Is QBism a Possible Solution to the Conceptual Problems of Quantum Mechanics?
read the original abstract
QBism is a recently developed version of Quantum Bayesianism. QBists think that the primitive concept of experience is the central subject of science. QBism refuses the idea that the quantum state of a system is an objective description of this system. It is a tool for assigning a subjective probability to the agent's future experience. So quantum mechanics does not directly say something about the "external world". A measurement (in the usual sense) is just a special case of what QBism calls experience and this is any action done by any agent on her external world. The result of the measurement is the experience that the agent gets from her action on her personal world. For Qbists, this way of seeing the measurement helps rejecting any non-local influences. We will examine if these claims are robust and will show that a certain number of issues needs to be clarified in order to get a coherent picture. Depending on the way these necessary clarifications are made, the global image given by Qbism can vary from pure instrumentalism to interpretations making the observer play a radical role.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Is Quantum Mechanics Universal? EWF Experiments and Non Absoluteness of Events
Convivial Solipsism is presented as a coherent interpretive framework that resolves the non-absoluteness of events in quantum mechanics while maintaining universality and intersubjectivity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.