Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Star formation, stellar evolution, and planets in high-resolution X-ray imaging

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A high-resolution X-ray imager with ~10 microarcsecond resolution and large collecting area could, for the first time, resolve stellar magnetic fields, flares, and coronal mass ejections beyond the Sun.

desk verdict A useful, well-organized white paper for a HiReX mission concept, but the 10 µas CME survey requirement is unsupported: the demanded FOV and pixel count are inconsistent, and the CME detectability argument rests on an unvalidated solar scaling. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15474 v1 pith:67D4PIVS submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GA

Hans Moritz Günther , Scott J. Wolk , Sean J. Gunderson , Ruchi Pandey , Keivan G. Stassun , Lynne Valencic This is my paper
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GA
keywords high-resolutionX-rayimagingstellarcoronaecoronalmassejectionsstarformationprotostellarjetsmassivewindsplanetarynebulaenovae
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This white paper argues that current X-ray telescopes leave stellar magnetic activity spatially unresolved everywhere except the Sun, forcing all models of stellar flares and coronal mass ejections to be scaled-up solar analogs. It contends that a next-generation high-resolution X-ray imager with roughly 10 microarcsecond angular resolution and 10-100 times the collecting area of existing observatories would resolve flare sites, distinguish confined loops from escaping ejecta, and track expanding plasma in nearby star-forming regions. Such observations would put the study of how magnetic activity shapes planet-forming disks, exoplanet atmospheres, and stellar angular momentum evolution on a direct observational footing. The paper also develops analogous imaging cases for resolving jets, massive-star wind shocks, planetary nebulae, and nova ejecta.

What carries the argument

The enabling mechanism is scale-matching: at star-forming distances of a few hundred parsecs, a resolution of ~10 microarcseconds corresponds to a few stellar radii, so the physical size of flare loops and ejecta matches the resolution element. The paper pairs this with a large effective area (10-100 times current telescopes) so that faint, time-variable X-ray features can be detected and followed over the duration of a flare. This resolution-sensitivity combination, applied across targets from comets to supernova remnants, is what unifies the science cases.

What would settle it

If a 10 microarcsecond, high-throughput X-ray instrument observed a young cluster such as Orion for a megasecond and, in the dozens of superflares detected, saw only stationary confined loops with no outward-moving cooling plasma or expanding ejecta, the claim that CMEs can be directly imaged and dominate early mass loss would be falsified. Alternatively, a finding that CME occurrence scales with flare energy far more steeply than the solar relation would invalidate the extrapolated mass-loss rates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the combination of ~10 microarcsecond spatial resolution and 10-100 times the effective area of current X-ray telescopes would make stellar astrophysics spatially resolved for the first time beyond the Sun. At the distance of Orion (~400 pc), 10 microarcseconds subtends a few stellar radii, so individual flare loops, potential star-disk magnetic connections, and outward-moving coronal mass ejection plasma become imageable. The paper argues this capability would enable the first direct tests of stellar CME physics, resolving whether CMEs dominate early stellar mass and angular momentum loss, how flares connect to protoplanetary disks, and how jets are launched from t

Load-bearing premise

The most load-bearing premise is that young stars produce coronal mass ejections as frequently and as massive as solar flare-CME scaling relations, extrapolated from the Sun, predict; if those relations overpredict by more than an order of magnitude, the 10 microarcsecond imaging requirement for the central CME science case loses its justification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Direct measurement of coronal mass ejection rates, masses, and energies in young stars, replacing flare-based proxy estimates with a physical picture of early stellar mass loss.
  • A test of whether stellar superflares are geometrically scaled-up solar flares or whether the standard flare loop model fails for extreme events.
  • Resolved imaging of the jet launching region in young stars, showing whether the X-ray emission comes from hot launching plasma, diamond shocks, or recollimation layers.
  • The ability to map wind-shock distributions around massive stars and measure mass-loss rates without assuming spherical symmetry.
  • In novae and planetary nebulae, direct localization of shock structures and dust-forming regions, testing whether radiative shocks are the dust-formation sites.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If stellar CME rates are as high as the solar-scaled estimates, the XUV and particle output delivered into young planetary systems would be dominated by eruptions, strengthening the case that the same mission's data should be folded into exoplanet atmospheric evolution models—a link the paper leaves qualitative.
  • For the closest exoplanet systems, the sub-milliarcsecond end of the resolution range would directly image the separation between star and escaping atmospheric plasmoid, turning a sketched science case into a real observational program.
  • The paper's scale-matching logic could be inverted: a less demanding angular resolution might still test the CME scenario if the flare-CME scaling relation is calibrated empirically, so the instrument requirements should be revisited once any stellar CME is detected.
  • The lower-resolution science cases (planetary nebulae and novae at ~0.1 arcseconds) could be addressed by a moderate-resolution mission years before the microarcsecond capability is built.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This white paper advocates for a next-generation high-resolution X-ray (HiReX) imaging mission, arguing that angular resolutions from ~0.1 arcsec down to 10 microarcsec, combined with 10–100 times Chandra's effective area, would open new windows on cometary charge exchange, planetary aurorae, astrospheres, stellar coronae and CMEs, protostellar jets, massive-star wind shocks, planetary nebulae, and novae. The paper's central claim (§4.2) is that a ~10 microarcsec imager with 10–100× Chandra area could directly resolve stellar CMEs in nearby star-forming regions, enabling the first spatially resolved study of stellar magnetic activity beyond the Sun and linking CMEs to disk evolution and planet atmospheric erosion. The science cases are grounded in established observational results, but several quantitative feasibility claims are stated without derivations, and the combination of 10 microarcsec resolution with an arcminute-scale field of view raises a fundamental detector-technology challenge that is not acknowledged.

Significance. If the capabilities described were realized and the CME predictions validated, the proposed HiReX mission would be transformative: it would extend spatially resolved stellar magnetic activity studies beyond the Sun, potentially directly detect stellar CMEs, resolve the jet launching zone in young stars, and map shock structures in massive stars, planetary nebulae, and novae. The paper usefully collects a broad set of high-impact science cases and identifies where current X-ray resolution is insufficient. However, its quantitative requirements are asserted rather than derived in several places, and the central 10 microarcsec/wide-field requirement is technically problematical. The paper's value as an advocacy document is clear, but for a journal publication the load-bearing estimates need to be substantiated or explicitly caveated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Table 1] The simultaneous requirement of ~10 microarcsec (10^-5 arcsec) resolution and a field of view larger than 1 arcmin^2 implies (60/10^-5)^2 ≈ 3.6×10^13 independent resolution elements (more with Nyquist sampling). No existing or plausible X-ray detector has this pixel count or readout capability, and the paper does not discuss this fundamental trade-off. This is load-bearing because the CME survey strategy explicitly requires monitoring many young stars simultaneously over a wide field. The authors must either present a realistic detector/focal-plane architecture that can meet this requirement, or revise the science case to separate the ultra-high-resolution mode (narrow field) from the wide-field survey mode, with appropriate pointing strategies and correspondingly different resolution/area combinations.
  2. [§4.2] No signal-to-noise calculation is provided for detecting CME ejecta at 1–7 keV after expansion to a few stellar radii. The Aarnio et al. (2012) solar flare–CME scaling is used to infer T Tauri CME mass-loss rates of 10^-12–10^-9 M_sun/yr, but the paper does not validate this extrapolation for pre-main-sequence stars, nor does it estimate the predicted X-ray surface brightness of an expanding CME against the stellar coronal emission. Without such an estimate, the stated requirement of 10 microarcsec and 10–100× Chandra effective area is not demonstrated. A concrete emission-measure calculation and a predicted count-rate would substantiate the central capability claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] The comet vent resolution claim appears numerically inconsistent: a 100 m feature at 0.2 AU subtends ~7×10^-4 arcsec, not 3×10^-4 arcsec. Please verify the angular-size calculations throughout the paper.
  2. [§6] The 235 ks exposure time for NGC 6543 is asserted without a calculation. Since the X-ray flux is cited (8×10^-13 erg cm^-2 s^-1), a rough count-rate estimate (assuming a response and spectral model) should be provided to support the feasibility statement.
  3. [References] There are duplicate and inconsistently formatted references: Favata et al. 2005a and 2005b are the same paper; Getman et al. 2008 appears three times; Bode et al. 2006a and 2006b are identical. The reference list should be cleaned.
  4. [Affiliation] Typo: 'Smithonian' should be 'Smithsonian'.
  5. [Table 1] The table has minor formatting issues: 'largeA eff' and 'FOV:>arcmin2' lack spacing/superscripts, and the resolution units (arcsec vs. arcsec^2) should be consistent. Also, the massive-star rows use '10^-4 arcsec' while the text uses '0.1 mas'; please standardize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the white paper's feasibility arguments rely on external, independently published data rather than fitting inputs to its own predictions.

full rationale

This is a mission-concept white paper, not a derivation. The central quantitative claim—that a 10 microarcsecond imager with 10–100x Chandra effective area is needed to test stellar CME physics—is asserted by plausibility argument and benchmark examples, not derived from any fitted parameter that is then renamed as a prediction. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to an input by construction. The most load-bearing external citation, Aarnio et al. (2012), includes one co-author of this paper (Stassun), and it supplies the CME mass-loss rates used to motivate the science case; however, that is an independently published, empirically calibrated study with its own data, not an internal ansatz. Other self-citations (Günther et al. 2024, Gunderson et al. 2024, Pandey et al. 2024, Lisse et al. 2026) are likewise external observations or modeling papers whose results are used as evidence, not as unverified premises that force the paper's conclusions. The paper does not invoke a uniqueness theorem, does not smuggle in an ansatz via citation, and does not rename a known result as a new organization. The weakest scientific step—extrapolating solar flare–CME scaling to T Tauri stars—is an external assumption and a correctness risk, but it is not circularity because the paper does not use its own output to justify that assumption. Therefore no circular steps are identified and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the quoted resolution and effective-area values are proposed requirements based on target physical scales and known fluxes. Four domain assumptions are imported from cited literature; none is new to this paper.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption X-ray luminosity correlates with total magnetic flux on stars (Pevtsov et al. 2003; Zhuleku et al. 2020), used to infer magnetic fields from X-rays in protostars.
    Section 4.4 invokes this scaling to argue X-ray emission is the primary observable of protostellar magnetic fields.
  • domain assumption The empirical solar flare–CME relation (Aarnio et al. 2012) applies to pre-main-sequence stars, giving CME mass-loss rates of 10^-12–10^-9 M_sun/yr for T Tauri stars.
    Section 4.2 uses this to motivate the CME imaging case; if the scaling is wrong, the mass-loss/disk-evolution impact claims are unsupported.
  • domain assumption Charge exchange between stellar winds and neutral ISM produces soft X-ray lines in astrospheres and comets (Kislyakova et al. 2024; Lisse et al. 2026).
    Section 3 relies on this emission mechanism to argue astrospheres can be imaged.
  • domain assumption The hot bubble of planetary nebulae is cooler than predicted because of heat conduction (Fang et al. 2016), so a radial distribution of X-ray emission is a testable prediction.
    Section 6 cites this to justify the PNe science case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Star formation, stellar evolution, and planets in high-resolution X-ray imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/67D4PIVS

@misc{pith2026260715474,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Star formation, stellar evolution, and planets in high-resolution X-ray imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/67D4PIVS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15474}
}
read the original abstract

Stars set the conditions for planet formation, planet evolution, and habitability -- all major topics in astronomy today. Stars are also important in their own right as the most visible component of galaxies. In cool stars, X-ray emission is powered by magnetic fields, and so far our Sun is the only system in which those fields are spatially resolved. High-resolution X-ray (HiReX) imaging can track the origin and evolution of those fields, see how they connect young stars to their disks and outflows, and measure the energy, mass, and momentum that radiation and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) carry into the circumstellar environment. This is crucial for understanding whether planets can form and survive in young stellar systems, whether life can develop on those planets, and how the star evolves over time. Intermediate-mass and high-mass stars blow winds and eventually evolve into degenerate objects such as white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes. Their evolution and death drive the chemical evolution of galaxies. High-resolution X-ray (HiReX) imaging can study the hottest components in those systems, such as the colliding winds of massive stars, accretion and nova explosions in CVs, and the shocks in outflows that form planetary nebulae. All these cases have in common that the X-ray emission is tracing the hottest, fastest, and most energetic components of the shocks. HiReX observations can reveal the temperature, spatial structures, and elemental abundances of different system components that no other wavelength can. While stars are physically small compared to more powerful objects such as accreting black holes and AGN, they are also much closer to us, allowing a HiReX mission to resolve a variety of physical phenomena fundamental to our understanding of how stellar systems form, evolve, and interact with their environment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15474 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: A JWST NIRCAM image of HOPS-70. The white box is about 14′′ on a side. The green contours indicate Chandra flux. Right: An ALMA 0.87mm image of the boxed region. The two X-ray sources are further resolved into binaries separated by ∼ 0.25′′ (100 AU). https://planetstarformation.iaa.es/HOPS-70 5 arcsec outer jet stellar corona inner jet Chandra: 350 ks 0.4 0.6 1 2 3 4 6 Energy (keV) 10 5 10 4 10 3 10 2 0.1 Coun… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chandra observations of DG Tau. Chandra detects a spatial offset between the hard (blue) and soft (red) photons of order 0.3 ′′, but cannot resolve the components. In this particular case, the central star is heavily absorbed, leading to the hard (blue) spectrum, while the base of the jet is soft (red spectrum). Spatial resolution better than 0.1 ′′ would reveal the separate components and the shape of the inner jet… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simulation of the HH 154 jet. The middle right panel shows the simulation, and the right panel shows synthetic X-ray data with 0.5 ′′ pixels. Clearly, that is insufficient to resolve even the most basic jet structures. Modified from a figure in S. Ustamujic et al. (2018). Reproduced with permission ©ESO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example schematic of a WC+O colliding wind system. Reproduced with permission from the authors of R. M. Lau et al. (2020). shocks form approximately at r = 1.5 − 2R∗ ≈ 10 − 30R⊙, meaning the resulting X-ray emission passes through the en￾tire wind column. The X-rays ca…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N., Matt , S

    Aarnio , A. N., Matt , S. P., & Stassun , K. G. 2012, title Mass Loss in Pre-main-sequence Stars via Coronal Mass Ejections and Implications for Angular Momentum Loss , , 760, 9, 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/9

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/9 2012

  2. [2]

    A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al

    Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al. 2010, title Gamma-Ray Emission Concurrent with the Nova in the Symbiotic Binary V407 Cygni , Science, 329, 817, 10.1126/science.1192537

    doi:10.1126/science.1192537 2010

  3. [3]

    2008, title X-ray emission from jet wind interaction in planetary nebulae , , 13, 563, 10.1016/j.newast.2008.03.002

    Akashi , M., Meiron , Y., & Soker , N. 2008, title X-ray emission from jet wind interaction in planetary nebulae , , 13, 563, 10.1016/j.newast.2008.03.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2008.03.002 2008

  4. [4]

    2017, title Electron beams and loss cones in the auroral regions of Jupiter , , 44, 7131, 10.1002/2017GL073180

    Allegrini , F., Bagenal , F., Bolton , S., et al. 2017, title Electron beams and loss cones in the auroral regions of Jupiter , , 44, 7131, 10.1002/2017GL073180

    work page doi:10.1002/2017gl073180 2017

  5. [5]

    J., et al

    Argiroffi , C., Reale , F., Drake , J. J., et al. 2019, title A stellar flare-coronal mass ejection event revealed by X-ray plasma motions , Nature Astronomy, 3, 742, 10.1038/s41550-019-0781-4

    doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0781-4 2019

  6. [6]

    Balman , S . 2005, title Chandra Observation of the Shell of Nova Persei 1901 (GK Persei): Detection of Localized Nonthermal X-Ray Emission from a Miniature Supernova Remnant , , 627, 933, 10.1086/430392

    work page doi:10.1086/430392 2005

  7. [7]

    2020, title Birth of convective low-mass to high-mass second Larson cores , , 638, A86, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937029

    Bhandare , A., Kuiper , R., Henning , T., et al. 2020, title Birth of convective low-mass to high-mass second Larson cores , , 638, A86, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937029

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937029 2020

  8. [9]

    F., O'Brien , T

    Bode , M. F., O'Brien , T. J., Osborne , J. P., et al. 2006 b , title Swift Observations of the 2006 Outburst of the Recurrent Nova RS Ophiuchi. I. Early X-Ray Emission from the Shocked Ejecta and Red Giant Wind , , 652, 629, 10.1086/507980

    doi:10.1086/507980 2006

Show all 75 references
  1. [10]

    2011, title X-Ray Emission from Protostellar Jet HH 154: The First Evidence of a Diamond Shock? , , 737, 54, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/54

    Bonito , R., Orlando , S., Miceli , M., et al. 2011, title X-Ray Emission from Protostellar Jet HH 154: The First Evidence of a Diamond Shock? , , 737, 54, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/54

    2011 doi

  2. [11]

    D., & Shen , K

    Chomiuk , L., Metzger , B. D., & Shen , K. J. 2021, title New Insights into Classical Novae , , 59, 391, 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502

    2021 doi

  3. [12]

    2025, title Revisiting the classics: on the statistics of dust formation in novae , , 541, 980, 10.1093/mnras/staf1001

    Chong , A., Aydi , E., Craig , P., et al. 2025, title Revisiting the classics: on the statistics of dust formation in novae , , 541, 980, 10.1093/mnras/staf1001

    2025 doi

  4. [13]

    A., Gruendl , R

    Chu , Y.-H., Guerrero , M. A., Gruendl , R. A., Williams , R. M., & Kaler , J. B. 2001, title Chandra Reveals the X-Ray Glint in the Cat's Eye , , 553, L69, 10.1086/320495

    2001 doi

  5. [14]

    H., Wollman , E

    Cohen , D. H., Wollman , E. E., Leutenegger , M. A., et al. 2014, title Measuring mass-loss rates and constraining shock physics using X-ray line profiles of O stars from the Chandra archive , , 439, 908, 10.1093/mnras/stu008

    2014 doi

  6. [15]

    M., Bhardwaj , A., et al

    Dennerl , K., Lisse , C. M., Bhardwaj , A., et al. 2012, title Solar system X-rays from charge exchange processes , Astronomische Nachrichten, 333, 324, 10.1002/asna.201211663

    2012 doi

  7. [16]

    M., Metzger , B

    Derdzinski , A. M., Metzger , B. D., & Lazzati , D. 2017, title Radiative shocks create environments for dust formation in classical novae , , 469, 1314, 10.1093/mnras/stx829

    2017 doi

  8. [17]

    J., Cohen , O., Yashiro , S., & Gopalswamy , N

    Drake , J. J., Cohen , O., Yashiro , S., & Gopalswamy , N. 2013, title Implications of Mass and Energy Loss due to Coronal Mass Ejections on Magnetically Active Stars , , 764, 170, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/170

    2013 doi

  9. [18]

    A., Toal \'a , J

    Fang , X., Guerrero , M. A., Toal \'a , J. A., Chu , Y.-H., & Gruendl , R. A. 2016, title HST STIS Observations of the Mixing Layer in the Cat s Eye Nebula , , 822, L19, 10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L19

    2016 doi

  10. [20]

    2005 b , title Bright X-Ray Flares in Orion Young Stars from COUP: Evidence for Star-Disk Magnetic Fields? , , 160, 469, 10.1086/432542

    Favata , F., Flaccomio , E., Reale , F., et al. 2005 b , title Bright X-Ray Flares in Orion Young Stars from COUP: Evidence for Star-Disk Magnetic Fields? , , 160, 469, 10.1086/432542

    2005 doi

  11. [21]

    Federrath , C., Schr \"o n , M., Banerjee , R., & Klessen , R. S. 2014, title Modeling Jet and Outflow Feedback during Star Cluster Formation , , 790, 128, 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/128

    2014 doi

  12. [22]

    D., & Montmerle , T

    Feigelson , E. D., & Montmerle , T. 1999, title High-Energy Processes in Young Stellar Objects , , 37, 363, 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.363

    1999 doi

  13. [23]

    H., et al

    Freeman , M., Montez , Jr., R., Kastner , J. H., et al. 2014, title The Chandra Planetary Nebula Survey (ChanPlaNS). II. X-Ray Emission from Compact Planetary Nebulae , , 794, 99, 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/99

    2014 doi

  14. [24]

    J., & Kastner , J

    Freeman , M. J., & Kastner , J. H. 2016, title A Multi-wavelength 3D Model of BD+30 3639 , , 226, 15, 10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/15

    2016 doi

  15. [25]

    2025, title Modeling Tails of Escaping Gas in Exoplanet Atmospheres with Harmonica , , 991, L47, 10.3847/2041-8213/adfb77

    Gasc \'o n , C., L \'o pez-Morales , M., Vissapragada , S., et al. 2025, title Modeling Tails of Escaping Gas in Exoplanet Atmospheres with Harmonica , , 991, L47, 10.3847/2041-8213/adfb77

    2025 doi

  16. [26]

    V., Feigelson , E

    Getman , K. V., Feigelson , E. D., & Garmire , G. P. 2021, title X-Ray Superflares from Pre-main-sequence Stars: Flare Modeling , , 920, 154, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1746

    2021 doi

  17. [28]

    V., Feigelson , E

    Getman , K. V., Feigelson , E. D., Micela , G., et al. 2008, title X-Ray Flares in Orion Young Stars. II. Flares, Magnetospheres, and Protoplanetary Disks , , 688, 437, 10.1086/592034

    2008 doi

  18. [29]

    2011, title The Bipolar X-Ray Jet of the Classical T Tauri Star DG Tau , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    G \"u del , M., Audard , M., Bacciotti , F., et al. 2011, title The Bipolar X-Ray Jet of the Classical T Tauri Star DG Tau , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 448, 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, ed. C. Johns-Kr...

    2011 doi arXiv

  19. [30]

    A., Chu , Y.-H., & Gruendl , R

    Guerrero , M. A., Chu , Y.-H., & Gruendl , R. A. 2000, title ROSAT Observations of X-Ray Emission from Planetary Nebulae , , 129, 295, 10.1086/313415

    2000 doi

  20. [31]

    J., Gayley , K

    Gunderson , S. J., Gayley , K. G., Huenemoerder , D. P., Pradhan , P., & Miller , N. A. 2024, title Observed epochal variations in X-ray lines from the O supergiant Puppis do not require substantial changes in the wind mass flux , , 529, 3154, 10.1093/mnras/stae547

    2024 doi

  21. [32]

    M., Li , Z.-Y., & Schneider , P

    G \"u nther , H. M., Li , Z.-Y., & Schneider , P. C. 2014, title Recollimation Boundary Layers as X-Ray Sources in Young Stellar Jets , , 795, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/51

    2014 doi

  22. [33]

    M., Schneider , P

    G \"u nther , H. M., Schneider , P. C., & Li , Z.-Y. 2013, title The evolution of the jet from Herbig Ae star HD 163296 from 1999 to 2011 , , 552, A142, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220772

    2013 doi

  23. [34]

    M., Pasham , D., Binks , A., et al

    G \"u nther , H. M., Pasham , D., Binks , A., et al. 2024, title A Long-duration Superflare on the K Giant HD 251108 , , 977, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b2c

    2024 doi

  24. [35]

    Y., Offner , S

    Guszejnov , D., Grudi \'c , M. Y., Offner , S. S. R., et al. 2022, title Effects of the environment and feedback physics on the initial mass function of stars in the STARFORGE simulations , , 515, 4929, 10.1093/mnras/stac2060

    2022 doi

  25. [36]

    2016, title Accretion onto Pre-Main-Sequence Stars , , 54, 135, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347

    Hartmann , L., Herczeg , G., & Calvet , N. 2016, title Accretion onto Pre-Main-Sequence Stars , , 54, 135, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347

    2016 doi

  26. [37]

    2024, title New Catalog of Distances to Planetary Nebulae Based on Gaia Parallaxes and Statistical Distances , , 60, 227, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2024.60.02.03

    Hern \'a ndez-Ju \'a rez , D., Rodr \' guez , M., & Pe \ n a , M. 2024, title New Catalog of Distances to Planetary Nebulae Based on Gaia Parallaxes and Statistical Distances , , 60, 227, 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2024.60.02.03

    2024 doi

  27. [38]

    H., Montez , Jr., R., Balick , B., et al

    Kastner , J. H., Montez , Jr., R., Balick , B., et al. 2012, title The Chandra X-Ray Survey of Planetary Nebulae (ChanPlaNS): Probing Binarity, Magnetic Fields, and Wind Collisions , , 144, 58, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/2/58

    2012 doi

  28. [39]

    G., G \"u del , M., Koutroumpa , D., et al

    Kislyakova , K. G., G \"u del , M., Koutroumpa , D., et al. 2024, title X-ray detection of astrospheres around three main-sequence stars and their mass-loss rates , Nature Astronomy, 8, 596, 10.1038/s41550-024-02222-x

    2024 doi

  29. [40]

    2022, title Impact of stellar flares on the chemical composition and transmission spectra of gaseous exoplanets orbiting M dwarfs , , 667, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243436

    Konings , T., Baeyens , R., & Decin , L. 2022, title Impact of stellar flares on the chemical composition and transmission spectra of gaseous exoplanets orbiting M dwarfs , , 667, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243436

    2022 doi

  30. [41]

    Koyama , K., Hamaguchi , K., Ueno , S., Kobayashi , N., & Feigelson , E. D. 1996, title Discovery of Hard X-Rays from a Cluster of Protostars , , 48, L87, 10.1093/pasj/48.5.L87

    1996 doi

  31. [42]

    2013, title Feedback by massive stars and the emergence of superbubbles

    Krause , M., Fierlinger , K., Diehl , R., et al. 2013, title Feedback by massive stars and the emergence of superbubbles. I. Energy efficiency and Vishniac instabilities , , 550, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220060

    2013 doi

  32. [43]

    M., Hankins , M

    Lau , R. M., Hankins , M. J., Han , Y., et al. 2020, title Resolving Decades of Periodic Spirals from the Wolf-Rayet Dust Factory WR 112 , , 900, 190, 10.3847/1538-4357/abaab8

    2020 doi

  33. [44]

    2023, title Protostellar collapse simulations in spherical geometry with dust coagulation and fragmentation , , 518, 3326, 10.1093/mnras/stac3220

    Lebreuilly , U., Vallucci-Goy , V., Guillet , V., Lombart , M., & Marchand , P. 2023, title Protostellar collapse simulations in spherical geometry with dust coagulation and fragmentation , , 518, 3326, 10.1093/mnras/stac3220

    2023 doi

  34. [45]

    L., Redfield , S., & Tilipman , D

    Linsky , J. L., Redfield , S., & Tilipman , D. 2019, title The Interface between the Outer Heliosphere and the Inner Local ISM: Morphology of the Local Interstellar Cloud, Its Hydrogen Hole, Str \"o mgren Shells, and ^ 60 Fe Accretion , , 886, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab498a

    2019 doi

  35. [46]

    M., Wolk , S

    Lisse , C. M., Wolk , S. J., Snios , B., et al. 2026, title First Resolution of a Main-sequence G star's Astrosphere Using Chandra , , 999, 125, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2eda

    2026 doi

  36. [47]

    Maness , H., & Vrtilek , S. D. 2003, title Nebular versus Stellar Wind Abundances in NGC 6543 , , 115, 1002, 10.1086/376573

    2003 doi

  37. [48]

    D., Finzell , T., Vurm , I., et al

    Metzger , B. D., Finzell , T., Vurm , I., et al. 2015, title Gamma-ray novae as probes of relativistic particle acceleration at non-relativistic shocks , , 450, 2739, 10.1093/mnras/stv742

    2015 doi

  38. [49]

    D., Hasco \"e t , R., Vurm , I., et al

    Metzger , B. D., Hasco \"e t , R., Vurm , I., et al. 2014, title Shocks in nova outflows - I. Thermal emission , , 442, 713, 10.1093/mnras/stu844

    2014 doi

  39. [50]

    Mohanty , S., Ercolano , B., & Turner , N. J. 2013, title Dead, Undead, and Zombie Zones in Protostellar Disks as a Function of Stellar Mass , , 764, 65, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/65

    2013 doi

  40. [51]

    2017, title X-ray Studies of Planetary Nebulae , in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Montez , R. 2017, title X-ray Studies of Planetary Nebulae , in IAU Symposium, Vol. 323, Planetary Nebulae: Multi-Wavelength Probes of Stellar and Galactic Evolution, ed. X. Liu , L. Stanghellini , & A. Karakas , 104--108, 10.1017/S1743921317000965

    2017 doi

  41. [52]

    2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s , 10.17226/26141

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine . 2021, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s , 10.17226/26141

    2021 doi

  42. [53]

    2021, title X-ray evolution of the nova V959 Mon suggests a delayed ejection and a non-radiative shock , , 500, 2798, 10.1093/mnras/staa3367

    Nelson , T., Mukai , K., Chomiuk , L., et al. 2021, title X-ray evolution of the nova V959 Mon suggests a delayed ejection and a non-radiative shock , , 500, 2798, 10.1093/mnras/staa3367

    2021 doi

  43. [54]

    A., & Wolk , S

    Osten , R. A., & Wolk , S. J. 2015, title Connecting Flares and Transient Mass-loss Events in Magnetically Active Stars , , 809, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/79

    2015 doi

  44. [55]

    E., & Lai , D

    Owen , J. E., & Lai , D. 2018, title Photoevaporation and high-eccentricity migration created the sub-Jovian desert , , 479, 5012, 10.1093/mnras/sty1760

    2018 doi

  45. [56]

    2004, title Stellar wind mechanisms and instabilities , in EAS Publications Series, Vol

    Owocki , S. 2004, title Stellar wind mechanisms and instabilities , in EAS Publications Series, Vol. 13, EAS Publications Series, ed. M. Heydari-Malayeri , P. Stee , & J.-P. Zahn (EDP), 163--250, 10.1051/eas:2004055

    2004 doi

  46. [57]

    P., Shultz , M

    Owocki , S. P., Shultz , M. E., ud-Doula , A., et al. 2022, title Centrifugal breakout reconnection as the electron acceleration mechanism powering the radio magnetospheres of early-type stars , , 513, 1449, 10.1093/mnras/stac341

    2022 doi

  47. [58]

    K., & Shaw , G

    Pandey , R., Srivastava , M. K., & Shaw , G. 2024, title A phenomenological study of the evolution of shock-induced O I emission lines in the spectrum of nova V2891 Cygni , , 532, 3985, 10.1093/mnras/stae1719

    2024 doi

  48. [59]

    2023, title The Role of Disk Winds in the Evolution and Dispersal of Protoplanetary Disks , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Pascucci , I., Cabrit , S., Edwards , S., et al. 2023, title The Role of Disk Winds in the Evolution and Dispersal of Protoplanetary Disks , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , ...

    2023 doi arXiv

  49. [60]

    A., Fisher , G

    Pevtsov , A. A., Fisher , G. H., Acton , L. W., et al. 2003, title The Relationship Between X-Ray Radiance and Magnetic Flux , , 598, 1387, 10.1086/378944

    2003 doi

  50. [61]

    2025, title Models and observational predictions of dust traps in protoplanetary discs , , 370, 140, 10.1007/s10509-025-04530-8

    Pinilla , P. 2025, title Models and observational predictions of dust traps in protoplanetary discs , , 370, 140, 10.1007/s10509-025-04530-8

    2025 doi

  51. [62]

    A., Krumholz , M

    Pokhrel , R., Gutermuth , R. A., Krumholz , M. R., et al. 2021, title The Single-cloud Star Formation Relation , , 912, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/abf564

    2021 doi

  52. [63]

    H., Feigelson , E

    Pravdo , S. H., Feigelson , E. D., Garmire , G., et al. 2001, title Discovery of X-rays from the protostellar outflow object HH2 , , 413, 708, 10.1038/35099508

    2001 doi

  53. [64]

    P., & Ferreira , J

    Ray , T. P., & Ferreira , J. 2021, title Jets from young stars , , 93, 101615, 10.1016/j.newar.2021.101615

    2021

  54. [65]

    2018, title X-Ray Flare Oscillations Track Plasma Sloshing along Star-disk Magnetic Tubes in the Orion Star-forming Region , , 856, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf1f

    Reale , F., Lopez-Santiago , J., Flaccomio , E., Petralia , A., & Sciortino , S. 2018, title X-Ray Flare Oscillations Track Plasma Sloshing along Star-disk Magnetic Tubes in the Orion Star-forming Region , , 856, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf1f

    2018 doi

  55. [66]

    Sala , G., Brandenstein , C., Baum , S., & Graham , P. W. 2026, title Detecting white dwarf binary mergers with gravitational waves , , 113, 123022, 10.1103/dbbd-7v7s

    2026 doi

  56. [67]

    Schmitt , J. H. M. M., Ness , J.-U., & Franco , G. 2003, title A spatially resolved limb flare on Algol B observed with XMM-Newton , , 412, 849, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034057

    2003 doi

  57. [68]

    C., G \"u nther , H

    Schneider , P. C., G \"u nther , H. M., & Schmitt , J. H. M. M. 2011, title The X-ray puzzle of the L1551 IRS 5 jet , , 530, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016305

    2011 doi

  58. [69]

    C., G \"u nther , H

    Schneider , P. C., G \"u nther , H. M., & Ustamujic , S. 2022, title Pre-main Sequence: Accretion and Outflows , in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Sangangelo , 57, 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_81-1

    2022 doi

  59. [70]

    2014, title On the spine-layer scenario for the very high-energy emission of NGC 1275 , , 443, 1224, 10.1093/mnras/stu1196

    Tavecchio , F., & Ghisellini , G. 2014, title On the spine-layer scenario for the very high-energy emission of NGC 1275 , , 443, 1224, 10.1093/mnras/stu1196

    2014 doi

  60. [71]

    2004, title X-Rays From Class 0/I Protostars , in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Tsuboi , Y. 2004, title X-Rays From Class 0/I Protostars , in IAU Symposium, Vol. 221, Star Formation at High Angular Resolution, ed. M. G. Burton , R. Jayawardhana , & T. L. Bourke , 247

    2004

  61. [72]

    2019, title NuSTAR Observations of the Supernova Remnant RX J1713.7-3946 , , 877, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b29

    Tsuji , N., Uchiyama , Y., Aharonian , F., et al. 2019, title NuSTAR Observations of the Supernova Remnant RX J1713.7-3946 , , 877, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b29

    2019 doi

  62. [73]

    2004, title A High-Resolution Very Large Array Observation of a Protostar in OMC-3: Shock-Induced X-Ray Emission by a Protostellar Jet , , 56, 341, 10.1093/pasj/56.2.341

    Tsujimoto , M., Koyama , K., Kobayashi , N., et al. 2004, title A High-Resolution Very Large Array Observation of a Protostar in OMC-3: Shock-Induced X-Ray Emission by a Protostellar Jet , , 56, 341, 10.1093/pasj/56.2.341

    2004 doi

  63. [74]

    2002, title X-Ray Properties of Young Stellar Objects in OMC-2 and OMC-3 from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory , , 566, 974, 10.1086/338110

    Tsujimoto , M., Koyama , K., Tsuboi , Y., Goto , M., & Kobayashi , N. 2002, title X-Ray Properties of Young Stellar Objects in OMC-2 and OMC-3 from the Chandra X-Ray Observatory , , 566, 974, 10.1086/338110

    2002 doi

  64. [75]

    2022, title Magnetically Confined Wind Shock , in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed

    ud-Doula , A., & Owocki , S. 2022, title Magnetically Confined Wind Shock , in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, ed. C. Bambi & A. Sangangelo , 46, 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_80-1

    2022 doi

  65. [76]

    Ustamujic , S., Orlando , S., Bonito , R., Miceli , M., & G \'o mez de Castro , A. I. 2018, title Structure of X-ray emitting jets close to the launching site: from embedded to disk-bearing sources , , 615, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732391

    2018 doi

  66. [77]

    A., Maehara , H., Airapetian , V., et al

    Yamashiki , Y. A., Maehara , H., Airapetian , V., et al. 2019, title Impact of Stellar Superflares on Planetary Habitability , , 881, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a71

    2019 doi

  67. [78]

    2020, title Stellar coronal X-ray emission and surface magnetic flux , , 640, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038022

    Zhuleku , J., Warnecke , J., & Peter , H. 2020, title Stellar coronal X-ray emission and surface magnetic flux , , 640, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038022

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.