Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Quantum Supremacy Is Both Closer and Farther than It Appears

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.10749 v3 pith:65SK6KYJ submitted 2018-07-27 quant-ph cs.DCcs.ET

classification quant-phcs.DCcs.ET
keywords circuitfidelityquantumsamplingsimulationtaskdepthbitstring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

As quantum computers improve in the number of qubits and fidelity, the question of when they surpass state-of-the-art classical computation for a well-defined computational task is attracting much attention. The leading candidate task for this milestone entails sampling from the output distribution defined by a random quantum circuit. We develop a massively-parallel simulation tool Rollright that does not require inter-process communication (IPC) or proprietary hardware. We also develop two ways to trade circuit fidelity for computational speedups, so as to match the fidelity of a given quantum computer --- a task previously thought impossible. We report massive speedups for the sampling task over prior software from Microsoft, IBM, Alibaba and Google, as well as supercomputer and GPU-based simulations. By using publicly available Google Cloud Computing, we price such simulations and enable comparisons by total cost across hardware platforms. We simulate approximate sampling from the output of a circuit with 7x8 qubits and depth 1+40+1 by producing one million bitstring probabilities with fidelity 0.5%, at an estimated cost of $35184. The simulation costs scale linearly with fidelity, and using this scaling we estimate that extending circuit depth to 1+48+1 increases costs to one million dollars. Scaling the simulation to 10M bitstring probabilities needed for sampling 1M bitstrings helps comparing simulation to quantum computers. We describe refinements in benchmarks that slow down leading simulators, halving the circuit depth that can be simulated within the same time.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constructive interference at the edge of quantum ergodic dynamics

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Second-order out-of-time-order correlators measured on 65-qubit random circuits remain sensitive to dynamics and are estimated to be beyond the reach of current classical tensor-network simulation.

  2. Fewer Histories, Faster Paths: Distributed Quantum Circuit Feynman Simulation via History Reduction, Checkpointing, and Pruning

    cs.ET 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Feynman path-sum simulator reduces the history space via boundary-value propagation and checkpointing, enabling exact sparse-output simulation of 100-qubit quantum walks.

  3. Matrix Product Evolution: A Method for Simulating Quantum Circuits Using Tensor Networks

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A depth-oriented tensor-network contraction method, called MPE, is introduced and shown to gain accuracy from post-selection, complementing standard MPS simulation.

  4. Node Replacement based Approximate Quantum Simulation with Decision Diagrams

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Replacing low-contribution decision-diagram nodes with similar nodes, accelerated by locality-sensitive hashing, improves the memory-fidelity trade-off in approximate quantum simulation.

Pith tools