”, JHEP 09 (2022), 118 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)118 [arXiv:2205.13556 [gr- qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Mass Inflation without Cauchy Hori- zons

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, “Mass Inflation without Cauchy Hori- zons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, no.18, 181402 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.181402 [arXiv:2402.14913 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Regular phan- tom black holes

    K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phan- tom black holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 251101 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.251101 [arXiv:gr- qc/0511109 [gr-qc]]

    2006

  19. [25]

    Magnetic black universes and wormholes with a phan- tom scalar

    S. V. Bolokhov, K. A. Bronnikov and M. V. Skvortsova, “Magnetic black universes and wormholes with a phan- tom scalar”, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012), 245006 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/24/245006 [arXiv:1208.4619 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Arbitrary Static, Spherically Symmetric Space-Times as Solutions of Scalar-Tensor Gravity

    K. A. Bronnikov, K. Badalov and R. Ibadov, “Arbitrary Static, Spherically Symmetric Space-Times as Solutions of Scalar-Tensor Gravity”, Grav. Cosmol. 29 (2023) no.1, 43-49 doi:10.1134/S0202289323010036 [arXiv:2212.04544 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [27]

    AdS-Taub-NUT spacetimes and exact black bounces with scalar hair

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, N. Mora and A. Vi- gan` o, “AdS-Taub-NUT spacetimes and exact black bounces with scalar hair”, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.2, 024038 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.024038 [arXiv:2202.06706 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field

    P. Ca˜ nate, “Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field”, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.2, 024031 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.024031 [arXiv:2202.02303 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Black bounces, wormholes, and partly phantom scalar fields

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Black bounces, wormholes, and partly phantom scalar fields”, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.6, 064029 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.064029 [arXiv:2206.09227 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Source of black bounces in general relativity

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de S. Silva, “Source of black bounces in general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.4, 044064 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044064 [arXiv:2302.10772 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources

    K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de S. Silva, “Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources”, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.2, 024065 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024065 [arXiv:2305.19296 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [32]

    On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics

    G. Alencar, K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues, D. S´ aez- Chill´ on G´ omez and M. V. de S. Silva, “On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics”, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.7, 745 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 13119-4 [arXiv:2403.12897 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Charged Ellis Wormhole and Black Bounce

    H. Huang and J. Yang, “Charged Ellis Wormhole and Black Bounce”, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.12, 124063 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.124063 [arXiv:1909.04603 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Trapping horizons of the evolving charged wormhole and black bounce

    J. Yang and H. Huang, “Trapping horizons of the evolving charged wormhole and black bounce”, Phys. Rev. D 104, no.8, 084005 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084005 [arXiv:2104.11134 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Black-bounce solution in k-essence theories

    C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, J. C. Fabris and M. E. Rodrigues, “Black-bounce solution in k-essence theories”, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.4, 044011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044011 [arXiv:2309.10963 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [36]

    New sources of ghost fields in k-essence theories for black-bounce solutions

    C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, ´E. L. Martins, J. C. Fabris and M. E. Rodrigues, “New sources of ghost fields in k-essence theories for black-bounce solutions”, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, no.1, 015001 (2025) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad98e0 [arXiv:2405.07455 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Magnet- ically charged black-bounce solution via nonlinear elec- trodynamics in a k-essence theory

    C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, M. V. de S. Silva, J. C. Fabris, M. E. Rodrigues and H. Belich, “Magnet- ically charged black-bounce solution via nonlinear elec- trodynamics in a k-essence theory”, Phys. Rev. D 111, no.8, 084025 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.084025 [arXiv...

    2025 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Novel black- bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy con- ditions, and causal structure

    F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, M. V. de S. Silva, A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Novel black- bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy con- ditions, and causal structure”, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.8, 084052 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084052 [arXiv:2009.12057 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Charged black-bounce spacetimes

    E. Franzin, S. Liberati, J. Mazza, A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Charged black-bounce spacetimes”, JCAP 07, 036 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/036 [arXiv:2104.11376 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes

    K. A. Bronnikov and R. K. Walia, “Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes”, Phys. Rev. D 105, no.4, 044039 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044039 [arXiv:2112.13198 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [41]

    On the structure of black bounces sourced by anisotropic fluids

    L. A. Lessa and G. J. Olmo, “On the structure of black bounces sourced by anisotropic fluids”, JCAP 03, 019 (2025) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/019 [arXiv:2412.05378 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Black-bounce in f(T) gravity

    E. L. B. Junior and M. E. Rodrigues, “Black-bounce in f(T) gravity”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 55, no.1, 8 (2023) doi:10.1007/s10714-022-03048-6 [arXiv:2203.03629 [gr- qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Generalized models for black-bounce solutions in f(R) gravity

    J. C. Fabris, E. L. B. Junior and M. E. Rodrigues, “Generalized models for black-bounce solutions in f(R) gravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.10, 884 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12022-8 [arXiv:2310.0071 4 [gr-qc]]

    2023

  38. [44]

    Black bounces in conformal Killing gravity

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Rodrigues, “Black bounces in conformal Killing gravity”, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.6, 557 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024- 12922-3 [arXiv:2405.09702 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Black bounces in Cotton grav- ity

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. de Silva and H. A. Vieira, “Black bounces in Cotton grav- ity”, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.11, 1190 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13568-x [arXiv:2407.2164 9 [gr-qc]]

    2024

  40. [46]

    BTZ Black-Bounce to Traversable Wormhole

    J. Furtado and G. Alencar, “BTZ Black-Bounce to Traversable Wormhole”, Universe 8, no.12, 625 (2022) doi:10.3390/universe8120625 [arXiv:2210.06608 [gr-qc] ]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Ringing of the regu- lar black-hole/wormhole transition

    M. S. Churilova and Z. Stuchlik, “Ringing of the regu- lar black-hole/wormhole transition”, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, no.7, 075014 (2020) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab7717 [arXiv:1911.11823 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Scalar perturbations around ro- tating regular black holes and wormholes: Quasi- normal modes, ergoregion instability, and superra- diance

    E. Franzin, S. Liberati, J. Mazza, R. Dey and S. Chakraborty, “Scalar perturbations around ro- tating regular black holes and wormholes: Quasi- normal modes, ergoregion instability, and superra- diance”, Phys. Rev. D 105, no.12, 124051 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.124051 [a...

    2022 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Echoes of charged black-bounce spacetimes

    S. R. Wu, B. Q. Wang, D. Liu and Z. W. Long, “Echoes of charged black-bounce spacetimes”, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.11, 998 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10938-1 14 [arXiv:2201.08415 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Shadows and optical appear- ance of black bounces illuminated by a thin accre- tion disk

    M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia and D. S. C. G´ omez, “Shadows and optical appear- ance of black bounces illuminated by a thin accre- tion disk”, JCAP 08, 036 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2021/08/036 [arXiv:2105.15073 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Charged black-bounce spacetimes: Photon rings, shadows and observational appearances

    Y. Guo and Y. G. Miao, “Charged black-bounce spacetimes: Photon rings, shadows and observational appearances”, Nucl. Phys. B 983, 115938 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115938 [arXiv:2112.0174 7 [gr-qc]]

    2022

  46. [52]

    Can different black holes cast the same shadow?

    H. C. D. Lima, Junior., L. C. B. Crispino, P. V. P. Cunha and C. A. R. Herdeiro, “Can different black holes cast the same shadow?”, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.8, 084040 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084040 [arXiv:2102.07034 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Gravitational lensing in black-bounce spacetimes

    J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, P. J. Porfirio and A. R. Soares, “Gravitational lensing in black-bounce spacetimes”, Phys. Rev. D 102, no.4, 044021 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044021 [arXiv:2005.13096 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Strong gravitational lensing by rotating Simpson-Visser black holes

    S. U. Islam, J. Kumar and S. G. Ghosh, “Strong gravitational lensing by rotating Simpson-Visser black holes”, JCAP 10, 013 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2021/10/013 [arXiv:2104.00696 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Gravitational lensing by two photon spheres in a black-bounce spacetime in strong deflec- tion limits

    N. Tsukamoto, “Gravitational lensing by two photon spheres in a black-bounce spacetime in strong deflec- tion limits”, Phys. Rev. D 104, no.6, 064022 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.064022 [arXiv:2105.14336 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Higher-dimensional perfect fluids and empty singular boundaries

    R. E. Gamboa Sarav ´ ı, “Higher-dimensional perfect fluids and empty singular boundaries”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 44, 1769-1786 (2012) doi:10.1007/s10714-012- 1366-z [arXiv:1204.4907 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Fake Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes

    H. Maeda, “Fake Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes”, [arXiv:2410.11937 [gr-qc]]

  52. [60]

    Energy conditions in arbitrary dimensions

    H. Maeda and C. Mart ´ ınez, “Energy conditions in arbitrary dimensions”, PTEP 2020 (2020) no.4, 4 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa009 [arXiv:1810.02487 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Existence and ab- sence of Killing horizons in static solutions with symmetries

    H. Maeda and C. Mart ´ ınez, “Existence and ab- sence of Killing horizons in static solutions with symmetries”, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, no.24, 245013 (2024) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad8ea4 [arXiv:2402.11012 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Hawking-Ellis type of matter on Killing horizons in symmetric spacetimes

    H. Maeda, “Hawking-Ellis type of matter on Killing horizons in symmetric spacetimes”, Phys. Rev. D 104, no.8, 084088 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084088 [arXiv:2107.01455 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Planar black holes and black bounces with flat exterior

    H. Maeda and C. Mart ´ ınez, “Planar black holes and black bounces with flat exterior”, [arXiv:2506.11184 [gr-qc]]

  56. [64]

    Addendum: Existence and absence of Killing horizons in static solutions with symmetries (2024 Class. Quantum Grav. 41, 245013)

    H. Maeda and C. Mart ´ ınez, “Addendum: Existence and absence of Killing horizons in static solutions with symmetries (2024 Class. Quantum Grav. 41, 245013)”, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ade35a

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Plane symmet- ric self-gravitating fluids with pressure equal to en- ergy density

    R. Tabensky and A. H. Taub, “Plane symmet- ric self-gravitating fluids with pressure equal to en- ergy density”, Comm. Math. Phys. 29 (1973), 61 doi.org/10.1007/BF01661153

    1973 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.