Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader Approaches Best-of-Both-Worlds for the m-Set Semi-Bandit Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.07307 v4 pith:65PAZGNG submitted 2025-04-09 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords regretarmssemi-banditsettingsqrtadversarialapproachesbound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider a common case of the combinatorial semi-bandit problem, the $m$-set semi-bandit, where the learner exactly selects $m$ arms from the total $d$ arms. In the adversarial setting, the best regret bound, known to be $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{nmd})$ for time horizon $n$, is achieved by the well-known Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) policy. However, this requires to explicitly compute the arm-selection probabilities via optimizing problems at each time step and sample according to them. This problem can be avoided by the Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) policy, which simply pulls the $m$ arms that rank among the $m$ smallest (estimated) loss with random perturbation. In this paper, we show that FTPL with a Fr\'echet perturbation also enjoys the near optimal regret bound $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{nm}(\sqrt{d\log(d)}+m^{5/6}))$ in the adversarial setting and approaches best-of-both-world regret bounds, i.e., achieves a logarithmic regret for the stochastic setting. Moreover, our lower bounds show that the extra factors are unavoidable with our approach; any improvement would require a fundamentally different and more challenging method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Note on Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader in Combinatorial Semi-Bandit Problems

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader with Pareto perturbations reaches the optimal O(sqrt(mdT)) regret in adversarial size-invariant combinatorial semi-bandits, and a conditional resampling variant cuts per-round complexity to...

  2. Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader for Decoupled Bandits: Best-of-Both-Worlds and Practicality

    stat.ML 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Pareto-perturbed follow-the-perturbed-leader policy achieves best-of-both-worlds regret for decoupled bandits with O(K log K) per-step cost and no resampling.

Pith tools