Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Spectral Topology and Non-Bloch Band Theory for Domain-Wall Systems

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a domain-wall ring of non-Hermitian lattices, every skin mode is tied to a winding mismatch between adjacent domains, and the full spectrum is fixed by two generalized Brillouin zone conditions.

desk verdict Solid theory paper that upgrades domain-wall NHSE to n-domain rings and finds a new traveling-wave skin sector; the main caveat is a coefficient-nonvanishing assumption in the thermodynamic reduction. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22976 v1 pith:67MVV4NK submitted 2026-07-25 cond-mat.mes-hall

Mingtao Xu , Rui Wang , Tian-Shu Deng , Wei Yi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords non-Hermitianskineffectdomain-wallringspectralwindinggeneralizedBrillouinzoneRonkinfunctiontraveling-wavemodesnon-Blochbandtheoryflux
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the non-Hermitian skin effect in a one-dimensional domain-wall ring—several different non-reciprocal lattices joined in a closed loop—is governed by the difference in spectral winding between adjacent domains, not by any single domain's winding alone. It then develops a non-Bloch band theory, extending the Ronkin-function formalism to multi-domain rings, and derives the generalized Brillouin zone (GBZ) conditions that determine the thermodynamic eigenspectrum. The spectrum splits into two sectors: standing-wave-like skin modes, which are inherited from the conventional open-boundary GBZ of individual domains, and traveling-wave-like skin modes, which exist only because of the global round-trip condition of the ring. The traveling-wave sector carries a finite flux spectral winding, so it is boundary-sensitive and disappears when the ring is cut into an open chain. If correct, the theory fully predicts where skin modes localize and which energies appear in a domain-wall ring.

What carries the argument

The relative spectral winding Δα(E)=w_{α+1}(E)−w_α(E) between adjacent domains is the topological order parameter; its sign predicts the localization side of skin modes. The GBZ conditions are obtained from the constrained Ronkin function R(μ;E)=Σ_{α=1}^{n−1} r_α R_α(μ_α;E)+r_n R_n(−Σ r_α/r_n μ_α;E), whose flat regions correspond to imaginary-gauge transformations that equalize all domain windings; the collapse of these flat regions yields the two spectral cases. Case I generalizes the single-domain GBZ/aGBZ condition; Case II is a new round-trip resonance condition, λ_w(E)=Σ_α r_α μ_{α,s_α+w}(E)=0.

What would settle it

Take a three-domain ring and tune the parameters so that, at some energy E0, the relative winding Δ1(E0)>0 while the weighted sum Σ_α r_α μ_{α,m_α(w)} = 0 has no solution in the relevant sector; if a mode localizing at interface 1|2 nevertheless appears at E0, the necessity of the Case I/II conditions would be falsified. Alternatively, find a domain-wall ring whose diagonalized spectrum contains an eigenenergy not obeying either Case I or Case II.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an eigenstate of an n-domain-wall ring that is exponentially localized near the interface between domains α and α+1 exists only when the relative spectral winding Δα(E)=w_{α+1}(E)−w_α(E) is positive (for right eigenstates); a vanishing mismatch across every interface rules out point-gap-protected skin effects. The full thermodynamic spectrum is then fixed by two GBZ conditions derived from the collapse of flat regions of a constrained Ronkin function: Case I (standing-wave-like) requires an equal-modulus pair μ_{α,m(w)} = μ_{α,m(w)+1} within some domain, consistent with the weighted global constraint Σ_α r_α μ_{α,m} ≤ 0 ≤ Σ_α r_α μ_{α,m+1}; Case II (traveling-wave-l

Load-bearing premise

The argument that the thermodynamic spectrum is fully captured by the two GBZ conditions assumes that, for every energy on the continuum spectrum, the coefficients of the exponentially dominant terms in the boundary-determinant expansion do not vanish, so the largest-modulus terms are never cancelled by accidental degeneracies or coefficient zeros.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Skin-mode localization in a domain-wall ring is determined by the sign of the relative winding across each interface; a positive mismatch is necessary for an eigenstate to accumulate there.
  • The thermodynamic ring spectrum is exactly the union of the spectra from the two GBZ conditions, so it can be computed from the characteristic equations of the constituent domains without diagonalizing the full ring.
  • The traveling-wave-like sector is a distinct class of skin mode with no single-domain open-boundary analogue; it disappears under open boundary conditions, leaving only standing-wave-like modes.
  • The flux spectral winding is carried entirely by the traveling-wave sector, so a 2π flux insertion shifts these states' energies but not the standing-wave sector's.
  • Open domain-wall chains have no traveling-wave sector; their thermodynamic spectrum equals the union of the open-boundary spectra of the constituent domains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Case II traveling-wave condition Σ_α r_α μ_{α,m}=0 is essentially a non-Hermitian analogue of a quantized Aharonov-Bohm phase around the ring; one might test the theory by measuring the flux-induced spectral flow in an electric-circuit or photonic quantum-walk implementation.
  • The constrained-Ronkin collapse method may generalize to higher-dimensional domain-wall configurations or to disordered/quasiperiodic domain walls, where the same relative-winding logic could hold.
  • The explicit exclusion of discrete boundary states (where a single dominant coefficient vanishes) suggests a complementary theory is needed for those states; the paper's continuum spectrum may fail to capture edge-localized modes in finite rings.
  • The claim that standing-wave modes carry no flux spectral winding could be tested directly in a finite ring: the flux winding should jump exactly when a traveling-wave branch crosses the reference energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies one-dimensional non-Hermitian systems arranged as a ring of n translationally invariant domains. Its central claims are: (i) an eigenstate localized at the interface α|α+1 exists only if the relative point-gap winding Δα(E)=w_{α+1}(E)-w_α(E) is positive (right eigenstates) or negative (left eigenstates), making the NHSE at domain walls topologically protected; (ii) in the thermodynamic limit the continuum eigenspectrum of the n-DW ring is characterized by two GBZ conditions—Case I (standing-wave-like: an equal-modulus pair inside a maximal common-winding sector) and Case II (traveling-wave-like: Σ r_α μ_{α,m_α(w)}=0); (iii) the Case II sector is unique to closed domain-wall rings and carries a nonzero flux spectral winding. The authors support (i) by eigenmode counting and a Toeplitz-index proof, and (ii) by a boundary-condition determinant expansion and, independently, by a constrained Ronkin-function calculation; numerical diagonalization of a 3-domain model is used to check the results.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is an important extension of non-Bloch band theory beyond translationally invariant single-bulk systems. The relative-winding criterion is a clean, parameter-free topological statement with a rigorous-looking proof, and the predicted traveling-wave sector—distinguished by a global round-trip condition and flux spectral winding—is a concrete, falsifiable new phenomenon. The agreement between two independent derivations (determinant expansion and Ronkin function) and the direct numerical comparison are strengths. However, because the dominant-term reduction in the determinant expansion rests on an unproven nonvanishing assumption for the coefficients A_{w;I}(E), the claimed completeness of the Case I/II characterization is not yet fully established. The paper has no fitted parameters and the numerical work is reproducible in principle from the stated model.

major comments (2)
  1. [SM SIII, Eqs. (S61)-(S75)] SM SIII, Eqs. (S61)-(S75): the reduction to Case I/II assumes the maximal-order terms in det M(E) are present with nonzero coefficients. The text excludes a single vanishing dominant coefficient as a discrete boundary state (SM SIII after Eq. (S62); SM SI), but never excludes an identically zero leading coefficient, or an identically zero sum of all maximal-order coefficients, along an open energy arc. Since A_{w;I}(E) are determinants of submatrices of L_α and G_α, no general argument prevents such a cancellation; if it occurred, the true dominant sector would shift and the predicted Case I/II spectrum would miss a continuum. The G_1=0 limit (SM SV) shows coefficient structure can change the spectral condition. The single 3-DW numerical example is not a proof. Please prove nonvanishing on the predicted arcs or state the result under a generic-coupling assumption and characterize excepti
  2. [SM SIII, 'Derivation of boundary equations'] SM SIII, 'Derivation of boundary equations': the bulk solution (S41) assumes nondegenerate roots of f_α(β;E)=0 and uses the eigenvector basis u_{α,m}. The GBZ condition itself, however, is an equal-modulus condition μ_{α,m}=μ_{α,m+1}; at a genuine root degeneracy β_{α,m}=β_{α,m+1} (an exceptional point), that basis collapses and Eqs. (S41)-(S61) require a Jordan-chain or limiting argument. This is not supplied. If the theory is meant to cover only nondegenerate characteristic roots, that restriction should be stated where Case I/II are introduced; otherwise the determinant expansion is incomplete at the very points it is meant to characterize.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract/Discussion] 'Complete characterization' and 'fully resolves' overstate the scope given the acknowledged exclusion of discrete boundary states and the generic-coefficient caveat in SM SIII. Please qualify.
  2. [Fig. 2] The unshaded regions are not explained; state whether Δ1(E) is nonpositive there or simply not shown.
  3. [Fig. 4 / Eq. (12)] Specify how W_DW=1 is evaluated (for example, numerical quadrature of Eq. (12) over the flux with a stated grid). As written, the claimed value is not independently checkable.
  4. [SM SII] The heuristic counting sentence equating s_α and d_α−s_α with hopping ranges for multiband models is informal; since the Toeplitz proof is rigorous, label the counting argument as a single-band illustration.
  5. [SM SIII, Eq. (S62)] The symbols w_- and w_+ are used before their definitions; define them at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the winding criterion, GBZ conditions, and traveling-wave sector are derived from independent determinant/boundary arguments and verified by direct diagonalization.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The relative-winding criterion (Eqs. 1–2 and SM SII) is defined from the bulk Bloch Hamiltonians, proved via eigenmode counting and a Toeplitz-index argument (SM SII, Eqs. S6–S34), and checked against independent real-space diagonalization (Figs. 2 and S1); the localization claim is not the input. The GBZ conditions (Case I and Case II, Eqs. S74–S75 and main text) are derived from the boundary-condition determinant det M(E)=0 (SM SIII, Eq. S57) by expanding into exponential orders and requiring dominant-term balance; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The constrained Ronkin construction (SM SIV) independently recovers the same conditions and is benchmarked against diagonalization (Fig. S1). The flux spectral winding (SM SVI) follows from the round-trip phase condition for traveling-wave modes and is not used to define the Case II condition. The standing-wave overlap with individual-domain (a)GBZ spectra is stated as a direct consequence of the Case I equal-modulus condition, not as an independent prediction. The authors' own cited works ([30,31,34,36]) are contextual or experimental and are not load-bearing; the core mathematics relies on external Toeplitz/Ronkin results and numerical checks. The paper explicitly limits itself to thermodynamic continuum states, excludes discrete boundary states, and notes that determinant coefficients can vanish for special interface matrices (SM SIII); these are completeness/correctness caveats, not circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard complex analysis and Toeplitz-index theory plus two explicitly stated thermodynamic-limit assumptions (single dominant envelope per domain; exponential dominance of det M). No free parameters are fitted — the example Hamiltonians (Eqs. 3–5) are fixed coefficient inputs used to illustrate the general derivation, and the N_α lengths are chosen sizes. No new physical entities are postulated; traveling-wave-like modes are a predicted mode class verified by direct diagonalization, not an ad hoc mechanism.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Toeplitz index theorem: for a semi-infinite Toeplitz operator with symbol h_α(e^{ik}) − E, the Fredholm index equals the negative (left) or positive (right) spectral winding of the symbol.
    Invoked in SM SII, Eq. (S25), to prove that the interface Fredholm index equals the relative winding ∆_α(E)=w_{α+1}−w_α — the topological origin of DW-ring NHSE.
  • standard math The Fredholm index is invariant under compact (in particular finite-rank) perturbations.
    Used in SM SII Eq. (S27) to connect the cut reference Hamiltonian to the full domain-wall Hamiltonian, whose difference is localized near the interface.
  • standard math Argument principle: the winding number w_α(E) equals the number of roots of f_α(β;E)=0 inside |β|=1 minus the pole order s_α.
    Used in SM SII Eqs. (S9)–(S10) for the mode-counting proof and for translating winding mismatch into an excess of decay modes over interface constraints.
  • standard math Jensen's formula: the single-domain Ronkin function R_α(μ_α;E) is piecewise linear in μ_α with slope equal to the point-gap winding w_α(μ_α;E).
    Used in SM SIV Eq. (S108) to derive the constrained Ronkin function and its flat-region structure.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic-limit dominance: as all N_α → ∞, det M(E) is dominated by the largest-modulus exponential terms ∏_α (∏_{m∈I_α} β_{α,m})^{N_α}, so the continuum spectrum is fixed by degeneracy of the two largest exponential orders; coefficients A_{w;I}(E) are assumed not to vanish on the continuum.
    Core reduction in SM SIII (Eqs. S61–S75) leading to Case I and Case II. The authors themselves note (SI, SIII) that discrete boundary states from vanishing single coefficients are excluded from this GBZ theory.
  • domain assumption Each thermodynamic eigenstate of the DW ring has a single dominant exponential envelope per domain, so a decay rate κ_α exists in each domain and the round-trip condition Σ r_α κ_α = 0 holds.
    Stated in SM SI Eqs. (S4)–(S5). Required for the piecewise imaginary-gauge construction and for the standing-wave/traveling-wave classification; excludes discrete boundary states.
  • domain assumption At the reference energy E, the point gaps of all domains are open, det[h_α(e^{ik})−E] ≠ 0, so w_α(E) and ∆_α(E) are well defined.
    Assumed in the main text Eqs. (1)–(2) and SM SII; energies with point-gap-closing (unit-modulus Bloch modes) are outside the winding-based criterion.
  • domain assumption Each domain has finite hopping range, so f_α(β;E)=det[h_α(β)−E] is a Laurent polynomial with finite orders s_α (poles) and p_α (roots).
    Used throughout SM SIII for the column-selection analysis of det M(E) and for the constraint counting in the interface problem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral Topology and Non-Bloch Band Theory for Domain-Wall Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/67MVV4NK

@misc{pith2026260722976,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral Topology and Non-Bloch Band Theory for Domain-Wall Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/67MVV4NK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22976}
}
read the original abstract

We study the spectral topology of one-dimensional non-Hermitian models in a domain-wall configuration, where different domains are arranged in a ring geometry. While eigenstates can localize near an interface under the non-Hermitian skin effect, we show that the localization of an eigenstate originates from the difference in the spectral winding numbers, with respect to the corresponding eigenenergy, between the two adjacent domains. We then obtain the conditions for the generalized Brillouin zone (GBZ) in the complex momentum space, by extending the Ronkin-function formalism to the domain-wall configuration. In addition to the conventional skin modes that correspond to standing waves on individual domains under the open boundary condition, a unique type of traveling-wave-like skin modes emerges, whose construction involves all domains. Besides their difference in the spatial profiles, these two types of modes obey distinct GBZ conditions, making them differentiable on the GBZ. Interestingly, the traveling-wave-like modes further carry a finite flux spectral winding number, indicating their boundary sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22976 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Overview of the DW non-Bloch theory. (a) Schematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Topological origin of NHSE in a 3-DW model. (a) PBC spectra of the three constituent domains and eigenenergies of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Ronkin function and domain-resolved GBZs for the 3-DW ring. (a) DW-ring eigenspectrum obtained from direct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spectral winding and eigenspectrum of a 3-DW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Those featuring a simple exponential decay in each domain [Fig

    Further examination of the spatial profiles of the wave functions indicate that two types of skin modes exist. Those featuring a simple exponential decay in each domain [Fig. 2(c)(d) dashed], corresponding to the traveling-wave-like skin modes in Fig. 1(e). And those with finer oscillations [Fig. 2(c)(d) solid], corresponding to the standing-wave-like ski...

  2. [2]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge States and Topological In- variants of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  4. [4]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symme- try and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence between Winding Numbers and Skin Modes in Non-Hermitian Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topo- logical Origin of Non-Hermitian Skin Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Hu, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effect in higher dimensions and uniform spectra, Science Bulletin S2095927324005024 (2024)

    H. Hu, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effect in higher dimensions and uniform spectra, Science Bulletin S2095927324005024 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal Bulk-Boundary Correspondence in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)

    2018

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological Phases of Non- Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian Physics, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian Topological Phe- nomena: A Review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023)

    2023

  4. [13]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Skin Effect and Chiral Damping in Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170401 (2019)

    2019

  5. [14]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-Bloch bands in two- dimensional non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195112 (2023)

    2023

  6. [15]

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Non-Hermitian Bulk-Boundary Correspondence and Auxiliary General- ized Brillouin Zone Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 226402 (2020)

    2020

  7. [16]

    F. K. Kunst and V. Dwivedi, Non-Hermitian systems and topology: A transfer-matrix perspective, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245116 (2019)

    2019

  8. [17]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern Bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018)

    2018

  9. [18]

    H.-Y. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Amoeba Formula- tion of Non-Bloch Band Theory in Arbitrary Dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021011 (2024)

    2024

  10. [19]

    Xiong, Z.-Y

    Y. Xiong, Z.-Y. Xing, and H. Hu, Non-Hermitian Skin Effect in Arbitrary Dimensions: Non-Bloch Band Theory and Classification, arXiv:2407.01296

    arXiv

  11. [20]

    Hu, H.-Y

    Y.-M. Hu, H.-Y. Wang, Z. Wang, and F. Song, Geometric Origin of Non-Bloch P T Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 050402 (2024)

    2024

  12. [21]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Shu, and K. Sun, Algebraic Non-Hermitian Skin Effect and Generalized Fermi Surface Formula in Ar- bitrary Dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031039 (2025)

    2025

  13. [22]

    Xiao et al., Observation of topological edge states in parity–time-symmetric quantum walks, Nature Phys13, 1117 (2017)

    L. Xiao et al., Observation of topological edge states in parity–time-symmetric quantum walks, Nature Phys13, 1117 (2017)

    2017

  14. [23]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics, Nat. Phys. 16, 761 (2020)

    2020

  15. [24]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of Non-Bloch Parity-Time Symmetry and Ex- ceptional Points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 230402 (2021)

    2021

  16. [25]

    Q. Lin, T. Li, L. Xiao, K. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Ob- servation of non-Hermitian topological Anderson insulator in quantum dynamics, Nat Commun 13, 3229 (2022)

    2022

  17. [26]

    B. Liu, Y. Li, B. Yang, X. Shen, Y. Yang, Z. H. Hang, and M. Ezawa, Experimental observation of non-Hermitian higher-order skin interface states in topological electric cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 043034 (2023)

    2023

  18. [27]

    Zhang et al., Observation of Non-Hermitian Bulk- Boundary Correspondence in Nonchiral Nonunitary Quan- tum Dynamics of Single Photons, Phys

    M. Zhang et al., Observation of Non-Hermitian Bulk- Boundary Correspondence in Nonchiral Nonunitary Quan- tum Dynamics of Single Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 213601 (2025)

    2025

  19. [28]

    Xiao, W.-T

    L. Xiao, W.-T. Xue, F. Song, Y.-M. Hu, W. Yi, Z. Wang, and P. Xue, Observation of non-Hermitian edge burst in quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 070801 (2024)

    2024

  20. [29]

    L. Xiao, S. Sarkar, K. Wang, A. Bayat, and P. Xue, Observation of Criticality-Enhanced Quantum Sensing in Nonunitary Quantum Walks

  21. [30]

    Ezawa, Non-Hermitian boundary and interface states in nonreciprocal higher-order topological metals and elec- trical circuits, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Non-Hermitian boundary and interface states in nonreciprocal higher-order topological metals and elec- trical circuits, Phys. Rev. B99, 121411 (2019)

    2019

  22. [31]

    Deng and W

    T.-S. Deng and W. Yi, Non-Bloch topological invariants in a non-Hermitian domain wall system, Phys. Rev. B 100, 035102 (2019)

    2019

  23. [32]

    and Institute for Advanced Study, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China, Non-Hermitian skin ef- fect in a domain-wall system, Acta Phys

    Deng T.-S. and Institute for Advanced Study, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China, Non-Hermitian skin ef- fect in a domain-wall system, Acta Phys. Sin. 71, 170306 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    J.-R. Li, C. Luo, L.-L. Zhang, S.-F. Zhang, P.-P. Zhu, and W.-J. Gong, Band structures and skin effects of coupled nonreciprocal Su-Schrieffer-Heeger lattices, Phys. Rev. A 107, 022222 (2023)

    2023

  25. [34]

    Mikhalkin,Amoebas of Algebraic Varieties and Trop- ical Geometry, arXiv:math/0403015

    G. Mikhalkin,Amoebas of Algebraic Varieties and Trop- ical Geometry, arXiv:math/0403015

    arXiv

  26. [35]

    M. Yang, Y. Li, M. Xu, W. Yi, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Observation of Non-Hermitian Spectral Defor- mation in Complex Momentum Space, arXiv:2511.06844

  27. [36]

    Zhong, J

    J.-X. Zhong, J. Lin, K. Chen, J. Lu, K. Ding, and Y. Jing, Unveiling Non-Hermitian Band Structures with Non- Bloch Supercells, arXiv:2510.20160

  28. [37]

    M. Xu, Z. Gong, and W. Yi, Optimal spectral trans- port of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B111, 214305 (2025)

    2025

  29. [38]

    See Supplemental Material for detailed discussions

  30. [39]

    N. M. Shnerb and D. R. Nelson, Winding Numbers, Com- plex Currents, and Non-Hermitian Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5172 (1998)

    1998

  31. [40]

    Y. Liu, Q. Zhou, and S. Chen, Localization transi- tion, spectrum structure, and winding numbers for one- dimensional non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024201 (2021)

    2021

  32. [41]

    Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys

    S. Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 237601 (2019)

    2019

  33. [42]

    Claes and T

    J. Claes and T. L. Hughes, Skin effect and winding num- ber in disordered non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140201 (2021)

    2021

  34. [43]

    A. P. Acharya, A. Chakrabarty, D. K. Sahu, and S. Datta, Localization, PT symmetry breaking, and topo- logical transitions in non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B 105, 014202 (2022). 7

    2022

  35. [44]

    Spectral Topology and Non-Bloch Band Theory for Domain-Wall Systems

    K. Sun and H. Hu, Lyapunov Formulation of Band Theory for Disordered Non-Hermitian Systems, arXiv:2507.09447. 8 Supplemental Material for “Spectral Topology and Non-Bloch Band Theory for Domain-Wall Systems” CONTENTS SI. The Domain-Wall Ring Imaginary Gauge Transformation 8 SI...

    arXiv

  36. [45]

    Thus|β α,m|<1 represents a right-decaying mode, whereas|β α,m|>1 represents a left-decaying mode

    We take the positive spatial direction to be the right direction. Thus|β α,m|<1 represents a right-decaying mode, whereas|β α,m|>1 represents a left-decaying mode. The winding mismatch at the interfaceα|α+ 1 is therefore ∆α(E) =w α+1(E)−w α(E) = [n< α+1(E)−s α+1]−[n < α (E)−s ...

  37. [46]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-Bloch Band Theory of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019)

    2019

  38. [47]

    L. N. Trefethen,Spectra and Pseudospectra: The Behavior of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2005)

    2005

  39. [48]

    B¨ ottcher and S

    A. B¨ ottcher and S. M. Grudskij,Spectral Properties of Banded Toeplitz Matrices(Society for Industrial and Applied Math- ematics (SIAM, 3600 Market Street, Floor 6, Philadelphia, PA 19104), Philadelphia, Pa, 2005)

    2005

  40. [49]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological Origin of Non-Hermitian Skin Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  41. [50]

    B¨ ottcher and B

    A. B¨ ottcher and B. Silbermann,Analysis of Toeplitz Operators(Springer, Berlin, 2006)

    2006

  42. [51]

    Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators(Springer, Berlin, 1995)

    T. Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators(Springer, Berlin, 1995)

    1995

  43. [52]

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Non-Hermitian Bulk-Boundary Correspondence and Auxiliary Generalized Brillouin Zone Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 226402 (2020)

    2020

  44. [53]

    H.-Y. Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Amoeba Formulation of Non-Bloch Band Theory in Arbitrary Dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021011 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.