Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 74 references

Thermodynamics of hydride formation: Anisotropic size-dependent coupled chemo-thermo-mechanical effects at Ni/NiH interfaces

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A chemo-thermo-mechanical enthalpy model explains anisotropic Ni hydride growth from elastic anisotropy and size.

desk verdict Solid, carefully parameterized CTM enthalpy for coherent Ni/NiH {100}/{111} interfaces that matches MD; the G≈H step is the real soft spot for the claimed growth switch. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09977 v1 pith:6AVRXBV5 submitted 2026-07-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sourabh Singha , Abhijit Chatterjee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords α/βinterfacestrainenergynickelhydridehydrogenstorageenthalpyofmoleculardynamicsvolumeexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Nickel nanoparticles can form hydride at modest hydrogen pressure, but the growing Ni/NiH interface is coherent and anisotropic: growth prefers one crystal plane early and another later. This paper builds a simplified molar enthalpy model H(x, T, P, l, λ) that folds chemical composition, temperature, elastic strain, film thickness, and interface energy into one expression for thin-film Ni/NiH systems. The model is fitted to molecular-dynamics data for bulk heat capacity, thermal expansion, elastic constants (with temperature- and strain-dependent corrections), and interface energies of the (100) and (111) orientations. It recovers the enthalpy and lattice dimensions measured in MD from roughly 1 nm to tens of nanometres and beyond. The central physical insight is that anisotropic elastic constants alone reverse the relative stability of the two interfaces once the hydride fraction exceeds about 0.25, thereby explaining the observed switch in preferred growth direction without invoking surface or interface energy as the dominant driver.

What carries the argument

The size-dependent chemo-thermo-mechanical enthalpy H(x, T, P, l, λ) obtained by adding bulk thermo-elastic contributions of the α and β phases to a positive interface term λ A_int and then minimising with respect to the four independent lengths of the bilayer.

What would settle it

Measure the relative populations of (111) versus (100) coherent Ni/NiH interfaces in thin films or nanoparticles as a function of hydride fraction x at fixed temperature; if the crossover near x = 0.25 is absent or reversed, the elastic-anisotropy explanation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors show that a continuum enthalpy function H(x, T, P, l, λ) that includes temperature- and strain-corrected elastic constants, thermal expansion, heat capacity, and a size-dependent interface term accurately reproduces MD enthalpies and equilibrium lattice parameters of coherent Ni/NiH bilayers for both (100) and (111) orientations across length scales from ~1 nm to the continuum limit; the same elastic anisotropy causes the preferred interface to switch from (111) at low hydride fraction to (100) at higher fraction.

Load-bearing premise

Free-energy minimisation is replaced by pure enthalpy minimisation (G ≈ H), on the claim that entropy differences between the strained phases remain small.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Preferred hydride growth direction in Ni can be predicted from elastic constants alone once x is known.
  • The same construction supplies a transferable enthalpy model for other coherent metal/hydride systems that exhibit anisotropic growth.
  • Interface and surface energies matter only below ~20 nm; above that scale continuum elastic anisotropy dominates.
  • Corrections that couple temperature and strain into the elastic constants and heat capacity are required for quantitative enthalpy predictions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the G ≈ H approximation holds for other fcc metals, the same elastic-anisotropy switch should appear in Pd and Pt hydrides and could be checked by TEM.
  • The model supplies a cheap continuum surrogate that can replace repeated MD runs when screening particle-size or temperature effects on hydride thermodynamics.
  • Once dislocations become probable (larger particles), the coherent-lattice assumption will break and the predicted crossover may shift or disappear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a continuum chemo-thermo-mechanical (CTM) enthalpy model H(x, T, P, {l}, λ) for coherent Ni/NiH (α/β) interfaces in thin films. Starting from bulk 0 K properties, heat capacities, thermal expansion, and temperature- and strain-dependent elastic constants (fitted to single-phase NVT MD and transformed for orientation), the model adds an independently extracted interface energy λ and minimizes H with respect to the layer dimensions. It is shown to reproduce NPT MD molar enthalpies and equilibrium lattice parameters for both {100} and {111} interfaces from ~1 nm to tens of nm (and by construction to the bulk limit). The authors attribute the observed switch in preferred growth direction—from {111} at low x to {100} at higher x—to anisotropic elastic constants rather than interface energy, and argue that the same framework can be transferred to other nanostructured metal hydrides.

Significance. If the predictions hold, the work supplies a practical, size-aware continuum enthalpy model that bridges atomistic MD to continuum scales for a technologically relevant hydride system, correctly capturing the strong chemo-thermo-mechanical coupling that is usually omitted from continuum treatments. The demonstration that elastic anisotropy alone can reverse the preferred interface orientation with hydride fraction is a concrete, falsifiable explanation for anisotropic growth previously seen in the authors’ Monte Carlo nanoparticle simulations and in related Pd systems. The systematic protocol (single-phase fitting → tensor transformation → excess-enthalpy extraction of λ → free-dimension minimization) is reusable for other solid-state hydrogen-storage materials. Strengths include quantitative parity with the underlying MD (R^{2} improving to 0.99 once coupling terms are retained) and explicit coverage of the full length-scale range claimed in the abstract.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.3, Eqs. (11)–(12), Fig. 9] Section 4.3 and Eqs. (11)–(12): equilibrium dimensions and the orientation ranking are obtained by minimizing H rather than G, with the sole justification that “entropy terms were shown to be small in our earlier work [22]”. That earlier work examined bulk, unstrained Ni–H; it does not quantify configurational or vibrational entropy differences between coherently strained α and β layers or the interface excess entropy. Because the molar-enthalpy difference between {100} and {111} orientations is only 1–7 meV per Ni atom (Fig. 9), a modest orientation- or strain-dependent –TΔS of a few meV can reverse the sign of ΔG and therefore move or eliminate the claimed {111}→{100} crossover at x ≈ 0.25. The same approximation underpins the lattice-parameter predictions that the model claims to reproduce. Either a free-energy calculation (or at least an estimate of the relevant ΔS under the actual i
  2. [Section 2.1] Section 2.1 and the construction of H: the model treats α as pure Ni and β as stoichiometric NiH, thereby discarding both the finite H solubility of the α phase and all configurational entropy of the interstitial solid solution. While this simplifies the continuum description, the neglected terms are of the same order as the elastic and interface contributions that drive the reported orientation switch. A quantitative bound on the error introduced by the pure-phase approximation (e.g., by comparing to a few mixed-composition MD cells or to the authors’ own earlier free-energy calculations) is needed to confirm that the predicted crossover and size dependence remain intact.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 4] Table 4 lists C44 = 0 for NiH. If this is the value returned by the EAM potential it should be stated explicitly and its consequences for the {111} transformation discussed; if it is a typographical omission the correct number should be supplied.
  2. [Abstract / Section 5] The abstract and title emphasize nanoparticles, yet all continuum calculations are performed on periodic thin-film geometries. A short paragraph clarifying how the film results map onto faceted nanoparticles (or an explicit caveat) would improve accessibility.
  3. [Section 4.6] Surface energies are computed (Section 4.6) but never inserted into the working enthalpy expression used for the size-dependent comparisons. Either drop them or show a representative calculation that includes free surfaces.
  4. [Figures 7–11] Several figure captions and the TOC image are missing or incomplete in the supplied manuscript; ensure all panels of Figs. 7–11 are fully labeled with units and that the supplementary figures referenced in the text are available.
  5. [Throughout] Minor typographical issues: “s ize-dependent” (title), “α/β interface” vs. “α/β” inconsistency, and occasional missing spaces around mathematical symbols.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: coupling parameters are fitted to single-phase MD and then independently tested on two-phase interfaces; the only soft self-citation is the G≈H approximation, which is not definitional of the enthalpy model itself.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 4.3, paragraph discussing Fig. 7]
    "For simplicity, the entropic terms are ignored here. This amounts to writing G ≈ H. Entropy terms were shown to be small in our earlier work [22]."

    The equilibrium dimensions {l} and the claimed {111}→{100} crossover are obtained by minimizing H rather than G (Eqs. 11–12). The sole justification for discarding –TΔS is a citation to the authors' prior bulk, unstrained Ni–H study. That prior result does not quantify strain- or orientation-dependent entropy differences at coherent interfaces, so the free-energy ranking of the two orientations rests on an unverified self-citation. The circularity is mild because the enthalpy model itself is independently validated against MD; only the thermodynamic interpretation of the minimum is affected.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained against the paper's own MD benchmarks. Bulk cohesive energies, lattice parameters, heat capacities and 0 K elastic constants are obtained from independent energy-minimization and NPT runs (Secs. 4.1–4.2). Temperature–strain coupling coefficients (Eq. 10, Table 5) are fitted exclusively to single-phase NVT enthalpies (Fig. 7–8). Interface energy λ is extracted from the excess enthalpy of two-phase supercells versus 1/N (Eq. 14, Fig. 9). The full model (Eqs. 11–12) is then used to predict both enthalpy and lattice dimensions of coherent α/β systems that were never part of the fit; agreement with fresh NPT data is shown in Fig. 11. The only self-citation that carries load is the claim that entropy is small enough for G≈H (Sec. 4.3 citing [22]), but that approximation is an external modeling choice, not a definitional reduction of the enthalpy expressions. The anisotropic-growth motivation also cites the authors' prior Monte Carlo work [15], yet the present paper supplies an independent elastic explanation. No equation is forced by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction of the same data. Score 2 reflects one non-definitional self-citation that is not load-bearing for the central enthalpy–volume claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on standard continuum elasticity plus a set of MD-fitted material functions and three modeling choices (pure end-member phases, G≈H, always-coherent interface). No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are the temperature–strain correction coefficients and the extracted interface energies.

free parameters (3)
  • C_P,T, C_P,ε, C11,T, C11,ε, C11,Tε, C12,T, C12,ε, C12,Tε (Ni and NiH) = See Table 5 (e.g. C11,T(Ni)=−0.00094 eV Å−3 K−1)
    Temperature and strain correction coefficients in Eq. (10); obtained by regression to NVT MD enthalpies of single-phase crystals (Fig. 8, Table 5).
  • Interfacial energy λ({100},{111}; x; T) = Temperature- and x-dependent; positive and superlinear in T (Fig. 10)
    Extracted as slope of (H−H∞) vs A_int from finite-thickness NPT supercells (Eq. 14, Figs. 9–10); used as input to the continuum enthalpy.
  • Surface energies γ100, γ111 for α and β = γ100,α=0.1272, γ111,α=0.118, γ100,β=0.0926, γ111,β=0.08696 eV/Ų at 300 K
    Computed from slab–bulk energy differences at 300–800 K and inserted into the general enthalpy expression (Eq. 1).
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Gibbs free energy may be replaced by enthalpy for equilibrium dimension search (G ≈ H); entropy contributions are negligible.
    Stated in §4.3 with only a self-citation to prior work; load-bearing for all minimized {l} and for the claimed {111}/{100} crossover.
  • domain assumption α-phase is pure Ni and β-phase is stoichiometric NiH (H:Ni = 1); partial solubility and H configurational entropy are ignored.
    §2.1; simplifies the model but differs from experimental α (<2% H) and β (H:Ni ≈ 0.8–1).
  • domain assumption The Ni/NiH interface remains coherent (no dislocations or cracks) for the sizes considered.
    §3.1; justified by short MD runs and nanoparticle literature, but excludes the powdering regime of large particles.
  • domain assumption Linear elasticity with Voigt cubic constants plus the fitted temperature–strain corrections is sufficient; shear strains vanish by geometry.
    §4.3, Eqs. (5)–(10); standard continuum assumption for the thin-film geometry.
  • domain assumption The Baskes NiAlH EAM potential accurately reproduces Ni–NiH thermodynamics, elastic constants, and interface energetics.
    §3.2; all numerical results inherit the potential’s biases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamics of hydride formation: Anisotropic size-dependent coupled chemo-thermo-mechanical effects at Ni/NiH interfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6AVRXBV5

@misc{pith2026260709977,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamics of hydride formation: Anisotropic size-dependent coupled chemo-thermo-mechanical effects at Ni/NiH interfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6AVRXBV5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09977}
}
abstract

Ni nanoparticles are frequently used as catalysts for hydrogenation reactions as well as in hydrogen storage applications. Recently, we have shown that small Ni nanoparticles can absorb hydrogen at < 10 bar pressure to form Ni hydride. During this process, the hydride growth is anisotropic, and a coherent Ni/NiH interface is formed. In order to explain the anisotropy and to comprehensively account for the coupling chemical, mechanical and thermal effects, we develop in this study a simplified chemo-thermo-mechanical enthalpy model for Ni/NiH interfaces in thin films. This model captures the combined influence of extent of hydride formation x, temperature T, pressure P, size effect ($l$), and the ${\alpha}$/${\beta}$ interface energy ${\lambda}$. Two different ${\alpha}$/${\beta}$ interface orientations, namely (100) and (111), are investigated. The model is shown to correctly predict the enthalpy and volume changes over a wide range of length scales, from atomically thin layers (~1 nm) to micron scale and larger. This work provides the basis for the development of similar enthalpy models for other solid-state hydrogen storage nanostructured materials where anisotropic growth of hydride phases is also observed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Khanzadeh, H

    M. Khanzadeh, H. Alipour, G. Alahyarizadeh, Understanding hydrogen behavior on aluminum: DFT investigations on adsorption and diffusion mechanisms, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 73 (2024) 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.068

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.068 2024

  2. [1]

    Ni is also used as a catalyst to improve the kinetics of hydrogen storage materials, such as MgH2 [4–10]

    Introduction Nickel nanoparticles are frequently used for hydrogenation reactions, offering an alternative to noble metals like palladium or platinum [1–3]. Ni is also used as a catalyst to improve the kinetics of hydrogen storage materials, such as MgH2 [4–10]. Although hydrogen adsorption on Ni surfaces has been extensively studied [11–14], the extent o...

  3. [2]

    1a shows the different stages of hydrogen absorption in a Ni particle

    Theory Fig. 1a shows the different stages of hydrogen absorption in a Ni particle. Initially, the hydride nucleates at the particle surface. The α/β interface moves, as the hydride phase (green color) grows. We simplify the picture by focusing on the interfacial region in a 2D film (Fig. 1b). Fig. 1b shows a thermodynamic path for Ni/NiH interface formati...

  4. [3]

    System preparation The fcc unit Ni system has lattice parameters 𝑎 = 𝑏 = 𝑐 = 3.52 Å and an angle 𝛼 = 𝛽 = 𝛾 = 90° with space group Fm3̅m (No.225) [34]

    Computational methodology 3.1. System preparation The fcc unit Ni system has lattice parameters 𝑎 = 𝑏 = 𝑐 = 3.52 Å and an angle 𝛼 = 𝛽 = 𝛾 = 90° with space group Fm3̅m (No.225) [34]. Hydrogen occupies the octahedral interstitial site [28,35]. The bulk nickel hydride (NiHx, x=0-1) possesses an NaCl structure with a lattice constant of 3.738 Å (19% vol. expa...

  5. [4]

    Results and discussion The enthalpy model (equation (1)) contains various contributions. This section we evaluate the related parameters step-by-step as follows: (i) bulk properties at 0 K, (ii) temperature effects, (iii) development of a temperature-dependent elastic model, (iv) interfacial energy as a function of strain and temperature, and finally, (v)...

  6. [5]

    A thermodynamic model that accounts for the coupled chemical, thermal and mechanical effects is required

    Conclusion In solid-state hydrogen storage materials, volume changes and heat release are common during the absorption/desorption process. A thermodynamic model that accounts for the coupled chemical, thermal and mechanical effects is required. In addition, applications often use nanometer to micron sized particles, hence, size effect also needs to be con...

  7. [6]

    This work was also supported by the National Supercomputing Mission, India, through the DST/NSM/R&D_HPC_Applications grant (2021/02)

    Acknowledgements AC would like to acknowledge the Computer Centre at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay for providing computational support. This work was also supported by the National Supercomputing Mission, India, through the DST/NSM/R&D_HPC_Applications grant (2021/02). AC acknowledges funding support from the Centre of Excellence in Oil, Gas a...

    2021

  8. [7]

    Data Availability Statement The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    Author contributions SS and AC conceptualized the work; SS conducted the investigation; SS and AC jointly wrote the manuscript

  2. [9]

    Y. Hu, M. Liu, S. Bartling, H. Lund, H. Atia, P.J. Dyson, M. Beller, R. V. Jagadeesh, A general and robust Ni-based nanocatalyst for selective hydrogenation reactions at low temperature and pressure, Sci. Adv. 9 (2023) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.ADJ8225

    2023 doi

  3. [10]

    T. Cai, M. Tian, L. Wang, C. Lu, F. Feng, Q. Zhang, Q. Wang, X. Li, Recent Advances in Nickel- Based Catalysts for Hydrogenation Reactions: Deactivation Mechanisms and Design Principles, ACS Catal. 16 (2026) 5346–5379. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5c09013

    2026 doi

  4. [11]

    Rudman, Soluble Nickel Nanoparticles for Catalytic Hydrogenation, Curr

    P.S. Rudman, Soluble Nickel Nanoparticles for Catalytic Hydrogenation, Curr. Org. Chem. 17 (2013) 336–347. https://doi.org/10.2174/1385272811317040004

    2013 doi

  5. [12]

    Rusman, M

    N.A.A. Rusman, M. Dahari, A review on the current progress of metal hydrides material for solid-state hydrogen storage applications, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 41 (2016) 12108–12126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.244

    2016 doi

  6. [13]

    Sakintuna, F

    B. Sakintuna, F. Lamari-Darkrim, M. Hirscher, Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: A review, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 32 (2007) 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.022

    2007 doi

  7. [14]

    M. V. Lototskyy, B.P. Tarasov, V.A. Yartys, Gas-phase applications of metal hydrides, J. Energy 33 Storage. 72 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108165

    2023 doi

  8. [15]

    S. Li, J. Gong, Strategies for improving the performance and stability of Ni-based catalysts for reforming reactions, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 7245–7256. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00223g

    2014 doi

  9. [16]

    Fetcenko, S.R

    M.A. Fetcenko, S.R. Ovshinsky, B. Reichman, K. Young, C. Fierro, J. Koch, A. Zallen, W. Mays, T. Ouchi, Recent advances in NiMH battery technology, J. Power Sources. 165 (2007) 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.10.036

    2007 doi

  10. [17]

    Sazelee, N.A

    N. Sazelee, N.A. Ali, M.S. Yahya, N.S. Mustafa, F.A. Halim Yap, S.B. Mohamed, M.Z. Ghazali, S. Suwarno, M. Ismail, Recent Advances on Mg–Li–Al Systems for Solid-State Hydrogen Storage: A Review, Front. Energy Res. 10 (2022) 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.875405

    2022 doi

  11. [18]

    Y. Sun, C. Shen, Q. Lai, W. Liu, D.W. Wang, K.F. Aguey-Zinsou, Tailoring magnesium based materials for hydrogen storage through synthesis: Current state of the art, Energy Storage Mater. 10 (2018) 168–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.010

    2018 doi

  12. [19]

    Watson, R.P.K

    G.W. Watson, R.P.K. Wells, D.J. Willock, G.J. Hutchings, A comparison of the adsorption and diffusion of hydrogen on the {111} surfaces of Ni, Pd, and Pt from density functional theory calculations, J. Phys. Chem. B. 105 (2002) 4889–4894. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002864c

    2002 doi

  13. [20]

    Shirazi, A

    M. Shirazi, A. Bogaerts, E.C. Neyts, A DFT study of H-dissolution into the bulk of a crystalline Ni(111) surface: A chemical identifier for the reaction kinetics, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 (2017) 19150–19158. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp03662k

    2017 doi

  14. [21]

    Panczyk, P

    T. Panczyk, P. Szabelski, W. Rudzinski, Hydrogen Adsorption on Nickel (100) Single-Crystal Face. A Monte Carlo Study of the Equilibrium and Kinetics, J. Phys. Chem. B. 109 (2005) 10986–10994. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp047230a. 34

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    S. Rana, N. Masli, D.S. Monder, A. Chatterjee, Hydriding pathway for Ni nanoparticles: Computational characterization provides insights into the nanoparticle size and facet effect on layer-by-layer subsurface hydride formation, Comput. Mater. Sci. 210 (2022) 111482. https://do...

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    Pundt, R

    A. Pundt, R. Kirchheim, Hydrogen in metals: Microstructural aspects, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 36 (2006) 555–608. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.090804.094451

    2006 doi

  17. [25]

    Dadfarnia, P

    M. Dadfarnia, P. Novak, D.C. Ahn, J.B. Liu, P. Sofronis, D.D. Johnson, I.M. Robertson, Recent advances in the study of structural materials compatibility with hydrogen, Adv. Mater. 22 (2010) 1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200904354

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    Q. Wang, X. Liu, T. Zhu, F. Ye, M. Wan, P. Zhang, Y. Song, C. Huang, R. Ma, X. Ren, R. Yu, B. Wang, X. Cao, Mechanism of hydrogen-induced defects and cracking in Ti and Ti–Mo alloy, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 48 (2023) 5801–5809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.119

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Briki, P

    C. Briki, P. de Rango, S. Belkhiria, M.H. Dhaou, A. Jemni, Measurements of expansion of LaNi5 compacted powder during hydrogen absorption/desorption cycles and their influences on the reactor wall, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 44 (2019) 13647–13654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhyd...

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Wagner, H

    H. Wagner, H. Horner, Elastic interaction and the phase transition in coherent metal-hydrogen systems, Adv. Phys. 23 (1974) 587–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018737400101401. 35

    1974 doi

  21. [29]

    Singha, A

    S. Singha, A. Chatterjee, Atomistic-scale insights into hydrogen diffusion barrier in nickel hydride: Complex interplay between short- and long-range hydrogen arrangement and hydrogen concentration, Comput. Mater. Sci. 241 (2024) 113044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113044

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Rana, D.S

    S. Rana, D.S. Monder, A. Chatterjee, Thermodynamic calculations using reverse Monte Carlo: A computational workflow for accelerated construction of phase diagrams for metal hydrides, Comput. Mater. Sci. 233 (2024) 112727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112727

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Dornheim, Thermodynamics of Metal Hydrides: Tailoring Reaction Enthalpies of Hydrogen Storage Materials, Thermodyn

    M. Dornheim, Thermodynamics of Metal Hydrides: Tailoring Reaction Enthalpies of Hydrogen Storage Materials, Thermodyn. - Interact. Stud. - Solids, Liq. Gases. (2011). https://doi.org/10.5772/21662

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    Züttel, V

    A. Züttel, V. Güther, A. Otto, M. Bärtsch, R. Kötz, D. Chartouni, C. Nützenadel, L. Schlapbach, About the mechanism and the rate limiting step of the metalhydride electrode reaction, J. Alloys Compd. 293 (1999) 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00427-2

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    Wayman, W.G

    M.L. Wayman, W.G. C, The H-Ni (Hydrogen-Nickel) System Equilibrium Diagram, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams. 10 (1989) 569–580

    1989

  26. [34]

    Zhang, C

    H. Zhang, C. Leygraf, L. Wen, F. Huang, H. Chang, Y. Jin, The formation of hydride and its influence on Ti–6Al–4V alloy fracture behavior, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 48 (2023) 36169– 36184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.226

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Singha, A

    S. Singha, A. Chatterjee, Pressure-composition-temperature and phase diagram construction of Ni hydride using embedded atom method, Comput. Mater. Sci. 262 (2026) 114405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.114405. 36

    2026 doi

  28. [36]

    Traisnel, A

    C. Traisnel, A. Metsue, A. Oudriss, J. Bouhattate, X. Feaugas, Hydrogen solubility and diffusivity near surface of nickel single crystals: Some implications of elastic energy, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110136

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Mellouli, F

    S. Mellouli, F. Askri, H. Dhaou, A. Jemni, S. Ben Nasrallah, A study of the thermal behavior of a deformable metal-hydride bed, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 41 (2016) 1711–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.058

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    Zhang, C

    J. Zhang, C. Mao, J. Chen, C.G. Long, K. Tang, M.J. Zhang, P. Peng, Strain tuned dehydrogenation thermodynamics of magnesium based hydride: A first principle study, Comput. Mater. Sci. 105 (2015) 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.026

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    Benzidi, M

    H. Benzidi, M. Lakhal, A. Benyoussef, M. Hamedoun, M. Loulidi, A. El kenz, O. Mounkachi, First principle study of strain effect on structural and dehydrogenation properties of complex hydride LiBH4, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 42 (2017) 19481–19486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhy...

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Zaoui, Continuum Micromechanics: Survey, J

    A. Zaoui, Continuum Micromechanics: Survey, J. Eng. Mech. 128 (2002) 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:8(808)

    2002 doi

  33. [41]

    Aguey-Zinsou, J.R

    K.F. Aguey-Zinsou, J.R. Ares-Fernández, Hydrogen in magnesium: New perspectives toward functional stores, Energy Environ. Sci. 3 (2010) 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1039/b921645f

    2010 doi

  34. [42]

    Daw, M.I

    M.S. Daw, M.I. Baskes, Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals, Phys. Rev. B. 29 (1984) 6443–6453

    1984

  35. [43]

    V Gapontsev, V

    A. V Gapontsev, V. V Kondrat’ev, Hydrogen diffusion in disordered metals and alloys, Physics- Uspekhi. 46 (2003) 1077–1098. https://doi.org/10.1070/pu2003v046n10abeh001660

    2003 doi

  36. [44]

    Shizuku, S

    Y. Shizuku, S. Yamamoto, Y. Fukai, Phase diagram of the Ni-H system at high hydrogen 37 pressures, J. Alloys Compd. 336 (2002) 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925- 8388(01)01861-8

    2002 doi

  37. [45]

    Li, The Mechanics and Physics of Defect Nucleation, MRS Bull

    J. Li, The Mechanics and Physics of Defect Nucleation, MRS Bull. 32 (2007) 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2007.48

    2007 doi

  38. [46]

    Narayan, F

    T.C. Narayan, F. Hayee, A. Baldi, A. Leen Koh, R. Sinclair, J.A. Dionne, Direct visualization of hydrogen absorption dynamics in individual palladium nanoparticles, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14020

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    Thompson, H.M

    A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S.J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling ...

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Angelo, N.R

    J.E. Angelo, N.R. Moody, M.I. Baskes, Trapping of hydrogen to lattice defects in nickel, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 3 (1995) 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/3/3/001

    1995 doi

  41. [49]

    M. Ruda, D. Farkas, Embedded-atom interatomic potentials for hydrogen in metals and intermetallic alloys, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 54 (1996) 9765–9774. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.9765

    1996 doi

  42. [50]

    Daw, S.M

    M.S. Daw, S.M. Foiles, M.I. Baskes, The embedded-atom method: a review of theory and applications, Mater.Sci.Rept. 9 (1993) 251–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920- 2307(93)90001-U

    1993 doi

  43. [51]

    Evans and Brad Lee Holian, The Nose–Hoover thermostat, 4074 (2008) 4069–4074

    Denis J. Evans and Brad Lee Holian, The Nose–Hoover thermostat, 4074 (2008) 4069–4074

    2008

  44. [52]

    Janek, J

    J. Janek, J. Kolafa, Novel barostat implementation for molecular dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 160 38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0193281

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Kittel, D.F

    C. Kittel, D.F. Holcomb, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 1967. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1974177

    1967 doi

  46. [54]

    Philipsen, E

    P. Philipsen, E. Baerends, Cohesive energy of 3d transition metals: Density functional theory atomic and bulk calculations, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 54 (1996) 5326–

    1996

  47. [55]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.5326

    doi

  48. [56]

    Y. Feng, C. Wang, N. Chen, Electronic structures of nickel metal with hydrogen impurity, Sci. China, Ser. E Technol. Sci. 44 (2001) 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03014631

    2001 doi

  49. [57]

    W.S. Ko, B. Grabowski, J. Neugebauer, Development and application of a Ni-Ti interatomic potential with high predictive accuracy of the martensitic phase transition, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 92 (2015) 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.134107

    2015 doi

  50. [58]

    C.S. Yoo, H. Cynn, P. Söderlind, V. Iota, New β(fcc)-Cobalt to 210 GPa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 4132–4135. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4132

    2000 doi

  51. [59]

    Metsue, A

    A. Metsue, A. Oudriss, J. Bouhattate, X. Feaugas, Contribution of the entropy on the thermodynamic equilibrium of vacancies in nickel, J. Chem. Phys. 140 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4867543

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    Wimmer, The growing importance of computations in materials science

    E. Wimmer, The growing importance of computations in materials science. Current capabilities and perspectives, Mater. Sci. Pol. 23 (2005) 325–345

    2005

  53. [61]

    J. Ying, H. Liu, E. Greenberg, V.B. Prakapenka, V. V. Struzhkin, Synthesis of new nickel hydrides at high pressure, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.085409. 39

    2018 doi

  54. [62]

    KANAGAPRABHA, First Principles Study of Electronic Structure, Structural Properties and Superconductivity of Nickel Hydride, Walailak J

    S. KANAGAPRABHA, First Principles Study of Electronic Structure, Structural Properties and Superconductivity of Nickel Hydride, Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 9 (2012) 115–126

    2012

  55. [63]

    BIRCH, Section of Geology and Mineralogy : Elasticity and Constitution of the Earth’S Interior* , Trans

    F. BIRCH, Section of Geology and Mineralogy : Elasticity and Constitution of the Earth’S Interior* , Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 14 (1951) 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164- 0947.1951.tb01059.x

    1951 doi

  56. [64]

    M. G. Adamson, Chemical thermodynamics of uranium, J. Nucl. Mater. 200 (1993) 154–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(93)90021-p

    1993 doi

  57. [65]

    G. Wolf, B. Baranowski, Specific h e a t of n i c k e l h y d r i d e from 10 ~, 32 (1971) 1649– 1655

    1971

  58. [66]

    Kollie, Measurement of the thermal-expansion coefficient of nickel from 300 to 1000 K and determination of the power-law constants near the Curie temperature, Phys

    T.G. Kollie, Measurement of the thermal-expansion coefficient of nickel from 300 to 1000 K and determination of the power-law constants near the Curie temperature, Phys. Rev. B. 16 (1977) 4872–4881. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.16.4872

    1977 doi

  59. [67]

    Sadd, Elasticity: Theory, Applications, and Numerics, 2020

    M.H. Sadd, Elasticity: Theory, Applications, and Numerics, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03720-5

    2020 doi

  60. [68]

    M. Wen, A. Barnoush, K. Yokogawa, Calculation of all cubic single-crystal elastic constants from single atomistic simulation: Hydrogen effect and elastic constants of nickel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 1621–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2011.04.009

    2011 doi

  61. [69]

    Hachet, A

    G. Hachet, A. Metsue, A. Oudriss, X. Feaugas, Influence of hydrogen on the elastic properties of nickel single crystal: A numerical and experimental investigation, Acta Mater. 148 (2018) 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.056

    2018 doi

  62. [70]

    Sun, H.T

    X.F. Sun, H.T. Wang, E.H. Han, Effect of Cr Doping on the Surface Characteristics of Ni Metal Studied with First-Principles Calculation, Acta Metall. Sin. (English Lett. 32 (2019) 461–470. 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-018-0776-7

    2019 doi

  63. [71]

    Clark, R

    E.A. Clark, R. Yeske, H.K. Birnbaum, The effect of hydrogen on the surface energy of nickel, Metall. Trans. A. 11 (1980) 1903–1908. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655107

    1980 doi

  64. [72]

    G. Li, H. Kobayashi, S. Dekura, R. Ikeda, Y. Kubota, K. Kato, M. Takata, T. Yamamoto, S. Matsumura, H. Kitagawa, Shape-dependent hydrogen-storage properties in Pd nanocrystals: Which does hydrogen prefer, octahedron (111) or cube (100)?, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 10222–1022...

    2014 doi

  65. [73]

    Andersson, J

    C. Andersson, J. Zimmerman, J. Fritzsche, E. Rabkin, C. Langhammer, Hydride formation pressures and kinetics in individual Pd nanoparticles with systematically varied levels of plastic deformation, Nat. Commun. . 16 (2025) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025- 64311-3

    2025 doi

  66. [74]

    Jia, W.Z

    Y.J. Jia, W.Z. Han, Mechanisms of Hydride Nucleation, Growth, Reorientation, and Embrittlement in Zirconium: A Review, Materials (Basel). 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062419

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.