Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comment on 'Spin Ice: Magnetic Excitations without Monopole Signature Using μSR' (arXiv:1110.0877)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1111.4168 v1 pith:67E3CFM2 submitted 2011-11-17 cond-mat.str-el

Comment on 'Spin Ice: Magnetic Excitations without Monopole Signature Using $\mu$SR' (arXiv:1110.0877)

S. T. Bramwell , S. R. Giblin This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords spindynamicsmagneticmonopolearxivbramwellco-workerscomment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Dunsiger and co-workers have criticised our paper on magnetic monopole dynamics spin ice [S. T. Bramwell et al., Nature, 461 956 (2009)]. We consider their criticisms and results but show that these do not warrant any revision of our earlier conclusions. In contrast, we point out that their conclusion of a `new' type of spin dynamics in spin ice is inconsistent with established facts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.