pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01858 · v1 · pith:62UT6VDWnew · submitted 2019-07-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.str-el

Incommensurate charge and spin density wave order in electron doped SrMn1-xWxO3 (x= 0.08 to 0.1875)

Poonam Yadav , Shivani Sharma , Aga Shahee , Ivan da Silva , Vaclav Petricek , N P Lalla This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 10:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords incommensurate charge orderspin density waveelectron dopingmanganitesorbital orderFermi surface nestingcharge density waveneutron diffraction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electron doping in SrMn1-xWxO3 produces incommensurate charge order tied to 3dx2-y2 orbital ordering through Fermi-surface nesting of eg electrons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the structural and magnetic effects of tungsten electron doping in SrMn1-xWxO3 for x from 0.08 to 0.1875 using neutron diffraction. It establishes that increasing doping changes the structure to an incommensurate charge-ordered modulated phase with super-space-group P2/m(αβ0)00, featuring ab-plane ferro-ordering of 3dx2-y2 orbitals in a compressed tetragonal lattice. This incommensurate charge order is linked directly to the orbital order and is explained as arising from the mixed itinerant-localized character of eg electrons that undergo Fermi-surface nesting, triggering an electronic instability and opening a gap by a charge density wave mechanism. At lower temperatures this charge-ordered state transitions into different spin density wave orders whose propagation vectors shift continuously with doping before frustration suppresses them at higher x. The authors note that the nesting-driven charge density wave shares features with the electronic instability seen in high-Tc cuprates.

Core claim

The incommensurate charge-order order is intimately related with the 3dx2-y2 orbital order. The occurrence of IC-CO has been attributed to the mixed character (itinerant/localized) of eg-electrons undergoing Fermi-surface nesting of 3dx2-y2 band causing electronic instability, which opens a gap through a charge density wave (CDW) mechanism.

What carries the argument

Fermi-surface nesting of the 3dx2-y2 band in the mixed-character eg electrons, producing the incommensurate charge density wave that stabilizes the super-space-group modulated structure with ab-plane orbital ferro-order.

If this is right

  • For 0.08 < x < 0.10 a C-type antiferromagnetic order with propagation vector (1/2, 1/2, 0) appears under 3dz2 orbital ferro-ordering.
  • For x > 0.1 a C-type antiferromagnetic order with vector (1/2, 0, 1/2) coexists with an incommensurate spin density wave of vector (0.12, 0.38, 1/2).
  • In the window 0.1625 < x < 0.175 the magnetic order changes to a single incommensurate spin density wave with vector (0.07, 0.43, 1/2) while the charge and orbital features stay qualitatively unchanged.
  • Spin density wave order disappears at still higher doping because large frustration is introduced into the system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the nesting mechanism is confirmed, further doping or pressure studies could test whether superconductivity emerges in this family as it does near similar instabilities in cuprates.
  • The continuous evolution of propagation vectors with tungsten content supplies a tunable platform for mapping how Fermi-surface nesting strength controls the competition between charge and spin density waves.

Load-bearing premise

The incommensurate superlattice peaks observed by neutron diffraction are produced by a charge density wave from Fermi-surface nesting rather than by alternative structural distortions or purely magnetic mechanisms.

What would settle it

Neutron diffraction intensities of the superlattice peaks that fail to refine under the P2/m(αβ0)00 CDW model with 3dx2-y2 orbital order, or spectroscopic data showing no gap opening at the nested portions of the 3dx2-y2 band.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01858 by Aga Shahee, Ivan da Silva, N P Lalla, Poonam Yadav, Shivani Sharma, Vaclav Petricek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Typical example of a selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern, showing charge-order modulation superlattice spots in SrMn1-xWxO3-δ for 0.10 ≤ x ≤ 0.1625. (b) Stack of XRD profiles showing tetragonal (200)/(002) peaks. The splitting behavior of these peaks shows cubic to tetragonal phase transformation as a function of W content. The corresponding inset shows the c/a ratio representing the chan… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Incommensurate (IC) charge-order (CO) and spin density wave (SDW) order in electron doped SrMn1-xWxO3-{\delta} (x= 0.08 to 0.1875) have been studied using neutron diffraction.The study highlights the drastic effect of electron doping on the emergence of magnetic ground states which were not revealed in manganites before. With increasing (x) the crystal structure changes from simple tetragonal (P4/mmm) to an IC-CO modulated structure with super space-group P2/m({\alpha}\b{eta}0)00 having ab-planer ferro order of 3dx2-y2 orbitals in a compressed tetragonal (c<a) lattice. The IC-CO order is found to be intimately related with the 3dx2-y2 orbital order.The occurrence of IC-CO has been attributed to the mixed character (itinerant/localized) of eg-electrons undergoing Fermi-surface nesting of 3dx2-y2 band causing electronic instability, which opens a gap through a charge density wave (CDW) mechanism. This feature appears to share proximity with the high-Tc cuprates. At lower temperatures, the CDW phase undergoes SDW transition, which changes continuously with x and finally disappear at higher x due to the introduction of large frustration into the system. For 0.08 < x < 0.10 a C-type antiferromagnetic (AFM) order with propagation vector k = (1/2, 1/2, 0) appears under ferro-ordering of 3dz2 orbitals, whereas for x > 0.1, a different C-type AFM order with propagation vector k = (1/2,0,1/2), coexists with an incommensurate SDW order with k = (0.12, 0.38, 1/2).For compositions with 0.1625 < x < 0.175, while the structural features of CDW and orbital-order remain qualitatively the same, the magnetic interaction gets modified and results another SDW phase with single incommensurate propagation vector k = (0.07, 0.43, 1/2). A detail magnetic and structural phase-diagram, as a function of W substitution for SrMn1-xWxO3 (0.08 < x < 0.4) is presented.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports neutron diffraction studies on electron-doped SrMn_{1-x}W_xO_3 (x = 0.08–0.1875), documenting a transition from tetragonal P4/mmm to an incommensurate charge-ordered structure with superspace group P2/m(αβ0)00 that features ab-plane ferro-order of 3d_{x^2-y^2} orbitals. The IC-CO is attributed to a CDW instability arising from Fermi-surface nesting of the mixed-character e_g electrons; this phase is followed at lower temperature by several SDW and C-type AFM orders whose propagation vectors evolve with x, culminating in a detailed magnetic/structural phase diagram.

Significance. If the CDW/nesting attribution is substantiated, the work identifies previously unreported incommensurate orders and orbital–charge coupling in doped manganites, supplies a doping-dependent phase diagram, and draws a parallel to cuprate physics through the proposed CDW mechanism in a mixed itinerant/localized electron system.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central attribution of the observed incommensurate modulation vector to Fermi-surface nesting of the 3d_{x^2-y^2} band (and the consequent CDW gap opening) is asserted without band-structure calculations or explicit demonstration that the measured (α,β,0) coincides with a calculated nesting vector. Neutron diffraction establishes the superspace symmetry and its coupling to orbital order but cannot by itself distinguish this electronic mechanism from lattice instabilities or magnetoelastic coupling to the SDW.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: superspace-group notation contains typographic artifacts (P2/m({α}{β}0)00); the conventional form P2/m(αβ0)00 should be used consistently.
  2. The manuscript does not report refinement statistics (R-factors, χ²), error bars on the incommensurate components (α,β), or raw integrated intensities for the superlattice peaks, which would be required to assess the robustness of the structural model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the single major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central attribution of the observed incommensurate modulation vector to Fermi-surface nesting of the 3d_{x^2-y^2} band (and the consequent CDW gap opening) is asserted without band-structure calculations or explicit demonstration that the measured (α,β,0) coincides with a calculated nesting vector. Neutron diffraction establishes the superspace symmetry and its coupling to orbital order but cannot by itself distinguish this electronic mechanism from lattice instabilities or magnetoelastic coupling to the SDW.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain explicit band-structure calculations demonstrating that the measured (α,β,0) vector exactly matches a calculated nesting vector of the 3d_{x^2-y^2} band. The attribution to a CDW instability driven by Fermi-surface nesting is instead based on three experimental observations: (i) the incommensurate propagation vector appears only in the doping window where the e_g electrons have mixed itinerant/localized character, (ii) the superspace group P2/m(αβ0)00 is accompanied by ab-plane ferro-order of 3d_{x^2-y^2} orbitals in a compressed tetragonal lattice, and (iii) the structural modulation onsets at higher temperature than the subsequent SDW orders, which argues against a purely magnetoelastic origin. We acknowledge that these points do not constitute a direct proof of nesting and that lattice instabilities cannot be ruled out by neutron diffraction alone. In the revised version we will rephrase the abstract and discussion to present the CDW/nesting scenario as a physically motivated interpretation supported by the observed orbital-charge coupling and analogy to cuprate CDW physics, rather than as a definitively established mechanism. We will also add a sentence noting the absence of explicit band-structure calculations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental neutron diffraction study with interpretive attribution only

full rationale

The paper reports neutron diffraction measurements, superspace-group refinements (P2/m(αβ0)00), orbital-order assignments, and a magnetic phase diagram as functions of W doping x. The central attribution of IC-CO to Fermi-surface nesting of the 3dx2-y2 band is presented as an interpretive conclusion in the abstract and discussion, not as a derived result obtained from equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce to the target claim by construction. No load-bearing derivations, predictions from fitted inputs, or uniqueness theorems appear. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks as an experimental report; the interpretive step is open to alternative explanations but does not constitute circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental diffraction study and introduces no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities beyond standard crystallographic indexing of peaks.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of neutron diffraction peak indexing, propagation-vector determination, and super-space-group refinement
    Invoked to assign the observed superlattice peaks to IC-CO and SDW orders.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6034 in / 1315 out tokens · 36186 ms · 2026-05-25T10:14:19.833232+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Howald, H

    C. Howald, H. Eisaki, N. Kaneko, and A. Kapitulnik, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100(17), 9705 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Hanaguri, C

    T. Hanaguri, C. Lupien, Y. Kohsaka, D.-H. Lee, M. Azuma, M. Takano, H. Takagi & J. C. Davis, Nature, 430, 1001 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    W. D. Wise, M. C. Boyer, K. Chatterjee, T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, H. Ikuta, Y. Wang and E. W. Hudson, Nat. Physics, 4, 696 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. Le Tacon, M. Minola, S. Blanco-Canosa, C. Mazzoli, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, A. Frano, D. G. Hawthorn, F. He, T. Loew, M. Moretti Sala, D. C. Peets, M. Salluzzo, E. Schierle, R. Sutarto, G. A. Sawatzky, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, L. Braicovich, Science, 337, 821 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Chang, E

    J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. v. Zimmermann, E. M. Forganand, S. M. Hayden, Nature Physics, 8, 871 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    J. A. Rosen, R. Comin, G. Levy, D. Fournier, Z.-H. Zhu, B. Ludbrook, C.N. Veenstra, A. Nicolaou, D. Wong, P. Dosanjh, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, G.R. Blake, F. White, T.T.M. Palstra, R. Sutarto, F.He, A. Fran˜o Pereira,Y.Lu, B. Keimer, G. Sawatzky, L. Petaccia& A. Damascelli, Nature commun.,4, 1977 (2013)

    work page 1977

  7. [7]

    Blanco-Canosa, A

    S. Blanco-Canosa, A. Frano, T. Loew, Y. Lu, J. Porras, G. Ghiringhelli, M. Minola, C. Mazzoli, L. Braicovich, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, M. Le Tacon, and B. Keimer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 187001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    A. M. Gabovich , A. I. Voitenko, J. F. Annettand, M. Ausloos, Supercond. Sci. Technol., 14, R1–R27 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    C. H. Chen and S-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76(21), 4042 (1996)

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    P. G. Radaelli, D. E. Cox, M. Marezio, and S-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. B, 55 (5), 3015 (1997)

    work page 1997

  11. [11]

    P. G. Radaelli, D. E. Cox, L. Capogna, S.-W. Cheong, M. Marezio, Phys. Rev. B, 59 (22), 14440 (1999)

    work page 1999

  12. [12]

    S. Cox, J. Singleton, R. D. Mcdonald, A. Migliori, and P. B. Littlewood, Nature Material, 7, 25 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Kida and M

    N. Kida and M. Tonouchi, Phys. Rev. B, 66, 024401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    S. Cox, J. C. Lashley, E. Rosten, J. Singleton, A. J. Williams and P. B. Littlewood, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 19, 192201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Landsgesell, A

    S. Landsgesell, A. Maljuk, T. C. Hansen, O. Prokhnenko, N. Aliouane, and D. N. Argyriou, Phys. Rev. B, 80, 014412 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    L. C. Chapon, P. G. Radaelli, G. R. Blake, S. Park, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96,097601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    R. D. Johnson, D. D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, A. Bombardi, C. Martin, L. C. Chapon, and P. G. Radaelli, Phys. Rev. B, 93, 180403(R) (2016). 31

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    G. R. Blake, L. C. Chapon, P. G. Radaelli, S. Park, N. Hur, S -W. Cheong, and J. Rodríguez - Carvajal, Phys. Rev. B, 71, 214402 (2005)

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    R.E. Thorne. Charge density wave conductors, Physics Today 49(5), 42 (1996)

    work page 1996

  20. [20]

    A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. Lett., 4 (9), 462 (1960)

    work page 1960

  21. [21]

    Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter, Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    S. Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter, Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    work page 2001

  22. [22]

    D. H. Torchinsky, F. Mahmood, A.T. Bollinger, I. Božović and N. Gedik, Nat. Mat. 12, 387 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    T. C. Ozawa and S. M. Kauzlarich, Chem. Mater., 13, 1804-1810 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Bonville, F

    P. Bonville, F. Rullier-Albenque, D. Colson and A. Forget, EPL, 89, 67008 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    S. Jun, M. Martin, O Oren, K. Kazuya, H. Masashi , A. Daniel, A. Alex, J .H. Brewer, E . J. Ansaldo, H. Ohta, C. Michioka, and K. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. B, 84, 184421 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    P. Cai, X. Zhou, W. Ruan, A. Wang, X. Chen, D.-H. Lee and Y. Wang, Nat. Commun., 4, 1596 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    B. H. Savitzkya, I. E. Baggaria, A. S. Admasu, J. Kim, S.-W. Cheong, R. Hovdend, and L. F. Kourkoutis, Nat. commun., 8(1883), 1-7 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    I. E. Baggaria, B. H. Savitzkya, A. S. Admasu, J. Kim, S.-W. Cheong, R. Hovdend, and L. F. Kourkoutis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 115(7), 1445-1450 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Wang, B.H

    Y.M. Wang, B.H. Gea, Y.X. Cui, R.C. Yu, S. Chen, and Z.F. Ren, Mater. Today, 5, 7 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Brink, and D.I

    J.V.D. Brink, and D.I. Khomskii, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 434217 (2008)

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Kenzelmann, A

    M. Kenzelmann, A. B. Harris, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, S. B. Kim, C. L. Zhang, S.-W.Cheong, O. P. Vajk and J. W. Lynn, Phys. Rev. Lett.,95, 087206 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Nature (London) 426, 55 (2003)

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Kimura, G

    T. Kimura, G. Lawes, T. Goto, Y. Tokura, and A. P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. B, 71, 22445 (2005)

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    Kimura, S

    T. Kimura, S. Ishihara, H. Shintani, T. Arima, K. T. Takahashi, K. Ishizaka, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B, 68, 060403(R) (2003)

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    N. Hur, S. Park, P. A. Sharma, S. Guha, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 107207 (2004)

    work page 2004

  36. [36]

    L. C. Chapon, G. R. Blake, M. J. Gutmann, S. Park, N. Hur, P. G. Radaelli, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 177402 (2004)

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    G. R. Blake, L. C. Chapon, P. G. Radaelli, S. Park, N. Hur, S-W. Cheong, and J. R. Carvajal, Phys. Rev. B, 71, 214402 (2005)

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Brink, G

    J.V.D. Brink, G. Khaliullin and D.I. Khomskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(24), 5118 (1999)

    work page 1999

  39. [39]

    J. B. Goodenough, Phys. Rev. 100 (2), 564 (1955). 32

    work page 1955

  40. [40]

    E. O. Wollan and W. C. Koehler, Phys. Rev. 100(2), 545 (1955)

    work page 1955

  41. [41]

    C. H. Chen and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 4042 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    J. R. Carvajal, A. D. Aladine, L. P. Gaudart, M. T. F. Díaz and A. Revcolevschi, Physica B , 320, 1-6 (2002)

    work page 2002

  43. [43]

    J. C. Loudon, S. Cox, A. J. Williams, J. P. Attfield, P. B. Littlewood, P. A. Midgley and N. D. Mathur, Phys.Rev.Lett., 94, 097202 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    G. C. Milward, M. K. Calderón and P. B. Littlewood, Nature, 433, 607 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    Sánchez, J

    D. Sánchez, J. Calderón, J. Sánchez-Benítez, A. J. Williams, J. P. Attfield, P. A. Midgley and N. D. Mathur Phys.Rev. B, 77, 092411(2008)

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    L. Pi, S. Zhang, W. Tong, S. Tan, and Y. Zhang, Solid State Commun., 139, 460 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    Miclau, J

    M. Miclau, J. Hejtmanek, R. Retoux, K. Knizek, Z. Jirak, R. Fre´sard, A. Maignan, S. He´bert, M. Hervieu, and C. Martin, Chem. Mater., 19, 4243-4251 (2007)

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    Martin, A

    C. Martin, A. Maignan, M. Hervieu, and B. Raveau, and J. Hejtmanek, Phys. Rev. B, 63, 100406 (R) (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    Aga Shahee and N. P. Lalla, Mater. Res. Express, 2, 046106 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Petricek, M

    V. Petricek, M. Dusek, and L. Palatinus, 229(5), 345-352 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Thesis, Physics, DAVV, Indore (2015)

    Aga Shahee, Crystal structure and phase-transition studies of few perovskite based manganites and chromates using powder x -ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy, Ph.D. Thesis, Physics, DAVV, Indore (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    MuSR and neutron diffraction studies on the tuning of spin-glass phase in partially ordered double perovskite SrMn$_{1-x}$W$_x$O$_3$

    Poonam Yadav, Shivani Sharma, Peter J.Baker, Pabitra K. Biswas, Ivan da Silva, and N. P. Lalla, arXiv:1810.06846

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Chmaissem, B

    O. Chmaissem, B. Dabrowski, S. Kolesnik, J. Mais, J.D. Jorgensen, S. Short, Phys. Rev. B 67, 094431(2003)

    work page 2003

  54. [54]

    Hemberger, A

    J. Hemberger, A. Krimmel, T. Kurz, H.-A. Krug Von Nidda, Phys. Rev. B 66, 094410 (2002)

    work page 2002

  55. [55]

    Takeda, and S

    T. Takeda, and S. Ohara, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 37, 275 (1974)

    work page 1974

  56. [56]

    Søndenå, P

    R. Søndenå, P. Ravindran, S. Stølen, T. Grande ,and M. Hanfland , Phys. Rev. B, 74, 144102 (2006)

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Daoud-Aladine, C

    A. Daoud-Aladine, C. Martin, L. C. Chapon, M. Hervieu, K. S. Knight, M. Brunelli, and P. G. Radaelli, Phys. Rev. B, 75, 104417 (2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, D. E. Tanner, and D. M. Hatch, J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 607-614 (2006)

    work page 2006

  59. [59]

    J. Lee, B. Kim, B. H. Kim, B. I. Min, S. Kolesnik, O. Chmaissem, J. Mais, B. Dabrowski, H. J. Shin, D. H. Kim, H. J. Lee, and J.-S. Kang, Phys. Rev. B, 80, 205112 (2009)

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    J. H. Hwang, D. H. Kim, J.-S. Kang, S. Kolesnik, O. Chmaissem, J. Mais, B. Dabrowski, J. Baik, H. J. Shin, J. Lee, B. Kim, and B. I. Min, Phys. Rev. B, 83, 073103 (2011). 33

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    S. Mori, C. H. Chen, and S.-W. Cheong, Nature (London) 392, 473 (1998)

    work page 1998

  62. [62]

    P. G. Radaelli, D. E. Cox, L. Capogna, S.-W. Cheong, and M. Marezio, Phys. Rev. B, 59(22), 14440 (1999)

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    J. P. Wright, J. P. Attfield, and P. G. Radaelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 266401 (2001)

    work page 2001

  64. [64]

    Leonov, A

    I. Leonov, A. N. Yaresko,V. N. Antonov,M. A. Korotin,and V. I. Anisimov , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 146404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  65. [65]

    Subı´as, J

    G. Subı´as, J. Garcı´a, J. Blasco,M. G. Proietti,H. Renevier, and M. C. Sa´nchez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 156408 (2004)

    work page 2004

  66. [66]

    Ramakrishnan, H

    T.V. Ramakrishnan, H. R. Krishnamurthy, S. R. Hassan and G. V. Pai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 157203 (2004)

    work page 2004

  67. [67]

    D. I. Khomskii, Physica Scripta., 72, CC8–14, (2005)

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Kajimoto, H

    R. Kajimoto, H. Yoshizawa, H. Kawano, H. Kuwahara, Y. Tokura , K. Ohoyama and M. Ohashi Phys. Rev. B 60, 9506 (1999), A. M. Glazer, Acta Cryst. B28, 3384 (1972)

    work page 1999

  69. [69]

    D. J. Huang, W. B.Wu, G.Y. Guo, H.-J. Lin, T.Y. Hou, C. F. Chang, C.T. Chen, A. Fujimori, T. Kimura, H. B. Huang, A. Tanaka and T. Jo Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087202 (2004), and S. B. Wilkins, N. Stojiæ, T. A. W. Beale, N. Binggeli, C. W. M. Castleton, P. Bencok, D. Prabhakaran, A. T. Boothroyd, P. D. Hatton, and M. Altarelli, Phys. Rev. B 71, 245102 (2005)

    work page 2004

  70. [70]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa and Xiao-Gang Wen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006)

    work page 2006

  71. [71]

    Schlappa, K.Wohlfeld, K

    J. Schlappa, K.Wohlfeld, K. J. Zhou, M. Mourigal, M. W. Haverkort, V. N. Strocov, L. Hozoi, C. Monney, S. Nishimoto, S. Singh, A. Revcolevschi, J.-S. Caux, L. Patthey, H. M. Rønnow, J. van den Brink and T. Schmitt, Nature 485, 82 (2012)

    work page 2012

  72. [72]

    Morrow, A

    R. Morrow, A. E. Taylor, D. J. Singh, J. Xiong, S. Rodan, A. U. B. Wolter, S. Wurmehl , B. Büchner, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, A. A. Aczel, A. D. Christianson and P. M. Woodward, Scientific Reports, 6, 32462 (2016)

    work page 2016