pith. sign in

arxiv: 1507.07064 · v2 · pith:6AP5TIIVnew · submitted 2015-07-25 · 💻 cs.GT

Strategyproof Quota Mechanisms for Multiple Assignment Problems

classification 💻 cs.GT
keywords quotamechanismsdictatorshipserialstrategyproofagentslexicographicmultiple
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study the problem of allocating multiple objects to agents without transferable utilities, where each agent may receive more than one object according to a quota. Under lexicographic preferences, we characterize the set of strategyproof, non-bossy, and neutral quota mechanisms and show that under a mild Pareto efficiency condition, serial dictatorship quota mechanisms are the only mechanisms satisfying these properties. Dropping the neutrality requirement, this class of quota mechanisms further expands to sequential dictatorship quota mechanisms. We then extend quota mechanisms to randomized settings, and show that the random serial dictatorship quota mechanisms (RSDQ) are envyfree, strategyproof, and ex post efficient for any number of agents and objects and any quota system, proving that the well-studied Random Serial Dictatorship (RSD) satisfies envyfreeness when preferences are lexicographic.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On Truthful Mechanisms without Pareto-efficiency: Characterizations and Fairness

    cs.GT 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Serial-quota mechanisms are the only strategy-proof non-bossy neutral mechanisms for indivisible goods allocation under lexicographic, all strict ordinal, and additive cardinal preferences, without needing Pareto efficiency.